I7 920 vs: Intel Core i7-6700K vs i7-920

i7-920 vs i7-920 — Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz

i7-920
i7-920

Multi-Thread Performance

4928 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1165 Pts

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

i7-920 vs i7-920 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-920
i7-920

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	129.3 FPS
1080p	129.3 FPS
1440p	107.7 FPS
1440p	107. 7 FPS
2160p	96.9 FPS
2160p	96.9 FPS
w1440p	109.5 FPS
w1440p	109.5 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	195.4 FPS
1080p	195.4 FPS
1440p	167.7 FPS
1440p	167.7 FPS
2160p	153.4 FPS
2160p	153.4 FPS
w1440p	170.0 FPS
w1440p	170.0 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	261.5 FPS
1080p	261.5 FPS
1440p	227. 7 FPS
1440p	227.7 FPS
2160p	210.0 FPS
2160p	210.0 FPS
w1440p	230.6 FPS
w1440p	230.6 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	393.8 FPS
1080p	393.8 FPS
1440p	347.7 FPS
1440p	347.7 FPS
2160p	323.1 FPS
2160p	323.1 FPS
w1440p	351.7 FPS
w1440p	351.7 FPS

i7-920

Compare i7-920 vs i7-920 specifications

Share Your Comments 88

Compare i7-920 vs i7-920 in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Intel Core i7-920 vs Intel Core i5-12600K Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Core i7-920 vs Intel Core i5-12600K

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-920 on one side and the Intel Core i5-12600K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	Intel Core i7-920	Intel Core i5-12600K
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Nehalem	Alder Lake
Core name	Bloomfield	Alder Lake-S
Family	Core i7-900	Core i5-12000
Part number(s), S-Spec	BX80601920, BXC80601920, AT80601000741AA, Q1CM, Q1H7, SLBCH, SLBEJ	CM8071504555227, BX8071512600K, SRL4T
Release date	Q4 2008	Q4 2021
Lithography	45 nm	Intel 7
Transistors	731. 000.000	—
Cores	4	10
Threads	8	16
Base frequency	2,7 GHz	3,7 GHz
Turbo frequency	2,9 GHz	4,9 GHz
Energy cores	—	4 Cores 4 Threads @ 2,8 / 3,6 GHz
High performance cores	—	6 Cores 12 Threads @ 3,7 / 4,9 GHz
Cache memory	8 MB	20 MB
Max memory capacity	24 GB	128 GB
Memory types	DDR3 800/1066	DDR5-4800
Max # of memory channels	3	2
Max memory bandwidth	25,6 GB/s	76,8 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	16	20
TDP	130 W	125 W
Suggested PSU	650W ATX Power Supply	650W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Alder Lake)
GPU execution units	—	32
GPU shading units	—	256
GPU base clock	—	300 MHz
GPU boost clock	—	1450 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	—	742,4 GFLOPS
Socket	LGA1366	LGA1700
Compatible motherboard	Socket LGA 1366 Motherboard	Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	67. 9°C	100°C
AI accelerator	—	Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost
Crypto engine	—	AES New Instructions, Secure Key
Security	—	OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
Max display resolution	—	4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI), 7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP), 5120 x 3200@120Hz (eDP)
CPU-Z single thread	369	751
CPU-Z multi thread	1. 978	7.145
Cinebench R15 single thread	108	266
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	558	2.507
Cinebench R23 single thread	549	1.784
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	2.872	16.793
PassMark single thread	1.209	4.056
PassMark CPU Mark	2.698	24.171
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	2.536	8.644
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	8. 528	43.147
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	63,1 GFLOPS	729,3 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	66 pts / W	345 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Core i5-12600K has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-12600K is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-12600K is less. The Intel Core i5-12600K was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-12600K	751 7.145
Intel Core i7-920	369 1. 978

In single core, the difference is 104%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 261%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-12600K	266 2.507
Intel Core i7-920	108 558

In single core, the difference is 146%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 349%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-12600K	1.784 16.793
Intel Core i7-920	549 2.872

In single core, the difference is 225%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 485%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-12600K	4.056 24.171
Intel Core i7-920	1. 209 2.698

In single core, the difference is 235%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 796%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-12600K	8.644 43.147
Intel Core i7-920	2. 536 8.528

In single core, the difference is 241%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 406%.

On Linux 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-12600K	8.588 45.624
Intel Core i7-920	2.489 7.758

In single core, the difference is 245%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 488%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i5-12600K	8.902 48.515
Intel Core i7-920	2.508 8.660

In single core, the difference is 255%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 460%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i7-920 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-12600K AMD equivalent

Comparison Intel Core i7-920 vs Intel Core i7-860 which is better?

Home / Intel Core i7-920 VS Intel Core i7-860

Intel Core i7-920

22%

Devicelist

Intel Core i7-860 9000

Evaluation Devicelist

We compared the specifications of Intel Core i7-920 and Intel Core i7-860 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023.

Benefits of Intel Core i7-920

Value for money

50.7%

24.3% (92%) better than

26.4%

Maximum core temperature

68°C

-5 °C (-6.8%) better than

73 °C

Permissible memory size

24 GB

8 GB (50%) better than

16 GB

Benefits of Intel Core i7-860

Comparison winner

Maximum frequency

nine0031 3.46 GHz

0.53 GHz (18.1%) better than

2.93 GHz

Number of transistors

774 million

43 million (5. 9%) better than

731 million

Release price

nine0031 $229

-111 $ (-32.6%) better than

340 $

Power Demand (TDP)

95 W

-35 W (-26.9%) better than

130 W

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

nine0031 4280

310 (7.8%) better than

3970

nine0028

nine0024 8 MB (total)

General
Type
Desktop	Desktop
Architecture code name
Bloomfield	Lynnfield
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.
4	4
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). nine0003
8	8
Process
45 nm	45 nm
Chip size
263 mm2	296 mm2
Number of transistors
731 million	774 million nine0002 43 million (5.9%) better than
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
2.93GHz	3.46 GHz Better than at 0.53 GHz (18.1%)
64 bit support

Max. number of processors in configuration
1	1
Socket
FCLGA1366	LGA1156
Series
Core i7 (Desktop)	no data
Release price
340 $	$229 -111 $ (-32.6%) better than
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
50.7% By 24.3% (92%) better than	26.4%
Bus
1333 MHz	no data
Maximum core temperature
68 °C -5 °C (-6.8%) better than	73 °C
vPro

TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

PCI Express revision
no data	2.0
Number of PCI-Express lanes
n/a	16
Demand Based Switching
—	—
PAE
36bit	36 bit
Level 1 cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the kernel. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache
256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache
8 MB (total)
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
130W	95 W -35 W (-26.9%) better than
EDB
+	+
Permissible core voltage
0.8V-1.375V	0.65V-1.4V

nine0024 4280

310 (7.8%) better than

		2920
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
3874	no data
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
15576	no data
3DMark06 CPU
4728	no data
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
3970
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
2702	no data

nine0028

Technologies and Supplementary Instructions
Extended Instructions		Intel® SSE4. 2
Turbo Boost
1.0	1.0
Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to save power when the processor is idle.

Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.

RAM parameters
RAM types
DDR3-800, DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
24 GB 8 GB (50%) better than	16 GB
Number of memory channels
3	2

Virtualization Technologies
VT-x

EPT

VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. nine0003

nine0024

Integrated graphics
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon X5690 and Intel Core i7-920 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization.

Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
nine0003

Intel Xeon X5690

versus

Intel Core i7-920

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Xeon X5690

Newer processor, release date difference 2 year(s) 3 month(s)

2.083 Run more cores applications simultaneously: 6 vs 4

4 threads more: 12 vs 8
Approximately 27% more clock speed: 3.73 GHz vs 2.93 GHz
Approximately 16% higher maximum core temperature: 78. 5°C vs 67.9°C
Newer manufacturing process allows the processor to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm vs 45 nm
L1 cache approximately 50% larger , means more data can be stored in it for quick access
L2 cache is approximately 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
L3 cache is approximately 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access access
Maximum memory size is 12 times larger: 288 GB vs 24 GB
About 39% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1705 vs 1223
Performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark is 4.6 times( a) more: 12858 vs 2796
About 36% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 637 vs 469
About 90% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 3517 vs 1855
3.8 times better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.301 vs 0. 873 vs 50.388
2.5 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.762 vs 0.3
3.2 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark( a) more: 5.122 vs 1.595
3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.77 vs 4

nine0024 12 vs 8

nine0028

Release date	February 2011 vs November 2008
Number of cores	6 vs 4
Number of threads
Maximum frequency	3.73 GHz vs 2.93 GHz
Maximum core temperature	78.5°C vs 67.9°C
Process	32 nm vs 45 nm
Level 1 cache	64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	12288 KB (shared) vs 8192 KB (shared)
Maximum memory size	288 GB vs 24 GB
Maximum number of processors in configuration	2 vs 1
PassMark — Single thread mark	1705 vs 1223
PassMark — CPU mark	12858 vs 2796
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	637 vs 469
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3517 vs 1855
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.301 vs 0.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	57.148 vs 50.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.762 vs 0.3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.122 vs 1.595
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.77 vs 4

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-920

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

nine0027

Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

nine0022

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.

5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

57.148

nine0022

50.388

CPU 1

CPU 2

CPU 1

CPU 2

nine0028

nine0024 5.122

Name	Intel Xeon X5690	Intel Core i7-920
PassMark — Single thread mark	1705	1223
PassMark — CPU mark	12858	2796
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	637	469
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3517	1855
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	0	2227
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.301	0.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	57.148	50.388
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.762	0.3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	1.595
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.77	4

Performance comparison

nine0028

nine0024 $340

nine0024 17. 68

nine0024 3.46 GHz

nine0024 64 KB (per core)

nine0028

nine0024

	Intel Xeon X5690	Intel Core i7-920
Architecture name	Westmere EP	Bloomfield
Production date	February 2011	November 2008
Price at first issue date	$205
Place in the ranking	1873	2424
Price now	$149	$174
Processor Number	X5690	i7-920
Series	Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	8.34
Applicability	Server	Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	2.66 GHz
Bus Speed	6.4 GT/s QPI	4.8 GT/s QPI
Crystal area	239mm	263 mm2
Level 1 cache	64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	12288 KB (shared)	8192 KB (shared)
Technological process	32nm	45nm
Maximum core temperature	78. 5°C	67.9°C
Maximum frequency	3.73 GHz	2.93 GHz
Number of cores	6	4
Number of QPI Links	2	1
Number of threads	12	8
Number of transistors	1170 million	731 million
Permissible core voltage	0.750V-1.350V	0.800V-1.375V
System bus (FSB)		1333MHz
ECC support
Maximum number of memory channels	3	3
Maximum memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	25. 6 GB/s
Maximum memory size	288GB	24GB
Supported memory types	DDR3 800/1066/1333	DDR3 800/1066
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in configuration	2	1
Package Size	42.5mm X 45mm	42.5mm x 45.0mm
Supported sockets	FCLGA1366	FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	130 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions	Intel® SSE4. Навигация по записям Previous: Firepro v3800 specs: ATI FirePro V3800 Specs \| TechPowerUp GPU Database Next: I5 4460 vs 4690k: Intel Core i5-4460 vs i5-4690K Найти: Свежие записи Intel pentium dual core 6000: Please click the green button to continue. Rivatuner osd not display in league of legends: Reddit — Dive into anything 980 ti wattage: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Specs A6-5200M: AMD A-Series A6-5200 Notebook Processor G502 lightspeed review: Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED Review — RTINGS.com Свежие комментарии Архивы Октябрь 2023 Сентябрь 2023 Август 2023 Июль 2023 Июнь 2023 Май 2023 Апрель 2023 Март 2023 Февраль 2023 Январь 2023 Декабрь 2022 Ноябрь 2022 Октябрь 2022 Сентябрь 2022 Август 2022 Июль 2022 Июнь 2022 Май 2022 Апрель 2022 Март 2022 Февраль 2022 Январь 2022 Декабрь 2021 Ноябрь 2021 Октябрь 2021 Сентябрь 2021 Август 2021 Июль 2021 Июнь 2021 Май 2021 Апрель 2021 Март 2021 Февраль 2021 Январь 2021 Декабрь 2020 Ноябрь 2020 Октябрь 2020 Сентябрь 2020 Август 2020 Июль 2020 Июнь 2020 Май 2020 Апрель 2020 Март 2020 Февраль 2020 Январь 2020 Декабрь 2019 Рубрики Amd Benchmark Cpu Gpu Miscellaneous Monitor Playstation Radeon Windows Xbox Мета Войти Лента записей Лента комментариев WordPress.org 2024 © All rights reserved