I5 9300h vs i7 9750h: Intel Core i5-9300H vs Intel Core i7-9750H

Why is Intel Core i7-9750H better than Intel Core i5-9300H?

• 1.63x faster CPU speed?
  6 x 2.6GHzvs4 x 2.4GHz
• 4 more CPU threads?
  12vs8
• 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
  1.5MBvs1MB
• 43.23% higher PassMark result?
  11239vs7847
• 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  4.5GHzvs4.1GHz
• 4MB bigger L3 cache?
  12MBvs8MB
• 128KB bigger L1 cache?
  384KBvs256KB
• 5.37% higher PassMark result (single)?
  2493vs2366

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

Intel Core i5-11400H

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

Intel Core i5-1135G7

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

Apple M1

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

Intel Core i7-1165G7

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600H

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel Core i5-9300H

vs

Apple M1

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

Intel Core i5-11300H

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i5-9300H

5 User reviews

Intel Core i5-9300H

9. 0/10

5 User reviews

Intel Core i7-9750H

3 User reviews

Intel Core i7-9750H

8.0/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.0/10

5 votes

6.7/10

3 votes

Gaming

8.6/10

5 votes

9.3/10

3 votes

Performance

9.0/10

5 votes

8.3/10

3 votes

Reliability

8.6/10

5 votes

7.7/10

3 votes

Energy efficiency

8.2/10

5 votes

5.7/10

3 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 2.4GHz

6 x 2.6GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.1GHz

4.5GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i5-9300H

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

2MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

41.8GB/s

41.8GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i5-9300H

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

456.94seconds

334.84seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

1513.05seconds

1076.37seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-9300H

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i7 9750H vs i5 9300H: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i7 9750H

Intel Core i5 9300H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2. 6 GHz Intel Core i7 9750H with 6-cores against the 2.4 GHz i5 9300H with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

1. Review
2. Differences
3. Performance
4. Specs
5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i7 9750H

58

Core i5 9300H

57

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i7 9750H

32

Core i5 9300H

23

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i7 9750H

55

Core i5 9300H

55

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i7 9750H

46

Core i5 9300H

43

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9300H and 9750H

Advantages of Intel Core i7 9750H

• Has 2 more physical cores
• Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
• 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 5 GHz vs 4.1 GHz)

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i7 9750H

1106

Core i5 9300H
+1%

1119

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 9750H
+45%

6850

Core i5 9300H

4717

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i7 9750H
+6%

2476

Core i5 9300H

2346

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i7 9750H
+44%

11195

Core i5 9300H

7800

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i7 9750H
+2%

1068

Core i5 9300H

1044

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 9750H
+49%

5282

Core i5 9300H

3554

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 9750H and i5 9300H

General

Performance

Cores	6	4
Threads	12	8
Base Frequency	2. 6 GHz	2.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency	4.5 GHz	4.1 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	—
Multiplier	26x	—
Bus Bandwidth	8 GT/s	8 GT/s
L1 Cache	32K (per core)	128K (per core)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
L3 Cache	12MB (shared)	8MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	No	No

Integrated Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock	350 MHz	350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1050 MHz
Shading Units	192	192
TMUs	24	24
ROPs	3	3
Execution Units	24	24
TGP	15 W	15 W
Max. Resolution	4096×2304 — 60 Hz	4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i7 9750H

0.38 TFLOPS

Core i5 9300H

0.38 TFLOPS

Memory support

Official site	Intel Core i7 9750H official page	Intel Core i5 9300H official page
PCI Express Version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express Lanes	16	16
Extended instructions	SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i7 9750H

74 (55.2%)

Core i5 9300H

60 (44.8%)

Total votes: 134

ompetitors

1.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 or i7 9750H

2.
Intel Core i7 11800H or i7 9750H

3.
Intel Core i7 12700H or i7 9750H

4.
Apple M1 or Intel Core i7 9750H

5.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U or Intel Core i5 9300H

6.
Intel Core i5 10210U or i5 9300H

Intel i5-9300H vs i7-9750H — Laptop CPU Comparison and Benchmarks

Let’s find out what the differences are between the Intel i5-9300H and i7-9750H laptop processors. Starting with the specs

	I5-9300H	I7-9750H
Cores/Threads	4/8	6/12
Base Clock	2. 4GHZ	2.6GHZ
Single Core Boost	4.1GHZ	4.5GHZ
All Core Boost	4.0GHZ	4.0GHZ
Cache	8MB	12MB
TDP	25W	45W
Memory	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Architecture	12NM++	14NM++
Unlocked	NO	NO
Released	Q2 2019	Q2 2019

We can see that the key difference is that the i7 has 6 cores versus the 4 in the i5. The i7 has a 400MHz higher single core turbo boost speed, however when all cores are active they both max out at 4GHz. Along with 50% more cores, the i7 also has 50% more cache, otherwise both chips use the same 9th gen architecture.

The laptops I’m testing with are my Lenovo Y540 with i7-9750H, and Lenovo Y7000 with i5-9300H.

The chassis of both are basically the same, so comparable thermals and battery. We’ll start with the games, then other applications like rendering, video editing, thermals, power draw and clock speeds afterwards.

Red Dead Redemption 2 was tested with the game’s built in benchmark tool. I’ve got the i5-9300H shown by the red bar on the bottom, and the i7-9750H shown by the purple bar on top, and I’ve tested all setting levels, which are noted on the left. In this test the i7 was just 3% faster in average FPS at ultra settings, and about the same at low too.

Battlefield V was tested in campaign mode running through the same section of the game on both machines. The results were quite close here, at ultra settings the i7 was only 1% ahead, which is honestly kind of margin of error ranges anyway. Interestingly the i5 was ahead in 1% low at all other settings, however I have found 1% low performance inconsistent in this title.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider was tested using the built in benchmark. The i7 was ahead in all tests, although by the time we step up to highest settings the result was identical, likely as we’re more GPU bound at this stage. At lowest settings, the i7 was just 3% faster than the i5.

Apex Legends was tested by running through the same section of the map on both laptops. Unfortunately I tested with the default frame cap enabled, so both were about the same at minimum settings, however even maxed out the i7 was only 2% faster than the i5.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare was also tested with maximum or minimum settings, and again the results were almost identical at minimum, however interestingly the i5 was actually slightly ahead at ultra, granted it’s only 1 FPS, which I’d say is basically margin of error, even though this is the average of 3 test runs.

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey was tested using the games benchmark, the i7 is ahead at the lower setting presets, 4% faster than the i5 at low settings, then at maximum where we’re presumably less CPU bound it’s now just 1% faster with the same 1% low performance.

Control was tested running through the same area of the game on both machines. At high and medium setting presets the performance was essentially identical, but with low settings for some reason the i7 saw a nice improvement. My guess is the low setting preset must be more CPU bound compared to the others, which is why the i7 was almost 22% faster here.

Borderlands 3 was tested with the built in benchmark and follows the same pattern as many other titles tested, in that the results are quite close together, especially at higher settings. The top three settings have basically the same average FPS with only minor gains to 1% low results, while the i7 was less than 5% faster at low settings.

Fortnite was tested using the replay feature, different replay files but running through the same part of the game on both laptops. The average FPS at high and epic is about the same regardless of CPU, but the 1% low results are a bit strange. The two chips are similar in 1% low performance in all but epic settings, where the i7 saw a large 23% improvement.

The Witcher 3 was similar in that the 1% low performance was way up at the highest setting preset when compared to the others, however outside of this the averages were much the same regardless of the processor in use.

Ghost Recon Breakpoint was tested using the games benchmark tool. The i7 was ahead in all tests in terms of average FPS, however the margin closes in at higher settings. At ultimate, the i7 was just 2% faster than the i5, but at low settings it was just under 16% faster.

Rainbow Six Siege was also tested using the games benchmark tool with the latest Vulkan option. The average frame rates are so close here that there’s not going to be a perceivable difference between the two, and interestingly the i5 was actually consistently coming out in front with the 1% low performance. The i5 does actually clock higher in multicore loads as we’ll see a bit later, so this could be part of the reason.

CS:GO was tested with the Ulletical FPS benchmark, and is a game that really cares about CPU power, so it wasn’t much of a surprise that this game saw one of the largest differences out of all 15 titles tested. At max settings the i7 was 5.5% faster than the i5, and then almost 10% faster at low settings where we’re less GPU bound.

Dota 2 is another game that typically relies more on CPU power. At low settings the i7, was 5% faster than the i5. Unlike most other games, I’ve actually found the gap to widen as we step up to higher setting levels. By the time we’re at ultra settings, the i7 was actually 16% faster than the i5 in terms of average FPS, though the 1% low was only 3.5% faster.

Overwatch was tested playing in the practice range, and while this performs better than actual gameplay it allows me to more accurately perform the exact same test run, perfect for a comparison like this. As another esports title, the CPU matters more compared to many others tested. There was a 4% higher average FPS at max settings with the i7, which doesn’t sound like much but for context makes it the 3rd biggest gain out of all 15 titles tested, granted the 1% lows were nicely improved at epic at ultra, though at the same time the i5 was ahead at high with minor change at medium and low.

These are the differences to average FPS over all 15 games tested. On average with the highest setting levels in use, the Intel i7-9750H was just 2% faster than the i5-9300H. As we can see here, the results really vary by game. The three top games are esports titles, so if you’re serious about those then the i7 may make more sense there, otherwise at max settings where we’re more GPU bound, it seems that for the most part it doesn’t matter too much.

As we saw throughout the games, there was generally a larger difference with the lowest possible settings, as we’re more CPU bound here. At minimum in these same titles, the i7 was now 5% faster on average when compared to the i5. Some non esports titles are now dominating the top of the graph, so it seems that some games may benefit from more cores when the GPU is taking less of the work, but again on average the difference isn’t anything too amazing.

That’s it for gaming, let’s move onto the productivity focussed tests starting with Cinebench R20.

I’ve got the quad core i5 down the bottom, and the six core i7 up top. The multicore test is obviously ahead on the i7, it’s got 50% more cores, and as such is scoring 46% higher over the i5. The i7 is only 5% ahead in terms of single core performance though, if you recall the i7 can boost 400MHz higher in single core workloads.

I’ve also tested the older Cinebench R15 as many people still use it, so these numbers can be used for comparison.

This time the i7 was a larger 9.5% ahead when it came to single core performance, and a much larger 62% faster at multicore. This test doesn’t take long to complete, so that larger difference could be due to PL2 limits.

I’ve run the BMW and Classroom benchmarks with blender, and this is another test which benefits from additional cores, so it’s no surprise that the i7 is coming out ahead here.

The i7 completes both tasks around 48% faster at the stock 45w limit, so pretty good scaling given the 50% core increase with the i7.

I’ve used Adobe Premiere to export the same 4K video, and the results surprised me.

Given this task is generally pretty CPU heavy, at least I thought, I figured the difference would be larger, however that was not the case, at least with this particular project I test with. My guess is both are utilizing quicksync primarily in this workload, so the iGPU may be the limit rather than core count.

I’ve also used the warp stabilizer effect in Adobe Premiere which basically uses a single core to smooth out a clip.

There was a larger performance difference here compared to exporting, with the i7 completing the task 7% faster than the i5, right in between the previous two Cinebench single core improvements.

Handbrake was used to convert a 4K video file to 1080p, and then a separate 1080p file to 720p.

This is another test that benefits greatly from CPU cores. The i7 was completing the 4K transcode 40% faster than the i5, then the i7 was 48% faster with the 1080p to 720p conversion.

The V-Ray benchmark uses the CPU to render out a scene, so yet another task that’s typically faster the more cores you have.

The i7 was 52% faster in this test, which makes sense given it’s got 50% more cores and that they’re all being utilized.

Another benchmark that renders out a scene with the processor, slightly less of a difference here, but these rendering tests smash all cores well with load, so the i7 was able to complete the task 45% faster than the i5.

I’ve used 7-Zip to test compression and decompression speeds.

The compression speeds saw a 37% improvement with the i7, then a larger 55% boost when it came to decompression speed.

VeraCrypt was used to test AES encryption and decryption speeds.

Both tasks were around 53% faster with the i7, so it seems like either the 50% additional cores or cache are helping out in this workload and it’s scaling quite nicely.

GeekBench was able to score 9% faster in single core performance with the i7, and 39% faster when it came to multicore, so the workloads this runs aren’t quite as core efficient as many of those rendering tasks we saw hit 50% higher speeds.

Here’s a summary of all of the applications just tested.

On average over these tests, the Intel i7-9750H was 37% faster than the i5-9300H. That overall percentage isn’t too useful though as it includes both single and multicore tests, we can see some of the rendering tests were around 50% better with the extra cores, then single core performance was anywhere from from 5 to almost 10% faster with the i7. This is about what you’d expect, given the i7 has 50% more cores, and the single core turbo boost speed is almost 10% faster than the i5.

When we look at the total power drawn from the wall with the core heavy Blender test running, the i7 is using about 10 watts more, despite both chips apparently running with the sustained stock 45 watt TDP limit. At least this was what was being reported by HWinfo when running the blender test over the course of 20-30 minutes.

These are the average clock speeds while running the same blender benchmark.

Interestingly the i5 was able to clock higher in this test, which makes sense when you consider that the same 45w power budget is spread out over fewer cores.

The temperatures were actually cooler with the i7 which I wasn’t expecting, both chips have the same power limit. The i5 was clocking higher as we just saw, but the i7 system was drawing more power from the wall, so I was thinking the extra cores would produce more heat. The comparison should be pretty apples to apples given both laptops have the same cooling design.

Both laptops have the same sized battery, and we can see the i5 was lasting longer in these tests, though to be fair, it’s hard to compare as the panel is also of lower quality so doesn’t get quite as bright even when at the same brightness percentage which may affect results.

In terms of price differences, you could get an Acer Helios 300 with i7 for around $1100 USD, or the i5 model with the same 1660 Ti for $900 USD, granted it does seem to have half the memory. Assuming around $50 for memory upgrade, that’s almost 16% more money to go for the i7. 16% more money for an on average 2% boost in games at max settings or 5% boost at minimum settings doesn’t really seem worth it.

The i5 actually seems fine for gaming in most instances, at least today, this could of course change in the future as games require more cores going forward, but that’s difficult to predict.

Outside of gaming, paying 16% more money for 50% more cores is absolutely worth it, on average in the applications tested there was 37% higher performance to be had, so it depends more on if your workload is multicore heavy than anything else.

Let me know which of these two CPUs you’d pick and why down in the comments.

In case you have found a mistake in the text, please send a message to the author by selecting the mistake and pressing Ctrl-Enter.

Intel Core i7 9750H vs i5 9300H:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i7 9750H

Intel Core i5 9300H

Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i7 9750H at 2.6 GHz or i5 9300H with 4 cores at 2. 4 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 14nm laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

1. Overview
2. Differences
3. Performance
4. Features
5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Core i7 9750H

58 58

Core i5

57

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus

9 9,000 9,000 9,000

Core i7 9750h

32

Core i5 9300h

23

Energy Equality

Energy Effect Consum CHIP

Core I7 9750H 9000H

Core

Core i7 9750H

46

Core i5 9300H

43

Key differences

What are the main differences between the 9300H and 9750H

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 9750H

• Has 2 more physical cores
• Has 4 MB more L3 cache
• 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 5 GHz vs 4.1 GHz)

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i7 9750H

1106

Core i5 9300H
+1%

1119

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i7 9750H
+45%

6850

Core i5 9300H

4717

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i7 9750H
+6%

2476

Core i5 9300H

2346

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i7 9750H
+44%

11195

Core i5 9300H

7800

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i7 9750H
+2%

1068

Core i5 9300H

1044

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i7 9750H
+49%

5282

Core i5 9300H

3554

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full specifications of Intel Core i7 9750H and i5 9300H

General information

Performance

Cores	6	4
Number of threads	12	8
Frequency	2. 6 GHz	2.4 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost	4.5 GHz	4.1 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	—
Multiplier	26x	—
Tire speed	8 GT/s	8 GT/s
Level 1 cache	32KB (per core)	128KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	256KB (per core)	256KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	12MB (shared)	8MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Energy consumption

Integrated graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency	350 MHz	350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency	1150 MHz	1050 MHz
Shader blocks	192	192
TMUs	24	24
ROPs	3	3
Computer units	24	24
TGP	15W	15W
Max. resolution	4096×2304 — 60Hz	4096×2304 — 60Hz

Igpu Flops

Core i7 9750h

0.38 Teraflops

Core I5 ​​9300h

0.38 Teraflops

Other

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i7 9750H

74 (55. 2%)

Core i5 9300H

60 (44.8%)

Total votes: 134

Competitors

1.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 or i7 9750H

2.
Intel Core i7 11800H or i7 9750H

3.
Intel Core i7 12700H or i7 9750H

4.
Apple M1 or Intel Core i7 9750H

5.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U or Intel Core i5 9300H

6.
Intel Core i5 10210U or i5 9300H

What will you choose: Intel Core i5 9300H or i7 9750H?

Name

Message

Intel Core i5-9300H vs Intel Core i7-9750H: What is the difference?

55 points

Intel Core i5-9300H

59 points

Intel Core i7-9750H

vs

64 facts in comparison300H

Intel Core i7-9750H

Why is Intel Core i5-9300H better than Intel Core i7-9750H?

Why is Intel Core i7-9750H better than Intel Core i5-9300H?

• 1. 63x higher CPU speed?
  6 x 2.6GHz vs 4 x 2.4GHz
• 4 more CPU threads?
  12 vs 8
• 0.5MB more L2 cache?
  1.5MB vs 1MB
• 43.23% higher PassMark result?
  11239 vs 7847
• 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  4.5GHz vs 4.1GHz
• 4MB more L3 cache?
  12MB vs 8MB
• 128KB more L1 cache?
  384KB vs 256KB
• 5.37% higher PassMark score (single)?
  2493 vs 2366

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i5-9300h

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5500u

Intel Core i7-9750H

VS

Intel Core i5-11400h

Intel Core I5-9300H

VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000)

Intel Core i7-9750h

VS

Intel Core i5-1135g7

Intel Core i5-9300h

VS

Intel Core I5-1135G7

Intel Core I7-97503

VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 10300H

Intel Core i5-9300h

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H

Intel Core i7-9750H

VS

Apple M1

Intel Core Core Core Core 9000 VS

AMD RYZEN 5,0002 AMD RYZEN -9750h

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 3750h

Intel Core i5-9300h

VS

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

Intel Core I7-97502 VS

AMD Ryzen 7 4800h

AMD Ryzen 7 4800h

AMD Ryzen 7,0002 AMD 9300H

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 4600h

Intel Core i7-9750H

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5800h

Intel Core i5-9300h

VS

Intel Core

vs

Intel Core i7-1165g7

Intel Core i5-9300H

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600h

Intel Core i7-9750H

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 4600h

Intel Core INTEL Core2 Intel Core INTEL COREN

Apple M1

Intel Core i7-9750h

VS

Intel Core i5-11300h

Complexation prices

total rating I5-9300h

9300h

/10

5 Reviews of users

Intel Core i7-9750H 9000h

3 Reviews of users

Intel Core i7-9750H

8. 0 /10 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

002 3 reviews of users

Functions

Reason and quality ratio

/10

5 Votes

6.7 /10

3 Votes

8.6 9/10 9000 /10

9.3 /10

3 Votes

performance

/10

5 Votes

8.3 /10

3 Votes

Reliability

9000

002

8.6 /10

5 Votes

7.7 /10

3 Votes

Energy

8.2 /10

9000 5 Votes

9000 9000 9000 9000 3 Votes 3 Votes

1.CPU speed

4 x 2.4GHz

6 x 2.6GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.1GHz

4.5GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i5-9300H

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing you to enjoy better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0. 25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

2MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

41.8GB/s

41.8GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4 memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.Maximum memory

Maximum memory (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Intel Core i5-9300H

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9. bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

456.94seconds

334.84seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

1513.05seconds

1076.37seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multi-threading

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6 bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-9300H

✔Intel Core i7-9750H

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-9300H

✖Intel Core i7-9750H

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9300H)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-9750H)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Intel Core i7-9750H or Intel Core i5-9300H

Main page
• >
• Core i9-9880H
  Compare

Speed ​​in games

Core i7-9750H

69.3 (+7.4%)

Core i5-9300h

64.2

Productivity in games and similar applications, according to the tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Core i7-9750H

70.3 (+5.8%)

Core i5-9300H

66.2

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Core i7-9750H

44.7 (+14.1%)

Core i5-9300H

38.4

The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Core i7-9750H 67.6 (+5.5%) Core i5-9300H 63.9

Demanding games and tasks

Core i7-9750H 45. 3 (+16.8%) Core i5-9300H 37.7

Extreme

Core i7-9750H 13.6 (+33.1%) Core i5-9300H 9.1

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R20 Single Core

Intel Core i7-9750H

441 (+4.3%)

Intel Core i5-9300H

422

Cinebench R20 Multi Core

Intel Core i7-9750H

2653 (+20.4 %)

Intel Core i5-9300H

2111

Geekbench 5 Single Core

Intel Core i7-9750H

1170 (+13.8%)

Intel Core i5-9300H

1009

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i7-9750h

5149 (+31.7%)

Intel Core i5-9300h

3518

Blender 2.81 BMW27

Intel Core i7-9750H 9000,0003,0003

)))

Passmark

Intel Core i7-9750H

11319 (+30.2%)

Intel Core i5-9300H

7899

Features

Basic

Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.	Intel® Core™ i7-9750H Processor	Intel® Core™ i5-9300H Processor
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption.	14 nm	14 nm
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability.	08-2021	07-2021
Model Official name.	i7-9750H	i5-9300H
Cores The number of physical cores.	6	4
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees.	12	8
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications.	Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard).	Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard).
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one.	2.6 GHz	2.4 GHz
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.	4.5GHz	4.1 GHz
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume.	12 MB	8 MB
Instructions	64-bit	64-bit
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard.	No	No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.	8 GT/s DMI	8 GT/s DMI
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly.	45W	45W
Cooling system specifications

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.	Intel® UHD Graphics 630	Intel® UHD Graphics 630
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle.	350 MHz	350 MHz
Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock.	1150MHz	1050MHz
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802. 11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.	3	3

RAM

Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor.	128 GB	128 GB
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.	DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133	DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.	2	2
RAM bandwidth	41.8 GB/s	41.8 GB/s
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread.	No data	No data

PCI

PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility.	3	3
PCI configuration options	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Number of PCI lanes	16	Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4

Data Security

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption.	No data	No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator.	No data	No data

Decoration

Dimensions	No data	No data
Supported sockets	No data	No data
Maximum processors per motherboard	No data	No data

Which is better

Intel Core i7-9750H

• On average, gaming performance is 5% better.
• The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 4%.