Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-2-duo-e6600-vs-core-i5-1035g1%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Ryzen 5
5600X
EPYC
7h22
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-2-duo-e6600-vs-core-i5-1035g1%23technologies
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Ryzen 5
5600X
EPYC
7h22
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 and Intel Core i5-2300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 and Intel Core i5-2300 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Compatibility, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Peripherals.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
versus
Intel Core i5-2300
Advantages
reasons to choose the Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
- less energy consumption: 65 WATT VS 95 WATT
| Energy (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-2300
- 2 more cores, able to run more applications at the same time: 4 vs 2
- About 21% more maximum core temperature: 72.
6°C vs 60.1°C - with lower power consumption: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- About 49% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 1427 vs 956
- 3.6x more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 3383 vs 932
- About 95% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 603 vs 310
- 3.7 times more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1959 vs 533
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.6°C vs 60.1°C |
| Process | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1427 vs 956 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 3383 vs 932 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 603 vs 310 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1959 vs 533 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2300
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | Intel Core i5-2300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 956 | 1427 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 932 | 3383 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 310 | 603 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 533 | 1959 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
2.55 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 59.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.236 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.695 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 | Intel Core i5-2300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Conroe | Sandy Bridge |
| Production date | Q3’06 | January 2011 |
| Place in the ranking | 2470 | 2430 |
| Processor Number | E6600 | i5-2300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price at first issue date | $168 | |
| Price now | $79. 99 |
|
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 19.67 | |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Crystal area | 143 mm2 | 216mm |
| Process | 65nm | 32nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 60.1°C | 72. 6°C |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of transistors | 291 million | 1160 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
| Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| Level 3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 10 GHz |
|
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
| Sockets supported | PLGA775 | LGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Parity FSB | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
|
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | |
| Device ID | 0x102 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 850MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 10 GHz |
|
| Maximum GPU clock | 1.1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | |
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | |
| WiDi support | ||
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2. 0 |
Compare Intel Core i5 4570 and Intel Core2 Duo E6600
Intel Core i5 4570
3.2 GHz | Quad Core
VS
Intel Core2 Duo E6600
2.4GHz | 2 cores | LGA 775
Benchmark
General result
Based on 8 tests:
Intel Core i5 4570 faster 756%
Intel Core I5 4570
856
DUO E6600 9000 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 900 9000 9000 -core)
Intel Core i5 4570 345.43% faster
Intel Core i5 4570
Reasons to choose Intel Core2 Duo E6600
- Larger L2 cache (4MB vs 1MB) allows processor to access data faster
- Larger L2 cache per core: 2MB/core vs 0.
