Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i9-9900: What is the difference?
55points
Intel Core i7-8700
63points
Intel Core i9-9900
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i9-9900
Why is Intel Core i7-8700 better than Intel Core i9-9900?
Why is Intel Core i9-9900 better than Intel Core i7-8700?
- 29.17% faster CPU speed?
8 x 3.1GHzvs6 x 3.2GHz - 4 more CPU threads?
16vs12 - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
2MBvs1.5MB - 9.24% higher PassMark result?
16864vs15437 - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
5GHzvs4.6GHz - 4MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs12MB - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
512KBvs384KB - 10.45% higher PassMark result (single)?
2865vs2594
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
vs
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
1. CPU speed
6 x 3.2GHz
8 x 3.1GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.6GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i7-8700
✖Intel Core i9-9900
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
42.7GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM.
Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i7-8700
✖Intel Core i9-9900
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device.
For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
193.8seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
630.1seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i7-8700
✖Intel Core i9-9900
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i9-9900)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i9 9900 vs i7 8700: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 9900
Intel Core i7 8700
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.1 GHz Intel Core i9 9900 with 8-cores against the 3.2 GHz i7 8700 with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments (1)
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i9 9900
68
Core i7 8700
64
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i9 9900
53
Core i7 8700
37
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i9 9900
51
Core i7 8700
44
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i9 9900
58
Core i7 8700
49
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 8700 and 9900
Advantages of Intel Core i9 9900
- Newer — released 1-year and 7-months later
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
- 9% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4.
6 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i9 9900
+5%
1292
Core i7 8700
1233
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 9900
+72%
12304
Core i7 8700
7158
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i9 9900
+7%
2867
Core i7 8700
2682
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i9 9900
+29%
17003
Core i7 8700
13130
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i9 9900
+9%
1278
Core i7 8700
1174
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i9 9900
+27%
7955
Core i7 8700
6274
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 9900 and i7 8700
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | April 23, 2019 | October 5, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Model number | i9-9900 | i7-8700 |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 1 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 31x | 32x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| ROPs | 3 | 3 |
| Execution Units | 24 | 24 |
| TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i9 9900
0.38 TFLOPS
Core i7 8700
0.38 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| Official site | Intel Core i9 9900 official page | Intel Core i7 8700 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i9 9900
18 (58.1%)
Core i7 8700
13 (41.9%)
Total votes: 31
ompetitors
1.
Core i9 12900K vs Core i9 9900
2.
Core i7 12700K vs Core i9 9900
3.
Core i5 12600K vs Core i9 9900
4.
Core i7 12700K vs Core i7 8700
5.
Core i5 12600K vs Core i7 8700
6.
Core i5 12400F vs Core i7 8700
7.
Core i7 12700KF vs Core i7 8700
8.
Core i3 12100 vs Core i7 8700
9.
Core i3 12100F vs Core i7 8700
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.
20GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz
i7-8700
i9-9900
Multi-Thread Performance
15150 Pts
19284 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2628 Pts
2826 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-8700
i9-9900
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
107.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
112.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
77.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
79.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
46.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
47.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
65.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
68. |
3 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
166.9 FPS |
| 1080p |
173.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
126.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
130.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
81.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
84.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
110.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
114.1 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
226.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
235.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
175.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
180.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
116.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
120.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
155. |
| w1440p |
160.0 FPS |
Low Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
346.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
358.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
274.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
281.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
187.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
192.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
245.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
251.6 FPS |
i7-8700
- The i7-8700 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The i7-8700 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The i7-8700 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The i7-8700 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i7-8700 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-9900
- The i9-9900 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The i9-9900 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare i7-8700 vs i9-9900 specifications
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Architecture
| i7-8700 | i9-9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Core i9 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3QS | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jan 2018 | Apr 2019 |
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Cache
| i7-8700 | i9-9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Cores
| i7-8700 | i9-9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Features
| i7-8700 | i9-9900 |
|---|
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Performance
| i7-8700 | i9-9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. |
3.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32.0x | 31.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.6 GHz | up to 5 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | variable |
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Physical
| i7-8700 | i9-9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA14C |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 95
Compare i7-8700 vs i9-9900 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Core i9-9900 vs Core i7-8700
Availability
Intel Core i9-9900 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5. 0GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy on Amazon
$715.51
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Availability
Intel Core i7-8700 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy on Amazon
$310
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 477 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
-
Performs up to 5% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-8700 — 275 vs 261 FPS
-
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 — 16 vs 12 threads
-
Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn’t have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1. 45/FPS
78%
Price, $
$715.51
43%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-9900 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $715.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
261
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$310
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-8700 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $310 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
675
FPS
642
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
1097
FPS
1046
FPS
League of Legends
275
FPS
261
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
1461
FPS
1395
FPS
Minecraft
479
FPS
456
FPS
VALORANT
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1251
100%
Multi-Core
7668
100%
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1155
92%
Multi-Core
5811
68%
|
Intel Core i9-9900 |
vs |
Intel Core i7-8700 |
|---|---|---|
|
Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
|
8 |
Cores | 6 |
|
16 |
Threads | 12 |
| 3. |
Base Clock Speed |
3.2 GHz |
|
5.0 GHz |
Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier |
32.0x |
|
UHD 630 |
Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i9-9900 or Core i7-8700
Grand Theft Auto V, 1080p, High
2019_Dell Alien.Ware Gaming Desktop PC
151 FPS
$16.55/FPS
GeForce RTX 2070
Core i7-8700
16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,499
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Elite Gaming PC
126 FPS
$19.83/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060
Core i7-8700
8 GB, 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,499
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
ROG Strix GL10CS Gaming Desktop PC
81 FPS
$20. 98/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050
Core i7-8700
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,699
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Dell Inspiron i3670 Desktop PC
62 FPS
$21.94/FPS
GeForce GT 1030
Core i7-8700
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,359.99
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Dell Optiplex 7060 SFF Desktop PC
44 FPS
$33.18/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
8 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,459.99
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Dell Optiplex 5060 SFF Desktop PC
44 FPS
$33.39/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,469
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Dell Optiplex 7060 SFF Desktop PC
44 FPS
$34.05/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,498
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Dell Optiplex 7060 SFF Desktop PC
44 FPS
$34. 07/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
24 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Dell XPS 8930-7764BLK-PUS Tower Desktop PC
44 FPS
$35.59/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,565.99
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
HP Z2 G4 Workstation — 1 X Intel Core i7 (8th Gen) i7-8700 Hexa-core (6 Core) 3.20 GHz — 16 GB DDR4 SDRAM — 256 GB SSD — Intel UHD Graphics 630 Graphics — Windows 10 Pro (English) — Mini-Tower — Black PC
44 FPS
$36.34/FPS
UHD Graphics 630
Core i7-8700
16 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,599
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i9-9900
$399.99
Xeon W-2123
N/A Stock
Core i9-9900
$399. 99
Core i5-4460
N/A Stock
Core i9-9900
$399.99
Core i7-7700
Core i9-9900
$399.99
Xeon E5-2667 v4
N/A Stock
Core i9-9900
$399.99
Core i7-4810MQ
N/A Stock
Core i9-9900
$399.99
Core i7-6900K
$169.79
Core i9-9900
$399.99
Core i5-4670S
Core i9-9900
$399.99
Core i7-9750H
N/A Stock
Core i9-9900
$399.99
FX-4100
$32.68
Intel Core i9-9900 vs. Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i9-9900
The Intel Core i9-9900 operates with 8 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 5.00 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2019
Intel Core i7-8700
The Intel Core i7-8700 operates with 6 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.60 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151-2 CPU socket. This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Coffee Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2017
Intel Core i9-9900
Intel Core i7-8700
Compare Detail
| 3.10 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 6 |
| 5.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.60 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.30 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
GPU |
Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| 1. |
GPU (Turbo) | 1.15 GHz |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 1.20 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.15 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 16.00 MB | L3 Cache | 12.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| LGA 1151-2 | Socket | LGA 1151-2 |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q4/2017 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| Intel Core i9-9900 | Intel Core i7-8700 | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
|
Intel Core i9-9900KS
4. |
9103 |
|
|
Intel Core i9-9900KF
3.6 GHz (8 cores) |
8561 |
|
|
Intel Core i9-9900K
3.6 GHz (8 cores) |
8483 |
|
|
Intel Core i9-9900
3.1 GHz (8 cores) |
7592 |
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2288G
3.7 GHz (8 cores) |
7237 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-9700K
3.6 GHz (8 cores) |
7172 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-9700KF
3.6 GHz (8 cores) |
7109 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8086K
4.0 GHz (6 cores) |
7002 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8700K
3.7 GHz (6 cores) |
6481 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-9700F
3.0 GHz (8 cores) |
6437 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-9700
3.0 GHz (8 cores) |
6350 |
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2136
3. |
5911 |
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2146G
3.5 GHz (6 cores) |
5837 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8700
3.2 GHz (6 cores) |
5781 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8700B
3.2 GHz (6 cores) |
5706 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9600KF
3.7 GHz (6 cores) |
5618 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9600K
3.7 GHz (6 cores) |
5526 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8600K
3.6 GHz (6 cores) |
5430 |
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2276M
2.8 GHz (6 cores) |
5124 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-9700T
2.0 GHz (8 cores) |
5099 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9600
3.1 GHz (6 cores) |
4997 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-9850H
2.6 GHz (6 cores) |
4883 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-9750H
2. |
4831 |
|
|
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.9 GHz (6 cores) |
4829 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8600
3.1 GHz (6 cores) |
4828 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8700T
2.4 GHz (6 cores) |
4765 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8500B
3.0 GHz (6 cores) |
4673 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9500
3.0 GHz (6 cores) |
4593 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8500
3.0 GHz (6 cores) |
4578 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9400F
2.9 GHz (6 cores) |
4556 |
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2176M
2.7 GHz (6 cores) |
4504 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8400
2.8 GHz (6 cores) |
4495 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9400
2.9 GHz (6 cores) |
4495 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8750H
2. |
4438 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8850H
2.6 GHz (6 cores) |
4375 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-9350KF
4.0 GHz (4 cores) |
4064 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9500T
2.2 GHz (6 cores) |
4026 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8559U
2.7 GHz (4 cores) |
3989 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8569U
2.8 GHz (4 cores) |
3979 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-8350K
4.0 GHz (4 cores) |
3856 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8500T
2.1 GHz (6 cores) |
3842 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8400T
1.7 GHz (6 cores) |
3729 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8259U
2.3 GHz (4 cores) |
3702 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8279U
2.4 GHz (4 cores) |
3587 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8257U
1. |
3572 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9300HF
2.4 GHz (4 cores) |
3475 |
|
|
Intel Core i7-8557U
1.7 GHz (4 cores) |
3455 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8400H
2.5 GHz (4 cores) |
3404 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-9300H
2.4 GHz (4 cores) |
3300 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-9100
3.6 GHz (4 cores) |
3281 |
|
|
Intel Core i5-8300H
2.3 GHz (4 cores) |
3263 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-9100F
3.6 GHz (4 cores) |
3249 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-8100
3.6 GHz (4 cores) |
3027 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-8300
3.7 GHz (4 cores) |
3023 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-9100T
3.1 GHz (4 cores) |
2832 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-8100T
3. |
2673 |
|
|
Intel Pentium Gold G5400
3.7 GHz (2 cores) |
2066 |
|
|
Intel Core i3-8109U
3.0 GHz (2 cores) |
2029 |
|
|
Intel Pentium Gold G5500
3.8 GHz (2 cores) |
1941 |
|
|
Intel Celeron G4900
3.1 GHz (2 cores) |
1336 |
|
Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i9-9900: What is the difference?
55 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-8700
63 BALLLA
Intel Core i9-9900
VS
64 Facts compared to
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i9-9900 Is the i7-8700 better than the Intel Core i9-9900?
Why is Intel Core i9-9900 better than Intel Core i7-8700?
- 29.17% higher CPU speed?
8 x 3.1GHz vs 6 x 3.2GHz
- 4 more CPU threads?
16 vs 12 - 0.5MB more L2 cache?
2MB vs 1.5MB - 9.24% higher PassMark score?
16864 vs 15437 - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
5GHz vs 4.6GHz - 4MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 12MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 384KB - 10.45% higher PassMark score (single)?
2865 vs 2594
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i9-9900
Intel Core i9 i7-9700
Intel Core i9-9900
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Apple M1
Intel Core i9-9900
VS
Intel Core I99-9000
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i9-9900
VS
Intel Core i7-9700K
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
9000 9000. 9900
vs
Intel Core i7-9700
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Core i9-9900
VS
Intel Core i3-9100
Intel Core I7-872
VS
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i9-9900
VS
Intel Core i7-10700
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-8500
9900
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-8700
VS
Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i9-9900
Intel Core i5-8500
VS 9000 VS 9000 i5-9400
Price comparison
User reviews
Performance
its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i7-8700
✖Intel Core i9-9900
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2666MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
42.7GB/s
41.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✖Intel Core i7-8700
✖Intel Core i9-9900
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Result Cinebench R20 (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
193.8seconds
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
630.1seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i7-8700
✔Intel Core i9-9900
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i7-8700
✖Intel Core i9-9900
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i9-9900)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i9 9900 vs i7 8700:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i9 9900
Intel Core i7 8700
Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i9 9900 at 3. 1 GHz or i7 8700 with 6 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core I9 9900
68
Core i7 8700
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei
Core 9000 9000 are involved 53
Core i7 8700
37
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption by chip
Core i9 9900
51
Core i7 8700
44
Rating NanoreView
Final rating of the processor
Core I9 9900
58 9000 9000
Key differences
What are the main differences between 8700 and 9900
Reasons to choose Intel Core i9 9900
- Launched 1 year and 7 months later than rival
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB more L3 cache
- 9% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4.
6 GHz)
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i9 9900
+5%
1292
Core i7 8700
1233
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i9 9900
+72%
12304
Core i7 8700
7158
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i9 9900
+7%
2867
Core i7 8700
2682
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i9 9900
+29%
17003
Core i7 8700
13130
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i9 9900
+9%
1278
Core i7 8700
1174
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i9 9900
+27%
7955
Core i7 8700
6274
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of the Intel Core i9 9900 and i7 8700
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | April 23, 2019 | October 5, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Model number | i9-9900 | i7-8700 |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 12 |
| Frequency | 3. |
3.2 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 31x | 32x |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 256KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Power consumption
| Process technology | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| ROPs | 3 | 3 |
| Computer units | 24 | 24 |
| TGP | 15W | 15W |
| Max. |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | 4096×2304 — 60Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i9 9900
0.38 TFLOPS
Core i7 8700
0.38 TFLOPS
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i9 9900 | Site Intel Core i7 8700 |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i9 9900
18 (58. 1%)
Core i7 8700
13 (41.9%)
Total votes: 31
Competitors
1.
Core i9 12900K vs Core i9 9900
2.
Core i7 12700K vs Core i9 9900
3.
Core i5 12600K vs Core i9 9900
4.
Core i7 12700K vs Core i7 8700
5.
Core i5 12600K vs Core i7 8700
6.
Core i5 12400F vs Core i7 8700
7.
Core i7 12700KF vs Core i7 8700
8.
Core i3 12100 vs Core i7 8700
9.
Core i3 12100F vs Core i7 8700
What will you choose: Intel Core i7 8700 or i9 9900?
Name
Message
Intel Core i9-9900 or Intel Core i7-8700
- 0032
Family
- Core i5-9600
Compare - Core i7-9700
Compare
Family
- Core-8500
- Core Core Core Core
- 9003 Core i9-9900
80.
3 (+4.2%)
Core i7-8700
76.9
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i9-9900
79.4 (+4.2%)
Core i7-8700
76.1
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i9-9900
58.6 (+13%)
Core i7-8700
51
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading up to 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Core i9-9900
77.3 (+5%)
Core i7-8700
73.4
Demanding games and tasks
Core i9-9900
63.3 (+14.7%)
Core i7-8700
54
Extreme
Core i9-9900
24.2 (+28.
5%)
Core i7-8700
17.3
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 SINGLE CORE
Intel Core i9-9900
1284 (+10.7%)
Intel Core i7-8700
1146
Cine 9000
00040004 INTEL INTEL CORE INTEL CORE. %)
Intel Core i7-8700
7969
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i9-9900
518 (+7.
1%)
481
Cine
Intel Core i9-9900
4346 (+18.4%)
Intel Core i7-8700
3547
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core I99900
219 (+7.3%)
INTEL CORE ANTEL CORE I7-8700 9000 3,0003 9000 3,0003 9000 3 200003
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9900
1931 (+25.7%)
Intel Core i7-8700
1434
9000 9000 INTEL CORE CORE CORE INTEL CORE INTEL CORE 9.3%)
Intel Core i7-8700
1172
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9-9900
8047 (+26.8%)
Intel Core i7-8700
5891
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Core i9-9900
6250 (+16.7%)
Intel Core i7-8700
5204
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Core i9-9900
2.61 (+7.3%)
Intel Core i7-8700
2,000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 .5 iGPU, OpenGL
Intel Core i99900
44.
1 (+0.9%)
Intel Core i7-8700
43.7
Passmark
Intel Core i9-9900
17108 (+23.6%)
Intel Core I7-8700
9 Specifications
The data is not yet complete, so the tables may be missing information or missing existing features.
Basic
Manufacturer Intel Intel DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i9-9900 Processor Intel® Core™ i7-8700 Processor (12M Cache, up to 4.60 GHz) ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Coffee Lake Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 nm 14 nm Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2021 09-2020 Model Official name. i9-9900 i7-8700 Cores The number of physical cores. 8 6 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 16 12 Multithreading TechnologyWith Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.1 GHz 3.2 GHz Turbo Frequency The maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU.
5GHz 4.6 GHz L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 16 MB 12 MB Instructions 64-bit 64-bit Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 SSE4. 1/4.2, AVX2
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s DMI3 Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 65 W 65 W Cooling system specifications PCG 2015C (65W) PCG 2015C (65W) Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.
Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® UHD Graphics 630 GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 350 MHz Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. 1200 MHz 1200 MHz Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3 3 RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 128 GB 64 GB Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666 RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2 RAM bandwidth 41.6 GB/s ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread.
No data No data PCI
PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 3 PCI configuration options Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration
Dimensions No data No data Supported sockets No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which is better
Intel Core i9-9900
- On average, gaming performance is 3% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 3%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 7%.
- The number of physical cores is 2 more.
- The number of threads is 4 more.
Intel Core i7-8700
- Price lower by $248
- Base frequency higher by 0.1 GHz.
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 — Metro Exodus with RTX 2060 performance comparison
RTX 2060 with
Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz
Metro Exodus
RTX 2060 with
Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz
i7-8700
i9-9900Multi-Thread Performance 9166
1080p 55.4 FPS
1080p 58.1 FPS
1440p 43.1 FPS
1440p 44.7 FPS
2160p 27.1 FPS
2160p 28.
0 FPS
w1440p 37.5 FPS
w1440p 38.9 FPS
High quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 95.5 FPS
1080p 99.4 FPS
1440p 77.0 FPS
1440p 79.4 FPS
2160p 51.5 FPS
2160p 53.0 FPS
w1440p 68.3 FPS
w1440p 70.5 FPS
Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 135.5 FPS
1080p 140.
8 FPS
1440p 110.9 FPS
1440p 114.2 FPS
2160p 76.0 FPS
2160p 78.1 FPS
w1440p 99.1 FPS
w1440p 102.0 FPS
Low quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 215.7 FPS
1080p 223.4 FPS
1440p 178.6 FPS
1440p 183.6 FPS
2160p 124.9 FPS
2160p 128.1 FPS
w1440p 160.6 FPS
w1440p 165.
2 FPS
i7-8700
- i7-8700 has higher level 2 cache. Data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for very slow DDR 9 RAM0032
- The i7-8700 has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i7-8700 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- The i7-8700 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
- The i7-8700 has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
i9-9900
- i9-9900 The i9-9900 is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
- i9-9900 The i9-9900 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
Compare i7-8700 vs i9-9900 specifications
i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Architecture
i7-8700 i9-9900 Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake Generation Core i7
(Coffee Lake)Core i9
(Coffee Lake Refresh)Market Desktop Desktop Memory Support DDR4 DDR4 Part# SR3QS unknown Production Status Active Active Released Jan 2018 Apr 2019 i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Cache
i7-8700 i9-9900 Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core) Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core) Cache L3 12MB (shared) 16MB (shared) i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Cores
i7-8700 i9-9900 # of Cores 6 8 # of Threads 12 16 Integrated Graphics N/A UHD 630 SMP # CPUs 1 1 i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Features
i7-8700 i9-9900 i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Performance
i7-8700 i9-9900 Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz Frequency 3. 2 GHz
3.1 GHz Multiplier 32.0x 31.0x Multiplier Unlocked No No TDP 65W 65W Turbo Clock up to 4.6 GHz up to 5 GHz Voltage variable variable i7-8700 vs i9-9900 Physical
i7-8700 i9-9900 Die Size unknown unknown Foundry Intel Intel Package FC-LGA1151 FC-LGA14C Process Size 14 nm 14 nm Socket Intel Socket 1151 Intel Socket 1151 Transistors unknown unknown tCaseMax 72°C 72°C Share your comments 95
Compare i7-8700 vs i9-9900 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-8700 vs.
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i7-8700 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.60 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W . CPU socket LGA 1151-2 This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, the Coffee Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2017
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K runs with 8 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 5.00 GHz base 4.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache per die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2018
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i9-9900K
Frequency 3. 60 GHz
6 Cores 8 4.60GHz Turbo (1 core) 5.00 GHz 4.30 GHz Turbo (all cores) 4.70 GHz Yes Hyper Threading Yes No. Overclocking Yes normal Basic architecture normal Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
1.15GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz 14nm Technology 14nm 1.15 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.20 GHz 12 DirectX Version 12 3 Max. displays 3 DDR4-2666 memory size DDR4-2666 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory No. ECC No. — L2 Cache — 12.00MB L3 Cache 16.00MB 3.0 PCIe version 3.0 16 PCIe lanes 16 14nm Technology 14nm LGA 1151-2 Connector LGA 1151-2 65 W TDP 95W VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q4/2017 Release date Q4/2018 Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms.
The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019of the year. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only be computed efficiently using either a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a large number of CPU cores, cache, and fast memory connectivity through as many memory channels as possible.
Estimated energy use
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Estimated energy use
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Intel Core i7-8700 Intel Core i9-9900K 65 W Max TDP 95W N. A.
Power consumption per day (kWh) NA NA Operating cost per day NA NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA NA Operating cost per year NA Comparison Intel Core i9
-9900K and Intel Core i7-8700K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-9900K and Intel Core i7-8700K processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i9-9900K
versus
Intel Core i7-8700K
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i9-9900K
- Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 8 month(s) 2.0 more cores
run more applications at the same time: 8 vs 6
- 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
- About 6% more clock speed: 5.00 GHz vs 4.70 GHz
- L1 cache is 2x(s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 2x(s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is about 33% more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 7% more: 2953 vs 2755
- Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 35% more: 18636 vs 13799
- About 5% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 1336 vs 1276
- About 31% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 8781 vs 6678
- Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics benchmark Score approximately 40% higher: 10793 vs 7702
- Performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) approximately 40% higher: 12.968 vs 9.279
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/ s) 2.3 times more: 202.925 vs 88.131
- Approximately 39% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.504 vs 1.084
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) approximately 42% greater performance : 6.779 vs 4.763
- About 44% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.406 vs 12.047
- About 4% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 2165 vs 2083
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 4% higher: 2165 vs 2083
| Release date | October 2018 vs 5 January 2017 |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 12 |
| Maximum frequency | 5. |
| Level 1 cache | 64K (per core) vs 256KB |
| Level 2 cache | 256K (per core) vs 1MB |
| Level 3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) vs 12288 KB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2953 vs 2755 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 18636 vs 13799 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1336 vs 1276 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 8781 vs 6678 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 10793 vs 7702 |
| CompuBench 1. |
12.968 vs 9.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.925 vs 88.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.504 vs 1.084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.779 vs 4.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.406 vs 12.047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2165 vs 2083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2165 vs 2083 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-8700K
- About 8% more performance in GFXBench 4.
0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 4305 vs 4003
- About 8% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark : 7198 vs 6679
- Approximately 8% increase in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) performance: 4305 vs 4003
- Approximately 8% increase in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) performance: 7198 vs 6679
- 0022
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 4305 vs 4003 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 7198 vs 6679 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 4305 vs 4003 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 7198 vs 6679 Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-9900K
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-8700KPassMark — Single thread mark CPU 1 CPU 2 PassMark — CPU mark CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Single Core CPU 1 CPU 2 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core CPU 1 CPU 2 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1 CPU 2 12.968 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 202.925 88.131 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1 CPU 2 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) CPU 1 CPU 2 17.406 12.047 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) CPU 1 CPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1 CPU 2 Name Intel Core i9-9900K Intel Core i7-8700K PassMark — Single thread mark 2953 2755 PassMark — CPU mark 18636 13799 Geekbench 4 — Single Core 1336 1276 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 8781 6678 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 10793 7702 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
12.968 9.279 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 202.925 88.131 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.504 1.084 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.779 4.763 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.406 12.047 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2165 2083 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
4003 4305 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 6679 7198 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2165 2083 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 4003 4305 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 6679 7198 Feature comparison
Intel Core i9-9900K Intel Core i7-8700K Architecture name Coffee Lake Coffee Lake Issue date October 2018 January 5, 2017 Place in the rating 393 496 Price now $909 $358. 99
Processor Number i9-9900K i7-8700K Series 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors Status Launched Launched Price/performance ratio (0-100) 6.63 13.10 Applicability Desktop Desktop Price at first issue date $420 Support 64 bit Base frequency 3. 60 GHz
3.70 GHz Bus Speed 8 GT/s DMI3 8 GT/s DMI3 Level 1 cache 64K (per core) 256KB Level 2 cache 256K (per core) 1MB Level 3 cache 16 MB (shared) 12288KB Process 14nm 14nm Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 72 °C Maximum core temperature 100°C 100°C Maximum frequency 5. 00 GHz
4.70 GHz Number of cores 8 6 Number of threads 16 12 Unlocked Maximum number of memory channels 2 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 41.6 GB/s Maximum memory size 128GB 128GB Supported memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666 Device ID 0x3E98 0x3E92 Graphics base frequency 350MHz 350MHz Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 20 GHz
1.20 GHz Intel® Clear Video HD Technology Intel® Clear Video Technology Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology Intel® Quick Sync Video Video memory size 64GB 64GB Integrated graphics Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Intel® UHD Graphics 630 Maximum number of monitors supported 3 3 4K support Maximum resolution via DisplayPort [email protected] [email protected] Maximum resolution via eDP [email protected] [email protected] Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4
[email protected] [email protected] DirectX 12 12 OpenGL 4.5 4.5 Maximum number of processors in configuration
1 1 Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm Supported sockets FCLGA1151 FCLGA1151 Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 95 Watt Thermal Solution PCG 2015D (130W) PCG 2015D (130W) Low Halogen Options Available Number of PCI Express lanes 16 16 PCI Express revision 3. 0
3.0 PCIe configurations Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Scalability 1S Only 1S Only Execute Disable Bit (EDB) Intel® Identity Protection Technology Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) Intel® OS Guard Intel® Secure Key Technology Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) Secure Boot Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology Idle States Extended instructions Intel® SSE4.