Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 9600K: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 6700K
Intel Core i5 9600K
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 4.0 GHz Intel Core i7 6700K with 4-cores against the 3.7 GHz i5 9600K with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 6700K
59
Core i5 9600K
64
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 6700K
26
Core i5 9600K
33
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 6700K
41
Core i5 9600K
45
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 6700K
44
Core i5 9600K
48
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 9600K and 6700K
Advantages of Intel Core i7 6700K
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than the Core i5 9600K – 91 vs 95 Watt
Advantages of Intel Core i5 9600K
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
- Newer — released 3-years and 2-months later
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Around 7.
5 GB/s (22%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
- Has 1 MB larger L3 cache size
- 10% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1203 vs 1097 points
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 6700K
1133
Core i5 9600K
+5%
1187
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 6700K
5651
Core i5 9600K
+17%
6637
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 6700K
2521
Core i5 9600K
+11%
2796
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 6700K
8971
Core i5 9600K
+21%
10824
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 6700K
1103
Core i5 9600K
+10%
1210
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 6700K
4304
Core i5 9600K
+32%
5687
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 6700K and i5 9600K
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | August 5, 2015 | October 8, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Skylake | Coffee Lake |
| Model number | i7-6700K | i5-9600K |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Performance
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base Frequency | 4. 0 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 40x | 37x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 8MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Transistors | 1.75 billions | — |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 91 W | 95 W |
Max. temperature |
— | 100°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU Base Clock | — | 350 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Shading Units | — | 192 |
| TMUs | — | 24 |
| ROPs | — | 3 |
| Execution Units | — | 24 |
| TGP | — | 15 W |
| Max. Resolution | — | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 6700K
n/a
Core i5 9600K
0.38 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 6700K official page | Intel Core i5 9600K official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 6700K
3 (10.3%)
Core i5 9600K
26 (89.7%)
Total votes: 29
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X or Intel Core i7 6700K
2.
Intel Core i7 12700K or Intel Core i7 6700K
3.
Intel Core i5 12600K or Intel Core i7 6700K
4.
Intel Core i5 12400 or Intel Core i7 6700K
5.
Intel Core i5 12400F or Intel Core i7 6700K
6.
Intel Core i5 12600K or Intel Core i5 9600K
7.
Intel Core i5 12400 or Intel Core i5 9600K
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K — Red Dead Redemption 2 with GTX 1070 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1070 with
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
Red Dead Redemption 2
GTX 1070 with
Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz
i7-6700K
i5-9600K
Multi-Thread Performance
11112 Pts
13352 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2352 Pts
2677 Pts
Red Dead Redemption 2
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K in Red Dead Redemption 2 using GTX 1070 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-6700K
i5-9600K
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
44. |
| 1080p |
48.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
36.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
37.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
22.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
23.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
31.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
32.7 FPS |
2 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
78.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
84.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
66.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
68.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
44.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
45.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
58.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
60.7 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
113. |
| 1080p |
121.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
96.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
98.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
66.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
68.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
86.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
88.6 FPS |
1 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
182.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
194.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
156.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
160.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
109.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
112.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
140.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
144.5 FPS |
i7-6700K
- The i7-6700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-9600K
- The i5-9600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The i5-9600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware.
Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare i7-6700K vs i5-9600K specifications
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Architecture
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Skylake) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR2L0 | SR3WZ |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Aug 2015 | Oct 2018 |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Cache
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Cores
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Features
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Performance
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.0x | 37.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 95 W | 95 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.6 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Physical
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 94
Compare i7-6700K vs i5-9600K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-6700K vs Intel Core i5-9600K
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-6700K vs Intel Core i5-9600K
Comparaison des caractéristiques techniques entre les processeurs, avec le Intel Core i7-6700K d’un côté et le Intel Core i5-9600K de l’autre.
Le premier est dédié au secteur ordinateur de bureau, il dispose de 4 coeurs, 8 threads, une fréquence maximale de 4,2 GHz. Le second est employé sur le segment ordinateur de bureau, il possède un total de 6 coeurs, 6 threads, sa fréquence turbo s’établit à 4,6 GHz. Le tableau suivant permet aussi de comparer la lithographie, le nombre de transistors (si indiqué), la quantité de mémoire cache, la capacité maximale de mémoire RAM, le type de mémoire accepté, la date de première diffusion, le nombre maximal de lignes PCIe, les valeurs obtenues dans Geekbench 4 et Cinebench R15.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
Cette page contient des références aux produits d’un ou de plusieurs de nos annonceurs. Nous pouvons recevoir une compensation lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers ces produits. Pour une explication de notre politique publicitaire, veuillez visiter cette page.
Caractéristiques :
| Processeur | Intel Core i7-6700K | Intel Core i5-9600K | ||||||
| Marché (principal) | Ordinateur de bureau | Ordinateur de bureau | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Skylake | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Nom de base | Skylake-S | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
| Famille | Core i7-6000 | Core i5-9000 | ||||||
| Numéro(s) de pièce, S-Spec | BX80662I76700K, BXC80662I76700K, CM8066201919901, SR2BR, SR2L0 |
BX80684I59600K, BXC80684I59600K, CM8068403874404, SRELU |
||||||
| Date de lancement | Q3 2015 | Q4 2018 | ||||||
| Lithographie | 14 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 750.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cœurs | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Fréquence de base | 4,0 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Fréquence turbo | 4,2 GHz | 4,6 GHz | ||||||
| Vitesse du bus | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
| Mémoire cache | 8 MB | 9 MB | ||||||
| Capacité mémoire maxi | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Types de mémoire | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-2666 | ||||||
Nb. max. de canaux mémoire |
2 | 2 | ||||||
| Bande passante mémoire maxi | 34,1 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Lignes PCIe max | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| PDT | 91 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Alimentation système recommandée | Alimentation PC de 600W | Alimentation PC de 600W | ||||||
| GPU intégré | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
| GPU, unités d’exécution | 16 | 23 | ||||||
| GPU, unités de calcul shader | 128 | 184 | ||||||
| GPU, cadence de base | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU, cadence maxi | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz | ||||||
| GPU, point flottant FP32 | 268,8 GFLOPS | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Carte mère compatible | Carte mère Socket LGA 1151 | Carte mère Socket LGA 1151 | ||||||
| Température maximale | 64°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z simple thread | 498 | 522 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2. 556 |
2.968 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 simple thread | 186 | 196 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 946 | 1.071 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 simple thread | 457 | 467 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 2.325 | 2.518 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 simple thread | 1.125 | 1.175 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 5.789 | 6.582 | ||||||
| PassMark simple thread | 2.512 | 2.773 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 8. 942 |
10.817 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 simple cœur |
5.240 | 5.820 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-cœur |
17.298 | 22.766 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 simple cœur |
1.186 | 1.183 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-cœur |
4.664 | 5.225 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) Performance en GFLOPS |
320,8 GFLOPS | 405,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Performance multi-cœur / watt) Rapport performance / watt |
190 pts / W | 240 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus.
On peut ainsi mieux comparer quelles sont les différences techniques entre les deux processeurs.
Alimentation système recommandée : on suppose que l’on possède une tour ATX, une carte graphique haut de gamme, 16GB de mémoire RAM, un disque SSD de 512GB, un disque dur HDD de 1TB, un lecteur Blu-Ray. Il faudra compter sur une alimentation plus puissante si on souhaite disposer de plusieurs cartes graphiques, plusieurs moniteurs, davantage de mémoire, etc.
Prix : pour des raisons techniques, nous ne pouvons pas afficher pour le moment un prix de moins de 24 heures, ou un prix en temps réel. C’est pourquoi on préfère pour l’instant ne pas faire apparaître de prix. Il faut vous référer aux boutiques en ligne respectives pour connaître le dernier prix, ainsi que la disponibilité.
Le processeur Intel Core i5-9600K a un plus grand nombre de cœurs, la fréquence turbo du Intel Core i5-9600K est plus grande, que le PDT du Intel Core i7-6700K est plus basse.
Le Intel Core i5-9600K a été lancé plus récemment.
Performances :
Comparaison des performances entre les deux processeurs, pour cela on considère les résultats générés sur des logiciels de benchmarks tels que Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
522 2.968 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
498 2.556 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 5%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 16%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
CPU-Z est un logiciel d’information système qui fournit le nom du processeur, son numéro de modèle, le nom de code, les niveaux de cache, le package, le processus.
Il peut également délivrer des données sur la carte mère, la mémoire. Il fait des mesures en temps réel, avec enfin un benchmark pour le simple thread, ainsi que pour le multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
196 1.071 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
186 946 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 5%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 13%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R15 permet d’évaluer les performances de calculs du CPU en restituant une scène 3D photoréaliste.
La scène possède 2 000 objets, 300 000 polygones, utilise des reflets nets et flous, des zones lumineuses, des ombres, des shaders procéduraux, un antialiasing, etc. Plus le rendu de la scène est rapidement créée, plus le PC est puissant, avec un nombre élevé de points.
| Cinebench R20 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
467 2.518 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
457 2.325 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 2%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 8%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R20 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur.
Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente.
| Cinebench R23 — Score multi-thread & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
1.175 6.582 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.125 5.789 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 4%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 14%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Cinebench R23 est un logiciel de test multi-plateformes qui permet d’évaluer les capacités matérielles d’un appareil tel qu’un ordinateur, une tablette, un serveur.
Cette version de Cinebench prend en compte les évolutions récentes des processeurs avec de multiples cœurs et les dernières améliorations de techniques de rendu. L’évaluation est au final encore plus pertinente. La scène de test contient pas moins de 2 000 objets et plus de 300 000 polygones au total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & simple thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
2.773 10.817 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
2.512 8.942 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 10%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 21%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
PassMark est un logiciel de benchmarks, qui fait plusieurs tests de performance, notamment, sur les nombres premiers, les nombres entiers, la virgule flottante, la compression, la physique, les instructions étendues, l’encodage, le triage.
Plus le score est élevé, plus l’appareil a des capacités importantes.
Sur Windows 64-bit :
| Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
5.820 22.766 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
5.240 17.298 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 11%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 32%.
Sur Linux 64-bit :
| Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
6.081 22.092 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
5.313 15.160 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 14%.
En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 46%.
Sur Android 64-bit :
| Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
4.060 11.767 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
3.401 7.369 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 19%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 60%.
Sur Mac OS X 64-bit :
| Geekbench 4 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
5.844 23.368 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
5.277 17.860 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 11%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 31%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Geekbench 4 est une plateforme de benchmarks complète avec plusieurs types de tests, dont la compression de données, d’images, le cryptage en AES, l’encodage en SQL, en HTML, le rendu d’un fichier PDF, le calcul matriciel, de Transformation de Fourier rapide, la simulation d’objets en 3D, l’édition de photos, des tests sur la mémoire. Cela nous permet de mieux visualiser la puissance respective de ces appareils. Pour chaque résultat, on a pris une moyenne de 250 valeurs sur le fameux logiciel de benchmarks.
Sur Windows :
| Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
1.  1835.225 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.186 4.664 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 0%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 12%.
Sur Linux :
| Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
1.257 5.459 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.160 4.184 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 8%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 30%.
Sur macOS :
| Geekbench 5 — Score multi-cœur & simple cœur — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-9600K |
1.119 5.555 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.  0474.276 |
En simple cœur, la différence est de 7%. En multi-cœurs, la différence en termes de gap est de 30%.
Remarque: des commissions peuvent être gagnées à partir des liens ci-dessus. Ces scores ne sont qu’une
moyenne des performances obtenues avec ces processeurs, vous pouvez obtenir des résultats différents.
Geekbench 5 est un logiciel de mesure de performance d’un système informatique, pour appareils fixes, appareils mobiles, serveurs. Cette plateforme permet de mieux comparer la puissance du CPU, la puissance de calcul et de la comparer avec des systèmes similaires ou totalement différents. Geekbench 5 inclut de nouvelles charges de travail qui représentent des tâches de travail et des applications que l’on retrouve dans la réalité.
Équivalence :
Intel Core i7-6700K équivalent AMDIntel Core i5-9600K équivalent AMD
Voir aussi :
Intel Core i7-6700Intel Core i7-6700HQIntel Core i7-6700T
Intel Core i5-9600Intel Core i5-9600KFIntel Core i5-9600T
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 9600K:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 6700K
Intel Core i5 9600K
Which is better: 4-core Intel Core i7 6700K at 4.
0 GHz or i5 9600K with 6 cores at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 6700k
59
Core i5 9600k
64
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
9 9,000 9,000 9,000
Core i7 6700k
26
Core i5 9600k
33
Energy Equality
Energy Effect CHIP
Core I7 6700K
45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000 45 9000
Core i7 6700K
44
Core i5 9600K
48
Key differences
What are the main differences between the 9600K and 6700K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 6700K
- 4% lower than Core i5 9600K peak power consumption — 91 vs 95 Watts
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 9600K
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666
- Introduced 3 years and 2 months later than rival
- Has 2 more physical cores
- 7.
5 GB/s (22%) higher maximum memory bandwidth - 10% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
- Has 1MB more L3 cache
- 10% faster in single core Geekbench v5 — 1203 and 1097 points
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 6700K
1133
Core i5 9600K
+5%
1187
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 6700K
5651
Core i5 9600K
+17%
6637
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 6700K
2521
Core i5 9600K
+11%
2796
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 6700K
8971
Core i5 9600K
+21%
10824
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 6700K
1103
Core i5 9600K
+10%
1210
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 6700K
4304
Core i5 9600K
+32%
5687
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i7 6700K and i5 9600K
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | August 5, 2015 | October 8, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Skylake | Coffee Lake |
| Model number | i7-6700K | i5-9600K |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated graphics | HD Graphics 530 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Performance
| Cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 6 |
| Frequency | 4. 0 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 40x | 37x |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 256KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 8MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | 1.75 billion | — |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91W | 95 W |
| Critical temperature | — | 100°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU frequency | — | 350 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Shader blocks | — | 192 |
| TMUs | — | 24 |
| ROPs | — | 3 |
| Computer units | — | 24 |
| TGP | — | 15W |
Max. resolution |
— | 4096×2304 — 60Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 6700k
N/D
Core i5 9600k
0.38 Teraflops
Memory Support
| Memory type | DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Site Intel Core i7 6700K | Site Intel Core i5 9600K | |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 6700K
3 (10.
3%)
Core i5 9600K
26 (89.7%)
Total votes: 29
Competitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7 6700K
2.
Intel Core i7 12700K and Intel Core i7 6700K
3.
Intel Core i5 12600K and Intel Core i7 6700K
4.
Intel Core i5 12400 and Intel Core i7 6700K
5.
Intel Core i5 12400F and Intel Core i7 6700K
6.
Intel Core i5 12600K and Intel Core i5 9600K
7.
Intel Core i5 12400 and Intel Core i5 9600K
What will you choose: Intel Core i5 9600K or i7 6700K?
Name
Message
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K — Red Dead Redemption 2 vs GTX 1080 performance comparison
GTX 1080 with
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
Red Dead Redemption 2
GTX 1080 with
Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.
70GHz
i7-6700K
i5-9600K
Multi-Thread Performance
11112 Pts
13352 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2352 Pts
2677 Pts
Red Dead Redemption 2
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Red Dead Redemption 2 using GTX 1080 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i7-6700K
i5-9600K
Ultra quality
| Resolution | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
50.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
54.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
41.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
42.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
26.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
27.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
35.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
37. |
2 FPS High quality
| Resolution | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
87.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
94.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
73.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
76.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
49.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
51.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
65.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
67.8 FPS |
Medium quality
| Approval | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
125.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
134.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
106.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
109.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
73. |
| 2160p |
76.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
95.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
98.4 FPS |
7 FPS Low quality
| Resolution | FPS |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
200.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
213.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
172.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
176.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
121.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
124.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
155.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
159.6 FPS |
i7-6700K
- The i7-6700K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
i5-9600K
- i5-9600K has higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i5-9600K has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware.
Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Compare i7-6700K vs i5-9600K specifications
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Architecture
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Skylake) |
Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR2L0 | SR3WZ |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Aug 2015 | Oct 2018 |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Cache
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 9MB (shared) |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Cores
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | N/A |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Features
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Performance
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.0x | 37.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 95W | 95W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.6 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-6700K vs i5-9600K Physical
| i7-6700K | i5-9600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share your comments 94
Compare i7-6700K vs i5-9600K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
F1 2018
2018
Far Cry 5
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Shadow of War
2017
Total War: Warhammer II
2017
Wolfenstein II
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-6700K vs.
Intel Core i5-9600K
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i7-6700K runs with 4 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 91 W .Processor connects to LGA 1151 CPU socket This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Skylake S Architecture is advanced over 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2015
Intel Core i5-9600K
Intel Core i5-9600K runs with 6 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.60 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .Processor connects to LGA 1151-2 CPU socket This version includes 9.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . Product was launched Q4/2018
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-9600K
Compare details
4. 00GHz |
Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4.20GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 4.60 GHz |
| 4.00GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 4.30 GHz |
| Yes | Hyper Threading | No. |
| Yes | Acceleration | Yes |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
|
Intel HD Graphics 530 |
GPU |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| 1.15GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.15 GHz |
| 14nm | Technology | 14nm |
| 1.15GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.15 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX 9 version0188 | 12 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| memory size | DDR4-2666 | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory | ||
No. |
ECC | No. |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| L3 Cache | 9.00 MB | |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 14nm | Technology | 14nm |
| LGA 1151 | Connector | LGA 1151-2 |
| 91 W | TDP | 95W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q3/2015 | Release date | Q4/2018 |
|
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS.
GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.
5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula.