I5 9600k i9 9900k: Intel Core i5-9600K vs i9-9900K

Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference?

61points

Intel Core i5-9600K

67points

Intel Core i9-9900K

Comparison winner

vs

64 facts in comparison

Intel Core i5-9600K

Intel Core i9-9900K

Why is Intel Core i5-9600K better than Intel Core i9-9900K?

Why is Intel Core i9-9900K better than Intel Core i5-9600K?

  • 29.73% faster CPU speed?
    8 x 3.6GHzvs6 x 3.7GHz
  • 10 more CPU threads?
    16vs6
  • 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
    2MBvs1.5MB
  • 1.74x higher PassMark result?
    18898vs10878
  • 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    5GHzvs4.6GHz
  • 7MB bigger L3 cache?
    16MBvs9MB
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    512KBvs384KB
  • 7.22% higher PassMark result (single)?
    2986vs2785

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

Apple M1 Pro (10-core)

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

Intel Core i9-9900

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i5-9600KF

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel Core i5-9600K

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

Intel Core i9-9900KF

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i5-9600K

1 User reviews

Intel Core i5-9600K

10. 0/10

1 User reviews

Intel Core i9-9900K

4 User reviews

Intel Core i9-9900K

8.8/10

4 User reviews

Features

Value for money

10.0/10

1 votes

8.5/10

4 votes

Gaming

10.0/10

1 votes

9.3/10

4 votes

Performance

10.0/10

1 votes

9.5/10

4 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

9.0/10

4 votes

Energy efficiency

8.0/10

1 votes

8.8/10

4 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.7GHz

8 x 3.6GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.6GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

41.6GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

303.7seconds

164.2seconds

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

980.5seconds

544seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i9 9900K vs i5 9600K: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i9 9900K

Intel Core i5 9600K

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3. 6 GHz Intel Core i9 9900K with 8-cores against the 3.7 GHz i5 9600K with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i9 9900K

69

Core i5 9600K

64

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i9 9900K

55

Core i5 9600K

33

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i9 9900K

46

Core i5 9600K

46

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i9 9900K

58

Core i5 9600K

48

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9600K and 9900K

Advantages of Intel Core i9 9900K

  • Has 7 MB larger L3 cache size
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 9% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4. 6 GHz)

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i9 9900K
+13%

1332

Core i5 9600K

1183

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 9900K
+88%

12359

Core i5 9600K

6584

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i9 9900K
+7%

2945

Core i5 9600K

2764

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i9 9900K
+74%

18709

Core i5 9600K

10783

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i9 9900K
+6%

1268

Core i5 9600K

1197

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 9900K
+49%

8410

Core i5 9600K

5654

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 9900K and i5 9600K

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released October 8, 2018 October 8, 2018
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Model number i9-9900K i5-9600K
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores 8 6
Threads 16 6
Base Frequency 3. 6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 5 GHz 4.6 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 37x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes
Fabrication process 14 nm 14 nm
TDP 95 W 95 W
Max. temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1200 MHz 1150 MHz
Shading Units 192 192
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 3 3
Execution Units 24 24
TGP 15 W 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz 4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i9 9900K

0.38 TFLOPS

Core i5 9600K

0.38 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No
Official site Intel Core i9 9900K official page Intel Core i5 9600K official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i9 9900K

26 (76.5%)

Core i5 9600K

8 (23.5%)

Total votes: 34

Сompetitors

1.
Core i9 9900K vs M1 Max

2.
Core i9 9900K vs Ryzen 7 5800X

3.
Core i9 9900K vs M1 Pro

4.
Core i9 9900K vs Apple M1

5.
Core i9 9900K vs Core i9 12900K

6.
Core i9 9900K vs Core i7 12700K

7.
Core i9 9900K vs Core i5 12600K

8.
Core i5 9600K vs Core i5 12600K

9.
Core i5 9600K vs Core i5 12400

Intel Core i9-9900K, i7-9700K, i5-9600K CPU Performance Leaks Out

Not one, not two but the performance numbers of all three of Intel’s upcoming 9th generation unlocked processors has leaked out. The performance numbers are compiled in Geekbench 4 which shows what kind of jump we should expect from the core count bump on the high-end processors, arriving next month.

Intel Core i9-9900K, Core i7-9700K, and Core i5-9600K Unlocked 9th Gen CPU Performance Leaks Out in Geekbench

All processors seem to have been tested on stock clock speeds which are very high out of the box. We are talking about up to 5.0 GHz boost on a single and up to 4.7 GHz boost on 8 cores. Here we can see that the enhanced 14nm++ process node is really helping Intel deliver the fastest clocked mainstream processors to date and even though there aren’t any architectural improvements to talk about, the core jump and clock speeds would really help boost performance in gaming, multi-tasking and rendering workloads.

Starting with the flagship part, the Intel Core i9-9900K scored 6248 points in single core and 33037 points in multi-core benchmarks. These are some of the highest numbers we have seen for an LGA 1151 socketed mainstream part and nothing even from the rivaling Ryzen club comes close to this. The chip was tested on an ASUS ROG Maximus X HERO motherboard with 16 GB of DDR4 memory which is pretty standard but what I am really interested to see now is where overclocks would take this score to since all three unlocked SKUs will be rocking a soldered IHS design and that would be a lot of help in keeping the chip cooler when overclocked and even when running under stock load.

2 of 9

The Intel Core i7-9700K scored 6297 points in the single core and 30152 points in the multi-core benchmark. While the single core score is similar to the Core i9-9900K since there’s a difference only of 100 MHz, the lower threads on the 9700K resulted in 3000 points lower than the flagship. The chip was tested on a Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming motherboard. Comparing it to the Ryzen 7 2700X shows that the chip is much faster in single core workloads but the Ryzen 2700X has a total of 16 threads while the Core i7-9700K has only 8 threads so while the 9th Gen chip is in lead, the difference in performance is lower than the 8700K’s multi-core score.

2 of 9

The last part that was tested is the Intel Core i5-9600K which was also tested on a similar config as the Core i7-9700K. The chip scored 6027 points in single core and 23472 points in multi-core CPU benchmark. Here, we also see the single core performance just about the same as the other parts but multi-core performance is lower due to much lower threads. The Core i5-9600K is an i5-8600K on steroids based on the clock speeds. The 8600K itself scored around 5000 points in single core and 19000-20000 points in multi-core benchmark so we can see a good boost in performance for this part.

2 of 9

table id=877 /]

Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel’s First 8 Core Mainstream CPU With 4.7 GHz All 8 Core Boost Frequency, Faster Than Intel’s 8086K Anniversary Edition In All Possible Ways

First up, we will detail the flagship part, the 8 core, 16 thread, Intel Core i9-9900K. This will be the first mainstream desktop Core i9 part and also the first Intel chip to boast 8 cores and 16 threads. In terms of cache, the chip will feature 16 MB of L3 and will come with an Intel UHD 620 graphics chip.

The clock speeds are something to check out here, we are going to get a 3.6 GHz base clock out of the box and a 5.0 GHz boost clock in single and dual core operations. 4 core boost is rated at 4.8 GHz while 6/8 core boost is rated at 4.7 GHz. This is the highest frequency we have seen on an 8 core part across all cores. All of this is done under a 95W package so we can expect some hefty cooling solutions to go along with this chip.

Intel Core i7-9700K, Intel’s First 8 Core, Core i7 Mainstream Desktop CPU With Up To 4.6 GHz Clocks Across All Cores

Coming to the top Core i7 part, we get 8 cores and 8 threads. This the complete opposite of what we have been hearing as previous rumors identified the chip as a 6 core and 12 thread part. The chip will have 12 MB of L3 cache and as you might tell, it has lower threads than the Core i7-8700K but comes with higher core count. So maybe, we will get same or even better performance from the chip.

In terms of clock speeds, the chip has a base clock of 3.6 GHz and boosts up to 4.9 GHz in single, 4.8 GHz in dual-core, 4.7 GHz in four core and 4.6 GHz in 6/8 core operations. The TDP for this part is maintained at the same 95W.

Intel Core i5-9600K, 6 Cores, and 6 Threads With Higher Clocks Than 8th Generation i5 ‘K” SKU

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a 6 core and 6 thread part with 9 MB of L3 cache. This makes it very similar to the Core i5-8600K. The difference is that it features higher clock speeds of 3.7 GHz base, 4.6 GHz boost (1 core), 4.5 GHz (2 core), 4.4 GHz (4 core) and 4.3 GHz (6 core). All of this is done at the same TDP of 95W.

The 9th generation will be compatible with existing 300 series and the new Z390 motherboards. Following are some key features of the upcoming lineup:

  • First performance Intel Core i9 desktop s-series processor
  • Up to 8 cores
  • Intel Z390 chipset compatible
  • Solder Thermal Interface Material (STIM)
  • Integrated USB 3. 1 gen 2 and Integrated Intel Wireless-AC
  • Up to 16 threads, 5.0 GHz, 16 MB cache, and 40 platform PCIe lanes (16 CPU + 24 PCH)
  • Compatible with all Intel 300 series chipsets
  • Intel Optane memory and Intel Optane SSD support
  • Thunderbolt 3 support

The specifications have been listed but there’s currently no word on the prices which are said to be expected around September, around the same time as the official announcement. Expect more on details regarding the prices and performance of these new 6 and 8 core mainstream parts from Intel in the coming months.

Which Intel 9th Generation CPUs are you most interested in?

  • Core i9-9900K (8 Core / 16 Thread) ~488 USD

  • Core i7-9700K (8 Core / 8 Thread) ~374 USD

  • Core i5-9600K (6 Core / 6 Thread) ~262 USD

Poll Options are limited because JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

Core i9-9900K vs Core i5-9600K

Availability

Intel Core i9-9900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W

Buy on Amazon

$570

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Availability

Intel Core i5-9600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz Turbo unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W

Buy on Amazon

$229.99

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K and the cheaper Core i5-9600K have been released at the same time.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K

Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K

VALORANT

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i9-9900K

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018


FPS

492

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1. 16/FPS

-37%

Price, $

$570

40%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-9900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W

Buy for $570 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Core i5-9600K

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018


FPS

466

94%

Value, $/FPS

$0.49/FPS

100%

Price, $

$229.99

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i5-9600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz Turbo unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W

Buy for $229.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 98 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Core i9-9900K

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018

Core i5-9600K

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018

282

FPS

267

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

1497

FPS

1421

FPS

Minecraft

492

FPS

466

FPS

VALORANT

1125

FPS

1066

FPS

League of Legends

693

FPS

654

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Core i9-9900K

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018


Single-Core

1309

100%

Multi-Core

8544

100%

Core i5-9600K

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018


Single-Core

1235

94%

Multi-Core

5549

46%

Intel Core i9-9900K

vs

Intel Core i5-9600K

Oct 19th, 2018 Release Date Oct 19th, 2018
Core i9 Collection Core i5
Coffee Lake Codename Coffee Lake
Intel Socket 1151 Socket Intel Socket 1151

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

8

Cores 6

16

Threads 6
3. 6 GHz Base Clock Speed

3.7 GHz

5.0 GHz

Turbo Clock Speed 4.6 GHz
95 W TDP 95 W
14 nm Process Size 14 nm
36.0x Multiplier

37.0x

UHD 630 Integrated Graphics UHD 630
Yes Overclockable Yes

Builds Using Core i9-9900K or Core i5-9600K

VALORANT, 1080p, High

CORSAIR ONE i164 Compact Gaming PC

410 FPS

$5.06/FPS

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Core i9-9900K

16 GB, 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$2,074.97

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

Omen Obelisk Gaming Desktop PC

410 FPS

$6.59/FPS

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Core i9-9900K

64 GB, 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$2,699.99

In Stock

Updated 85 minutes ago

Adamant Custom Liquid Cooled Gaming Desktop PC

492 FPS

$6. 61/FPS

GeForce RTX 3090

Core i9-9900K

32 GB, 5 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$3,249.99

In Stock

Updated 90 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC

343 FPS

$7/FPS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Core i9-9900K

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$2,399.99

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

CYBERPOWERPC Gamer Xtreme Gaming PC

281 FPS

$8.54/FPS

GeForce RTX 2060

Core i9-9900K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$2,398.96

In Stock

Updated 91 minutes ago

Omen by HP Obelisk Gaming Desktop PC

367 FPS

$10.08/FPS

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Core i9-9900K

32 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$3,699

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

Omen by HP Obelisk Gaming Desktop PC

410 FPS

$10.73/FPS

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Core i9-9900K

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$4,399

In Stock

Updated 85 minutes ago

CyberpowerPC Gamer Supreme Liquid Cool Gaming PC

410 FPS

$11. 46/FPS

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Core i9-9900K

16 GB, 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$4,699.99

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

CLX Set — Elite Gaming Desktop PC

326 FPS

$11.96/FPS

GeForce RTX 2070

Core i9-9900K

16 GB, 960 GB SSD + 3 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$3,899

In Stock

Updated 87 minutes ago

CYBERPOWERPC Gamer Xtreme Gaming PC

155 FPS

$12.89/FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Core i5-9600K

8 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,998

In Stock

Updated 89 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Core i9-12900K

$586.49

Core i9-9900K

Core i9-9900K

Xeon W3690

N/A Stock

Core i9-9900K

Core 2 Extreme X9770

N/A Stock

Core i5-9600K

$229. 99

Core i3-4340

Core i5-9600K

$229.99

Pentium G2130

$43.64

Core i5-9600K

$229.99

Core i5-4590S

Core i5-9600K

$229.99

Pentium G4560T

N/A Stock

Core i5-9600K

$229.99

Core i7-980X

$1,099.95

Core i5-9600K

$229.99

Xeon E5-2687W v3

N/A Stock

Intel 9th Gen Core i9-9900K 8 Core Flagship CPU Specs Leaked

The latest specifications of Intel’s 9th Generation desktop processor family have leaked out by Coolaler. The source which has been legit with their previous leaks, mention the specifications of the top tier ‘K’ SKUs which include a Core i5, a Core i7 and also, the flagship Core i9 processor.

Intel’s 9th Generation Desktop Processor Specifications Leak Out — Core i9-9900K 8 Core, Core i7-9700K 8 Core, and Core i5-9600K 6 Core CPUs

According to the leak, Intel will have at least three ‘K’ series SKUs. These would include the flagship Core i9-9900K, Core i7-9700K, and the Core i5-9600K. All three processors are designed for the new Z390 motherboards but based on the recent leaks, we will also get compatibility with current-gen Z370 motherboards. Moving on to the SKU configurations, the leak lists down the processors with the following configs:

  • Intel Core i9-9900K (est: 8 core / 16 thread)
  • Intel Core i7-9700K (est: 8 core / 8 thread)
  • Intel Core i5-9600K (est: 6 core / 6 thread)

Intel 9th Generation Core Family CPU Official Specifications:

Processor Name Process Cores / Threads Base Clock Boost Clock Cache TDP Price
Core i9-9900KS 14nm++ 8 / 16 3.6 GHz 5.0 GHz (8 Cores) 16 MB 127W $513 US
Core i9-9900K 14nm++ 8 / 16 3.6 GHz 5.0 GHz 16 MB 95W $488 US
Core i9-9900KF 14nm++ 8 / 16 3. 6 GHz 5.0 GHz 16 MB 95W $488 US
Core i7-9700K 14nm++ 8 / 8 3.6 GHz 4.9 GHz 12 MB 95W $374 US
Core i7-9700KF 14nm++ 8 / 8 3.6 GHz 4.9 GHz 12 MB 95W $374 US
Core i5-9600K 14nm++ 6 / 6 3.7 GHz 4.6 GHz 9 MB 95W $262 US
Core i5-9600KF 14nm++ 6 / 6 3.7 GHz 4.6 GHz 9 MB 95W $262 US
Core i5-9600 14nm++ 6 / 6 3.1 GHz 4.5 GHz 9 MB 65W TBD
Core i5-9500 14nm++ 6 / 6 3.0 GHz 4.3 GHz 9 MB 65W TBD
Core i5-9400 14nm++ 6 / 6 2.9 GHz 4.1 GHz 9 MB 65W $182
Core i5-9400T 14nm++ 6 / 6 1. 8 GHz 3.4 GHz 9 MB 35W TBD
Core i3-9350KF 14nm++ 4/4 4.0 GHz 4.6 GHz 8 MB 91W TBD
Core i3-9100 14nm++ 4 / 4 TBD 4.2 GHz 6 MB 65W TBD
Core i3-9000 14nm++ 4 / 4 3.7 GHz N/A 6 MB 65W TBD
Core i3-9000T 14nm++ 4 / 4 3.2 GHz N/A 6 MB 35W TBD

Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel’s First 8 Core Mainstream CPU With Expected 4.7 GHz All Core Boost

First up, we will detail the flagship part, the 8 core, 16 thread, Intel Core i9-9900K. This will be the first mainstream desktop Core i9 part and also the first Intel chip to boast 8 cores and 16 threads. In terms of cache, the chip will feature 16 MB of L3 and will come with an Intel UHD 620 graphics chip.

The clock speeds are something to check out here, we are going to get 3.6 GHz base clock out of the box and a 5.0 GHz boost clocks in single and dual core operations. 4 core boost is rated at 4.8 GHz while 6/8 core boost is rated at 4.7 GHz. This is the highest frequency we have seen on an 8 core part across all cores. All of this is done under a 95W package so we can expect some hefty cooling solutions to go along with this chip.

Intel Core i7-9700K, Intel’s First 8 Core, Core i7 Mainstream Desktop CPU With Up To 4.6 GHz Clocks Across All Cores

Coming to the top Core i7 part, we get 8 cores and 8 threads. This is completely opposite of what we have been hearing as previous rumors identified the chip as a 6 core and 12 thread part. The chip will have 12 MB of L3 cache and as you might tell, it has lower threads than the Core i7-8700K but comes with higher core count. So maybe, we will get same or even better performance from the chip.

In terms of clock speeds, the chip has a base clock of 3. 6 GHz and boosts up to 4.9 GHz in single, 4.8 GHz in dual-core, 4.7 GHz in four core and 4.6 GHz in 6/8 core operations. The TDP for this part is maintained at the same 95W.

Intel Core i5-9600K, 6 Cores, and 6 Threads With Higher Clocks Than 8th Generation i5 ‘K» SKU

The Intel Core i5-9600K is a 6 core and 6 thread part with 9 MB of L3 cache. This makes it very similar to the Core i5-8600K. The difference is that it features higher clock speeds of 3.7 GHz base, 4.6 GHz boost (1 core), 4.5 GHz (2 core), 4.4 GHz (4 core) and 4.3 GHz (6 core). All of this is done at the same TDP of 95W.

A mockup of Intel Core i9, 9th Generation SKU branding.

The main thing to note here is that the part is listed with 100 MHz higher frequencies than what was reported in Intel’s own documents which were posted a while back. Now they weren’t final in any way so changes were expected. Also, having no 6 core and 12 thread part in the lineup is also slightly unusual but we can see Intel taking this approach as every ‘K’ SKU beneath the flagship part comes with a non-multi-threaded design. As an example, the Core i7-8700K was the only 6/12 part while the Core i5-8600K was 6/6 and Core i3-8350K was 4/4.

There’s no word on the pricing or launch date but we know that these chips are expected to be introduced in the coming months so we will keep you posted as more information arrives. Aside from that, motherboard makers have already started shipping new BIOS firmware to support the upcoming CPUs which you can check out here.

Intel Desktop Platform Chipset Comparison

Chipset Name Raptor Lake-S (RPL-S) PCH / 700 Series (Z790) Alder Lake-S (ADL-S) PCH / 600 Series (Z690) Rocket Lake-S (RKL-S) PCH / 500 Series (Z590) Comet Lake-S (CML-S) PCH / 400 Series (Z490) Coffee Lake S (CNL-H) PCH / 300 Series (Z390/h470, B360, Q370, h410) Coffee Lake S (KBL-R) PCH / Z370 Platform
Process Node 14nm 14nm 14nm 14nm 14nm 22nm
Processor 24,16C,12C,10C,6C,4C (TBD) 16C,12C,10C,6C,4C (Full corporate/consumer SKU stack at launch) 8C, 6C (Full corporate/consumer SKU stack at launch) 10C, 8C, 6C, 4C, 2C (Full corporate/consumer SKU stack at launch) 8C, 6C, 4C, 2C (Full corporate/consumer SKU stack at launch) 8C, 6C, 4C (6 Consumer SKUs at Launch)
Memory Up To DDR5-5600 (Native)
Up To DDR4-3200 (Native)?
Up To DDR5-4800 (Native)
Up To DDR4-3200 (Native)
Up To DDR4-3200 (Native) Up To DDR4-2933 (Native) Up To DDR4-2666 (Native) Up To DDR4-2666 (Native)
Media, Display & Audio eDP / 4DDI (DP, HDMI) Display Capabilities eDP / 4DDI (DP, HDMI) Display Capabilities DP 1. 2 & HDMI 2.0, HBR3
HDCP 2.2 (HDMI 2.0a w/LSPCON)
12-bit AV1/HEVC & VP9 10-bit Enc/Dec, HDR, Rec.2020, DX12
Integrated Dual-Core Audio DSP With USB Audio offload
SoundWire Digital Audio Interface
DP 1.2 & HDMI 1.4
HDCP 2.2 (HDMI 2.0a w/LSPCON)
HEVC & VP9 10-bit Enc/Dec, HDR, Rec.2020, DX12
Integrated Dual-Core Audio DSP
SoundWire Digital Audio Interface
DP 1.2 & HDMI 1.4
HDCP 2.2 (HDMI 2.0a w/LSPCON)
HEVC & VP9 10-bit Enc/Dec, HDR, Rec.2020, DX12
Integrated Dual-Core Audio DSP
SoundWire Digital Audio Interface
DP 1.2 & HDMI 1.4
HDCP 2.2 (HDMI 2.0a w/LSPCON)
HEVC & VP9 10-bit Enc/Dec, HDR, Rec.2020, DX12
Integrated Dual-Core Audio DSP
I/O & Connectivity Integrated USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 (20G)
Integrated Intel Wireless-AC (Wi-Fi6E/ 7 BT CNVio) with Gig+
Integrated SDXC 4.0 Controller
Thunderbolt 4.0
Integrated USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 (20G)
Integrated Intel Wireless-AC (Wi-Fi6E/ 7 BT CNVio) with Gig+
Integrated SDXC 4. 0 Controller
Thunderbolt 4.0
Integrated USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 (20G)
Integrated Intel Wireless-AC (Wi-Fi6E/ BT CNVi)
Integrated SDXC 3.0 Controller
Thunderbolt 4.0 (Maple Ridge)
Integrated USB 3.2 Gen 2
Integrated Intel Wireless-AC (Wi-Fi / BT CNVi)
Integrated SDXC 3.0 Controller
Thunderbolt 3.0 (Titan Ridge) w/ DP 1.4
Integrated USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 Gbps)
Integrated Intel Wireless-AC (Wi-Fi / BT CNVi)
Integrated SDXC 3.0 Controller
Thunderbolt 3.0 (Titan Ridge) w/ DP 1.4
Integrated USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 Gbps)
Thunderbolt 3.0 (Alpine Ridge)
Storage Next-Gen Intel Optane memory
PCIe 5.0 (CPU Lanes), 6x SATA 3.0
Next-Gen Intel Optane memory
PCIe 5.0, 6x SATA 3.0
Next-Gen Intel Optane memory
PCIe 4.0, 6x SATA 3.0
Next-Gen Intel Optane memory
PCIe 3.0, 6x SATA 3.0
Next Gen Intel Optane memory
PCIe 3.0, 6x SATA 3.0
Next Gen Intel Optane memory
PCIe 3. 0, 6x SATA 3.0
Max PCH PCIe Lanes Up To 20 (Gen 4)
Up To 8 (Gen 3)
Up To 12 (Gen 4)
Up To 16 (Gen 3)
Up To 24 (Gen 3) Up To 24 (Gen 3) Up To 24 (Gen 3) Up To 24 (Gen 3)
Max CPU PCIe Lanes TBD Up To 16 (Gen 5)
Up To 4 (Gen 4)
Up To 20 (Gen 4) Up To 16 (Gen 3) Up To 16 (Gen 3) Up To 16 (Gen 3)
Max USB Ports Up To 5 (USB 3.2 Gen 2×2)
Up To 10 (USB 3.2 Gen 2×1)
Up To 10 (USB 3.2 Gen 1×1)
Up To 14 (USB 2.0)
Up To 4 (USB 3.2 Gen 2×2)
Up To 10 (USB 3.2 Gen 2×1)
Up To 10 (USB 3.2 Gen 1×1)
Up To 14 (USB 2.0)
Up To 3 (USB 3.2 Gen 2×2)
Up To 10 (USB 3.2 Gen 2×1)
Up To 10 (USB 3.2 Gen 1×1)
Up To 14 (USB 2.0)
Up To 10 (USB 3.2)
Up To 14 (USB 2.0)
Up To 10 (USB 3.1)
Up To 14 (USB 2.0)
Up To 10 (USB 3.0)
Up To 14 (USB 2.0)
Security N/A N/A N/A Intel SGX 1. 0 Intel SGX 1.0 Intel SGX 1.0
Power Management C10 & S0ix Support for Modern Standby C10 & S0ix Support for Modern Standby C10 & S0ix Support for Modern Standby C10 & S0ix Support for Modern Standby C10 & S0ix Support for Modern Standby C8 Support
Launch 2022 2021 2021 2019 2018 2017

Which Intel 9th Generation CPUs are you most interested in?

  • Core i9-9900K (8 Core / 16 Thread) ~488 USD

  • Core i7-9700K (8 Core / 8 Thread) ~374 USD

  • Core i5-9600K (6 Core / 6 Thread) ~262 USD

Poll Options are limited because JavaScript is disabled in your browser.

i5-9600K vs i9-9900K — Apex Legends with RTX 2080 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

RTX 2080 with

Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz

Apex Legends

RTX 2080 with

Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz


i5-9600K
i9-9900K

Multi-Thread Performance

13352 Pts

20500 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2677 Pts

2908 Pts

Apex Legends

i5-9600K vs i9-9900K in Apex Legends using RTX 2080 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-9600K
i9-9900K


Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

151.7 FPS

1080p

157.0 FPS

1440p

112.9 FPS

1440p

115.1 FPS

2160p

67. 4 FPS

2160p

68.7 FPS

w1440p

96.5 FPS

w1440p

98.3 FPS

High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

223.2 FPS

1080p

229.7 FPS

1440p

174.5 FPS

1440p

177.3 FPS

2160p

112.8 FPS

2160p

114.7 FPS

w1440p

152.9 FPS

w1440p

155.3 FPS

Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

294.7 FPS

1080p

302.3 FPS

1440p

236.0 FPS

1440p

239. 5 FPS

2160p

158.3 FPS

2160p

160.7 FPS

w1440p

209.3 FPS

w1440p

212.3 FPS

Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

437.8 FPS

1080p

447.7 FPS

1440p

359.2 FPS

1440p

363.9 FPS

2160p

249.2 FPS

2160p

252.7 FPS

w1440p

322.1 FPS

w1440p

326.3 FPS

i5-9600K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
i9-9900K
  • The i9-9900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-9900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-9900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-9900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-9600K vs i9-9900K specifications

i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Architecture
i5-9600K i9-9900K
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Generation Core i5
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Core i7
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# SR3WZ unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released Oct 2018 Oct 2018
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Cache
i5-9600K i9-9900K
Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
Cache L3 9MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Cores
i5-9600K i9-9900K
# of Cores 6 8
# of Threads 6 16
Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
SMP # CPUs 1 1
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Features
i5-9600K i9-9900K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Notes
i5-9600K i9-9900K
This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Performance
i5-9600K i9-9900K
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3.7 GHz 3.6 GHz
Multiplier 37. 0x 36.0x
Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
TDP 95 W 95 W
Turbo Clock up to 4.6 GHz up to 5 GHz
Voltage variable variable
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Physical
i5-9600K i9-9900K
Die Size unknown unknown
Foundry Intel Intel
Package FC-LGA1151 FC-LGA14C
Process Size 14 nm 14 nm
Socket Intel Socket 1151 Intel Socket 1151
Transistors unknown unknown
tCaseMax 72°C 72°C

Share Your Comments 0

Compare i5-9600K vs i9-9900K in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

F1 2018

2018

Far Cry 5

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Shadow of War

2017

Total War: Warhammer II

2017

Wolfenstein II

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Core i9-9900K: What is the difference?

61 BALLLA

Intel Core i5-9600K

67 Ballla

Intel Core i9-9900k

Winter when comparing

VS

64 Facts compared to

9000. 9600K

INTEC Why is Intel Core i5-9600K better than Intel Core i9-9900K?

Why is Intel Core i9-9900K better than Intel Core i5-9600K?

  • 29.73% higher CPU speed?
    8 x 3.6GHz vs 6 x 3.7GHz
  • 10 more CPU threads?
    16 vs 6
  • 0.5MB more L2 cache?
    2MB vs 1.5MB
  • 1.74x higher PassMark score?
    18898 vs 10878
  • 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
    5GHz vs 4.6GHz
  • 7MB more L3 cache?
    16MB vs 9MB
  • 128KB more L1 cache?
    512KB vs 384KB
  • 7.22% higher PassMark score (single)?
    2986 vs 2785

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i5-9600k

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i9-9900k

Apple M1 Pro (10-Core)

Intel Core I5-9600K

VS 9000 9000 VS

004 AMD RYZEN 5 3600

Intel Core i9-9900K

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x

Intel Core i5-9600K

VS

Intel Core I7-8700K

INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE Intel Core i9-9900

Intel Core i5-9600K

VS

Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i9-9900K

VS

I5-12600K

9000 INTEC

Intel Core i7-9700k

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5800x

Intel Core i5-9600K

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

VS 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

Intel Core i5-9600K

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x

Intel Core i9-9900k

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Intel Core i9-9900k

VS

Intel Core i7-9700K

Intel Core i5-9600K

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600g

Intel Core I9-9900K

VS

AMD Ryzen 9 5900x 9000) 9600K

VS

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i9-9900K

VS

Intel Core i9-9900KF

Costs

Users

Reviews

0004 Intel Core i5-9600k

1 reviews of users

Intel Core i5-9600k

10. 0 /10

1 reviews of users

Intel Core I9-9900K

4 $

Intel Core I9-000

8.8 /10

4 Reviews of users

Functions

Price and quality ratio

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

8.5 /10

003

Games

10.0 /10

1 Votes

/10

4 Votes 9000

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 Votes

/10

4 Votes

004

8.8 /10

4 votes

performance cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.6GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2666MHz

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

41.6GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports memory troubleshooting code

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Result Cinebench R20 (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender test result (bmw27)

303.7seconds

164.2seconds

The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

980.5seconds

544seconds

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multi-threading

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

Multi-threading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides better performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-9600K

✔Intel Core i9-9900K

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8. Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-9600K

✖Intel Core i9-9900K

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-9600K)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900K)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Testing Intel Core i5-9600K, i7-9700K, i9-9900K, i9-9900KF and i9-9900KS processors using the new 2020 methodology

Regular readers have long noticed that we try to make processor testing methods «long-lived» — at least for a year or two. The fact is that when using a large number of real applications that solve specific problems (and not simple synthetics), the process of studying each processor takes a fairly long time. But its absolute speed indicators are not always interesting in themselves — it is much more useful to be able to compare them with a large number of similar solutions, including, for example, a processor from the same company that cost the same, but three to five years ago. And these results still need to be collected, which in itself is not done quickly. However, updating the software is still required, and its “needs” also change, which leads to a change in the results. In particular, the difference between «old» and «new» processors often increases — after all, it is usually not possible to perform optimization for new ones in advance. Therefore, for buyers, newer test results are always more relevant. And the problem of the limited results base is solved simply (although not quickly): you need to test as many interesting models of different times as possible. And yet, first of all, the most «fresh» processors are of interest, which are just widely represented in retail chains. Now both AMD and Intel have updated their assortment, we have already met almost all the characteristic representatives of the last wave, and it is time for quiet time , the best way to update the methodology and get new results.

Test participants

Intel Core i5-9600K Intel Core i7-9700K Intel Core i9-9900K Intel Core i9-9900KF Intel Core i9-9900KS
Kernel name Coffee Lake Refresh Coffee Lake Refresh Coffee Lake Refresh Coffee Lake Refresh Coffee Lake Refresh
Production technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm
Core frequency, GHz 3.7/4.6 3.6/4.9 3.6/5.0 3. 6/5.0 4.0/5.0
Number of cores/threads 6/6 8/8 8/16 8/16 8/16
L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 192/192 256/256 256/256 256/256 256/256
L2 cache, KB 6×256 8×256 8×256 8×256 8×256
L3 cache, MiB 9 12 16 16 16
RAM 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666
TDP, W 95 95 95 95 127
Number of PCIe 3.0 lanes 16 16 16 16 16
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630 no UHD Graphics 630

For the very first article, we decided to take five Intel processors — the top (in their lines) ninth generation models for the updated version of LGA1151. With the fastest Core i5 (i.e. 9600K), everything is simple in general — it is he who is taken as a “scale unit” in the new line of tests, i.e. 100 points in each group is just 9600K. And the 9700K is a similar senior processor of the Core i7 line: recall that in the eighth generation of Core, such processors were also six-core, but, unlike the Core i5, they supported Hyper-Threading — in the ninth they were made eight-core, but the additional threads were “cut off” . Core i9 became the seniors in all respects — there are eight cores and Hyper-Threading. But they themselves became somehow … a lot.

Recall that since 2011, it has been common for LGA115x to have only one or two top models with an unlocked multiplier (which is just indicated by the “K” index in the number) in each generation. One each was in the third, sixth and seventh — 3770K, 6700K and 7700K. Two — in the second, fourth and eighth: 2600K / 2700K, 4770K / 4790K and 8700K/8086K, respectively (the latter was produced in a small edition as part of the 40th anniversary of the i8086). In the fifth, there was only one desktop Core i7-5775C at all, in principle, so some order in the notation was not required. In the ninth, the Core i9-9900K first appeared, but later the 9900KF and 9900KS were added to it.

The first one is simple: all models with index “F” come with a locked video core. The last time such Cores were encountered only in the second generation, although there were “unsuccessful” crystals later (the GPU occupies a considerable area, so defects in this area are possible) — but they were disposed of as part of the Xeon or even “went under the knife” that the company could afford. In 2017, another interesting direction was found: Kaby Lake-X processors for LGA2066, where the integrated GPU could not be used anyway. In principle, for two years now, some users have been waiting for the release of Coffee Lake-X, but still waiting unsuccessfully — since the main problem of Intel is not even the return of competition, but such a side effect of it as a shortage of processors: the number of cores had to be increased, so the number of processors obtained from the same platters has decreased (AMD did this easily due to initially much smaller volumes — and in some mass segments the number of cores is much more limited: for example, six to eight cores in laptops — until recently, almost unequivocally Intel ) — the crystals have become larger. Under such conditions, the company was not up to the dispersion of forces in areas — especially since it took both an increase in the number of cores in Xeon and a reduction in prices for models for LGA2066. In general, one of the results was the decision to return to the practice of releasing Core with a disabled GPU — which, recall, has not happened since the days of LGA1155 (and there were very few models without graphics at all — but many with partially working GPUs). In principle, no one was «very offended» — for a long time there were voices that it was not necessary, they say, GPUs are everywhere. Especially considering that discrete video cards are still used in some desktop systems, and the simultaneous operation of two chips in this segment is still exotic (unlike mobile PCs). In general, it was possible to increase the shipment volumes of processors — albeit formally and slightly different processors, so you have to indicate on the boxes that a discrete video card is required for their operation. But in such conditions, there should not be a fundamental difference between «K» and «KF». In addition … that, in fact, theoretically, these are crystals of different quality — and not necessarily the defects are localized in only one part. Therefore, the behavior of models with different indices may turn out to be slightly different. What is interesting to check in practice.

But the Core i9-9900KS is an aria from another opera. The platform update took place last year — before the Ryzen «3000 series» went on sale. As we have already seen, Intel has nothing to fully «answer» these processors. It is also impossible to radically improve Coffee Lake Refresh: in fact, this is a development in 2015, where they managed to “shove” twice as many cores as it was originally, which “pulls” the engineering feat onto , but leaves almost no freedom for maneuver. And the new microarchitecture is planned only for the new year that has already come and not at its very beginning. But something needed to be done — so we went along the path already tested last year: similarly to the Core i7-8086K, which is the «elite» analogue of the Core i7-8700K, the Core i9 appeared-9900KS. This is where the analogy ends, because in the i7-8086K they increased all the frequencies — both the base one (which has no meaning for a long time — they never work on exactly such processors for a long time), and the maximum one, and in the i9-9900KS they “pulled up” only the base one. True, they acted cunningly with the maximum — in the i9-9900K , the sacred 5 GHz can only be achieved with a load on 1-2 cores, and in the i9-9900KS — for everything. But “may” does not mean they will. If only because the power consumption is limited and the difference between these models is not so great. The «default» TDP, however, has increased — but this is precisely due to an increase in the base frequency: it has no other meaning for a long time, since they have never worked on such processors for a long time. Yes, and they can exceed the base limit — but for a short time (so the effect is not always noticeable) and is also limited. True, temporary upper limits are connected with TDP, so an additional margin of 30-40 W for a more “aggressive” boost mode appeared, but nothing more. And the inclusion of various auto-overclocking functions (which motherboard manufacturers have long and often sinned “by default”), as a rule, disables all restrictions for i9-9900K, and for i9-9900KS, so in this case the processors will behave approximately the same as — with an accuracy of 5%. And what will happen to both of them when trying to get not even 5 GHz on all cores, but close to that, has long been known to all overclockers: a sharp increase in power consumption to a level of 200 W and above. So letting go of limits “without looking” is fraught — it’s better to set them up and work with frequencies more flexibly, which the manual mode allows. But this is a separate topic, most users do not touch at all.

In general, in fact, we have the release of the processor just for the sake of release — and very beautiful packaging, of course. It is possible that crystals are “better” and the thermal interface is of better quality than , so that during overclocking, some noticeable difference will appear. And whether it will be in normal use mode — you can just check, since this is not for long.

Especially since the main objects of testing for us today, perhaps, will not be specific processors (fortunately, most of them have long been familiar), but the methodology itself. What is very convenient to do on one platform is that all test subjects can be provided with not just equal, but identical conditions: one Asus ROG Maximus X Hero motherboard based on the Z370 chipset, two identical memory modules of 8 GB each in the same DDR4-2666 mode (this is officially the fastest for all these processors), etc., etc. Yes, and the processors of the same generation for the same platform differ only quantitatively, but not qualitatively: Core i5 has six cores, Core i7 has eight of the same, and Core i9Hyper-Threading technology has been added to them. And the capacity of the third level cache is different, of course, but that’s all.

Test methodology

Test methodology is described in detail in a separate article, and the detailed results of all tests are available in the form of a complete table (in Microsoft Excel format). Directly in the articles, we use the processed results: normalized with respect to the reference system (Intel Core i5-9600K with 16 GB of memory, AMD Radeon Vega 56 video card and SATA SSD — she is directly involved in today’s article) and grouped by computer application areas. Accordingly, all diagrams related to applications show dimensionless scores — so greater than is always better than . And from this year we are finally transferring game tests to an optional status (the reasons for which are discussed in detail in the description of the test methodology), and only specialized materials will be available for them. In the main line of tests, only a couple of «processor-dependent» games in low resolution with average graphics quality remain — this, of course, is synthetic, but conditions close to reality for testing processors are not suitable, since nothing depends on processors in them.

iXBT Application Benchmark 2020

Plus 20% off an extra pair of cores — and another around through Hyper-Threading support: in these applications, the number of computational threads is important. The difference between the three modifications of the i9-9900K, as one would expect, is small: it fits into the supposed «difference in quality» of the crystals and a slight «expansion» of the heat pack.

Similar to the previous case — only here both multi-core and multi-threading are even more relevant. And the Core i9 gap is slightly increasing-9900KS. , which remains insignificant, however, is — but officially Intel «asks» for it no less than the cost of the package 🙂

The load becomes a little more complex and heterogeneous. Which is well seen, by the way, in terms of energy consumption, which behaves slightly differently on different processors. But in general, for Photodex ProShow Producer, the “power” in this test is below average even for the Core i5-9600K, so this program cannot completely “load work” on older LGA1151 processor models. Adobe After Effects behaves in a similar way (but a little better), but the first three are one of the main “cheaters” within the entire set. It is not surprising that here the performance difference is reduced. Although the nature of her behavior remains the same. But we didn’t expect anything else as part of testing processors of the same microarchitecture of the same generation by the same manufacturer under absolutely identical conditions. Some interesting nuances can only be discovered by testing «more different» processors, and today we have, first of all, just a test run of the methodology.

When choosing a “processor for a photographer” from the Intel LGA1151 assortment, as we see, there is no point in chasing top models at all — these programs hardly digest an “too large” number of cores (especially Hyper-Threading). So, if you also take into account the price, you can stop at the Core i5.

The increase in performance turns out to be actually «super-linear», but not for the first time — and previous versions of this program turned out to be susceptible to cache memory capacity (not even per thread, but total), and Intel still has it in these lines : 9, 12 and 16 MB. Plus, the difference in the number of computation threads — for a simple integer code that breaks well into relatively independent threads, this is relevant. And the 9900KS «can afford» to work at a higher frequency and at full load — with all the consequences.

In archiving — similar, but to a lesser extent. Judging by the power consumption, both programs load older Cores much less than the same FineReader. Cause? Active work with memory and a large dependence of computational threads on each other, which in total does not allow squeezing the maximum.

Half of the programs from this group do a good job with what. The remaining two applications also come only to Core i5 and i7, but not to Core i9 — from which we can make an unambiguous conclusion that they somehow … do not really need Hyper-Threading technology 🙂

But the final performance indicators strongly depend on from her too. Which causes an ambivalent attitude towards Intel’s approach to ranking processors by families. On the one hand, eight Core cores without HT support are faster than six with it — so the change in the ninth generation Core i7 device seems to be in the right direction. On the other hand, there is always such a hardware and can hardly «suffer» in the process of crystal production. Thus, the price difference between Core i7 and Core i9due only to the fact that money is very needed , and none of the buyers likes this. Unlike AMD’s approach, which usually requires you to pay only for the number of cores themselves (well, GPU units in models with graphics). There are exceptions to this rule, but they are few. Unlike Intel, where Hyper-Threading support has become the prerogative of either budget Pentiums or top-end Core i9s, but that’s all.

Energy consumption and energy efficiency

All older models of the ninth generation are not too different from each other — and are noticeably superior (in a bad sense of the word) to the eighth and previous ones (with the exception of perhaps the first, but that was more than ten years ago). On the other hand, there are many much more «gluttonous» platforms on the market. So there are only two points of interest here. «KF» fits into the same limits as «K», but the need to release processors with disabled blocks did not arise from scratch — as a result, the power consumption of these crystals is slightly higher on average. But «KS» is noticeably more «gluttonous», but both the reason and the mechanism for the occurrence of this phenomenon are described above.

And the most annoying thing is that the increase in performance is less than the increase in power consumption. In general, the Core i9-9900K already worked at at the limit of a reasonable , and the “energy efficiency” of the new product, of course, decreased even more. Yes, performance has increased (almost imperceptibly), but if it is so important to someone at any cost, and the choice is limited only to products for LGA1151, then manual overclocking of the Core i9-9900K will be much more fruitful. In principle, this is true for all subjects, but the Core i9in this regard, the most interesting, because they have «nothing cut off.» However, there will be no significant difference between these three modifications in this case at all.

Games

As already mentioned in the description of the methodology, it makes no sense to keep the «classic approach» to testing gaming performance. Since video cards have long been not only determining performance, but also significantly affecting the cost of the system, you need to “dance” in gaming PCs exclusively from them. In addition, in modern conditions, fixing a game set for a long time does not make sense, since literally everything can change with the next update of the game. But we will conduct a brief test, albeit in relatively synthetic conditions, using a couple of games in the «processor-dependent» mode.

However, these are usually obtained at an «excessive» frame rate: allowing without any special costs to increase the picture quality to a level that the video card can still handle. The older processor models themselves do not interfere too much with the Vega 56 we use: even Core i5 (that is, six cores with 9 MB L3) is enough for more than 200 frames per second. Adding cores and other quantitative improvements can increase the result a little more, but do not fundamentally change anything.

Total

Basically, today we did not test processors with a new method, but a new technique with well-known processors. All these models belong to the same generation of the same microarchitecture, differing only quantitatively. Accordingly, some “bangs” could have appeared only due to errors in the tests, but this did not happen. So, we can move on, gradually starting to compare already significantly different processors, which we will do in the following articles.

Conditionally new for us today were two processors: Core i9-9900KF and Core i9-9900KS. The first one is rejection, so it behaves a little worse than the ancestor of the family when using a discrete video card, and without it it is completely inoperable. But in general, the difference in performance is small, so as a method of dealing with shortages, the decision is correct: better than nothing. And the Core i9-9900KS is actually just a factory overclocked modification for big fans of the brand, and slightly overclocked: manual optimization allows you to squeeze more, but it is also available for 9900K, and for 9900KF. This processor does not have any serious advantages and cannot affect the competition in the market. Performance leadership is completely behind other processors that we have already studied and which we will deal with again next time — already in a new way .

Intel Core i9 9900K vs i5 9600K:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i9 9900K

Intel Core i5 9600K

Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i99900K at 3.6GHz or i5 9600K 6-core at 3.7GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single stream capacity

Rating in tests using one kernel

Core i9 9900k

69

Core i5 9600k

64

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks, where all kernels

Core I9

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 i5 9600K

33

Energy efficiency

Chip energy efficiency

Core i9 9900K

46

0003

NanoReview rating

Final processor score

Core i9 9900K

58

Core i5 9600K

48

Key differences

What are the main differences between 9600K and 9900K

Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 9900K

  • Has 7 MB more L3 cache
  • Has 2 physical cores more
  • 9% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4. 6 GHz)

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i9 9900K
+13%

1332

Core i5 9600K

1183

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i9 9900K
+88%

12359

Core i5 9600K

6584

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i9 9900K
+7%

2945

Core i5 9600K

2764

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i9 9900K
+74%

18709

Core i5 9600K

10783

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i9 9900K
+6%

1268

Core i5 9600K

1197

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i9 9900K
+49%

8410

Core i5 9600K

5654

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full specifications of Intel Core i9 9900K and i5 9600K

General information

Manufacturer Intel Intel
Release date October 8, 2018 October 8, 2018
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake

Coffee Lake
Model number i9-9900K i5-9600K
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores 8 6
Number of threads 16 6
Frequency 3. 6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 5 GHz 4.6 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 37x
Tire speed 8 GT/s 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 256KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 16MB (shared) 9MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier Yes Yes

Power consumption

Process 14 nanometers 14 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 95 W 95 W
Critical temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency 350 MHz 350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency 1200 MHz 1150 MHz
Shader blocks 192 192
TMUs 24 24
ROPs 3 3
Computer units 24 24
TGP 15W 15W
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz 4096×2304 — 60Hz

Igpu Flops

Core i9 9900k

0.38 Teraflops

Core I5 ​​9600K

0.38 Teraflops

9000 9000 9057 DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666 Max. size 128 GB 128 GB Number of channels 2 2 Max. bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 41.6 GB/s ECC support No No

Other

Official site Site Intel Core i9 9900K Site Intel Core i5 9600K
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 16
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i9 9900K

26 (76. 5%)

Core i5 9600K

8 (23.5%)

Total votes: 34

Competitors

1.
Core i9 9900K vs M1 Max

2.
Core i9 9900K vs Ryzen 7 5800X

3.
Core i99900K vs M1 Pro

4.
Core i9 9900K vs Apple M1

5.
Core i9 9900K vs Core i9 12900K

6.
Core i9 9900K vs Core i7 12700K

7.
Core i9 9900K vs Core i5 12600K

8.
Core i5 9600K vs Core i5 12600K

9.
Core i5 9600K vs Core i5 12400

What will you choose: Intel Core i5 9600K or i9 9900K?

Family

  • Core i7-9700K
    Compare
  • Core i9-9900K
    Compare
  • Core i9-9900KS
    Compare

9000 9000 9000.04 82.000 9000.000 9000. 04 82.

Core i5-9600K

81.1

Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

Speed ​​in office use

Core i9-9900K

81.9 (+3.1%)

Core i5-9600K

79.4

Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.

The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

Speed ​​in heavy applications

Core i9-9900K

61.7 (+18.3%)

Core i5-9600K

50.4 maximum

The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

Speed ​​of numerical operations

Simple household tasks

Core i9-9900K

79.6 (+3%)

Core i5-9600K

77.2

Demanding games and tasks

Core i9-9900K

66.2 (+15.3%)

Core i5-9600K

56.1

Extreme

Core i9-9900K

26. 1 (+47.5%)

Core i5-9600K

13.7

Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

Cinebench R23 Single Core

Intel Core i9-9900K

1284 (+0.6%)

Intel Core i5-9600K

1276

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Intel Core i9-9900K

12450 (+41. 4 %)

Intel Core i5-9600k

7301

Cinebench R20 Single Core

Intel Core i9-9900k

518 (+7.1%)

I5-9600k

481 9000 9000 9000 Cine

Intel Core i9-9900k

4995 (+47.5%)

Intel Core i5-9600k

2624

Cinebench R15 SINGLE CORE

Intel Core I9-9900K

219 (+6.8%)

Intel Core INTEL CORE 2044000

Cinebench R15 Multi Core

Intel Core i9-9900k

2245 (+48.1%)

Intel Core i5-9600k

9000 Geekbench 5 SINGLEL CORETEL CORETEL CORE ITEL INTEL INTL 6.4%)

Intel Core i5-9600K

1256

Geekbench 5 Multi Core

Intel Core i9-9900K

8779 (+35.7%)

Intel Core i5-9600K

5643

Blender 2.81 bmw27

Intel Core i9-9900K

163.8

Intel Core i5-9600k

318.4 (+48.6%)

Geekbench 3 Single Core

Intel Core i9-9900k

6250 (+19%)

Intel Core

9000 9000 9 Multi Core

Intel Core i9-9900k

35769 (+35. 6%)

Intel Core i5-9600k

23045

Cinebench R11.5

Intel Core i9-9900k

2.61 (+6.1%) -9600k

2.45

Cinebench R11.5

Intel Core i9-9900K

21.2 (+42%)

Intel Core i5-9600k

Cinebench R11.5 IGPU, Opengl IGPU, Opengl IGPU, OPENGL IGPU, OPENGL IGPU, OPENGL IGPU, OPENGL -9900K

45.4

Intel Core i5-9600K

52.6 (+13.7%)

Passmark

Intel Core i9-9900k

18862 (+42.6%)

Intel Core i5-9600k

10831

of the characteristics of

Data no, information may be missing or existing features may be omitted.

Basic

Manufacturer Intel Intel
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i9-9900K Processor (16M Cache, up to 5. 00 GHz) Intel® Core™ i5-9600K Processor (9M Cache, up to 4.60 GHz)
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Coffee Lake

Coffee Lake
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 nm 14 nm
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 01-2021 01-2021
Model Official name. i9-9900K i5-9600K
Cores The number of physical cores. 8 6
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 16 6
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). Missing
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 5GHz 4.6 GHz
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 16 MB 9 MB
Instructions 64-bit 64-bit
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s DMI3
Number of QPI links
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 95 W 95 W
Cooling system specifications PCG 2015D (130W) PCG 2015D (130W)

Video core

Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® UHD Graphics 630
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 350 MHz
Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1200 MHz 1150MHz
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802. 11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3

RAM

Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 64 GB 64 GB
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2
Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

PCI

PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 3
PCI configuration options Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4

Data Protection

AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

Decoration

Dimensions No data No data
Supported sockets No data No data
Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

Which is better

Intel Core i9-9900K

  • On average, gaming performance is 2% better.
  • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 3%.
  • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 12%.
  • The number of physical cores is 2 more.
  • The number of threads is 10 more.

Intel Core i5-9600K

  • Price lower by $389
  • Base frequency higher by 0.1 GHz.

Testing Intel Core i9-9900K and i5-9600KF in Escape from Tarkov, Insurgency:Sandstorm, RDR2 and other games

This article was written by a website visitor and has been rewarded.

Good day, dear readers! In this material, 2 processors from Intel will be tested: Core i5-9600KF and Core i9-9900K. Testing will consist of 2 parts, in the first part we will compare them in synthetics (only AIDA 64), but we will not dwell on this, because the results are known to everyone and the second part is a comparison in games, in particular, we will test the Witcher 3, Watch Dogs 2, Red Dead Redemption 2, Insurgency: Sandstorm, GTA 5 and Escape From Tarkov.

Initially, it was planned to compare the 9600KF and 9700K processors, since I already had a 9600KF and I wanted to replace it with an i7, however, due to the volatility of the ruble, as well as sharply increased prices for 9700K and still low prices for 9900K, I made choice in favor of the older model.

The processor was purchased in the BOX (dodecahedron) version for $400 in one of the small shops in Moscow.

Appearance:

recommendations

The processor is sold in its original dodecahedron packaging. Before installing the processor, I had to update the BIOS of the ASRock Z370M Pro4 motherboard to version 4.30.

Overclocking and Thermal Management

The I5-9600KF will perform both at stock frequencies and overclocked to 5.0 GHz in comparison. Initially, the idea was to overclock the i9-9900K, but even preliminary testing showed that with cooling in the form of the GAMMAXX 300, it is difficult to achieve even normal operation without exceeding normal temperatures.

By default, the ASRock Z370M Pro4 motherboard gave the i9-9900K a VCORE voltage of 1.350 V, which negatively affected the temperature and when trying to pass the AIDA stress test, the processor dropped the frequencies to 4.3 GHz. A minimum VCORE voltage of 1.210 V was found for it using LLC level 2. With these parameters, 9900K when passing the AIDA stress test recorded a temperature of 78 degrees.

Separately, it must be said that to tame the i9, the cooler fan speed was set to almost maximum values ​​(about 1500 rpm out of 1700 maximum). And when passing the Prime95 test with support for AVX instructions, it turned out to be impossible to maintain frequencies at the level of 4.7 GHz with this cooling (even at the maximum fan speed). Already after 30 seconds the temperature overcame the value of 90 degrees (apparently the turbo boost reacted precisely to this figure) and reset the frequencies to 4.3 GHz, at which the processor functioned quite successfully at a temperature of 71-73 degrees. Forced setting of 4.7 GHz on all cores during the prime 95 test with support for AVX instructions after 5 minutes showed a temperature of 96 degrees and continued to grow, which could lead to throttling in the future. In the future, I plan to replace the cooling system, but this had no effect on testing in games, since in games the temperature rarely went beyond 60 degrees.

At the same time, the i5-9600KF at 5.0 GHz in the Prime95 test with support for AVX instructions did not go beyond a temperature of 77 degrees with a cooler rotation speed of about 1300 rpm.

There are also problems on the Internet with VRM of motherboards that are not designed for i9-9900K, like the ASRock Z370m pro4 itself, but checking the temperature during stress tests using the most accurate tool — the hand, allows us to say that the temperature of the power elements motherboard do not go beyond 60 degrees. But here, I would like to say separately about the case and its cooling, the system was assembled in the Antec LanBoy Air case with 6 installed 120 mm fans, which undoubtedly had a positive effect on the temperatures of all components.

UPD: After all the tests, while writing the article, I decided to slightly improve the cooling of the cooler and added a second 90mm fan, which made it possible to reduce the temperature of the processor in prime 95 to 90 degrees when running at a frequency of 4.7 for all cores.

Test stand configuration

Maternal board: ASROCK Z370M Pro4

Processors:

Intel Core i5-9600KF Revision P0

Intel Core i9-9900K R0

cooling system: Deepcool Gammaxx 300 9000 Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1050W

RAM: GOODRAM IRDM Pro (IRP-3600D4V64L17/32GDC) 3600MHz 2x16Gb

9

compared03 90

3

CPU SHA3 test results

In general, everything is standard, except for the PhotoWorxx test, in which the i5-9600KF results did not increase after overclocking, but rather decreased, while during overclocking, the RAM settings did not change and with what such results are connected, I can’t explain, but I think there is a person in the comments who can tell.

Game tests

Now let’s move on to the games, for starters, I’ll say that all games were tested at a resolution of 1920×1080, while in all games, in order to reduce the dependence of results on the video card, the quality of textures was reduced, anti-aliasing was turned off, and the parameters that heavily loaded the video card were either reduced to the minimum value or turned off. The performance indicators were measured using the FPSMonitor program. All tests were carried out 2 times, and if both runs gave similar results, then the result of the second run was taken, if the results differed, a third test was performed.

To start testing in the game The Witcher 3, version 1.32.

Graphics settings used

In The Witcher, a run through the center of Novigrad was used for testing.

Performance difference between i9-9900K and i5-9600KF was not significant, but i9 was faster in LOW 1% by 10%, and in LOW 0. 1% by 6% (5.0 GHz) and 8% (Stock).

Next game Watch Dogs 2 version 1.017.189.2.1088394.

Graphics settings used

In Watch Dogs 2, for testing, a car was driven along the main street of the city (along the tram tracks).

The difference between the processors was the most significant, as the i9 was faster in average FPS by 14% (5.0 GHz) and 37% (Stock), in minimum FPS 76% (5.0 GHz) and 164% (Stock ), LOW 1% by 155% (5.0 GHz) and 311% (Stock) and LOW 0.1% by 77% (5.0 GHz) and 166% (Stock).

The next game is Red Dead Redemption version 1311.16 , the minimum quality preset was used here.

Graphics settings used

Red Dead Redemption 2 used the built-in benchmark.

The difference between the processors is as follows: i9 was faster in terms of average FPS by 6% (5.0 GHz) and 12% (Stock), by minimum FPS 54% (5.0 GHz) and 75% (Stock), by LOW 1% by 97% (5. 0 GHz) and 187% (Stock) and LOW 0.1% by 97% (5.0 GHz) and 123% (Stock).

Next game

i5 load was on average about 80-90%, and i9 no more than 60. The difference between the processors was noticed only in the minimum FPS and LOW 1% and LOW 0.1%, in favor of i9up to 65%, but the i5 processor at 5.0 GHz had a LOW 0.1% dip, I would say that it was most likely caused by some rare event, but over 3 runs the indicator was always low, but it cannot be ruled out simple coincidence (even 3 times in a row). At the same time, the low FPS of very rare events did not affect the gameplay.

Next Game GTA5 Build 2060 Online 1.51.

Graphics settings used

Built-in benchmark was used for testing.

In GTA5, i9 was faster than its younger brother in terms of average FPS by 5% (5.0 GHz) and 13% (Stock), in terms of minimum FPS 16% (5.0 GHz) and 20% (Stock), in terms of LOW 1% by 16% and LOW 0.1% by 20%.

And last tested game Escape From Tarkov version 0. 12.7.8753.

Graphics settings used

In Escape From Tarkov testing was carried out in offline mode on the Customs map, time in the game — morning (twilight), weather — rain.

Escape From Tarkov did not use i9 virtual threads during testing, however, 2 additional cores gave a decent boost, so i9 turned out to be 8% faster on average FPS (5.0 GHz) and 26% (Stock), on minimum FPS 19% (5.0 GHz) and 65% (Stock), LOW 1% by 8% (5.0 GHz) and 34% (Stock), and LOW 0.1% by 21% (5.0 GHz) and 67% (Stock).

Conclusions

As you can see, the difference in performance depends on the specific game, so in Watch Dogs 2 and RDR2 the difference in rare and very rare events of 1% and 0.1% was huge. In other games, the difference was not so significant, and in The Witcher the difference was no more than 5%. We can say that in some new games 6 cores, even at a frequency of 5.0 GHz, are no longer enough. In this case, you need to take into account the difference in price, which, in fact, is twofold. Overall, i5-9600K/KF is enough for most modern games, but if you decide to build a system from scratch, then you should think about eight-core processors (or six-core, but with 12 threads).

This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.

i5-9600K vs i9-9900K — Overwatch with RTX 2080 performance comparison

RTX 2080 with

Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz

Overwatch

i5-9600K
i9-9900K


Ultra quality
Resolution FPS
1080p

213.7 FPS

1080p

221.2 FPS

1440p

147.8 FPS

1440p

150.6 FPS

2160p

75.6 FPS

2160p

77.1 FPS

w1440p

119. 5 FPS

w1440p

121.8 FPS

High quality
Resolution FPS
1080p

296.1 FPS

1080p

304.6 FPS

1440p

218.4 FPS

1440p

221.9 FPS

2160p

124.4 FPS

2160p

126.5 FPS

w1440p

183.0 FPS

w1440p

185.9 FPS

Medium quality
Resolution FPS
1080p

378.6 FPS

1080p

388.1 FPS

1440p

289.1 FPS

1440p

293. 2 FPS

2160p

173.2 FPS

2160p

175.9 FPS

w1440p

246.4 FPS

w1440p

250.0 FPS

Low quality
Resolution FPS
1080p

543.5 FPS

1080p

554.9 FPS

1440p

430.4 FPS

1440p

435.7 FPS

2160p

270.8 FPS

2160p

274.7 FPS

w1440p

373.4 FPS

w1440p

378.2 FPS

i5-9600K
  • In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
i9-9900K
  • The i9-9900K has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
  • The i9-9900K has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
  • The i9-9900K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
  • The i9-9900K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.

Compare i5-9600K vs i9-9900K specifications

i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Architecture
i5-9600K i9-9900K
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Generation Core i5
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Core i7
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# SR3WZ unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released Oct 2018 Oct 2018
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Cache
i5-9600K i9-9900K
Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
Cache L3 9MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Cores
i5-9600K i9-9900K
# of Cores 6 8
# of Threads 6 16
Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
SMP# CPUs 1 1
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Features
i5-9600K i9-9900K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Notes
i5-9600K i9-9900K
This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
i5-9600K vs i9-9900K Performance
i5-9600K i9-9900K
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3.

2022 © All rights reserved