I5 4460 i5 9400f: Intel Core i5-4460 vs i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-4460 vs i5-9400F

UserBenchmark: Intel Core i5-4460 vs i5-9400F

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

BX80684I59400F

BX80646I54460

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 534,858 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

286,515 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 70% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)

Poor: 70%

Great: 92%

SPEED RANK: 130th / 1368

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 70%

Battle cruiser

248,343 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 77% Base clock 3. 2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 54%

Great: 77%

SPEED RANK: 394th / 1368

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

Effective Speed

Effective CPU Speed
85.6 % Faster effective speed.
+25%
68.6 %
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency
88.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
83. 1 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Speed
118 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+35%
87.7 Pts
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Speed
234 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+35%
173 Pts
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Speed
456 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+46%
313 Pts
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Speed
607 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+90%
320 Pts
Memory

OC Memory Latency
94. 7 Pts +2% 92.6 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Speed
125 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29%
96.6 Pts
2-Core

OC Dual Core Speed
248 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+31%
190 Pts
4-Core

OC Quad Core Speed
490 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+35%
363 Pts
8-Core

OC Octa Core Speed
702 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+93%
363 Pts

Market Share

Based on 56,204,880 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.25 % Hugely higher market share.
+155%
0.49 %
Value

Value For Money
111 % Much better value.
+46%
75.8 %
User Rating

UBM User Rating
86 % Much more popular.
+48%
58 %
Price

Price (score)
$109 Much cheaper.
+44%
$194
Age

Newest
44 Months Much more recent.
+56%
101 Months
TDP

Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts More energy efficient.
+23%
84 Watts
Cores

CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
4 cores
Threads

CPU Processing Threads
6 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
4 threads
Lithography

Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+36%
22 nm
Base Clock

Base Clock Speed
2.9 GHz 3. 2 GHz Faster base frequency.
+10%
Turbo Clock

Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+21%
3.4 GHz
64-Core

OC Multi Core Speed
711 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+96%
363 Pts
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Speed
627 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+95%
322 Pts
Series

CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Haswell
Socket

Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 FCLGA1150
Graphics

Integrated Graphics
None HD 4600
Launch Date

Launch Date
Q1’19 Q2’14
Cache

Cache
9 MB SmartCache 6 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions

Instruction Set Extensions
Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0
Lithography

Lithography
14 nm 22 nm
Max Turbo Frequency

Max Turbo Frequency
4.10 GHz 3.4 GHz
Bus Speed

Bus Speed
8 GT/s DMI3 5 GT/s DMI2
Thermal Solution Specification

Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2015C (65W) PCG 2013D
Max Memory Size

Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
128 GB 32 GB
Memory Types

Memory Types
DDR4-2666 DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1. 5V
Memory Bandwidth

Max Memory Bandwidth
41.6 GB/s 25.6 GB/s
PCI Express Revision

PCI Express Revision
3.0 Up to 3.0
More specs » More specs »

ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s Core i5-9400F is a hex-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 2. 9 / 4.1 GHz, 9 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler but it does not have integrated graphics like the “non-F” variants. Although the 9400F is compatible with the enthusiast grade Z390 chipset it is normally paired with a better value for money B360 motherboard. At its launch the i5-9400F retailed for $180 but prices have dropped to the point ($135) that it now represents an excellent value proposition to gamers. Comparing the i5-9400F to the Ryzen 3600 shows that the 3600 is 8% better for quad-core processing but it costs 40% ($50) more than the 9400F. Ordinarily higher quad-core performance would result in better gaming but the Ryzen 3000 memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. Gamers can invest the $50 savings in a better GPU, for example by upgrading from a 2060S to a 2070S. Since the GPU makes the most difference to gaming, the end result is a system which offers far superior real world gaming performance for similar money. For those gamers who demand the best of the best, it is necessary to jump to one of the higher frequency SKUs such as the 9600K but for everyone else the i5-9400F offers unparalleled value. [Aug ’19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i5-4460 is a slightly upgraded version of Intel’s 2013 Haswell i5-4440. Comparing the i5-4460 and i5-4440 shows that the only change is an increase in both base and turbo frequencies from 3.4 to 3.5 GHz. In terms of effective speed the 4460 is exactly on a par with the average of the top ten user rated CPUs, not a bad result for an i5. Thanks to its four cores the 4460 is can easily deal with the vast majority of desktop computing (email, web browsing, word processing etc.). In fact this model is probably overpowered for the majority of users. Most users wont require the multi-core capabilities that the 4460 offers and will do better to choose a lower powered and cheaper CPU. [Jun ’14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

  • Asus PRIME h410M-K R2. 0 (1,587)
  • Gigabyte B365M DS3H (1,252)
  • MSI h410M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (1,230)
  • MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (1,191)
  • Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (1,030)
  • Acer Nitro N50-600 (913)
  • Asus PRIME h410M-R R2.0 (848)
  • Dell Inspiron 3847 (693)
  • Asus H81M-K (617)
  • MSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817) (483)
  • Asus B85M-G (474)
  • Asus H81M-PLUS (323)
  • Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H (259)
  • Asus H81M-C (248)

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12600K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400F

  •   

    Intel Core i5-13600K

  •   

    Intel Core i7-12700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400

  •   

    Intel Core i9-13900K

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100F

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100

  •   

    Intel Core i7-11700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-11400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

i5-4460 vs i5-9400F — Just Cause 4 with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3. 20GHz

Just Cause 4

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz


i5-4460
i5-9400F

Multi-Thread Performance

6707 Pts

12212 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1944 Pts

2387 Pts

Just Cause 4

i5-4460 vs i5-9400F in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-4460
i5-9400F


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

49.8 FPS

1080p

65.3 FPS

1440p

36.8 FPS

1440p

48.3 FPS

2160p

19.2 FPS

2160p

25.1 FPS

w1440p

30.0 FPS

w1440p

39. 3 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

87.1 FPS

1080p

109.8 FPS

1440p

67.2 FPS

1440p

84.9 FPS

2160p

38.2 FPS

2160p

48.2 FPS

w1440p

56.3 FPS

w1440p

71.1 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

124.5 FPS

1080p

154.4 FPS

1440p

97.6 FPS

1440p

121.5 FPS

2160p

57.1 FPS

2160p

71.3 FPS

w1440p

82.

2024 © All rights reserved