Intel Core i5-4590 vs. Intel Core i5-6600K Specs & Speed
| Product | Core i5-4590 | Core i5-6600K |
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Street Price (Approx) | ~ $285 Search low Core i5-4590 price (Amazon) |
~ $225 Search low Core i5-6600K price (Amazon) |
| # CPU Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Frequency (GHz) | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Cache (MB) | 6 | 6 |
| TDP (Watts) | 84 W | 91 W |
| Product Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Status | Released | Released |
| Announced On | 2014-03-01 | 2015-06-01 |
| Technicals | Core i5-4590 | Core i5-6600K |
| Dimensions (2D) | 37. |
37.5×37.5 mm |
| Conflict Free? | 1 | 1 |
| # CPU Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads/Core | 4 | 4 |
| Frequency (GHz) | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (GHz) | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Cache (MB) | 6 | 6 |
| Instructions Width (bits) | 64 | 64 |
| Instructions Extensions | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 |
| Lithography Process (nm) | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP (Watts) | 84 W | 91 W |
| Max RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| # Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Memory Bandwidth (GB/Sec) | 25.6GB/s | 34.1GB/s |
| Max CPU / Package | 1 | 1 |
| PCI-E Version | 3 | 3 |
| PCI-E Configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| PCI-E Max Lanes # | 16 | 16 |
| Compatible Sockets | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1151 |
| Intel Turbo Boost Version | 2 | 2 |
| Intel V-Pro | Yes | No |
| Intel Hyper-Thread | No | No |
| Intel Virtualization (VTX) | Yes | Yes |
| Intel Directed I/O (VTD) | Yes | Yes |
Intel Ext. Page Tables (EPT) |
Yes | Yes |
| Intel TSX Sync. Extensions | No | Yes |
| Intel 64 | Yes | Yes |
| Intel MyWiFi | Yes | |
| Idle States | Yes | Yes |
| Thermal MonitoringTech. | Yes | Yes |
| Intel ID Protect | Yes | Yes |
| Intel SIPP | Yes | No |
| Intel SMB Advantage | Yes | Yes |
| Intel AES New Instructions | Yes | Yes |
| Intel Secure Key | Yes | Yes |
| Intel OS Guard | Yes | Yes |
| Trusted Execution | Yes | No |
| Execution Disable | Yes | Yes |
Intel Core i5-4590 vs. Intel Core i5-6600K Specs & Speed Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590 vs. Intel Core i5-6600K Specs & Speed Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 Multi
Higher is better
Geekbench 4 Single
Higher is better
Memory Bandwidth (GB/Sec)
Higher is better
Geekbench 4 Multi / Price (Market)
Higher is better
Intel Core i5-6600K vs Intel Core i5-4590 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-6600K vs Intel Core i5-4590
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-6600K on one side and the Intel Core i5-4590 on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-6600K | Intel Core i5-4590 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Skylake | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Skylake-S | Haswell-DT | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-6000 | Core i5-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
BXC80662I56600K, |
BX80646I54590, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2014 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 350.000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,5 GHz | 3,3 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 6 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-1866/2133, |
DDR3-1333/1600, |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 91 W | 84 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 403,2 GFLOPS | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 64°C | 72. 7°C |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 397 | 347 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.581 | 1.403 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 159 | 146 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 602 | 502 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 986 | 802 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.882 | 3.133 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.323 | 2.079 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 6.277 | 5. 308 |
||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.916 | 4.154 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
14.148 | 11.418 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
297,4 GFLOPS | 202 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
155 pts / W | 136 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-6600K is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-4590 is less. The Intel Core i5-6600K was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
397 1.581 |
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
347 1.403 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
159 602 |
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
146 502 |
In single core, the difference is 9%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
986 3.882 |
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
802 3.133 |
In single core, the difference is 23%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 24%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
2.323 6.277 |
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
2.079 5.  308 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
4.916 14.148 |
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.154 11.418 |
In single core, the difference is 18%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 24%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
5.312 15.336 |
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.412 11.077 |
In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6600K |
5.147 15.152 |
| Intel Core i5-4590 |
4.156 12.083 |
In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.