Intel Core i9-9900K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600X Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i9-9900K vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i9-9900K on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 5,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i9-9900K | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Coffee Lake | Zen 2 | ||||||
| Core name | Coffee Lake-S | Matisse | ||||||
| Family | Core i9-9000 | Ryzen 5 3000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80684I99900K, |
100-000000022, |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2018 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm++ | 7 nm FinFET | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 3. 800.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 8 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 16 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,8 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 5,0 GHz | 4,4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 32 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2666 |
DDR4-3200 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 41,6 GB/s | 47,68 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 95 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | None | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 23 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 184 | — | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1200 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 423,2 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 573 | 507 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 5. 565 |
4.029 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.299 | 1.278 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 12.390 | 9.994 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.969 | 2.662 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 18.811 | 18.296 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
6.336 | 5.552 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
36.463 | 27.794 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.324 | 1. 272 |
||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
8.718 | 7.093 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
588 GFLOPS | 461 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
384 pts / W | 293 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive.
We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i9-9900K has more cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i9-9900K is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600X was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
573 5.  565 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
507 4.029 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
1.299 12.390 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
1.  2789.994 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 24%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
2.969 18.  811 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
2.662 18.296 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
6.336 36.463 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
5.  55227.794 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
6.595 35.295 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
6.105 31.110 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
6.317 35.651 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
5.803 30.435 |
In single core, the difference is 9%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 17%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
1.324 8.718 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
1.  2727.093 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
1.393 8.981 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
1.256 6.761 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-9900K |
1.256 8.607 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
1.249 6.773 |
In single core, the difference is 1%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 27%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i9-9900K AMD equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 3600X Intel equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i9-9900Intel Core i9-9900KFIntel Core i9-9900KSIntel Core i9-9900TIntel Core i9-9900X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Porovnání Intel Core i9-9900K vs.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Porovnání procesorů
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Celkové hodnocení
VÍTĚZ
PORAŽENÝ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Pokud se rozhodujete mezi procesory Intel Core i9-9900K a AMD Ryzen 5 3600, pak zvolte
Intel Core i9-9900K, pokud chcete procesor s celkově lepšími parametry. Pokud však upřednostňujete lepší koupi z pohledu cena/výkon, doporučujeme zvolit
AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
Obecné
Výrobce
Intel
AMD
Výrobní technologie
14 nm
7 nm
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má efektivnější technologii výroby než Intel Core i9-9900K
Příkon (TDP)
95 W
65 W
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má o 32 % nižší příkon než Intel Core i9-9900K
Patice (Socket)
Intel 1151 Coffee Lake
AMD AM4
Počet jader a vláken
Počet jader procesoru
Intel Core i9-9900K má 1.
33x více jader než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Počet výpočetních vláken
Intel Core i9-9900K má 1.33x více výpočetních vláken než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Frekvence
Základní frekvence procesoru
3,6 GHz
3,6 GHz
Oba procesory mají stejnou základní frekvenci
Maximální frekvence (Boost)
5 GHz
4,2 GHz
Intel Core i9-9900K má o 19 % vyšší maximální frekvenci než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Možnost taktování
ano
neuvedeno
Cache
Velikost L1 cache
neuvedeno
384 kB
Velikost L2 cache
neuvedeno
3072 kB
Velikost L3 cache
neuvedeno
32768 kB
Výkon
Celkové skóre procesoru
18 555
17 793
Intel Core i9-9900K má obecně o 4 % vyšší celkový výkon než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Skóre jednoho vlákna
2 948
2 569
Intel Core i9-9900K má o 15 % vyšší výkon na jednom výpočetním vlákně než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Skóre herní fyziky
7 084
4 652
Intel Core i9-9900K má o 52 % vyšší výkon při výpočtu herní fyziky než AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Operační paměť
Podporovaný typ paměti
neuvedeno
DDR4
Maximální počet kanálů
Oba procesory podporují stejný počet paměťových kanálů
Grafická karta
Integrovaná grafická karta
Intel UHD Graphics 630
neuvedeno
Základní frekvence graf.
karty
1200 MHz
neuvedeno
Chladič
Chladič v balení
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 má v balení chladič, Intel Core i9-9900K nikoli
Typ chladiče
neuvedeno
Wraith Stealth
Další funkce a vlastnosti
Produktová řada
Intel Core i9
AMD Ryzen 5
Mikroarchitektura
neuvedeno
Zen 2
Kódový název
Coffee Lake Refresh
Matisse
Přibližná cena
Přibližná cena
již se neprodává
4 600 Kč
Upozornění: Porovnání těchto produktů je vytvářeno automaticky na základě jejich parametrů, uživatelského hodnocení a ceny. Jedná se o systémové řešení pro usnadnění vašeho výběru, nikoli o přímé doporučení redakce Cena-Vykon.cz. Nalezli jste chybu v parametrech nebo se vám nezdá výsledné hodnocení? Dejte nám vědět!
Uživatelské hodnocení
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
Celkové hodnocení
VÍTĚZ
PORAŽENÝ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Pokud se rozhodujete mezi procesory Intel Core i9-9900K a AMD Ryzen 5 3600, pak zvolte
Intel Core i9-9900K, pokud chcete procesor s celkově lepšími parametry.