Intel 9400f vs ryzen 3600: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-9700F

15 марта, 2023

i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 — Doom with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz

Doom

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

i5-9400F
Ryzen 5 3600

Multi-Thread Performance

12212 Pts

19634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2387 Pts

2900 Pts

Doom

i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Doom using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-9400F
Ryzen 5 3600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

137.6 FPS
1080p

140.2 FPS
1440p

97.9 FPS
1440p

99.7 FPS
2160p

52.0 FPS
2160p

52. 9 FPS
w1440p

80.2 FPS
w1440p

81.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

205.8 FPS
1080p

209.1 FPS
1440p

154.8 FPS
1440p

157.2 FPS
2160p

90.4 FPS
2160p

91.8 FPS
w1440p

130.8 FPS
w1440p

132.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

274.1 FPS
1080p

277.9 FPS
1440p

211.7 FPS
1440p

214.6 FPS
2160p

128. 9 FPS
2160p

130.6 FPS
w1440p

181.4 FPS
w1440p

184.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

410.5 FPS
1080p

415.6 FPS
1440p

325.4 FPS
1440p

329.6 FPS
2160p

205.7 FPS
2160p

208.4 FPS
w1440p

282.6 FPS
w1440p

286.3 FPS
i5-9400F
    Ryzen 5 3600
    • The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
    • The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
    • The Ryzen 5 3600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The Ryzen 5 3600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
    • The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

    Compare i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications

    i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture
    i5-9400F Ryzen 5 3600
    Codename Coffee Lake Zen 2
    Generation Core i5
    (Coffee Lake Refresh)    		 Ryzen 5
    (Zen 2)
    Market Desktop Desktop
    Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
    Part# SRF6M unknown
    Production Status Active Active
    Released Jan 2019 Jul 2019
    i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache
    i5-9400F Ryzen 5 3600
    Cache L1 64K (per core) 96K (per core)
    Cache L2 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
    Cache L3 9MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
    i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores
    i5-9400F Ryzen 5 3600
    # of Cores 6 6
    # of Threads 6 12
    Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
    SMP # CPUs 1 1
    i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features
    i5-9400F Ryzen 5 3600
    i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Notes
    i5-9400F Ryzen 5 3600
    i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance
    i5-9400F Ryzen 5 3600
    Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
    Frequency 2. 9 GHz 3.6 GHz
    Multiplier 29.0x 36.0x
    Multiplier Unlocked No Yes
    TDP 65 W 65 W
    Turbo Clock up to 4.1 GHz up to 4.2 GHz
    Voltage variable variable
    i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical
    i5-9400F Ryzen 5 3600
    Die Size unknown unknown
    Foundry Intel TSMC
    Package FC-LGA1151
    Process Size 14 nm 7 nm
    Socket Intel Socket 1151 AMD Socket AM4
    Transistors unknown 4,800 million
    tCaseMax 72°C unknown

    Share Your Comments 0

    Compare i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games

    Elden Ring

    2022

    God of War

    2022

    Overwatch 2

    2022

    Forza Horizon 5

    2021

    Halo Infinite

    2021

    Battlefield 2042

    2021

    Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

    2020

    Microsoft Flight Simulator

    2020

    Valorant

    2020

    Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

    2020

    Death Stranding

    2020

    Marvel’s Avengers

    2020

    Godfall

    2020

    Cyberpunk 2077

    2020

    Apex Legends

    2019

    Anthem

    2019

    Far Cry New Dawn

    2019

    Resident Evil 2

    2019

    Metro Exodus

    2019

    World War Z

    2019

    Gears of War 5

    2019

    F1 2019

    2019

    GreedFall

    2019

    Borderlands 3

    2019

    Call of Duty Modern Warfare

    2019

    Red Dead Redemption 2

    2019

    Need For Speed: Heat

    2019

    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    2018

    Battlefield V

    2018

    Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

    2018

    Final Fantasy XV

    2018

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    2018

    Forza Horizon 4

    2018

    Fallout 76

    2018

    Hitman 2

    2018

    Just Cause 4

    2018

    Monster Hunter: World

    2018

    Strange Brigade

    2018

    Assassin’s Creed Origins

    2017

    Dawn of War III

    2017

    Ghost Recon Wildlands

    2017

    Destiny 2

    2017

    PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

    2017

    Fortnite Battle Royale

    2017

    Need For Speed: Payback

    2017

    For Honor

    2017

    Project CARS 2

    2017

    Forza Motorsport 7

    2017

    Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

    2016

    Battlefield 1

    2016

    Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

    2016

    Doom

    2016

    F1 2016

    2016

    Total War: Warhammer

    2016

    Overwatch

    2016

    Dishonored 2

    2016

    Grand Theft Auto V

    2015

    Rocket League

    2015

    Need For Speed

    2015

    Project CARS

    2015

    Rainbow Six Siege

    2015

    Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

    2012

    League of Legends

    2009

    Minecraft

    2009

    Intel Core i5-9400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    Summary

    • Intel Core i5-9400F

      100%

    • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      140%

    Relative performance

    • Intel Core i5-9400F

      100%

    • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      118%

    Relative performance

    • Intel Core i5-9400F

      100%

    • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      162%

    Relative performance

    Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-9400F
    None
    Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    18% higher single threaded performance.
    Much higher multi threaded performance (around 62% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
    Around 40% higher average synthetic performance.

    Gaming

    HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

    Productivity

    HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

    Features
    Intel Core i5-9400F AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    MMX
    SSE
    SSE2
    SSE3
    SSSE3
    SSE4.2
    AVX
    AVX2
    EIST
    Intel 64
    XD bit
    VT-x
    VT-d
    AES-NI
    TSX
    TXT
    CLMUL
    FMA3
    F16C
    BMI1
    BMI2
    Boost 2. 0
    SSE4A
    SSE4.1
    AES
    SHA
    AMD64
    EVP
    AMD-V
    SMAP
    SMEP
    SMT
    Precision Boost 2

    Architecture
    Intel Core i5-9400F AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    Architecture Intel_Coffelake vs AMD Zen 2
    Market Desktop vs Desktop
    Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR4
    Codename Coffee Lake vs Zen 2
    Release Date Jan 2019 vs Mar 2019

    Cores
    Intel Core i5-9400F AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    Cores 6 vs 6
    Threads 6 vs 12
    SMPs 1 vs 1
    Integrated Graphics No vs No

    Cache
    Intel Core i5-9400F AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    L1 Cache 64K (per core) vs 96K (per core)
    L2 Cache 256K (per core) vs 512K (per core)
    L3 Cache 9MB (shared) vs 16MB (shared)

    Physical
    Intel Core i5-9400F AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    Socket Intel Socket 1151 vs AMD Socket AM4
    Max Case Temp 72°C vs unknown
    Package FC-LGA1151 vs
    Die Size unknown vs unknown
    Process 14 nm vs 7 nm

    Performance
    Intel Core i5-9400F AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    Cpu Frequency 2900 MHz vs 3600 MHz
    Turbo Clock 4100 MHz vs 4400 MHz
    Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
    Voltage variable vs variable
    TDP 65 W vs 65 W

    • Intel Core i5-9400F

      4920 points

    • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      4928 points

    Points — higher is better

    • Intel Core i5-9400F

      20880 points

    • AMD Ryzen 5 3600

      29514 points

    Points — higher is better

    • Intel Core i5-9400F (simulated)

      174. 25

    • AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (simulated)

      206.31

    points — higher is better

    • Intel Core i5-9400F (simulated)

      972.54

    • AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (simulated)

      1575.75

    points — higher is better

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs. Intel Core i5-9400F

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600 runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.20 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .CPU connects to CPU socket AM4 (LGA 1331) This version includes 32.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200 RAM, and supports 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction is kept below 95°C degrees C. In particular, Matisse (Zen 2) architecture is advanced over 7 nm and supports AMD-V, SVM . The product was launched Q3/2019

    Intel Core i5-9400F

    Intel Core i5-9400F runs with 6 and 12 CPU threads It runs at 4.10 GHz base 3.90 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 65 W .The processor connects to LGA 1151- CPU socket 2 This version includes 9. 00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2666 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. Specifically, Coffee Lake S Refresh Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2019

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    Intel Core i5-9400F

    Frequency 2.90 GHz 6 Kernels 6 4.20GHz Turbo (1 core) 4.10 GHz 4.00 GHz Turbo (all cores) 3.90 GHz Yes Hyper Threading No. Yes Acceleration No. normal Basic architecture normal no iGPU GPU no iGPU no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo 7 nm Technology 14nm no turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo DirectX Version Max. displays DDR4-3200 memory size DDR4-2666 2 Memory channels 2 Maximum memory size Yes ECC No. — L2 Cache — 32.00MB L3 Cache 9.00 MB 4.0 PCIe version 3.0 20 PCIe lanes 16 7 nm Technology 14nm AM4 (LGA 1331) Connector LGA 1151-2 65 W TDP 65W AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Q3/2019 Release date Q1/2019

    Show more details

    Show more details

    Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

    Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

    Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0003

    Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

    Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

    Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene. nine0003

    Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

    Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

    Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.