AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-9750H
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
CL8068404121817
YD270XBGAFBOX
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 591,546 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
322,580 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47%
Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 274th / 1368
Gaming 74% Battleship |
Desktop 77% Battleship |
Workstation 64% Destroyer |
268,966 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Base clock 3. 7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 63%
Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 219th / 1368
Gaming 77% Battleship |
Desktop 79% Battleship |
Workstation 75% Battleship |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
74 % | 77.3 % | +5% |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
79.7 Pts | +4% | 76.8 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
107 Pts | 116 Pts | Slightly faster single-core speed. +8% |
|||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
205 Pts | 225 Pts | Slightly faster dual-core speed. +10% |
|||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
369 Pts | 418 Pts | Faster quad-core speed. +13% |
|||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
572 Pts | 727 Pts | Faster octa-core speed. +27% |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
93.3 Pts | Slightly lower OC memory latency. +9% |
85.3 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
126 Pts | 127 Pts | +1% | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
245 Pts | 251 Pts | +2% | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
464 Pts | 491 Pts | Slightly faster OC quad-core speed. +6% |
|||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
759 Pts | 874 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed. +15% |
Market Share
Based on 56,203,905 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
1. 01 % | Hugely higher market share. +124% |
0.45 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
57 % | 70 % | More popular. +23% |
Age Newest |
42+ Months | More recent. +22% |
54 Months | |||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
951 Pts | 1270 Pts | Much faster OC 64-core speed. +34% |
|||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
692 Pts | 1134 Pts | Much faster 64-core speed. +64% |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i7-9750h-vs-ryzen-7-2700x%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 7
3700X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Intel Core i7 9750H vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 9750H
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Which is better: 6-core laptop Intel Core i7 9750H at 2. 6 GHz or desktop AMD Ryzen 7 2700 with 8 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 9750H
58 58
Ryzen 7 2700
53
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
9 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000
Core i7 9750h
33
Ryzen 7 2700
43 9000
Core i7 9750H
47
Ryzen 7 2700
49
Key differences
What are the main differences between 2700 and 9750H
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 9750H
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666
- 31% lower than Ryzen 7 2700 peak power consumption — 45 vs 65 watts
- 1 year later than 901 integrated graphics rival1 Intel UHD Graphics 630 accelerator
- 10% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 5 GHz vs. 4.1 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 physical cores more
- Has 4 MB more L3 cache
- More modern process technology — 12 vs. 14 nanometers
- 1.91 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 9750H
+6%
1112
Ryzen 7 2700
1051
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 9750H
6911
Ryzen 7 2700
+29%
8901
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 9750H
+13%
2471
Ryzen 7 2700
2192
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 9750H
900 R2 11136
+40%
15562
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 9750H
+7%
1075
Ryzen 7 2700
1006
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 9750H
5272
Ryzen 7 270 270
+28%
6761
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 9750H and AMD Ryzen 7 2700
General
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Release date | April 23, 2019 | April 19, 2018 |
Type | For laptop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen+ |
Model number | i7-9750H | — |
Socket | BGA-1440 | AM4 |
Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
Cores | 6 | 8 |
Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
Frequency | 2. 6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 26x | 36x |
Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
Level 1 cache | 32KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 16MB (general) |
Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
Number of transistors | — | 4.8 billion |
Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45W | 65 W |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1150 MHz | — |
Shader blocks | 192 | — |
TMUs | 24 | — |
ROPs | 3 | — |
Computer units | 24 | — |
TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution | 4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 9750h
0.38 Teraflops
Ryzen 7 2700
N/D
Memory Support
Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2933 | |
Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB | |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 | |
Max. throughput | 41.8 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s | |
ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
Official site | Site Intel Core i7 9750H | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 website |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 9750H
1 (100%)
Ryzen 7 2700
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i7 1165G7 vs. Intel Core i7 9750H
2.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 vs. Intel Core i7 9750H
3.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H vs Intel Core i7 9750H
4.
Intel Core i7 11800H vs. Intel Core i7 9750H
5.
Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Core i7 9750H
6.
Intel Core i7 12700H vs. Intel Core i7 9750H
7.
Intel Core i5 11400H vs. Intel Core i7 9750H
8.
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i7 9750H
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 or Intel Core i7 9750H?
Name
Message
Compare
Compare
Compare
Compare
Speed in games
9000 9000 2 RYEN
69.3 (+4.000) 66.4
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i7-9750H
70.3 (+5.5%)
Ryzen 7 2700
66.4
Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i7-9750H
44.7
Ryzen 7 2700
48.7 (+8.2%) maximum
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Core i7-9750H 67.6 (+9.9%) Ryzen 7 2700 60.9 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Core i7-9750H 45.3 Ryzen 7 2700 48.7 (+7%) |
Extreme |
Core i7-9750H 13.6 Ryzen 7 2700 20.4 (+33.3%) |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9750H
1113 (+5%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
1057
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9750H
6912
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
8947 (+22.7%)
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9750H
441 (+8.6%)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
403 9000 9000 Cinebench R20 Mulpti i7-9750H
2653
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
3448 (+23. 1%)
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core i7-9750H
184
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 164 9000 9000 164 R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9750h
1182
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
1529 (+22.7%)
Geekbench 5 Single Core 9000 9000h 9000h 9000h 9000h (+9750h 9000h (+97550h (+97550h (+97-9750h 9000h (+97-9750h 9000h (+97-9750H 9000h (+97-9750H 270 ( AMD Ryzen 7 2700
944
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-9750H
5149
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
6252 (+17.6%)
Blender 2.81 bmw27
Intel Core i7-9750H
307 (+24.8% )
AMD RYZEN 7 2700
231
Passmark
Intel Core i7-9750H
11319
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
15716 (+28%)
of the characteristics of
Data is not yet complemented. information may be missing or existing features may be omitted.
Basic
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i7-9750H Processor | |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | ||
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
Release dateMonth and year of the processor being available for purchase. | 08-2021 | 10-2020 |
Model Official name. | i7-9750H | |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 6 | 8 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 12 | 16 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). | SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 4.5 | No data |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 12 | No data |
Instructions | 64-bit | |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI | |
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 45 | No data |
Cooling system specifications |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | 350 | No data |
Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. | 1150 | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802. 11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 128 | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
RAM bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | No data |
PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Protection
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i7-9750H
- On average, gaming performance is 3% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 4%.