AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-10100
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-10100
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G on one side and the Intel Core i3-10100 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Intel Core i3-10100 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Zen | Comet Lake | ||||||
Core name | Raven Ridge | Comet Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Ryzen 3 2000 | Core i3-10000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | YD2200C5M4MFB, YD2200C5FBBOX |
BX8070110100, BXC8070110100, CM8070104291317, QTP6, SRh4N |
||||||
Release date | Q1 2018 | Q2 2020 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm+++ | ||||||
Transistors | 4. 950.000.000 | — | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,5 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,7 GHz | 4,3 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 4 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | ||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Raven) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Comet Lake) | ||||||
GPU cores | 8 | — | ||||||
GPU execution units | — | 24 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 512 | 192 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 1. 126 GFLOPS | 460,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | LGA1200 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
Crypto engine | Advanced Encryption Standard instructions | — | ||||||
Security | Enhanced Virus Protection, Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, Secure Mode Execution Protection |
— | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 419 | 468 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 1. 694 | 2.449 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 140 | 184 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 585 | 905 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 335 | 440 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.402 | 2.181 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 953 | 1.114 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.637 | 5.269 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.047 | 2.638 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 6. 766 | 8.934 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.922 | 5.101 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
10.594 | 16.447 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
835 | 1.105 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
2.855 | 4.164 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
174,4 GFLOPS | 342,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
163 pts / W | 253 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-10100 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i3-10100 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
468 2.449 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
419 1.694 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
184 905 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
140 585 |
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 55%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
440 2.181 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
335 1.402 |
In single core, the difference is 31%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 56%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
1.114 5.269 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
953 3.637 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
2.638 8.934 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
2.047 6. 766 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
5.101 16.447 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
3.922 10.594 |
In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 55%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
4.771 14.186 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
4.151 9.301 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 53%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
5.428 18.097 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
4.211 12.142 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 49%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
1.105 4.164 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
835 2.855 |
In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 46%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
1.171 4.181 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
1.051 3.584 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.
On macOS:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100 |
1.050 4.207 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
909 3.190 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Intel equivalentIntel Core i3-10100 AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GEAMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Intel Core i3-10100FIntel Core i3-10100TIntel Core i3-10100YIntel Core i3-10105Intel Core i3-10105FIntel Core i3-10105T
Ryzen 3 2200G vs Core i3-10100F
Availability
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics — YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy on Amazon
$174. 99
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100F outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100F
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$174.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics — YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for $174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Core i3-10100F
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Core i3-10100F
227
FPS
251
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
915
FPS
1006
FPS
League of Legends
396
FPS
438
FPS
VALORANT
1225
FPS
1343
FPS
Minecraft
245
FPS
271
FPS
Fortnite
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
835
76%
Multi-Core
2708
67%
Core i3-10100F
Single-Core
1093
100%
Multi-Core
4054
100%
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
vs |
Intel Core i3-10100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Not Available |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Not Available |
Desktop |
Segment | |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads |
8 |
3. 5 GHz | Base Clock Speed |
3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | Not Available |
35.0x | Multiplier | Not Available |
Radeon Vega 8 |
Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes |
Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen 3 2200G or Core i3-10100F
Microsoft Flight Simulator, 1080p, High
SkyTech Chronos Mini Gaming Computer PC
28
FPS
$
30
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
4 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$839.99
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
SkyTech Blaze 3. 0 Gaming Computer PC
28
FPS
$
26.79
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$749.99
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze II Gaming PC
28
FPS
$
28.83
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$807.29
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Skytech Legacy Mini Gaming PC
28
FPS
$
28.93
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$809. 99
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC
39
FPS
$
21.27
/FPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Core i3-10100F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$829.49
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Ryzen 3 2200G
$174.99
Ryzen 7 5700G
$178.61
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 5700G
$178.61
Ryzen 3 2200G
$174.99
Ryzen 5 5600
$154.99
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Ryzen 5 5600
$154.99
Ryzen 3 2200G
$174.99
Ryzen 7 5700X
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 3 2200G
$174.