Intel Core i7 9700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 9700K
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
We compared two 8-core desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz Intel Core i7 9700K against the 3.9 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 3800X. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 9700K
59
Ryzen 7 3800X
61
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 9700K
37
Ryzen 7 3800X
52
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 9700K
47
Ryzen 7 3800X
62
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 9700K
48
Ryzen 7 3800X
58
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 3800X and 9700K
Advantages of Intel Core i7 9700K
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 9% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
9 GHz vs 4.5 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Has 20 MB larger L3 cache size
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.0
- Newer — released 9-months later
- Around 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 9700K
1281
Ryzen 7 3800X
+5%
1342
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 9700K
9383
Ryzen 7 3800X
+47%
13765
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 9700K
+7%
2879
Ryzen 7 3800X
2696
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 9700K
14460
Ryzen 7 3800X
+60%
23198
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 9700K
1283
Ryzen 7 3800X
+4%
1340
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 9700K
7422
Ryzen 7 3800X
+28%
9486
Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 9700K and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | October 8, 2018 | July 7, 2019 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | — |
| Model number | i7-9700K | — |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
| P-Cores | 8 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 3. 6 GHz |
3.9 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 4.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 36x | 39x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Package
| Transistors | — | 3. 8 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| TDP | 95 W | 105 W |
| Peak temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 9700K
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 7 3800X
n/a
Memory Support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 9700K official page | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
— |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 9700K
6 (14.6%)
Ryzen 7 3800X
35 (85.4%)
Total votes: 41
ompetitors
1.
Core i7 9700K or Ryzen 5 5600X
2.
Core i7 9700K or Ryzen 9 5900X
3.
Core i7 9700K or Core i5 12600K
4.
Core i7 9700K or Apple M2
5.
Ryzen 7 3800X or Ryzen 5 5600X
6.
Ryzen 7 3800X or Ryzen 7 5700G
Compare other CPUs (480+)
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 3800X or Intel Core i7 9700K?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X on one side and the Intel Core i7-9700K on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | Intel Core i7-9700K | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Matisse | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 7 3000 | Core i7-9000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
100-000000025, |
BX80684I79700K, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2019 | Q4 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 3. 800.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 16 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,9 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,5 GHz | 4,9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 32 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-3200 |
DDR4-2666 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 47,68 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 105 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 23 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 184 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
| Security |
— |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2304@60Hz |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 514 | 554 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 5. 601 |
4.158 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 210 | 211 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 2.180 | 1.510 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 510 | 521 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 4.970 | 3.731 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.322 | 1.273 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 13.078 | 9.419 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.728 | 2.908 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 23. 305 |
14.549 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.760 | 6.084 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
35.030 | 29.763 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.282 | 1.314 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
8.811 | 7.464 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
648 GFLOPS | 424,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
334 pts / W | 313 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-9700K is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-9700K is less. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
514 5.601 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
554 4.158 |
In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 35%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
210 2.  180 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
211 1.510 |
In single core, the difference is -0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
510 4.  970 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
521 3.731 |
In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
1.322 13.  078 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.273 9.419 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
2.  72823.305 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
2.908 14.549 |
In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 60%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
5.760 35.  030 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.084 29.763 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
6.248 41.118 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.057 24.055 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 71%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
6.176 31.100 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
5.  27324.482 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 27%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
5.738 36.130 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
6.229 31.150 |
In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
1.282 8.811 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.314 7.464 |
In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
1.373 9.680 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.380 7.645 |
In single core, the difference is -1%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 27%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
1.260 8.272 |
| Intel Core i7-9700K |
1.254 7.725 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 7%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.
Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Intel equivalentIntel Core i7-9700K AMD equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Intel Core i7-9700Intel Core i7-9700EIntel Core i7-9700FIntel Core i7-9700KFIntel Core i7-9700T
Intel Core i7 9700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 9700K
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Which is better: Intel Core i7 9700K at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.9) or AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT at 3.9 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.7)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 8-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
nine0010
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 9700k
59 59
Ryzen 7 3800XT
61
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus 9 are involved0003
Core i7 9700k
37
Ryzen 7 3800XT
50
Energy Equality
Energy Effect CHIP
Core I7 9700K
47
3800XT
68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68
Core i7 9700K
48
Ryzen 7 3800XT
58
Key differences
What are the main differences between 3800XT and 9700K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 9700K
- There is an integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 4% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.
9 GHz vs 4.7 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Has 20 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
- Introduced 1 year and 9 months later than rival
- PCI Express-0 4. New standard nine0012
- 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 9700K
1281
Ryzen 7 3800XT
+5%
1344
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700K
9383
Ryzen 7 3800XT
+37%
12846
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 9700K
+3%
2879
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2790
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 9700K
14460
+63%
23576
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 9700K
1283
Ryzen 7 3800XT
+3%
1319
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 9700K
7422
Ryzen 7 3800XT
+25%
9269
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 9700K and AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | October 8, 2018 | July 7, 2020 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 (Matisse) |
| Model number | i7-9700K | — |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Processor
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| threads | 8 | 16 |
| Frequency | 3. 6 GHz |
3.9 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 36x | 39x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Number of transistors | — | 3.8 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 W | 105 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 9700k
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 7 3800XT
N/D
Memory Support
| DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 | |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 9700K | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 24 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
nine0002
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 9700K
0 (0%)
Ryzen 7 3800XT
6 (100%)
Total Votes: 6
Competitors
1.
Core i7 9700K vs Ryzen 5 5600X
2.
Core i7 9700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X
3.
Core i7 9700K vs Ryzen 9 5900X
4.
Core i7 9700K vs Core i7 12700K
5.
Core i7 9700K vs. Core i5 12600K
6.
Core i7 9700K vs. Core i5 12400F
7.
Core i7 9700K vs Apple M2
8.
Core i7 9700K vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Compare other CPUs (480+)
Which is better? Intel Core i7 — 9700K OEM vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X OEM
[email protected]
Forum Friend
-
-
#1
I bought Detroit: Become Human and apparently it lacks 7700k processor.
where a lot of people fps drops to 30 frames, video 1080ti.
Maybe I’m thinking of building a comp, I found two processors, but the Ryzen 7 3800x is not very cheaper than the i79700k. (22k vs 27k)
Is it worth it to buy or leave 7700k.? Since all this is pampering.
noodl
-
-
#2
[email protected] said:
FPS drops to 30 frames
Click to expand… 9
Molla
Forum friend
#3
Ooooh .
…. right now, the overpriced inteloboi will catch up.
Of course Ryazan!
[email protected]
Forum Friend
#four
noodl said:
Console experience, cinematic.
Show the loading process in the game.Click to expand…
Loading the processor is 100%, if you change the ultra graphics settings to a minimum, then the fps does not react in any way, as it was 27 frames, it will be 27, this is exactly a percent. works to the maximum. nine0003
miloman00
Experienced
#five
sit still, everything is fine with you, then bushrattling!!!!! the competition has just begun, there are still few fruits
nine0002
[email protected]
Forum friend
#6
Molla said:
Oooooh .
…. right now, the overprice inteloboi will catch up.
Of course Ryazan!
Click to expand…
Why? Because of the difference in 5k.? nine0003
noodl
#7
[email protected] said:
Processor loading 100%, if you change the ultra graphics settings to a minimum, then the fps does not react in any way, as it was 27 frames, it will be 27, this is exactly a percent. works to the maximum. nine
[email protected]
Forum friend
#8
noodl said:
What kind of motherboard? In the Z170, you can shove coffee pots, with a tambourine, of course, but do not change the platform.
Click to expand…
Z270 I think I have it, but I want to put it on Avito together with my mother and take it. They seem to be 15k. leave + mother is not so much overpayment 12-13k. seems to run.
Molla
Forum friend
#nine
nine0089
[email protected] said:
Why? Because of the difference in 5k.?
Click to expand…
Due to the fact that 3900 redi, 3950 redi … if you take a mother for 6-7 thousand, then with a greater (probably) probability, the 4th generation will start.
Although you immediately want 3800x, I would take 3700x (cheaper, less losses, quite relevant). But inteloboi will say take the top overprice better than change to the 4th generation according to deshman
in five years
nine0002
[email protected]
Forum friend
#10
Molla said:
Because of the sho 3900 redi, 3950 redi … if you take the mother of a thousand for 6-7, then with a greater (probably) probability, the 4th generation will start. nine0003
Although you immediately want 3800x, I would take 3700x (cheaper, less losses, quite relevant).
But inteloboi will say take a top overprice is better than changing to the 4th generation according to deshman in five years
Click to expand…
Perhaps…. but bro they are all miserable, (in appearance) and what’s the norm. also from 10k. worth
noodl
Anthony
Forum friend
#12
Here is a good gaming test of the Ryzen 7 3700x VS i9 9900K .
Ryzen 5 3600 VS i7 9700K here.
nine0002
gegun
Forum friend
#13
[email protected] said:
they are all poor, ( looks like )
Click to expand…
The choice of iron by type)) victims of marketing) There are no light-works, plastic rattles and double phases (after all, plankton has grown wiser — he learned to count throttles) — that’s it, the mother of the victims is not quoted.
And the fact that she pulls even 3900 (here someone on the forum) does not care. Nah then some kind of poll? Take beauty)))
AlexZhyk97
Forum friend
#fourteen
such expenses due to a crooked console port. mda
nine0002
Morally challenged
#15
gegun said:
The choice of iron by appearance)) victims of marketing) There are no light tricks, plastic rattles and double phases (after all, the plankton has grown wiser — it has learned to count the throttle) — that’s it, the mother of the victims is not quoted.
And the fact that she pulls even 3900 (here someone on the forum) does not care. Nah then some kind of poll? Take beauty)))
Click to expand…
Correct! Zhiga squeezes 200 from the mountain, why the heck is Merce shameful to us 5 times more expensive! This is the psychology of just a rogue … was, is and will be … I don’t want to offend … but … whoever has the opportunity will always choose Merce and for free !!! Will not take Vasotaz… different psychology…
SBA
Forum Friend
#sixteen
Now, of course, only Raizen. Intel buy no point at all
remmer29
Forum friend
#17
[email protected] said:
Ryzen 7 3800x
Click to expand.
..
take it and don’t worry
I myself have been sitting on Intel all my life since I was 12, but now I need to assemble myself a desktop PC with a large 4k monitor and I look only at AMD 5800X, which will soon appear and Ryzen 7 12 core, since purely technologically AMD is now the top in this segment. nine0003skarm
#eighteen
Ce
[email protected] said:
I bought Detroit: Become Human and apparently it lacks 7700k processor. where a lot of people fps drops to 30 frames, video 1080ti.
nine0646 Maybe I’m thinking of building a comp, so I found two processors, but the Ryzen 7 3800x is not very cheaper than the i79700k. (22k vs 27k)
Should I buy any of this or keep 7700k? Since all this is pampering.
View attachment 126049Click to expand…
Today on 3Dnews the article was just about the prots, something like the best PC build in 2019, I don’t remember the name exactly. They just compared red and Intel processors. Come read, there is no link, sorry, if I find it I’ll throw it off. nine0003
MiningFamily(ECPiCo)
skarm
#nineteen
About how, I found the same link to the article.
