Intel Core i5-4460 vs Pentium G3220
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i5-4460 vs Pentium G3220
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80646G3220
BX80646I54460
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 267,307 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
18,964 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 36% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 36%
Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 740th / 1368
|
Gaming 51% Yacht |
Desktop 61% Destroyer |
Workstation 35% Jet ski |
248,343 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 77% Base clock 3. 2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 54%
Great: 77%
SPEED RANK: 394th / 1368
|
Gaming 69% Battle cruiser |
Desktop 73% Battleship |
Workstation 51% Yacht |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
51 % | 68.6 % | Much faster effective speed. +35% |
| Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
76.5 Pts | 83.1 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +9% |
|||
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
77.3 Pts | 87.7 Pts | Faster single-core speed. +13% |
|||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
146 Pts | 173 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. +18% |
|||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
150 Pts | 313 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +109% |
|||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
152 Pts | 320 Pts | Hugely faster octa-core speed. +111% |
| Memory OC Memory Latency |
90. 9 Pts |
92.6 Pts | +2% | |||
| 1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
85.5 Pts | 96.6 Pts | Faster OC single-core speed. +13% |
|||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
170 Pts | 190 Pts | Faster OC dual-core speed. +12% |
|||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
170 Pts | 363 Pts | Hugely faster OC quad-core speed. +114% |
|||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
170 Pts | 363 Pts | Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +114% |
Market Share
Based on 56,312,121 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.05 % | 0.56 % | Insanely higher market share. +1,020% |
|||
| Value Value For Money |
90.2 % | Better value. +19% |
75.8 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
54 % | 58 % | Slightly more popular. +7% |
|||
| Price Price (score) |
$35 | Hugely cheaper. +82% |
$194 |
| Age Newest |
110 Months | 102 Months | Slightly more recent. +7% |
|||
| TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
53 Watts | Much more energy efficient. +37% |
84 Watts | |||
| Cores CPU Processing Cores |
2 cores | 4 cores | Hugely higher core count. +100% |
|||
| Threads CPU Processing Threads |
2 threads | 4 threads | Hugely higher thread count. +100% |
|||
| Lithography Manufacturing process |
22 nm | 22 nm | ||||
| Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3 GHz | 3.2 GHz | Slightly faster base frequency. +7% |
|||
| Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
3 GHz | 3.4 GHz | Faster turbo frequency. +13% |
|||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
169 Pts | 363 Pts | Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +115% |
|||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
152 Pts | 322 Pts | Hugely faster 64-core speed. +112% |
| Series CPU Architecture |
Haswell | Haswell | ||||
| Socket Motherboard Socket |
FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 | ||||
| Graphics Integrated Graphics |
HD | HD 4600 | ||||
| Launch Date Launch Date |
Q3’13 | Q2’14 | ||||
| Cache Cache |
3 MB SmartCache | 6 MB SmartCache | ||||
| Instruction Set Extensions Instruction Set Extensions |
SSE4. 1/4.2 |
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | ||||
| Recommended Price Recommended Customer Price |
$54.00 — $64.00 | $182.00 — $187.00 | ||||
| Thermal Solution Specification Thermal Solution Specification |
PCG 2013C | PCG 2013D | ||||
| Memory Types Memory Types |
DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | ||||
| Memory Bandwidth Max Memory Bandwidth |
21.3 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | ||||
| ECC Memory Supported ECC Memory Supported ‡ |
Yes | No | ||||
| Processor Graphics Processor Graphics ‡ |
Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | ||||
| Graphics Output Graphics Output |
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA | eDP/DP/HDMI/VGA | ||||
| Clear Video HD Tech Intel® Clear Video HD Technology |
No | Yes | ||||
| Graphics Video Max Memory Graphics Video Max Memory |
1. 7 GB |
2 GB | ||||
| Turbo Boost Tech Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡ |
No | 2.0 | ||||
| Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡ |
No | Yes | ||||
| AES New Instructions Intel® AES New Instructions |
No | Yes | ||||
| More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Intel Core i5-4460 vs Intel Pentium G3220
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-4460 and Intel Pentium G3220 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i5-4460
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Pentium G3220
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4460
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 3.
40 GHz vs 3 GHz - Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 72.72°C vs 72°C
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1902 vs 1700
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 4847 vs 1875
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 795 vs 623
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2529 vs 1136
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.471 vs 1.203
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 72.642 vs 33.68
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.404 vs 0.191
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.
0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1128 vs 658 - Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2353 vs 1371
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3312 vs 2524
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1128 vs 658
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2353 vs 1371
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3312 vs 2524
| Launch date | 1 June 2014 vs September 2013 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.40 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 72. 72°C vs 72°C |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB vs 3072 KB (shared) |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1902 vs 1700 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4847 vs 1875 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 795 vs 623 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2529 vs 1136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3. 471 vs 1.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.642 vs 33.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 vs 0.191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 vs 658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2353 vs 1371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3312 vs 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 vs 658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2353 vs 1371 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
3312 vs 2524 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G3220
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 84 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4460
CPU 2: Intel Pentium G3220
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4460 | Intel Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1902 | 1700 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4847 | 1875 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 795 | 623 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2529 | 1136 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2664 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
3.471 | 1.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.642 | 33.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 | 0.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.943 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.623 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | 658 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2353 | 1371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3312 | 2524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | 658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2353 | 1371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3312 | 2524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-4460 | Intel Pentium G3220 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Haswell |
| Launch date | 1 June 2014 | September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $182 | $71 |
| Place in performance rating | 1304 | 1659 |
| Price now | $184. 79 |
$119.95 |
| Processor Number | i5-4460 | G3220 |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.69 | 7.69 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 20 GHz |
3.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Die size | 177 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72. 72°C |
72°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.40 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1400 Million | 1400 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s |
21.3 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Device ID | 0x412 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1. 10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | 1.7 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics |
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| DVI | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | [email protected] |
| Max resolution over VGA | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.1/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 53 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013D | PCG 2013C |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.
|