Intel Core i5-4590 vs Intel Core i5-6500
Summary
-
Intel Core i5-4590
100%
-
Intel Core i5-6500
104%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-4590
100%
-
Intel Core i5-6500
105%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i5-4590
100%
-
Intel Core i5-6500
103%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-4590 |
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the Intel Core i5-6500. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-6500 |
5% higher single threaded performance. |
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 | ||||
AVX | ||||
AVX2 | ||||
EIST | ||||
Intel 64 | ||||
XD bit | ||||
VT-x | ||||
VT-d | ||||
AES-NI | ||||
TSX | ||||
TXT | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
FMA3 | ||||
F16C | ||||
BMI1 | ||||
BMI2 | ||||
vPro | ||||
Boost 2.0 |
Architecture
Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | Intel_Haswell | vs | Intel_Skylake | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR4 | |
Codename | Haswell | vs | Skylake | |
Release Date | May 2014 | vs | Jul 2015 |
Cores
Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 4 | vs | 4 | |
Threads | 4 | vs | 4 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | vs | No |
Cache
Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | vs | 6144 KB (shared) |
Physical
Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | vs | Intel Socket 1151 | |
Max Case Temp | 72°C | vs | 72°C | |
Package | FC-LGA12C | vs | FC-LGA12C | |
Die Size | 177mm² | vs | 177mm² | |
Process | 22 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3200 MHz | vs | 3200 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 3600 MHz | vs | 3600 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown | |
TDP | 84 W | vs | 65 W |
-
Intel Core i5-4590
4032 points
-
Intel Core i5-6500
4140 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
14336 points
-
Intel Core i5-6500
14720 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
10153
-
Intel Core i5-6500
10602
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
3464
-
Intel Core i5-6500
3693
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
11041
-
Intel Core i5-6500
11265
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
3219
-
Intel Core i5-6500
3438
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
5479
-
Intel Core i5-6500
5746
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
18998
-
Intel Core i5-6500
19577
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
1. 63
-
Intel Core i5-6500
1.74
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
5.92
-
Intel Core i5-6500
6.35
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
146
-
Intel Core i5-6500
151
points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i5-4590
530
-
Intel Core i5-6500
541.5
points — higher is better
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.20GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz
i5-6500
i5-4590
Multi-Thread Performance
7238 Pts
7296 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1946 Pts
2113 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i5-6500
i5-4590
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
85. 3 FPS |
1080p |
88.8 FPS |
1440p |
61.4 FPS |
1440p |
64.0 FPS |
2160p |
36.7 FPS |
2160p |
38.2 FPS |
w1440p |
52.5 FPS |
w1440p |
54.7 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
137.8 FPS |
1080p |
142.6 FPS |
1440p |
104.2 FPS |
1440p |
108.0 FPS |
2160p |
67.0 FPS |
2160p |
69.4 FPS |
w1440p |
91.2 FPS |
w1440p |
94.4 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
190. 3 FPS |
1080p |
196.3 FPS |
1440p |
147.1 FPS |
1440p |
152.0 FPS |
2160p |
97.3 FPS |
2160p |
100.6 FPS |
w1440p |
129.9 FPS |
w1440p |
134.2 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
295.3 FPS |
1080p |
303.8 FPS |
1440p |
232.7 FPS |
1440p |
239.9 FPS |
2160p |
158.0 FPS |
2160p |
162.9 FPS |
w1440p |
207.2 FPS |
w1440p |
213.7 FPS |
i5-6500
i5-4590
Compare i5-6500 vs i5-4590 specifications
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 Architecture
i5-6500 | i5-4590 |
---|
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 Cache
i5-6500 | i5-4590 |
---|
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 Cores
i5-6500 | i5-4590 |
---|
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 Features
i5-6500 | i5-4590 |
---|
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 Performance
i5-6500 | i5-4590 |
---|
i5-6500 vs i5-4590 Physical
i5-6500 | i5-4590 |
---|
Share Your Comments 94
Compare i5-6500 vs i5-4590 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i5-4590 vs Intel Core i5-6500T
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-4590 vs Intel Core i5-6500T
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-4590 on one side and the Intel Core i5-6500T on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the mini desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500T | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Mini desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Haswell | Skylake | ||||||
Core name | Haswell-DT | Skylake-S | ||||||
Family | Core i5-4000 | Core i5-6000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80646I54590, BXC80646I54590, CM8064601560615, QF4H, SR1QJ |
BXC80662I56500T, CM8066201920600, QJEJ, SR2BZ, SR2L8 |
||||||
Release date | Q2 2014 | Q3 2015 | ||||||
Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 | — | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,3 GHz | 2,5 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,1 GHz | ||||||
Bus speed | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
Cache memory | 6 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 25,6 GB/s | 34,1 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 84 W | 35 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | ||||||
GPU execution units | 20 | 24 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 160 | 192 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 352 GFLOPS | 403,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 72. 7°C | 66°C | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 347 | 305 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 1.403 | 1.204 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 146 | 128 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 502 | 433 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 802 | 810 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.133 | 2.828 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.079 | 1.869 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 5. 308 | 4.934 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.154 | 3.574 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
11.418 | 9.870 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
202 GFLOPS | 221,7 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
136 pts / W | 282 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-4590 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-6500T is less. The Intel Core i5-6500T was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
347 1. 403 |
Intel Core i5-6500T |
305 1.204 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 17%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
146 502 |
Intel Core i5-6500T |
128 433 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
802 3.133 |
Intel Core i5-6500T |
810 2.828 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 11%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
2.079 5.308 |
Intel Core i5-6500T |
1.869 4. 934 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.154 11.418 |
Intel Core i5-6500T |
3.574 9.870 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.412 11.077 |
Intel Core i5-6500T |
3.949 10.885 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-6500T |
4.053 11.108 |
Intel Core i5-4590 |
3.817 11.082 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.156 12.083 |
Intel Core i5-6500T |
3.880 10.791 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-4590 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-6500T AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i5-4590SIntel Core i5-4590T
Intel Core i5-6500
CPU — Prozessor Vergleich und Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500 | Intel Core i5-4590 | |
3.20 GHz | Taktfrequenz | 3.30 GHz |
3.60 GHz | Turbo (1 Kern) | 3.70 GHz |
3.40 GHz | Turbo (alle Kerne) | 3.50 GHz |
4 | Kerne | 4 |
Nein | Hyperthreading | Nein |
Nein | Übertaktbar ? | Nein |
6 MB | Cache | 6 MB |
Intel HD Graphics 530 | Grafik | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
0. 35 GHz | Grafiktakt | 0.35 GHz |
1.15 GHz | Grafiktakt (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
9 | Generation | 7.5 |
12.0 | DirectX Version | 11.1 |
3 | Max. Bildschirme | 3 |
24 | Einheiten | 20 |
De- / Enkodieren | Codec h364 | Dekodieren |
De- / Enkodieren | Codec JPEG | Dekodieren |
De- / Enkodieren | Codec h365 8bit | Nein |
Nein | Codec h365 10bit | Nein |
De- / Enkodieren | Codec VP8 | Nein |
Dekodieren | Codec VP9 | Nein |
Dekodieren | Codec VC-1 | Dekodieren |
De- / Enkodieren | Codec AVC | De- / Enkodieren |
DDR4-2133 | Arbeitsspeicher | DDR3-1600 |
2 | Speicherkanäle | 2 |
Nein | ECC | Nein |
3. 0 | PCIe Version | 3.0 |
16 | PCIe Leitungen | 16 |
Skylake | Architektur | Haswell Refresh |
14nm | Fertigung | 22nm |
LGA 1151 | Sockel | LGA 1150 |
65W | TDP | 84W |
Ja | AES-NI | Ja |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualisierung | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q3/2015 | Erscheinungsdatum | Q3/2014 |
ca. 250 Euro | Preis | ca. 175 Euro |
|
|
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU)
Beim iGPU-Test wird die Prozessoreigene Grafikeinheit benutzt um per OpenGL Berechnungen durchzuführen.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Passmark CPU Mark
Beim PassMark CPU Mark werden unter anderem Primzahlberechnungen durchgeführt um die Leistung des Prozessors zu bestimmen. Es werden alle CPU-Kerne sowie Hyperthreading benutzt.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
4x 3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
4x 3.3 GHz (3.7 GHz)
Die häufigsten Vergleiche mit diesen Prozessoren
Zurück zum CPU-Vergleich
Hinweis: Wir übernehmen keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit der hier angezeigten Informationen.
Intel Core i5-4590T vs. Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i5-4590T
The Intel Core i5-4590T operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.00 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2014
Intel Core i5-4590
The Intel Core i5-4590 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 84 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1150 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2014
Intel Core i5-4590T
Intel Core i5-4590
Compare Detail
2.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
4 | Cores | 4 |
3.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
2.50 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.50 GHz |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
11.1 | DirectX Version | 11. 1 |
3 | Max. displays | 3 |
DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
6.00 MB | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
LGA 1150 | Socket | LGA 1150 |
35 W | TDP | 84 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q2/2014 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Intel Core i5-4590T | Intel Core i5-4590 | |
35 W | Max TDP | 84 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Core i5-4570 vs Intel Core i5-6500: What is the difference?
39points
Intel Core i5-4570
49points
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i5-6500
Why is Intel Core i5-4570 better than Intel Core i5-6500?
- 128KB bigger L1 cache?
256KBvs128KB - 0. 05MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.25MB/corevs0.2MB/core - 6.12% higher PassMark result (single)?
2063vs1944 - 100MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1150MHzvs1050MHz - 5 higher clock multiplier?
32vs27
Why is Intel Core i5-6500 better than Intel Core i5-4570?
- 533MHz higher ram speed?
2133MHzvs1600MHz - 8nm smaller semiconductor size?
14nmvs22nm - 19W lower TDP?
65Wvs84W - 8.5GB/s more memory bandwidth?
34.1GB/svs25.6GB/s - 0.9 newer version of DirectX?
12vs11.1 - 32GB larger maximum memory amount?
64GBvs32GB - 0.4 newer version of OpenGL?
4.4vs4 - Uses multithreading?
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i5-6500T
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Celeron N3060
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
Intel Core i3-7100
Intel Core i5-4570
vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i5-6500
vs
AMD Pro A8-8600B
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
1. CPU speed
4 x 3.2GHz
4 x 3.2GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.6GHz
3.6GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i5-6500
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5. L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1600MHz
2133MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
25.6GB/s
34.1GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i5-6500
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i5-6500
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i5-6500
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i5-6500
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i5-6500
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-4570
✔Intel Core i5-6500
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-4570
✖Intel Core i5-6500
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-4570)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-6500)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5-4590 or Intel Core i5-6500
- main page
- >
- Processors
- >
- Comparison
- >
- Intel Core i5-4590 VS Intel Core I5-6500
- Core i5-4590s
Compare
Family
- Core i5-6400
Compare - Core i5-6600k
Compare - Core i5-6600
Compare
Game speed
Core i5-4590
63. 4 (+2.7%)
Core i5-6500
61.7
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i5-4590
65.4 (+2.6%)
Core i5-6500
63.7
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i5-4590
35.3 (+2%)
Core i5-6500
34.6
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Core i5-4590 61.1 (+2%) Core i5-6500 59.9 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Core i5-4590 34.2 (+3.2%) Core i5-6500 33.1 |
Extreme |
Core i5-4590 6. 7 (+3%) Core i5-6500 6.5 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i5-4590
811
Intel Core i5-6500
923 (+12.1%)
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-4590
3167 (+2. 2 %)
Intel Core i5-6500
3097
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i5-4590
319
Intel Core i5-6500
354 (+9.9%)
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-4590
1227
Intel Core i5-6500
1299 (+5.5%)
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core I5-4590
144
Intel Core I5-65-6500
Intel Core I5-6500
Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE ANTIL
Blender 2.81 bmw27
Intel Core i5-4590
677.5 (+5.2%)
Intel Core i5-6500
642.1
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Core i5-4590
3412
Intel Core i5-6500
3827 (+10.8%)
Geekbench 3 Multi Core
Intel Core i5-4590
10726
Intel Core i5-6500
11448 (+6.3%)
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i5-4590
1.62
Intel Core i5-6500
1.83 (+11.5%)
Cinebench R11.
5
Intel Core i5-4590
5.72
Intel Core i5-6500
6.16 (+7.1%)
Cine , OpenGL
Intel Core i5-4590
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
GPU base clockFrequency of 2D and idle operation. | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | 1150MHz | 1050MHz |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | No data | No data |
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 | 3 |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 32 GB | 64 GB |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Memory Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | 2 |
RAM bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | No data | 3 |
PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i5-4590
- On average, gaming performance is 2% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 2%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 0%.
- Price lower by $190
- Base clock higher by 0.1 GHz.
How are they similar
- The number of physical cores is the same.
- The number of threads is equal.
Core i5-6500 vs. Core i5-4590
Core i5-6500 vs. Core i5-4590 — Th200
Contents
- Introduction
- Features
- Tests
- Key differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Processor
Processor
Introduction
We compared two processors: Intel Core i5-6500 vs. Intel Core i5-4590. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.
Intel Core i5-6500 is a Core i5 (Skylake) generation desktop processor released on Jul 2nd, 2015. It has 4 cores and 4 threads. Operates at a frequency of 3200 MHz and consumes up to 65 watts.
ECC memory
No
no
PCI-Express
Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU ONLY)
GEN 3
Instructions
AES-NI, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, BOST 2.0 CLMUL, EIST, F16C, FMA3, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT-d, VT-x, XD bit, vPro
AES-NI, AVX, AVX2 , CLMUL, EIST, FMA3, Intel 64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.2, SSSE3, TSX, TXT, VT-d, VT-x, XD bit
Benchmarks
3DMark Physics
3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.
Intel Core i5-6500
+10%
Intel Core i5-4590
Blender bmw27
Blender is the most popular program for creating 3D content. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-4590
+4%
Geekbench 5 Multi-thread
GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a multi-threaded version, i.e. all cores are used, making it suitable for evaluating server performance.
Intel Core i5-6500
+4%
Intel Core i5-4590
Geekbench 5 Single-thread
GeekBench is a cross-platform benchmarking utility that runs a series of benchmarks that simulate real-life tasks. There are two versions of the program. This is a single threaded version. Most applications (MS Word, web browsers, games) rarely use more than one thread at a time, making it suitable for performance evaluation in everyday tasks.
Intel Core i5-6500
+3%
Intel Core i5-4590
Key differences
Why is Intel Core i5-6500 better than Intel Core i5-4590?
Newer — 1 year late release
More modern manufacturing process — 14 nm vs. 22 nm
Uses 23% less power — 65 W vs. 84 W
Why is Intel Core i5-4590 better than Intel Core i5- 6500?
Has a 4% higher frequency — 3300 MHz vs. 3200 MHz
Has a 3% higher Turbo Boost frequency — 3700 MHz vs. 3600 MHz
Conclusion
The Core i5-6500 delivers 3% better performance, uses up to 23% less energy and has 100 MHz lower frequency. According to our research, the Core i5-6500 3990X is more powerful than the Core i5-4590. While the Core i5-6500 is the winner in this comparison, it’s worth paying attention to the Core i5-6500 versus Core i5-6600K comparison. The Core i5-6600K is the same generation processor, but more powerful.
Relative performance
Relative single thread performance
Relative multi-thread performance
Overall performance
Overall single-thread performance
Overall multi-thread performance
Desktop performance
Desktop single-thread performance
Desktop multi-thread performance
Intel Core i5-4590 vs. Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i5-4590 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.70 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 84 W . LGA 1150 CPU socket This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell S Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2014
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-6500 runs with 4 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 3.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W . The processor connects to LGA 1151 CPU socket This the version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Skylake S Architecture is advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2015
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 530
Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-6500 | |
84 W | Max TDP | 65W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Popular comparison0
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 1200 and Intel Core i5-4590 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Safety and reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
versus
Intel Core i5-4590
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 2 month(s), processor unlocked easily
- Approximately 31% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 72. 72°C
- A newer manufacturing process for the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 2 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache by about 33% more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 29% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Performance in the PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 18% more: 6314 vs 5349
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 12% better: 0.454 vs 0.404
overclock
Release date | 27 July 2017 vs May 2014 |
Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 72. 72°C |
Process | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Level 1 cache | 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 2 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 84 Watt |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6314 vs 5349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 vs 0.404 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-4590
- About 9% more clock speed: 3. 70 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- PassMark performance — Single thread mark about 8% more: 2090 vs 1931
- performance about 9% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 876 vs 802
- About 9% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2820 vs 2576
- 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score performance about 4% better: 2840 vs 2718
Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2090 vs 1931 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 876 vs 802 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2820 vs 2576 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2840 vs 2718 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 1200
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4590
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1931 | 2090 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6314 | 5349 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 802 | 876 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2576 | 2820 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2718 | 2840 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | 0.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.131 | 6.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 71.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1067 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2023 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1067 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2023 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3383 |
Feature comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | Intel Core i5-4590 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Zen | Haswell |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
Production date | 27 July 2017 | May 2014 |
Price at first issue date | $110 | $300 |
OPN PIB | YD1200BBAEBOX | |
OPN Tray | YD1200BBM4KAE | |
OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in the ranking | 1421 | 1305 |
Price now | $102. 98 | $188.99 |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 19.32 | 11.38 |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | i5-4590 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3. 1 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
Crystal area | 192 mm | 177mm |
Level 1 cache | 384KB | 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 2MB | 256 KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 8MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Process | 14nm | 22nm |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 72.72°C |
Maximum frequency | 3. 4 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 1400 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2667 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1. 5V |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
Supported sockets | AM4 | FCLGA1150 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 84 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | PCG 2013D |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0×16 | Up to 3.0 |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
AMD SenseMI | ||
AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
Extended Frequency Range (XFR) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
The «Zen» Core Architecture | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi Technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Device ID | 0x412 | |
Graphics base frequency | 350MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 15 GHz | |
Maximum GPU clock | 1.15 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Video memory size | 2GB | |
Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | |
VGA | ||
WiDi support | ||
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via VGA | [email protected] | |
DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Anti-Theft Technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) |
Comparison of Intel Core i5-4590T and Intel Core i5-6500
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-4590T and Intel Core i5-6500 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection ( mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining ( mHash/s).
Intel Core i5-4590T
versus
Intel Core i5-6500
Advantages
reasons to choose Intel Core i5-4590T
- about 86% less power consumption: 35 WATT VS 65 WATT
35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-6500
- About 20% more clock speed: 3. 60 GHz vs 3.00 GHz
- About 7% more maximum core temperature: 71°C vs 66.35°C lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Maximum memory size 2 times more: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- PassMark — Single thread mark performance about 29% higher: 2121 vs 1648
- Approximately 41% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 5657 vs 4013
- Approximately 29% increase in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 899 vs 696
- 34% more: 2938 vs 2193
- About 35% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 1575 vs 1163
- 2.3x more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3075 vs 1328
- About 35% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 5455 vs 2325
- About 35% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1575 vs 1163
- 2.3 times greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3075 vs 1328
- 2.3 times greater performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 5455 vs 2325
0
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4590T
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-6500
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
Name | Intel Core i5-4590T | Intel Core i5-6500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1648 | 2121 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 4013 | 5657 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 696 | 899 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2193 | 2938 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1163 | 1575 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1328 | 3075 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2325 | 5455 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1163 | 1575 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1328 | 3075 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2325 | 5455 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 3161 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.525 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.436 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.188 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.811 |
Feature comparison
Intel Core i5-4590T | Intel Core i5-6500 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Haswell | Skylake |
Production date | Q2’14 | 5 August 2015 |
Place in the ranking | 1330 | 953 |
Processor Number | i5-4590T | i5-6500 |
Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Price at first issue date | $192 | |
Price now | $234. 38 | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 9.10 | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
Process | 22nm | 14nm |
Maximum core temperature | 66.35°C | 71°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.00 GHz | 3. 60 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Crystal area | 177mm | |
Level 1 cache | 256KB | |
Level 2 cache | 1MB | |
Level 3 cache | 6MB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25. 6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 32GB | 64GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
Device ID | 0x412 | 0x1912 |
Graphics base frequency | 350MHz | 350 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Video memory size | 2GB | 64GB |
Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
Maximum GPU clock | 1. 05 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
VGA | ||
DVI | ||
WiDi support | ||
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via VGA | [email protected] | N/A |
4K support | ||
Maximum resolution via WiDi | 1080p | |
DirectX | 11.2/12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Supported sockets | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2013A | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Anti-Theft Technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi Technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
i3-6100 vs i5-4590 — Metro: Last Light vs GTX 780 performance comparison
GTX 780 with
Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3. 70GHz
Metro: Last Light
GTX 780 with
Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz
i3-6100
i5-4590
Multi-Thread Performance
5491 Pts
7296 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2107 Pts
2113 Pts
Metro: Last Light
i3-6100 vs i5-4590 Metro: Last Light using GTX 780 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i3-6100
i5-4590
Ultra quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
50.4 FPS |
1080p |
65.2 FPS |
1440p |
42.4 FPS |
1440p |
54.9 FPS |
2160p | |
2160p | |
w1440p | |
w1440p |
High quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
88. 0 FPS |
1080p |
109.7 FPS |
1440p |
75.9 FPS |
1440p |
94.7 FPS |
2160p |
nan FPS |
2160p |
nan FPS |
w1440p |
nan FPS |
w1440p |
nan FPS |
Medium quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
125.7 FPS |
1080p |
154.2 FPS |
1440p |
109.4 FPS |
1440p |
134.6 FPS |
2160p |
nan FPS |
2160p |
nan FPS |
w1440p |
nan FPS |
w1440p |
nan FPS |
Low quality
Resolution | Frames per second |
---|---|
1080p |
201. |