Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i5-9400 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i5-9400
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8700 on one side and the Intel Core i5-9400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | Intel Core i7-8700 | Intel Core i5-9400 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | ||||||
Core name | Coffee Lake-S | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
Family | Core i7-8000 | Core i5-9000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80684I78700, |
BX80684I59400, |
||||||
Release date | Q4 2017 | Q1 2019 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm++ | 14 nm++ | ||||||
Transistors | 1. 800.000.000 | — | ||||||
Cores | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Threads | 12 | 6 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 2,9 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 4,6 GHz | 4,1 GHz | ||||||
Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
Cache memory | 12 MB | 9 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR4-2666 |
DDR4-2666 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 41,6 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
GPU execution units | 23 | 23 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 184 | 184 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1200 MHz | 1050 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 423,2 GFLOPS | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 100°C | 100°C | ||||||
Crypto engine |
AES New Instructions, |
— |
||||||
Security |
Software Guard Extensions, |
— |
||||||
Max display resolution |
4096 x 2304@60Hz |
— |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 489 | 462 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 3. 865 | 2.632 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 184 | 174 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.396 | 972 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.151 | 1.097 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 8.956 | 6.020 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.665 | 2.480 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 13.082 | 9.492 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.288 | 4.895 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
23. 378 | 18.940 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
406,6 GFLOPS | 323 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
360 pts / W | 291 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8700 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i5-9400 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
489 3.865 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
462 2. 632 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
184 1.396 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
174 972 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
1.151 8.956 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
1.097 6.020 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 49%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
2.665 13.082 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
2.480 9. 492 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
5.288 23.378 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
4.895 18.940 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
6.041 26.876 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
4.187 11.228 |
In single core, the difference is 44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 139%.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
4.276 14.464 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
3.837 13.999 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700 |
5. 742 25.519 |
Intel Core i5-9400 |
5.179 20.498 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 24%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-8700 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-9400 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i7-870Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-8700TIntel Core i7-8705GIntel Core i7-8706G
Intel Core i5-9400FIntel Core i5-9400HIntel Core i5-9400T
Intel Core i7-8700 vs Intel Core i5-9400
- Home
- CPU comparison
 / 
 / 
Overall score
Released
Q4/2017
Released
Q2/2019
Overall score
What’s the best choice Intel Core i7-8700 or Intel Core i5-9400?
We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.
Intel Core i7-8700 has a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q4/2017.
Intel Core i5-9400 has a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. 6 Cores. Power consumption of 65 W. Released in Q2/2019.
Differences
Specifications
Benchmarks
Testimonials
Differences
Reasons to consider
Intel Core i7-8700
Report a bug
Positions in all rankings
Common positions Intel Core i7-8700 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
-
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
224 place
-
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
205 place
-
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
163 place
-
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
185 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
118 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
223 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
269 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
305 place
-
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
647 place
-
Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)
132 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
13 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
127 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
13 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
110 place
-
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
32 place
-
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
283 place
Reasons to consider
Intel Core i5-9400
Report a bug
Positions in all rankings
Common positions Intel Core i5-9400 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
-
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
225 place
-
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
319 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
358 place
-
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
407 place
-
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
806 place
-
Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)
92 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
30 place
-
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
164 place
-
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
308 place
Specifications
Technical data
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-9400
CPU family and group
Background information about the processors being compared, series, generation and market segment.
-
Segment
Desktop / Server Desktop / Server
-
Family
Intel Core i7 Intel Core i5
-
Generation
8 9
-
CPU group
Intel Core i 8000 Intel Core i 9000
-
Predecessor
Intel Core i7-7700 Intel Core i5-8400
-
Successor
Intel Core i7-9700 Intel Core i5-10400
CPU Technical specs
Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, and cache size. These parameters indirectly tell about the speed of the processor, the higher they are the better.
-
Frequency
3.20 GHz 2.90 GHz
-
CPU Cores
6 6
-
Turbo (1 Core)
4.60 GHz 4.10 GHz
-
CPU Threads
12 6
-
Turbo (6 Cores)
4.30 GHz 3.90 GHz
-
Hyperthreading
Yes No
-
Overclocking
No No
-
Core architecture
normal normal
IGPU
Internal Graphics does not affect the performance of the CPU, performs the work of the graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.
Hardware codec support
Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speeds up the required operations.
-
h365 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
h365 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
h364
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
VP9
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
VP8
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
AV1
No No
-
AVC
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
-
VC-1
Decode Decode
-
JPEG
Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI
Types, channel quantity of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-9400 and Intel Core i7-8700. Depending on the motherboards, higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported.
-
Memory type
DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666
-
Max. Memory
128 GB 128 GB
-
ECC
No No
-
Memory channels
2 2
-
PCIe version
3.0 3.0
-
PCIe lanes
16 16
Encryption
-
AES-NI
Yes Yes
Thermal Management
Compare the TDP requirements of TDP Intel Core i7-8700 and Intel Core i5-9400 to select a cooling system. Note, the TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
-
TDP (PL1)
65 W 65 W
-
Tjunction max.
100 °C 100 °C
Technologies and extensions
Architecture, interfaces, additional instructions supported by Intel Core i7-8700 and Intel Core i7-8700, virtual machine technologies and process technology.
-
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
-
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
-
ISA extensions
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
-
L3-Cache
12. 00 MB 9.00 MB
-
Architecture
Coffee Lake S Coffee Lake S Refresh
-
Technology
14 nm 14 nm
-
Socket
LGA 1151-2 LGA 1151-2
-
Release date
Q4/2017 Q2/2019
Benchmarks
Performance tests CPUs
Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the difference in performance between Intel Core i7-8700 and Intel Core i5-9400.
Compare the synthetic test values and choose the best processor!
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-9400
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-9400
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-9400
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-9400
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU — the internal GPU in games
Intel Core i7-8700
Intel Core i5-9400
Blender 2.