Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K — Valorant with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Valorant
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-9700K
Multi-Thread Performance
19634 Pts
17589 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2900 Pts
2834 Pts
Valorant
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K in Valorant using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 5 3600
i7-9700K
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
179.
|
| 1080p |
184.1 FPS
|
| 1440p |
146.7 FPS
|
| 1440p |
149.0 FPS
|
| 2160p |
127.6 FPS
|
| 2160p |
129.6 FPS
|
| w1440p |
146.7 FPS
|
| w1440p |
149.1 FPS
|
High Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
256.5 FPS
|
| 1080p |
262.
|
| 1440p |
217.1 FPS
|
| 1440p |
219.9 FPS
|
| 2160p |
193.3 FPS
|
| 2160p |
195.8 FPS
|
| w1440p |
217.1 FPS
|
| w1440p |
220.0 FPS
|
0 FPSMedium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
333.5 FPS
|
| 1080p |
339.9 FPS
|
| 1440p |
287.
|
| 1440p |
290.8 FPS
|
| 2160p |
259.0 FPS
|
| 2160p |
262.0 FPS
|
| w1440p |
287.5 FPS
|
| w1440p |
291.0 FPS
|
5 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
487.6 FPS
|
| 1080p |
495.6 FPS
|
| 1440p |
428.3 FPS
|
| 1440p |
432.
|
| 2160p |
390.3 FPS
|
| 2160p |
394.4 FPS
|
| w1440p |
428.3 FPS
|
| w1440p |
432.9 FPS
|
7 FPSRyzen 5 3600
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
- The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-9700K
- The i7-9700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The i7-9700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K specifications
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Architecture
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 2) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Jul 2019 | Oct 2018 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Cache
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 32MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Cores
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Performance
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3. 6 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36.0x | 36.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| TDP | 65 W | 95 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.9 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | unknown |
Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K Physical
| Ryzen 5 3600 | i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA14C | |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | 4,800 million | unknown |
| tCaseMax | unknown | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 5 3600 vs i7-9700K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Porovnání Intel Core i7-9700K vs.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Porovnání procesorů
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Pokud se rozhodujete mezi procesory Intel Core i7-9700K a AMD Ryzen 5 3600, pak je procesor
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 jasná volba — má celkově lepší parametry a také poměr cena/výkon!
Obecné
Výrobce
Intel
AMD
Výrobní technologie
14 nm
7 nm
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má efektivnější technologii výroby než Intel Core i7-9700K
Příkon (TDP)
95 W
65 W
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má o 32 % nižší příkon než Intel Core i7-9700K
Patice (Socket)
Intel 1151 Coffee Lake
AMD AM4
Počet jader a vláken
Počet jader procesoru
Intel Core i7-9700K má 1.
33x více jader než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Počet výpočetních vláken
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má 1.5x více výpočetních vláken než Intel Core i7-9700K
Frekvence
Základní frekvence procesoru
3,6 GHz
3,6 GHz
Oba procesory mají stejnou základní frekvenci
Maximální frekvence (Boost)
4,9 GHz
4,2 GHz
Intel Core i7-9700K má o 17 % vyšší maximální frekvenci než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Možnost taktování
ano
neuvedeno
Cache
Velikost L1 cache
neuvedeno
384 kB
Velikost L2 cache
neuvedeno
3072 kB
Velikost L3 cache
neuvedeno
32768 kB
Výkon
Celkové skóre procesoru
14 540
17 794
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má obecně o 22 % vyšší celkový výkon než Intel Core i7-9700K
Skóre jednoho vlákna
2 889
2 569
Intel Core i7-9700K má o 12 % vyšší výkon na jednom výpočetním vlákně než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Skóre herní fyziky
5 901
4 652
Intel Core i7-9700K má o 27 % vyšší výkon při výpočtu herní fyziky než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Operační paměť
Podporovaný typ paměti
DDR4
DDR4
Maximální počet kanálů
Oba procesory podporují stejný počet paměťových kanálů
Grafická karta
Integrovaná grafická karta
Intel UHD Graphics 630
neuvedeno
Základní frekvence graf.
karty
1200 MHz
neuvedeno
Chladič
Chladič v balení
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má v balení chladič, Intel Core i7-9700K nikoli
Typ chladiče
neuvedeno
Wraith Stealth
Další funkce a vlastnosti
Produktová řada
Intel Core i7
AMD Ryzen 5
Mikroarchitektura
neuvedeno
Zen 2
Kódový název
Coffee Lake Refresh
Matisse
Přibližná cena
Přibližná cena
již se neprodává
6 700 Kč
Upozornění: Porovnání těchto produktů je vytvářeno automaticky na základě jejich parametrů, uživatelského hodnocení a ceny. Jedná se o systémové řešení pro usnadnění vašeho výběru, nikoli o přímé doporučení redakce Cena-Vykon.cz. Nalezli jste chybu v parametrech nebo se vám nezdá výsledné hodnocení? Dejte nám vědět!
Uživatelské hodnocení
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Pokud se rozhodujete mezi procesory Intel Core i7-9700K a AMD Ryzen 5 3600, pak je procesor
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 jasná volba — má celkově lepší parametry a také poměr cena/výkon!
Další srovnání
|
Intel Core i7-9700K vs.  AMD Ryzen 7 3700Xvs. Intel Core i5-9600K vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. Intel Core i7-9700F |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. Intel Core i5-10400F vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs. Intel Core i5-11400F vs. Intel Core i5-10400 |
Intel Core i7-9700K or AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- 0003 Intel Core i7-9700K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Family
- Core i5-9600K
Compare - Core i9-9900K
Compare - Core i9-9900KS
Compare
Family
- Ryzen 5 3600X
Compare - Ryzen 7 3700X
Compare - Ryzen 7 3800X
Compare - Ryzen 9 3900X
Compare
Game Speed
Core i7-9700K
9 0049 71.3 (+6%)
Ryzen 5 3600
67
Gaming and performance similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core have the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i7-9700K
73 (+4%)
Ryzen 5 3600
70.2
Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs x.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i7-9700K
50.9 (+5%)
Ryzen 5 3600
48.4
loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Price
The data is obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i7-9700K 68.8 (+10%) Ryzen 5 3600 62.5 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i7-9700K 56.9 (+7%) Ryzen 5 3600 53.2 |
Extreme |
|
Core i7-9700K 16. Ryzen 5 3600 18.4 (+10%) |
8 Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. 9Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
10326 (+13% )
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9150
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
481 (+2%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
472
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
3656 (+2%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
3570
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
214 (+9 %)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
197
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
1520
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1578 (+4%)
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
1302 (+10%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
1183
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
7421 (+9%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
6821
Blender 2.
81 bmw27 9 0048
Intel Core i7-9700K
217.1
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 5 3600
17796 (+22%)
CPU-Z 17 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9700K
549 (+13%)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
488
Blender 3.1
Intel Core i7-9700K
134
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
9004 9 140 (+4%)
Characteristics
Basic
| SocketInstalled in motherboards with the correct socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | LGA 1151 | AM4 |
| Manufacturer Firm | Intel | AMD |
| Presentation datePresentation in mass media, official information. | 2018-10-19 | 2019-07-07 |
Code name for the Microarchitecture family. |
Coffee Lake | Matisse |
| GenerationCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Ryzen 5 (Zen 2 (Matisse)) |
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | 8 | 6 |
| Threads The number of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 8 | 12 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
Missing | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS you can try to disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
| Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under low-threaded loads, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU, but do not load all threads. |
4.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Free multiplier Allows you to specify any multiplier, which is convenient for manual overclocking. It’s worth mentioning that old-school multiplier or bus overclocking is a thing of the past. | No data | No data |
| BCLK System bus frequency. Some motherboards allow you to achieve a good performance boost by slightly raising the bus frequency. Often this has a bad effect on the stability of the system. | 100 | 100 |
CPU multiplier. The final CPU frequency is determined by the simple formula BCLK * CPU multiplier. Modern processors instantly change the multiplier of each of the cores, taking into account the type of load, temperature, consumption and settings in the BIOS. |
36 | 36 |
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 95W | 65 W |
| tCaseMax Allowable IHS (heat spreading plate, «cover») temperature. | 72 °C | 95 °C |
Cache and RAM
L1 Cache First level cache. Modern processors use a multi-level cache. The first is the fastest, but the smallest. In the case of an L1 access and a miss, the L2 cache is searched for the next stage. |
64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache Second level cache. Holds more data, but is slower. | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache L3 cache. AMD created the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with a record-breaking L3 volume, which reduced the requirements for memory frequency and significantly increased the number of frames in many games. | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4 Dual-channel |
DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. |
UHD Graphics 630 | N/A |
PCI
| PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
Gen4 |
Detailed information
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Coffee Lake | Matisse |
Chip manufacturer A company that manufactures chips in its own factory. |
Intel | TSMC |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied. | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Socket type | FC-LGA14C | µOPGA-1331 |
| Spec Code | BX80684I79700K BXC80684I79700K CM8068403874212 SRELT |
100-000000031 |
Which is better
Intel Core i7-9700K
- On average, gaming performance is 6% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 7%.
- The number of physical cores is 2 more.
- The turbo boost frequency is 0.7 GHz higher.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Faster and 10% better in complex multi-threaded applications.
- 4 more threads.
- 32% lower TDP
How are they similar
- The base frequency is equal.
Your comment can be here
Intel Core i7-9700K vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600
GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE 9005 0
ETH AND 27 MORE
Intel Core i7-9700K
Intel Core i7-9700K runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.90 GHz base 4.60 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .Processor connects to LGA 1151-2 CPU socket This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d .
The product was launched Q4/2018
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 runs with 6 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to socket CPU AM4 (LGA 1331) This version includes 32.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, the Matisse (Zen 2) architecture has been improved in 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . Product launched Q3/2019
Intel Core i7-9700K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Compare Parts
90 101
Intel UHD Graphics 630
20GHz Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark.
A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and gives a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.