Core i5-4590 vs Core i5-2400
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4590 is 1208 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-2400 — 421 vs 386 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 — 84 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-4590 — $50.1 vs $143.76
- Up to 62% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4590 — $0.13 vs $0.34 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
421
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0. 34/FPS
-62%
Price, $
$143.76
34%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-4590 BX80646I54590 Processor (6M Cache, 3.3 GHz)
Buy for $143.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
386
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50.1
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400 3.10 GHz Quad-Core Processor
Buy for $50.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
229
FPS
211
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
1238
FPS
1147
FPS
Minecraft
925
FPS
855
FPS
League of Legends
401
FPS
369
FPS
VALORANT
248
FPS
227
FPS
Apex Legends
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
867
100%
Multi-Core
2796
100%
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
654
67%
Multi-Core
2103
67%
|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
vs |
Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
|
May 1st, 2014 |
Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
|
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
|
84 W |
TDP | 95 W |
|
22 nm |
Process Size | 32 nm |
|
33.0x |
Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
3 GHzIntel Core i5-4590 vs Intel Core i5-2400 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-4590 vs Intel Core i5-2400
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-4590 on one side and the Intel Core i5-2400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz.
The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-2400 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Haswell | Sandy Bridge | ||||||
| Core name | Haswell-DT | Sandy Bridge | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-4000 | Core i5-2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80646I54590, |
BX80623I52400, |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2014 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 |
1.160.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,3 GHz | 3,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 6 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3-1333/1600, |
DDR3 1066/1333 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 25,6 GB/s | 21 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 84 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 20 | 6 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 160 | 48 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 352 GFLOPS | 110,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1155 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 72. 7°C |
72.6°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 347 | 308 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.403 | 1.212 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 146 | 119 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 502 | 421 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 802 | 620 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.133 | 2.351 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.079 | 1.567 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 5. 308 |
3.811 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.154 | 3.247 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
11.418 | 9.282 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
202 GFLOPS | 139,74 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
136 pts / W | 98 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-4590 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Core i5-4590 is lower. The Intel Core i5-4590 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
347 1.  403 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
308 1.212 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
146 502 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
119 421 |
In single core, the difference is 23%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
802 3.133 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
620 2.351 |
In single core, the difference is 29%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
2.079 5.308 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
1.567 3.  811 |
In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.154 11.418 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.247 9.282 |
In single core, the difference is 28%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.412 11.077 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
3.425 9.109 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 22%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
3.817 11.082 |
| Intel Core i5-2400 |
2.961 8.591 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 29%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
4. 
|