Intel a4: AMD A4-5000 APU vs Intel Core i5-480M @ 2.67GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

AMD A4-9120 Intel equivalent — GadgetVersus

Intel equivalent of the AMD A4-9120 processor in the various benchmark platforms.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Celeron N2920	73 282
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600	151 269
Intel Celeron 2955U	142 267
Intel Atom x5-E8000	51 265
Intel Core i7-640LM	84 255
AMD A4-9120	135 252
Intel Celeron 1007U	137 246
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600	158 234
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350	126 227
Intel Atom x5-Z8300	57 227
Intel Celeron N2820	93 176

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Pentium T4500	79 168
Intel Pentium T4300	64 155
Intel Celeron N2820	84 149
Intel Celeron N2840	78 128
Intel Celeron N2830	66 126
AMD A4-9120	78 120
Intel Celeron N3060	74 116
Intel Celeron N2807	60 111
Intel Celeron N3050	68 96
Intel Atom N2600	23 91
Intel Atom N570	28 82

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-460M	1.137 1.295
Intel Core i5-480M	1.155 1.288
Intel Celeron 4205U	1.027 1.268
Intel Celeron 5205U	934 1. 266
Intel Core i3-3227U	939 1.248
AMD A4-9120	1.065 1.246
Intel Core i3-2350M	1.006 1.243
Intel Celeron 3855U	927 1.235
Intel Pentium N3540	702 1.226
Intel Core i5-450M	1.028 1.222
Intel Celeron 3865U	1.011 1.214

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Celeron 2957U	314 591
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600	336 590
Intel Atom x5-E8000	180 579
Intel Pentium N3700	200 579
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600	305 578
AMD A4-9120	328 548
Intel Celeron 1007U	286 546
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700	341 543
Intel Celeron 2955U	286 520
Intel Atom x5-Z8300	161 510
Intel Pentium T4300	284 508

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300	414 668
Intel Pentium P6100	354 663
Intel Celeron 2957U	339 658
Intel Core i3-2350M	357 655
Intel Celeron 3855U	392 645
AMD A4-9120	391 639
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y	430 637
Intel Pentium B960	398 627
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700	373 621
Intel Celeron 1007U	327 615
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600	329 606

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Atom Z3736F	208 578
Intel Celeron B830	299 574
Intel Celeron 1000M	289 566
Intel Celeron 1037U	289 559
Intel Atom x5-Z8300	176 558
AMD A4-9120	376 550
Intel Core i3-2310M	301 547
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400	306 545
Intel Celeron 3205U	273 535
Intel Core i3-380M	336 528
Intel Atom Z3735F	167 512

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

AMD A4-9120e vs Intel Core i3-330E

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-9120e and Intel Core i3-330E processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Peripherals, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.

AMD A4-9120e

Buy on Amazon

vs

Intel Core i3-330E

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-9120e

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm

Manufacturing process technology

28 nm vs 32 nm

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-330E

• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 934 vs 739
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1260 vs 844

Number of threads	4 vs 2
PassMark — Single thread mark	934 vs 739
PassMark — CPU mark	1260 vs 844

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-9120e
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-330E

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	AMD A4-9120e	Intel Core i3-330E
PassMark — Single thread mark	739	934
PassMark — CPU mark	844	1260

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD A4-9120e	Intel Core i3-330E
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge	Arrandale
Place in performance rating	2357	2079
Processor Number	A4-9120e	i3-330E
Vertical segment	Mobile	Mobile
Launch date		Q1’10
Series		Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status		Launched
Base frequency	1. 5 GHz	2.13 GHz
L1 cache	160 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Maximum frequency	2.2 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2	4
64 bit support
Bus Speed		2. 5 GT/s DMI
Die size		81 mm2
Maximum core temperature		90°C for rPGA,105°C for BGA
Transistor count		382 million
Max memory channels	1	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	17.1 GB/s	17.1 GB/s
Supported memory types	DDR4-2133	DDR3 800/1066
Maximum memory size		8. 79 GB
Number of pipelines	128
Processor graphics	Radeon R3 series	Intel HD Graphics
Graphics base frequency		500 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency		667 MHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Sockets supported	FT4	BGA1288
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Package Size		BGA 34mmX28mm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		35 Watt
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions		Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel 64
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)		36-bit
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Number of displays supported		2
Max number of PCIe lanes		16
PCI Express revision		2. 0
PCIe configurations		1X16, 2X8
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD A4-9120e with others

AMD
A4-9120e



vs



Intel
Core i5-450M




AMD
A4-9120e



vs



Intel
Core i7-2635QM




AMD
A4-9120e



vs



Intel
Core i3-2348M




AMD
A4-9120e



vs



AMD
E2-9000e




AMD
A4-9120e



vs



AMD
GX-420CA




AMD
A4-9120e



vs



AMD
GX-420MC

Intel is interested in making Apple A4 and A5

According to the latest information, Intel is showing interest in the production of mobile processors for Apple. Thus, Intel becomes a competitor to other independent manufacturers considered by Apple for this role and who want to take the place of Samsung, the current manufacturer of mobile chips.

Now Intel makes processors for Apple laptops and desktops, but Cupertinians are increasingly using ARM processors for iPod, Airport base station and other iOS devices, including iPhone, iPad and Apple TV. Apple is also showing increasing interest in building its own ARM processors, having released a processor named A4 last year and a new A5 for the iPad 2 this year. Both processors are manufactured by Samsung and designed by Apple, which is the intellectual property licensee of ARM and Imagination Technologies.

Since the design decision belongs to Apple and not Samsung, Apple may well team up with another chipmaker for various reasons — to maintain stable supply, in search of a better price, improvement in manufacturing technology, or in order to end cooperation with Samsung, with which it is currently clarifies legal patent relations.
Apple is rumored to be establishing ties with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. for further production of A5. It is said that the change in the company’s plans was caused by Samsung’s competitive intentions to create its own products similar to the Apple iPhone 4, iPod touch and iPad, which, in fact, Apple claims in its lawsuits against Samsung. Apple also expressed interest in TSMC’s achievements in the production of 40-nm processors.

Intel A5?

EE Times, citing analyst Piper Jaffray & Co. Gus Richard reports that Intel is interested in making mobile chips for Apple.

“Intel’s position as the market leader in electronics will give Apple an additional advantage over Asian competitors trying to replicate its product success. In addition, a decision in Intel’s favor would significantly weaken Samsung, which poses a competitive threat to the company. Although it will take several years to switch to another foundry supplier, we believe that Apple is beginning to look for a replacement for Samsung. We think that already in the fourth quarter of 2011 TSMC will begin to receive income from Apple. The latest patent disputes between the two partners (Apple and Samsung) are another sign and confirmation that Apple will look for another silicon supplier for its needs.0003

— comments Richard.

January data showed that Samsung planned to quadruple production of processors for Apple, and most of the $ 3.6 billion investment in manufacturing facilities in Austin, Texas, was for the production of mobile processors Apple.

Richard commented on the deal:

“We believe that it was the termination of the foundry partnership with Apple that forced Samsung to reduce equipment orders, as it is likely to repurpose Austin facilities for memory production” .

Apple’s processor business

Apple replaced its desktop Mac CPUs with Intel’s standard architecture in 2005 when PowerPC processors fizzled out and Apple was left broke.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who ported the NeXT platform to Intel in the early 1990s, said he wanted to migrate the Mac to Intel five years earlier. Also in the early 90s, Apple helped the use of ARM processors in mobile technologies, using them in the Newton Message Pad, which ceased production in 1998 year. Three years later, Apple began using ARM chips in the iPod, which is now the largest consumer of ARM processors. Right now, Apple is one of the few companies that can afford to design and benefit from developing their own versions of ARM processors.

Intel briefly ran its own ARM production called XScale, selling it in 2006 to Marvell. He then moved on to x86 compatible mobile chips, now called the Atom. It was said that Apple showed interest in Atom (then called Silverthorne) as a processor for the iPad, but in the end considered Intel’s mobile chips too «gluttonous» and developed its own ARM project. Intel’s failure to enter the mobile processor market was compounded by the fact that Microsoft also announced the use of other architectures in Windows 8, including ARM, for the production of tablets.

The opportunity to re-enter the mobile chip market by partnering with Apple is a powerful incentive for Intel and additional support for the iPhone maker. Microsoft is doing the same — trying to «make friends» with Nokia and RIM in promoting the Bing search engine, which intends to become a competitor to Google’s service, after Windows Phone 7 failed to achieve success in the mobile market.

Source: appleinsider.com

AMD A4-3300 vs Intel Core i7-4770K

• Home

&nbsp/&nbsp

• CPU Comparison

&nbsp/&nbsp

Overall rating

Issued
Q3/2011

Issued
Q2/2013

Overall score

What is better to choose AMD A4-3300 or Intel Core i7-4770K?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.

AMD A4-3300 has a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. 2 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q3/2011.

The Intel Core i7-4770K has a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. 4 cores. Power consumption 84 W. Released Q2/2013.

Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews

Differences

Reasons to choose
AMD A4-3300

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of AMD A4-3300 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

• Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

  561 place

• Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

  515 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  1220 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  1298 place

• iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

  1361 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

  771 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  826 place

• Cinebench R11. 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  747 place

• Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

  1088 place

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i7-4770K

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core i7-4770K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

• Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

  291 place

• Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

  265 place

• Cinebench R20 (Single Core)

  381 place

• Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

  295 place

• Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

  512 place

• Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

  419 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  423 place

• Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  489 place

• iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

  822 place

• Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

  76 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

  227 place

• Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  245 place

• Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

  235 place

• Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

  238 place

• Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

  112 place

• Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

  376 place

Characteristics

Technical data

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

CPU group and family

Reference information on compared processors, series, generation and market segment.

CPU specifications

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size. These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.

• Frequency

  2.50 GHz 3.50 GHz

• CPU cores

  2 4

• Turbo (1 Core)

  no turbo 3.90 GHz

• Threads

  2 8

• Hypertrading

  No Yes

• Acceleration

  Yes Yes

• Kernel architecture

  normal normal

IGPU

Internal graphics does not affect CPU performance, performs the work of a graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

• GPU

  AMD Radeon HD 6410D Intel HD Graphics 4600

• GPU frequency

  0.44 GHz 0.35 GHz

• GPU (Turbo)

  no turbo 1.25 GHz

• Processing units

  2 20

• Shaders

  160 160

• Max. GPU Memory

  1GB 2GB

• Max. displays

  2 3

• Generation

  3 7. 5

• DirectX Version

  11 11.1

• Tech. process

  32 nm 22 nm

• Issue

  Q4/2010 Q2/2013

Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speed up the work with the required operations.

• h365 / HEVC (8 bit)

  No No

• h365 / HEVC (10 bit)

  No No

• h364

  Decode Decode / Encode

• VP9

  No No

• VP8

  No No

• AV1

  No No

• AVC

  Decode Decode / Encode

• VC-1

  Decode Decode

• JPEG

  Decode / Encode Decode

RAM & PCI specifications

Types, number of channels of RAM supported by Intel Core i7-4770K and AMD A4-3300. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.

• Memory type

  DDR3-1600 DDR3-1600

• Maximum memory

  32GB

• ECC

  No No

• Memory channels

  2 2

• PCIe version

  3.0

• PCIe 9 lanes0003
  

  16

Encryption

• AES-NI

  No Yes

Power Consumption

Compare AMD A4-3300 and Intel Core i7-4770K TDP requirements for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

• TDP (PL1)

  65W 84W

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by AMD A4-3300 and AMD A4-3300, virtualization technology and process technology.

• Instruction set (ISA)

  x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)

• Virtualization

  AMD-V VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

• ISA Extensions

  SSE3, SSE4a SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2

• Cash L3

  1.00MB 8.00MB

• Architecture

  Llano (K10) Haswell S

• Tech. process

  32 nm 22 nm

• Socket

  FM1 LGA 1150

• Issue

  Q3/2011 Q2/2013

Benchmarks (tests)

CPUs performance tests

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between AMD A4-3300 and Intel Core i7-4770K.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 SC — high load CPU test for long running tasks on a desktop or laptop, uses a single CPU core, no hyperthreading.

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU benchmark for long running tasks on desktop or laptop using multi-core mode and hyper trading.

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive.

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors, is memory intensive and multi-threaded.

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU — Internal GPU performance in games. GFLOPS indicates the number of billions of operations per second that the iGPU is capable of performing.

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 SC — benchmark for single processor core, includes stress tests that simulate real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac , Linux, Ansroid, iOS

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 MC using multi-core and hyper-threading, includes real stress tests that simulate 3D scripts for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS

AMD A4-3300

Intel Core i7-4770K

Cinebench R11.