Intel Core i5-4460 vs i5-9400F
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i5-4460 vs i5-9400F
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80684I59400F
BX80646I54460
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 534,858 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
286,515 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 70% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 70%
Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 130th / 1368
Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier |
Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier |
Workstation 70% Battle cruiser |
248,343 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Base clock 3. 2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 54%
Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 394th / 1368
Gaming 69% Battle cruiser |
Desktop 73% Battleship |
Workstation 51% Yacht |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
85.6 % | Faster effective speed. +25% |
68.6 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
88.1 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +6% |
83. 1 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
118 Pts | Much faster single-core speed. +35% |
87.7 Pts | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
234 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +35% |
173 Pts | |||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
456 Pts | Much faster quad-core speed. +46% |
313 Pts | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
607 Pts | Hugely faster octa-core speed. +90% |
320 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
94. 7 Pts | +2% | 92.6 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
125 Pts | Faster OC single-core speed. +29% |
96.6 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
248 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +31% |
190 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
490 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed. +35% |
363 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
702 Pts | Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +93% |
363 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 56,204,880 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
1.25 % | Hugely higher market share. +155% |
0.49 % | |||
Value Value For Money |
111 % | Much better value. +46% |
75.8 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
86 % | Much more popular. +48% |
58 % | |||
Price Price (score) |
$109 | Much cheaper. +44% |
$194 |
Age Newest |
44 Months | Much more recent. +56% |
101 Months | |||
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
65 Watts | More energy efficient. +23% |
84 Watts | |||
Cores CPU Processing Cores |
6 cores | Much higher core count. +50% |
4 cores | |||
Threads CPU Processing Threads |
6 threads | Much higher thread count. +50% |
4 threads | |||
Lithography Manufacturing process |
14 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +36% |
22 nm | |||
Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
2.9 GHz | 3. 2 GHz | Faster base frequency. +10% |
|||
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
4.1 GHz | Faster turbo frequency. +21% |
3.4 GHz | |||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
711 Pts | Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +96% |
363 Pts | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
627 Pts | Hugely faster 64-core speed. +95% |
322 Pts |
Series CPU Architecture |
Coffee Lake | Haswell | ||||
Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1150 | ||||
Graphics Integrated Graphics |
None | HD 4600 | ||||
Launch Date Launch Date |
Q1’19 | Q2’14 | ||||
Cache Cache |
9 MB SmartCache | 6 MB SmartCache | ||||
Instruction Set Extensions Instruction Set Extensions |
Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | ||||
Lithography Lithography |
14 nm | 22 nm | ||||
Max Turbo Frequency Max Turbo Frequency |
4.10 GHz | 3.4 GHz | ||||
Bus Speed Bus Speed |
8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI2 | ||||
Thermal Solution Specification Thermal Solution Specification |
PCG 2015C (65W) | PCG 2013D | ||||
Max Memory Size Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) |
128 GB | 32 GB | ||||
Memory Types Memory Types |
DDR4-2666 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1. 5V | ||||
Memory Bandwidth Max Memory Bandwidth |
41.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | ||||
PCI Express Revision PCI Express Revision |
3.0 | Up to 3.0 | ||||
More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
Intel’s Core i5-9400F is a hex-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 2. 9 / 4.1 GHz, 9 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler but it does not have integrated graphics like the “non-F” variants. Although the 9400F is compatible with the enthusiast grade Z390 chipset it is normally paired with a better value for money B360 motherboard. At its launch the i5-9400F retailed for $180 but prices have dropped to the point ($135) that it now represents an excellent value proposition to gamers. Comparing the i5-9400F to the Ryzen 3600 shows that the 3600 is 8% better for quad-core processing but it costs 40% ($50) more than the 9400F. Ordinarily higher quad-core performance would result in better gaming but the Ryzen 3000 memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. Gamers can invest the $50 savings in a better GPU, for example by upgrading from a 2060S to a 2070S. Since the GPU makes the most difference to gaming, the end result is a system which offers far superior real world gaming performance for similar money. For those gamers who demand the best of the best, it is necessary to jump to one of the higher frequency SKUs such as the 9600K but for everyone else the i5-9400F offers unparalleled value. [Aug ’19 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
The Intel Core i5-4460 is a slightly upgraded version of Intel’s 2013 Haswell i5-4440. Comparing the i5-4460 and i5-4440 shows that the only change is an increase in both base and turbo frequencies from 3.4 to 3.5 GHz. In terms of effective speed the 4460 is exactly on a par with the average of the top ten user rated CPUs, not a bad result for an i5. Thanks to its four cores the 4460 is can easily deal with the vast majority of desktop computing (email, web browsing, word processing etc.). In fact this model is probably overpowered for the majority of users. Most users wont require the multi-core capabilities that the 4460 offers and will do better to choose a lower powered and cheaper CPU. [Jun ’14 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- Asus PRIME h410M-K R2. 0 (1,587)
- Gigabyte B365M DS3H (1,252)
- MSI h410M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (1,230)
- MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (1,191)
- Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (1,030)
- Acer Nitro N50-600 (913)
- Asus PRIME h410M-R R2.0 (848)
- Dell Inspiron 3847 (693)
- Asus H81M-K (617)
- MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) (483)
- Asus B85M-G (474)
- Asus H81M-PLUS (323)
- Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H (259)
- Asus H81M-C (248)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
i5-4460 vs i5-9400F — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3. 20GHz
Just Cause 4
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz
i5-4460
i5-9400F
Multi-Thread Performance
6707 Pts
12212 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1944 Pts
2387 Pts
Just Cause 4
i5-4460 vs i5-9400F in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i5-4460
i5-9400F
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
49.8 FPS |
1080p |
65.3 FPS |
1440p |
36.8 FPS |
1440p |
48.3 FPS |
2160p |
19.2 FPS |
2160p |
25.1 FPS |
w1440p |
30.0 FPS |
w1440p |
39. 3 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
87.1 FPS |
1080p |
109.8 FPS |
1440p |
67.2 FPS |
1440p |
84.9 FPS |
2160p |
38.2 FPS |
2160p |
48.2 FPS |
w1440p |
56.3 FPS |
w1440p |
71.1 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
124.5 FPS |
1080p |
154.4 FPS |
1440p |
97.6 FPS |
1440p |
121.5 FPS |
2160p |
57.1 FPS |
2160p |
71.3 FPS |
w1440p |
82. |