I7 2300k: Intel Core i7-2600K 3.4GHz (Boost) LGA 1155 Desktop Processor

Group Test Results

• Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
• Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
• Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works

• — Download and run UserBenchmark.
• — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
• — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
• — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
• — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
• — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
• — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
• — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
• — See speed test results from other users.
• — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
• — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
• — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

•   

  Intel Core i5-12600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400F

•   

  Intel Core i7-12700K

•   

  Intel Core i3-12100F

•   

  Intel Core i5-12400

•   

  Intel Core i5-11600K

•   

  Intel Core i7-11700K

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

•   

  AMD Ryzen 5 3600

•   

  Intel Core i5-11400F

•   

  Intel Core i5-9600K

•   

  Intel Core i5-10400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

How To Install Coretemp Gadgets On Your Computer – STJS Gadgets Portal

If you want to install Coretemp gadgets on your computer, there are a few things you need to do first. Coretemp is a freeware program that monitors your CPU temperature and other vital statistics. It’s a great way to keep an eye on your computer’s health, and it can also help you troubleshoot problems. Before you can install Coretemp, you’ll need to download and install the Windows Gadget Platform. This is a free download from Microsoft, and it’s required for Coretemp to work. Once you’ve installed the Windows Gadget Platform, you can download Coretemp from the developer’s website. Once you’ve downloaded Coretemp, double-click the setup file to begin the installation process. Follow the prompts and agree to the terms and conditions. When the installation is complete, you’ll find Coretemp in the list of gadgets in the Windows Sidebar. To add Coretemp to your Windows Sidebar, right-click the gadget and select “Add to Sidebar.” Coretemp will now appear in the Sidebar, and you can move it around to position it where you want it. To remove Coretemp from the Sidebar, right-click the gadget and select “Remove from Sidebar. ”

The CoreTemp gadget is available for purchase on the ALCPU Forum. Discuss Core Temp topics here on Quora. I can’t seem to get the CT gadget to work. When Windows recognizes the.gadget extension, it will ask you to install or cancel it. You could also use Winrar or 7zip to open the file. CoreTemp for Intel’s Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors provides accurate temperature readings. A AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct) is required as the primary processor.

The Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB Mobo I recommend. A 250GB HDD and a WD Blue cable are required. A Dell Inspiron B1304 4GB / Mem: 2x16GBDDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKWTRZ – 32GB total /psu: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W. NAS: Core i7 (2300K, 3.4 GHz, Cythe Mugen2) / Core i9 (2300K, 3.5 GHz, Cythe Mugen2) / Core i10 (2730K, 3.6 GHz, Cythe Mugen2) / Biostar TP67XE is a 2x motherboard that comes with a Biostar TP67XE. The Inland Pro has a capacity of 120GB on HDDs. To use it, the computer requires Intel HD 620, 1 GB RAM, and the AMD X3430 (2. 40 GHz @ 3.06 GHz), which also uses 1 GB RAM. MSI H55M-ED55 motherboard and graphics card, AMD Phenom II X4 B93 graphics card, and PNY CS1111 240GB hard drive

How Do I Download Coretemp?

Credit: mail.start64.com

In order to download CoreTemp, simply head to the official website and click on the “Download” button. Once the download is complete, run the installer and follow the on-screen instructions. CoreTemp will then be installed on your computer and ready for use.

Does Core Temp Have Virus?

Credit: fogartychiropractic.com

There is no evidence that Core Temp is infected with a virus. However, as with any program, it is always a good idea to use caution when downloading and installing it on your computer. If you are concerned about viruses, we recommend that you scan your computer with an anti-virus program before installing Core Temp.

Can I read the file attached to this post? This tool is not just for adware and spyware; it is also a driver or bios updater. It’s been there for about 18 months, and I haven’t received a single complaint. How can we hide a POS in a main window? I have not received a single complaint or comment about it since it was installed approximately 18 months ago. This program isn’t just spyware; it’s also a driver or bios update program. It is illegal to install anything on a computer without first purchasing it, so users can’t do so.

Core Temp does not contain any embedded malware or any other malicious software, according to the Core Temp home page. It comes with two extras in addition to the shortcut: a warning that malware may be present and an offer to add a shortcut to an online game. This monitor is ideal for Intel’s Core/Core 2 and AMD’s Phenom II X4 B93. If you run anav.exe incorrectly, some software may still flag it. If you installed Core Temp, it is highly unlikely that you received malware from a third party. It is not necessary to register just to complain about your design mistakes. If you prefer, you can add a donation link to your PayPal account to the application, under the about section, on your home page, or wherever else you wish.

You can also revert to a portable version that you don’t need to install if possible; it makes installing software a lot easier. The Core Temp monitor provides accurate temperature readings for Intel’s Core 2 and Core 2a processors. This software, which isn’t just adware or malware, has other functions as well. There is nothing a user can do that causes their computer to malfunction; all they have to do is purchase it. I am familiar with what it is. How can I get this link gone? If you dislike the installers, you can easily download the portable zip file from the ‘More downloads’ section. Windows 10 does not always install the best drivers for all PC/laptop/tablet computers on the planet. Snappy Driver Installer (SDI) and its fork SDI Origin are two excellent free alternatives to installed drivers.

Core Temp – A Great Option For Monitoring Processor Temperature

Core Temp is definitely worth a look if you want a simple, easy-to-use and powerful tool for monitoring processor temperature and information. This program, which is compatible with Windows OS, Intel, AMD, and VIA x86 processors, is also an excellent choice.

Does Coretemp Work With Amd?

It can be run on either the Intel or AMD platforms or on the VIA x86 platform.

AMD processors are correctly identified by CoreTemp. You should express your frustration about bugs in Core Temp and describe the problems so that they can be resolved and fixed more quickly. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct) / is the most common configuration for this purpose. Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB. The WD Blue 250GB drive is included. G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ – 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W Core i7 2612K, 3.6 GHz (Scythe Mugen2). The main operating system is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct).

Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB This card comes with a WD Blue 250GB hard disk drive and a GPU. In Dell’s RX 570, the following configuration is available: 2GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 8GBXL RipjawsX – 16GB total. The Core i7 has a peak power consumption of 3.2 GHz (Scythe Mugen2). Mobo with Biostar TP67XE / 2x. Inland Pro 120GB HDD / GPU: ATi64 Mach4-1600 / EMU: 4x4GBDDR30000 G.Skill 8GB RipjawsX – 16GB total / PSU: This is an internally cooled S12II 620W Core i7 2400K @ 5.4 GHz (Scythe Mugen2)! The TP67XE is available in the Mobo. Irland Pro 120GB HDD and GPUs, ATi64 Mach3-1600 RAM, 4GBDDR3 RAM, G.Skill 8GBXL RipjawsX, 16GB total / PSU: The AMD A6-3650, Asus F1A75-Mpro, 16G ram, my CPU is running between 9 and 3 degrees Celsius, as well as my graphics card, which has a rated speed of 300 kps.

AMD’s Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct) is the primary rig. This Mobo is built with the Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 and 500GB of internal memory. The WD Blue 250GB has a GPU and a HDD. The Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GBDDR4-3200 G.Skill 320GTZKWZ – 32GB total / PSU. Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W.NAS has an Intel Core i7 2975K (3.40 GHz) processor, Slythe Mugen 2, and Seagate Technology’s DbS 3. 0. CoreTemp is not yet compatible with these new platforms, nor are we aware of any updates. It is anticipated that a new version will be available in the near future.

The new release should include new code to retrieve accurate core temperature readings as well. The main processor in this system is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct). Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB Mobo with EVO 970 as driver A WD Blue 250GB hard drive is included in the package. The Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem.: 2x16GBDDR4-3200 G.Skill STRATHPOWER 32GB total /psu: 32GB total /psu Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W NAS: Core i7 22500K 3.4 GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Core i7 2580K 3.5 GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Core i7 2580K 3.5 GHz (Scythe Mugen2). Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB HDDs / AMD Phenom II X4 B93 / ASUS M2A-VM /GPU ATI Radeon Xpress X1250 / The M4 comes with a hard drive capacity of 120GB. The AMD FX8350 Black Edition processor is currently incompatible with CoreTemp.

It does provide some support, but it does not provide the correct temperature. In idle Windows, my processor is 11 degrees Celsius, with a maximum temperature of 32 degrees Celsius. It is being loaded at a temperature of Celsius. I can check my bios and AI Suite II software, on the other hand. This temperature in Windows is already 33 degrees, and it is not even close to being under load (I haven’t measured it yet). How can I get CoreTemp to support my processors? This issue would be so much better if it could be fixed.

The FX-8350 is built with a Sabertooth 990FX with 16GB of Corsair Vengeance and 2 MSI R7850s in CrossFire and is powered by an Intel Core i5 quad-core processor. Core Temp is used by Asus to measure CPU core temperatures, whereas Asus uses a sensor embedded in the motherboard. Core temperatures are generally averaged, so rounding up is an accurate way to look at core temperatures. Core Temp is still an area I need to improve, but I will. Since the Athlon64 era, the AMD CPU has not been able to report absolute temperatures. To use the FX series as a workaround, you must first add an offset to it, just as it has always been. With the newer Trinity and newer APUs, it appears that this has changed.

CoreTemp is an Intel Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processor temperature monitor. The main configuration is a AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (True Spirit 140 Direct) /. Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB mobo The WD Blue 250GB hard drive and the SATA 3Gb hard drive are required. The second system is an Intel Core i3 7130U / MiniPC / San Disk SDSSDP-128G / GPU, which has a 1x8GBDDR3L-1600 memory module and an Intel HD 620 graphics card.

Is Your Computer’s Processor Running Too Hot?

AMD’s Ryzen CPUs have a built-in core temp monitor, so it’s worth a look. Core temperatures, for example, for the Ryzen 7 1800X, range from 61 to 70 degrees Celsius. In comparison, the Core i7-7700K has a temperature of approximately 10 degrees Celsius while the Core i7-7700K has a temperature of approximately 3.6 GHz.
Software such as Core Temp can assist you in determining whether your processor is overheating or if it is performing poorly. It is important to remember, however, that not all software is created equal, and that some may be inaccurate. Nonetheless, Core Temp is a free tool that many people find useful.

Coretemp Gadget

A coretemp gadget is a small, portable device that can be used to measure the temperature of a CPU core. It is often used by computer enthusiasts and overclockers to monitor the temperature of their CPU in real-time, in order to avoid overheating and damage to the processor. Coretemp gadgets can be connected to a PC via a USB port, and many models also include an LCD display for easy temperature monitoring.

Core Temp: Perfect For Monitoring Processor Temperatures

If you want to monitor processor temperatures, Core Temp is a good choice. Furthermore, it is small and compact, making it ideal for laptops and other portable devices.

Core Temp Coretemp Gadget

Coretemp is a gadget that allows users to monitor their computer’s core temperature in real time. It is a useful tool for keeping an eye on your computer’s health and for troubleshooting overheating issues. Coretemp is available for free and is compatible with Windows 7 and 8.

Windows 7 gadgets do not run on Windows 10. To run the gadgets in Windows Vista or 7, you must have a “Windows Sidebar” application installed. It is no longer necessary to enable/install a gadget if it does not work and displays something like: “Can’t load library.” Microsoft’s. Net 3.5 framework is now supported by Windows. There have been reports that Windows 10 is incompatible and has been removed, but I am relieved that this has not been the case. I find it strange that I receive that message every time, and it actually does remove it, so I have to re-install it. Which version of Windows do you use? Updates are provided on a regular basis by Windows Insider Preview.

Is Core Temp Safe To Use?

A free program called Core Temp can be used to monitor the temperature of a computer’s CPU. Many people have complained in the past about Core Temp being bundled with software that was later found to contain malware, and many software review websites have stopped recommending Core Temp in the past. Core Temp does not install any software without first informing you, and there are no malware downloads associated with it.

Personal site — Comparison of computing power of processors (CPU)

Performance testing of leading processors from Intel and AMD

Processors tested using Windows 7 64-bit operating system. The programs for the analysis were selected in such a way that multiple load flows were used in the most accurate and competent way, performance improvement through overclocking technologies AMD Turbo CORE and Intel Turbo Boost Technology, performed in new generation processors (many/core), as well as for maximizing the potential of new SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instructions, such as SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions — a new set of instructions for Intel Core microarchitecture), implemented in Intel Core 2 Duo, Intel Core i3, Intel Core i5, Intel Core i7 and AMD Phenom latest generation. 990X Extreme 3.46 GHZ / 1.5 + 12MB / 6400 MHZ / LGA1366

9000 98. 8%

Intel 9000 + Core i7-980X EXTREME 3 12MB / 6400 MHZ / LGA1366

97.1%

Core i7-970 3.20 GHZ / 1.5 + 12MB / 4800 MHZ / LGZ0004

9000.13

-000.29000 Core I7-84 2.22.22.22.22.22.22.22.22.22.222 8MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

68.9%

Phenom 1090t Black EDITIONA / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SEMB0004

62.7%

AMD

62.3%

Core i7-860 2.80 GHZ / 1 + 8MB / 2500 MHZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ0005

62.2%

Intel

 Core i7-920 2.66 GHz / 1 + 8Mb / 4800 MHz / LGA1366

 60.7%

Intel

Core i5-2300K 2. 8 GHZ / 1 + 6MB / 5000 MHZ / LGA1155

59.1%

AMD

 Phenom II X6 1035T 2.60 GHz / 3 + 6Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

57.7%

AMD

Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition 3.50 GHz / 2 + 6Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

0018

 Core i5-760 2.80 GHz / 1 + 8Mb / 2500 MHz / LGA1156

54.8%

AMD

 Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition 3.40 GHz / 2 + 6MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

54. 6%

AMD

Phenom II X4 955 Black EDITION 3.20 GHZ / SEMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB AM3

 52.3%

Intel

 Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.00 GHz / 12Mb / 1333 MHz / LGA775

 51.5%

Intel

Core i5-750 2.66 GHZ / 1 + 8MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

51.2%

Intel

 Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.00 GHz / 12Mb / 1333 MHz / LGA775

 50. 5%

AMD

 Phenom II X4 945 3.00 GHz / 2 + 6 Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

0013

Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83 GHZ / 12MB / 1333 MHZ / LGA775

48.4%

5555555555555555555555000 9000 ATHLON IIIA 645555555555555000 ATH MHZ / SOCKET AM3

47.3%

AMD

Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition 3.0 GHZ / 2 + 6MB / SOMHZ / SOM0004

47%

AMD

Phenom II X4 925 2.80 GHZ / 2 + 6MB / 2 + 6MB / SOCKET AM3

9000 9000 9000 9000.

Intel

Core 2 quad Q9505 2.83 GHZ / 6MB / 1333 MHZ / LGA775

9000.7% 9000 9000

AMD

 Phenom II X4 820 2.80 GHz / 2 + 4Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

 46.1%

Intel

Core 2 quad Q9450 2.66 GHZ / 12MB / 1333 MHZ / LGA775

46%

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9500 2.83 GHZ / 6MB / 1333 MHZ / LGA775

46%

9000

blon II X4 Socket AM3

45. 9%

AMD

ATHLON II X4 635 2.90 GHZ / 2MB / 4000 MHZ / SOCKET AM3 9000 9000 9000

005

 44.8%

Intel

 Core i5-680 3.60 GHz / SVGA / 0,5 + 4Mb /2500 MHz / LGA1156

 44.7%

AMD

Phenom II X4 920 2.80 GHZ / 2 + 6MB / 3600 MHZ / SOCKET AM2 +

44.4%

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

018

AMD

 Athlon II X4 630 2.80 GHz / 2Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

 43. 7%

Intel

Core i3-2120k 3.3 GHZ / 0.5 + 3MB / 5000 MHZ / LGA1155

43.6%

AMD

Phenom II X4 810 2.60 GHZ / 2 + 4MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

43.3%

GUTEL 9000 9000 9000 Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core Core 2 / 1333 MHZ / LGA775

43.2%

Core I5-670 3.46 GHZ / SVGA / 0.5 + 4MB / 2500 MHZ / LGAA1560004

 43.2%

Intel

 Core 2 Quad Q8400 2. 66 GHz / 4Mb / 1333 MHz / LGA775

 42.5%

Intel

Core i5-660 3.33 GHZ / SVGA / 0.5 + 4MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

9000.1%

Intel

 Core i3-2100K 3.1 GHz / 0,5 + 3Mb / 5000 MHz / LGA1155

 41.7%

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9300 2.50 GHZ / 6MB / 1333 MHZ / LGA775

41.5%

013

Core i5-661 3.33 GHZ / SVGA / 0.5 + 4MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

%

Intel

0 9000 9000 Core 9000. GHZ / SVGA / 0.5 + 4MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

9000 4Mb / 2500 MHz / LGA1156

 40.8%

Intel

 Core 2 Quad Q8300 2.50 GHz / 4Mb / 1333 MHz / LGA775

 40.4%

Intel

Core i3-560 3.33 GHZ / SVGA / 0.5 + 4MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

%

Intel

 Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 2.33 GHz / 4Mb / 1333 MHz / LGA775

 38.3%

AMD

Athlon II X3 455 3. 30 GHZ / 1.5MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

37.1%

AMD

Athlon II X3 450 3.20 GHZ / 1.5MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

9000.9%

9000.20

9000.20000 Core I3-550 3.20000 9000.20000 Core I3-550 3 / 0.5 + 4MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

36.7%

Intel

Core i3-530 2.93 GHZ / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGA / SVGAA / SVGAA / SVGAA / SVGAA / SVGAA / SVGAA / SVGA MHz / LGA1156

9000.

AMD

Phenom II X3 720 2.80 GHZ / 1.5 + 6MB / 4000 MHZ / SOCKET AM3

9000. 9,000%

9000

Intel

Core i3-540 3.06 GHZ / SVGA / 0.5 + 4MB / 2500 MHZ / LGA1156

9000

Athlon II X3 440 3.00 GHZ / 1.5MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKket AM3

%

018

Athlon II X3 435 2.90 GHZ / 1.5MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

%

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 PHEH 1.5 + 6MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

33.5%

Intel

Duo E8500 3.16 GHZ / 6MB / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ0004

 32. 9%

AMD

 Athlon II X3 425 2.70 GHz / 1,5Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

 32.6%

AMD

Phenom II X2 565 Black Edition 3.40 GHZ / 1 + 6MB / 4000 MHZ / SOCKET AM3

9000 9000 32.4%

AMD

 Phenom II X2 560 Black Edition 3.30 GHz / 1 + 6Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

32.1%

AMD

Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition 3.20 GHZ / 1 + 6MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

31. 8%

Intel

 Core 2 Duo E8400 3.00 GHz / 6Mb / 1333 MHz / LGA775

 31.3%

AMD

 Phenom II X2 550 3.10 GHZ / 1 + 6MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

30.9%

AMD

ATHLON II X2 265 3.30 GHZ / SOMB / SOMB / SOMB / SOKOZ0004

28.8%

28.4%

Core 2 Duo E7500 2. 93 GHZ / 3MB / 1066 MHAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ0004

9000

6000 PENTIUM 800 MHZ / LGA775

23.9%

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4700 2.60 GHZ / 2MB / 800 MHZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGZ0004

+ ,000,0002 + ,000,0002 + ,000

+ 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 ,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004,0004000 ,000,0002

AMD

Athlon X2 7550 2. 50 GHZ / 1 + 2MB / 3600 MHz / SOCKETAM2 +

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

018

AMD

 Athlon X2 7450 2.40 GHz / 1 + 2Mb /3600 MHz / Socket AM2+

 22.4%

AMD

Athlon-64 x2 5600+ 2.90 GHZ / 1MB / 2000 MHZ / SOKKET AM2

20.8%

 Core 2 Duo E4500 2.20 GHz / 2Mb / 800 MHz / LGA775

 20.6%

Intel

 Celeron E3500 2. 70 GHz / 1Mb / 800 MHz / LGA775

19.6%

Intel

Intel Celeron E3400 2.60 GHZ / 1MB / 800 MHZ / LGA775

 19.1%

AMD

 Athlon X2 5050e 2.60 GHz / 1Mb / 2000 MHz / Socket AM2

 18.6%

Intel

Celeron E3300 2.50 GHZ / 1MB / 800 MHZ / LGA775

18.6%

Intel

 Pentium Dual-Core E2220 2.40 GHz / 1Mb / 800 MHz / LGA775

 17. 9%

AMD

 Athlon- 64 x2 5000+ 2.60 GHZ / 1MB / 2000 MHZ / SOKKET AM2

17.8%

AMD

 Athlon X2 4450e 2.30 GHz / 1Mb / 2000 MHz / Socket AM2

 17.5%

AMD

 Athlon-64 X2 4800+ 2.50 GHz / 1Mb / 2000 MHZ / SOCKET AM2

17.4%

Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2200 2.20 GHZ / 1MB / 800 MHZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ / LGAZ0004

 16. 9%

Intel

 Celeron Dual-Core E1500 2.2 GHz / 512Kb/ 800 MHz / LGA775

 14.8%

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core E1400 2.0 GHZ / 512KB / 800 MHZ / LGA775

%

AMD

 Sempron 145 2.8 GHz / 1Mb / 4000 MHz / Socket AM3

 13.7%

AMD

 Sempron 140 2.7 GHZ / 1MB / 4000 MHZ / SOKKET AM3

12.9%

 Celeron 450 2. 20 GHz / 512Kb / 800 MHz / LGA775

 12.4%

Intel

 Celeron 430 1.80 GHz / 512Kb / 800 MHz / LGA775

12.1%

Hash Runner contest / Habr

At PHDays 2012 there were many purely technical, interesting, spectacular contests, but one of them went almost unnoticed by forum visitors: it was the Hash Runner, whose participants were cracking hashes.

In such competitions, as a rule, the dominance of a number of individual teams remains: Hashcat, Inside Pro, john-users … And not surprisingly, since these are communities of developers, testers and users using the most popular hash cracking tools. The secret of success lies not only in vast experience, well-trained teams and access to impressive computing resources, but also in the ability to modify the toolkit on the fly, depending on current needs.

The above teams took an active part in the Hash Runner contest at PHDays 2012. For two days, the participants fought for the main prize — an AMD Radeon HD 7970 video card (the contest started at 10:00 on May 30 and ended at 18:00 on May 31).

Rules

Any Internet user was allowed to participate in the competition, and in the end 19 participants from different countries came together in the competition.

Competitors were offered a list of hash functions generated by various algorithms (MD5, SHA-1, BlowFish, GOST3411, etc.). Points for each cracked hash were awarded depending on the complexity of the algorithm, the generation rules, and the dictionary used. To become the winner, it was necessary to score as many points as possible in a limited time, overtaking all competitors.

Members

Both representatives of Russia and foreign hackers took part in the competition. The fight was mainly between the InsidePro Team 2012, Teardrop and Xanadrel.

Strategies

To successfully pass the contest, the participants needed to understand the rules by which the passwords were generated. To generate them, dictionaries in different languages ​​were used, as well as dictionaries with names. The rule that the participants first picked up was the repetition of a word from a dictionary, for example:

fayettefayette
jeweljewel
hamlethamlet

Each hash type contained a number of passwords generated according to the same rules. Having picked up a password for a hash encrypted with a simple algorithm and understood the generation algorithm, it was possible to apply the knowledge gained to the rest of the list and guess passwords for more complex hashes.

A rigorous analysis of the rules and patterns eventually allowed the top three to break away from their pursuers.

The teams used different tactics: someone tried to pick up passwords for the most complex hashes and get more points, while someone, on the contrary, tried to take the number and «brute» easy hashes.

Xanadrel (France), who previously performed in the Hashcat team, this time decided to test himself as a human orchestra and took part in the competition alone.

Hardware used by the participant: PC (i7 950, 1x 5770 and 1x 7970) and i5 2300k core for 4 LM hashes. Soft:

• Hashcat;
• oclHashcat plus;
• ophcrack;
• rcracki_mt;
• passwordspro;
• maskprocessor.

Passwords were cracked using dictionary attacks with basic/common rules in Hashcat and passwordspro for GOST hashes. For the entire contest, the participant failed to crack a single DES, phpbb3, ssha or WordPress hash (they were of unusual length and could not be cracked using Hashcat).

By the end of the contest, Xanadrel remembered brute force and with its help got a couple of passwords like 6{x#_a or 9Mv)0. There were passwords in the form ddyyyy (for example, «08march2924»): for such cases, we had to create rules for adding or deleting a year (day) and a separate file with the names of the months.

Original Xanadrel [eng]

Unlike Xanadrel who fought alone, the guys from the Insidepro team worked together. Their strategy was simple: try to attack any algorithm at the first opportunity using any technique (read: brute force, dictionaries).

List of hardware and software used by the team:

Note: since the team members did not break the hashes all at once, but in turn, the listed software and hardware were not used simultaneously, but at different points during the competition.

The guys relied primarily on their own software — InsidePro’s Extreme GPU Bruteforcer and PasswordsPro, since they supported WordPress hashes «without salt» — already out of the box. However, right during the contest, one of the team members was able to patch JtR to support hashes without salt, which made it possible to attack such hashes even more successfully.

Details of the contest in the insidepro [eng] write-up.

Another leader of the competition was the Teardrop team, which was formed specifically for participation in the contest by those members of the Hashcat team who were able to take part in it. For work, the guys used the following software:

• Hashcat;
• oclHashcat plus;
• oclHashcat-plus custom build to crack saltless PHPass and DCC2;
• Hashcat-utils and Maskprocessor;
• John the Ripper;
• rcracki_mt for LM;
• PasswordsPro for GOST.

During the competition, the team members had to make changes to the code of the oclHashcat-plus and John the Ripper utilities in order to load PHPass and BFcypt hashes, respectively. Details are in a post on the Hashcat team forum.

Statistics

Some pretty graphics. This is how the graph of the progress of the contestants over time looks like.

Note that in such competitions, teams often wait and do not send answers until the last minute in order to confuse other participants.

Team Progress by Hashes Cracked:

Types of hashes that contestants did best:

Cracked hashes of top five teams

Teardrop

InsidePro Team 2012

Xanadrel

John-users

Xyzxyz

Winners

The ending of the competition turned out to be extremely tense: the winner was determined in a matter of minutes before the end of the competition. Participants stopped their programs a few minutes before the end, and sent those passwords that they managed to guess.

The InsidePro Team 2012 was the leader for a long time, but the guys from Teardrop managed to snatch the victory and break away by 11,000 points. The podium looks like this:

1. Teardrop (Hashcat)
2. InsidePro Team 2012
3. Xanadrel

It is worth noting that the winners were able to guess passwords for only 11% of all hashes of the competition.

All participants of the competition received souvenirs from the organizers of the forum and sponsors of the event. A special prize — the AMD Radeon HD 7970 video card — went to the champions from Teardrop (Hashcat). Congratulations again!

P. S. The official blog of the PHDays forum contains links to video reports and presentation slides.

Core i7-2700K [in 13 benchmarks]

Intel
Core i7-2700K

• Interface
• Core clock
• Video memory size
• Memory type
• Memory frequency
• Maximum resolution

Description

Intel started Intel Core i7-2700K sales on October 24, 2011 at a suggested retail price of $514. This is a desktop processor based on the Sandy Bridge architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 4 cores and 8 threads and is manufactured in 32 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3900 MHz, multiplier unlocked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an LGA1155 socket processor with a TDP of 95W. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

5.59%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

Core i7
2700K

or

EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Core i7-2700K, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

95 100

Features

Core i7-2700K quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

Place in the performance rating	1163
Price-quality	2. 45

Cores	4
Threads

Compatible

Information on Core i7-2700K compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

Turbo Boost Technology 2. 0 Hyper-Threading Technology + Idle States + Thermal Monitoring + Flex Memory Access + FDI + FAST Memory Access +

9ATHER

9ATH
Technologies built into the Core i7-2700K that improve system security, such as those designed to protect against hacking.

TXT	—
EDB	+
IDENTITY PROTECTION	+

VIRTALIASE technologies

2
Technologies supported by Core i7-2700K that speed up virtual machines are listed.

VT-D	—
VT-X	+
EPT	+

RAM support

Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Core i7-2700K. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard. Ryzen 5 7600X0035

InTru 3D +

Integrated video interfaces

Interfaces and connections supported by the integrated graphics card in the Core i7-2700K.

Maximum number of monitors

2

Peripherals

Supported peripherals for the Core i7-2700K and how to connect them.

---

Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2700K
5.59

• Passmark
• GeekBench 5 Single-Core
• GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
• Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
• 3DMark06 CPU
• Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
• TrueCrypt AES
• WinRAR 4.0
• x264 encoding pass 2
• x264 encoding pass 1
• 3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

i7-2700K
5635

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-2700K
798

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

i7-2700K
3030

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2700K
4967

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2700K
19675

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2700K
6837

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2700K
7

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-2700K
4

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-2700K
3537

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-2700K
38

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

i7-2700K
147

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

i7-2700K
5300

---

Mining hashrates

Core i7-2700K performance in cryptocurrency mining. Usually the result is measured in mhash / s — the number of millions of solutions generated by the video card in one second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)

12 Mh/s

Relative capacity

Core i7-2700K overall performance compared to its nearest competitor desktop processors.

---

Intel Core i5-6600T
100.36

Intel Core i5-5675R
100

Intel Core i5-4690K
100

Intel Core i7-2700K
100

Intel Core i5-4690
99. 28

Intel Core i5-5675C
99.11

Intel Core i5-4670K
98.57

Competitor from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i7-2700K from AMD is Phenom II X6 1100T BE, which is 2% faster on average and higher by 11 positions in our rating.

Phenom II
X6 1100T BE

Compare

Here are some of AMD’s closest competitors to the Core i7-2700K:

AMD FX-9370
106.44

AMD FX-8350
105.37

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
101.97

Intel Core i7-2700K
100

AMD FX-8320
96.24

AMD FX-8370E
94.63

AMD FX-8300
93. 92

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Core i5
4690K

Compare

Core i5
4690

Compare

Core i5
4670K

Compare

Phenom II
X6 1100T BE

Compare

Core i7
3770T

Compare

Core i7
2600K

Compare

Recommended video cards

According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with Core i7-2700K:

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

9. 2%

GeForce GTX
1060 3GB

7.3%

GeForce GTX
1060 6GB

5.2%

GeForce GTX
750 Ti

4.5%

GeForce GTX
1650

3.3%

GeForce GTX
1050

2.8%

GeForce GTX
970

2.6%

GeForce GTX
1070

2.4%

GeForce GTX
960

2.3%

Radeon RX
570

2.3%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.