I7 9750h vs ryzen 7 2700x: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-9750H

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-9750H

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

CL8068404121817

YD270XBGAFBOX

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 591,546 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

322,580 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 88% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)

Poor: 47%

Great: 88%

SPEED RANK: 274th / 1368

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

268,966 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 87% Base clock 3. 7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 63%

Great: 87%

SPEED RANK: 219th / 1368

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Effective Speed

Effective CPU Speed
74 % 77.3 % +5%
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency
79.7 Pts +4% 76.8 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Speed
107 Pts 116 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+8%
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Speed
205 Pts 225 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Speed
369 Pts 418 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+13%
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Speed
572 Pts 727 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+27%
Memory

OC Memory Latency
93.3 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
85.3 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Speed
126 Pts 127 Pts +1%
2-Core

OC Dual Core Speed
245 Pts 251 Pts +2%
4-Core

OC Quad Core Speed
464 Pts 491 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+6%
8-Core

OC Octa Core Speed
759 Pts 874 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+15%

Market Share

Based on 56,203,905 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1. 01 % Hugely higher market share.
+124%
0.45 %
User Rating

UBM User Rating
57 % 70 % More popular.
+23%
Age

Newest
42+ Months More recent.
+22%
54 Months
64-Core

OC Multi Core Speed
951 Pts 1270 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+34%
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Speed
692 Pts 1134 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+64%

ADVERTISEMENT

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12600K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400F

  •   

    Intel Core i5-13600K

  •   

    Intel Core i7-12700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400

  •   

    Intel Core i9-13900K

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100F

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100

  •   

    Intel Core i7-11700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-11400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-i7-9750h-vs-ryzen-7-2700x%23characteristics

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
3090 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 7
3700X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










Intel Core i7 9750H vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i7 9750H

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Which is better: 6-core laptop Intel Core i7 9750H at 2. 6 GHz or desktop AMD Ryzen 7 2700 with 8 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Core i7 9750H

58 58

Ryzen 7 2700

53

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus

9 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000

Core i7 9750h

33

Ryzen 7 2700

43 9000

Core i7 9750H

47

Ryzen 7 2700

49

Key differences

What are the main differences between 2700 and 9750H

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 9750H

  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666
  • 31% lower than Ryzen 7 2700 peak power consumption — 45 vs 65 watts
  • 1 year later than 901 integrated graphics rival1 Intel UHD Graphics 630 accelerator
  • 10% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 5 GHz vs. 4.1 GHz)

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700

  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 2 physical cores more
  • Has 4 MB more L3 cache
  • More modern process technology — 12 vs. 14 nanometers
  • 1.91 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i7 9750H
+6%

1112

Ryzen 7 2700

1051

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i7 9750H

6911

Ryzen 7 2700
+29%

8901

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i7 9750H
+13%

2471

Ryzen 7 2700

2192

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i7 9750H

900 R2 11136

+40%

15562

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i7 9750H
+7%

1075

Ryzen 7 2700

1006

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i7 9750H

5272

Ryzen 7 270 270
+28%

6761

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i7 9750H and AMD Ryzen 7 2700

General

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Release date April 23, 2019 April 19, 2018
Type For laptop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Zen+
Model number i7-9750H
Socket BGA-1440 AM4
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 No

Performance

Cores 6 8
Number of threads 12 16
Frequency 2. 6 GHz 3.2 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.5 GHz 4.1 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 26x 36x
Tire speed 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 32KB (per core) 96KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 12MB (shared) 16MB (general)
Unlocked multiplier No Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors 4.8 billion
Process 14 nanometers 12 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 45W 65 W
Critical temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency 350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency 1150 MHz
Shader blocks 192
TMUs 24
ROPs 3
Computer units 24
TGP 15W
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz

Igpu Flops

Core i7 9750h

0.38 Teraflops

Ryzen 7 2700

N/D

Memory Support

Memory type

DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 DDR4-2933
Max. size 128 GB 64 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. throughput 41.8 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC support No Yes

Other

Official site Site Intel Core i7 9750H AMD Ryzen 7 2700 website
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 20
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i7 9750H

1 (100%)

Ryzen 7 2700

0 (0%)

Total votes: 1

Competitors

1.
Intel Core i7 1165G7 vs. Intel Core i7 9750H

2.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 vs. Intel Core i7 9750H

3.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H vs Intel Core i7 9750H

4.
Intel Core i7 11800H vs. Intel Core i7 9750H

5.
Apple M1 Pro vs Intel Core i7 9750H

6.
Intel Core i7 12700H vs. Intel Core i7 9750H

7.
Intel Core i5 11400H vs. Intel Core i7 9750H

8.
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i7 9750H

What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 or Intel Core i7 9750H?

Name

Message

Compare

  • Ryzen 5 2600
    Compare
  • Ryzen 7 2700x
    Compare
  • Ryzen 5 1600AF
    Compare
  • Speed ​​in games

    9000 9000 2 RYEN

    69.3 (+4.000) 66.4

    Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.

    The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.

    The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

    Speed ​​in office use

    Core i7-9750H

    70.3 (+5.5%)

    Ryzen 7 2700

    66.4

    Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.

    The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

    Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

    Speed ​​in heavy applications

    Core i7-9750H

    44.7

    Ryzen 7 2700

    48.7 (+8.2%) maximum

    The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

    At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

    Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

    Speed ​​of numerical operations

    Simple household tasks

    Core i7-9750H

    67.6 (+9.9%)

    Ryzen 7 2700

    60.9

    Demanding games and tasks

    Core i7-9750H

    45.3

    Ryzen 7 2700

    48.7 (+7%)

    Extreme

    Core i7-9750H

    13.6

    Ryzen 7 2700

    20.4 (+33.3%)

    Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

    We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

    Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

    When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

    Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

    Cinebench R23 Single Core

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    1113 (+5%)

    AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    1057

    Cinebench R23 Multi Core

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    6912

    AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    8947 (+22.7%)

    Cinebench R20 Single Core

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    441 (+8.6%)

    AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    403 9000 9000 Cinebench R20 Mulpti i7-9750H

    2653

    AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    3448 (+23. 1%)

    Cinebench R15 Single Core

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    184

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 164 9000 9000 164 R15 Multi Core

    Intel Core i7-9750h

    1182

    AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    1529 (+22.7%)

    Geekbench 5 Single Core 9000 9000h 9000h 9000h 9000h (+9750h 9000h (+97550h (+97550h (+97-9750h 9000h (+97-9750h 9000h (+97-9750H 9000h (+97-9750H 270 ( AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    944

    Geekbench 5 Multi Core

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    5149

    AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    6252 (+17.6%)

    Blender 2.81 bmw27

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    307 (+24.8% )

    AMD RYZEN 7 2700

    231

    Passmark

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    11319

    AMD Ryzen 7 2700

    15716 (+28%)

    of the characteristics of

    Data is not yet complemented. information may be missing or existing features may be omitted.

    Basic

    Manufacturer Intel AMD
    DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i7-9750H Processor
    ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
    Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 No data
    Release dateMonth and year of the processor being available for purchase. 08-2021 10-2020
    Model Official name. i7-9750H
    Cores The number of physical cores. 6 8
    ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 12 16
    Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard).
    Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 2.6 GHz 3.2 GHz
    Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 4.5 No data
    L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 12 No data
    Instructions 64-bit
    Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
    Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
    Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI
    Number of QPI links
    TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 45 No data
    Cooling system specifications

    Video core

    Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® UHD Graphics 630
    GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 No data
    Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1150 No data
    Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802. 11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
    Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 3

    RAM

    Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 128 No data
    Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133
    RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2
    RAM bandwidth 41.8 GB/s
    ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

    PCI

    PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 No data
    PCI configuration options Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
    Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4

    Data Protection

    AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
    Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

    Decoration

    Dimensions No data No data
    Supported sockets No data No data
    Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

    Which is better

    Intel Core i7-9750H

    • On average, gaming performance is 3% better.
    • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 4%.