Intel core i7 8700k vs i5 9400f: Intel Core i5-9400F vs i7-8700K

7 марта, 2023

Intel Core i5-9400F vs i7-8700K
14 Nov19|PCGamer

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 		7 % Hitm2 8%, FarC5 8%, TWarW2 11%, SotTR 8%, ACO 13%, MetroEx 0%, MESoW 5%, Divis2 8% StrangeB 1%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX

Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S… 		13 % BFV 5%, SotTR 22%, MetroEx 4%, Divis2 22%
28 May20|Techpowerup

Intel Core i5-10400F Review — Six … 		5 % FarC5 8%, BFV 7%, SotTR 1%, Rage2 7%, Witcher3 0%, Civ6 7%, ACO 17%, Sekiro 6% MetroEx 1%, Wolf2 0%
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency 		90.1 Pts +3% 87.8 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Speed 		128 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+9% 		117 Pts
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Speed 		249 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+7% 		233 Pts
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Speed 		466 Pts +4% 450 Pts
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Speed 		770 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+31% 		589 Pts
Memory

OC Memory Latency 		96. 5 Pts +2% 94.4 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Speed 		148 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+20% 		123 Pts
2-Core

OC Dual Core Speed 		292 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+20% 		243 Pts
4-Core

OC Quad Core Speed 		558 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+15% 		484 Pts
8-Core

OC Octa Core Speed 		892 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+30% 		685 Pts
Age

Newest 		63 Months 47 Months More recent.
+25%
TDP

Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		95 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
Cores

CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 6 cores
Threads

CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100% 		6 threads
Lithography

Manufacturing process 		14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock

Base Clock Speed 		3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+28% 		2.9 GHz
Turbo Clock

Turbo Clock Speed 		4. 7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+15% 		4.1 GHz
64-Core

OC Multi Core Speed 		1147 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+65% 		696 Pts
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Speed 		971 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+58% 		614 Pts
Series

CPU Architecture 		Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Socket

Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1151 FCLGA1151
Graphics

Integrated Graphics 		UHD 630 None
Launch Date

Launch Date 		Q4’17 Q1’19
Cache

Cache 		12 MB 9 MB SmartCache
Instruction Set Extensions

Instruction Set Extensions 		SSE4. 1/4.2, AVX2 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Max Turbo Frequency

Max Turbo Frequency 		4.70 GHz 4.10 GHz
Thermal Solution Specification

Thermal Solution Specification 		PCG 2015C (130W) PCG 2015C (65W)
Max Memory Size

Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) 		64 GB 128 GB
Hyper-Threading Tech

Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡ 		Yes No
TSX-NI

Intel® TSX-NI 		Yes No
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)

Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) 		Yes No
Trusted Execution Tech

Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡ 		Yes No
PCI Express Configurations

PCI Express Configurations ‡ 		Up to 1×16 or 2×8 or 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
More specs » More specs »

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-8700K on one side and the Intel Core i5-9400F on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

Intel Core i7-8700K

Intel Core i5-9400F
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Coffee Lake

Coffee Lake
Core name

Coffee Lake-S

Coffee Lake-S
Family

Core i7-8000

Core i5-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec

BX80684I78700K,
BXC80684I78700K,
CM8068403358220,
SR3QR, QNMK

BX80684I59400F,

CM8068403358819,

SRF6M
Release date

Q4 2017

Q1 2019
Lithography

14 nm++

14 nm++
Transistors

3. 000.000.000

—
Cores

6

6
Threads

12

6
Base frequency

3,7 GHz

2,9 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,7 GHz

4,1 GHz
Bus speed

8 GT/s

8 GT/s
Cache memory

12 MB

9 MB
Max memory capacity

128 GB

128 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2666

DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

41,6 GB/s

41,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

16

16
TDP

95 W

65 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake)

None
GPU execution units

23

—
GPU shading units

184

—
GPU base clock

350 MHz

—
GPU boost clock

1200 MHz

—
GPU FP32 floating point

423,2 GFLOPS

—
Socket

LGA1151

LGA1151
Compatible motherboard

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

100°C

100°C
Crypto engine

AES New Instructions,

Secure Key

—
Security

Software Guard Extensions,

Memory Protection Extensions,

OS Guard,

Trusted Execution Technology,

Execute Disable Bit,

Boot Guard

—
Max display resolution

4096 x 2304@60Hz

—
CPU-Z single thread

475

443
CPU-Z multi thread

3. 693

2.525
Cinebench R15 single thread

194

177
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

1.402

987
Cinebench R23 single thread

1.216

1.010
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

8.985

5.571
PassMark single thread

2.775

2.470
PassMark CPU Mark

13.883

9.536
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

6.100

4.914
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

24. 045

19.012
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

453,8 GFLOPS

344,7 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

253 pts / W

292 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-8700K is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-9400F is less. The Intel Core i5-9400F was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700K

475

3.693
Intel Core i5-9400F

443

2. 525

In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 46%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700K

194

1.402
Intel Core i5-9400F

177

987

In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 42%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-8700K

1.216

8.985
Intel Core i5-9400F

1.010

5.571

In single core, the difference is 20%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 61%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i7-8700K

2.775

13.883
Intel Core i5-9400F

2.470

9. 536

In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 46%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K

6.100

24.045
Intel Core i5-9400F

4.914

19.012

In single core, the difference is 24%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K

6.115

27.677
Intel Core i5-9400F

5.288

19.278

In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.

On Android 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K

5.646

21.101
Intel Core i5-9400F

3.482

9.644

In single core, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 119%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K

6. 084

28.485
Intel Core i5-9400F

5.289

21.232

In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 34%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i7-8700K AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-9400F AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i7-8700Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700T

Intel Core i5-9400Intel Core i5-9400HIntel Core i5-9400T

i5-9400F vs i7-8700K — Overwatch vs GTX 1660 performance comparison

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2. 90GHz

Overwatch

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz

i5-9400F
i7-8700K

Multi Thread Performance

12212 Pts

15970 Pts

Single Thread Performance

2387 Pts

2703 Pts

0006

i5-9400F vs i7-8700K in Overwatch with GTX 1660 — CPU performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

i5-9400F
i7-8700K

Ultra quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

132.8 FPS

1080p

136.4 FPS

1440p

91.7 FPS

1440p

94.2 FPS

2160p

47.3 FPS

2160p

48.6 FPS

w1440p

74. 4 FPS

w1440p

76.4 FPS

High quality
Approval Frames per second
1080p

199.8 FPS

1080p

204.3 FPS

1440p

146.5 FPS

1440p

149.8 FPS

2160p

83.4 FPS

2160p nine0002 85.3 FPS

w1440p

122.7 FPS

w1440p

125.5 FPS

Medium quality

nine0051

201. 2 FPS

Resolution Frames per second
1080p

266.9 FPS

1080p

272.3 FPS

1440p
1440p

205.5 FPS

2160p

119.5 FPS

2160p

122.1 FPS

w1440p

171.1 FPS

w1440p

174.6 FPS

Low quality

nine0043 Frames per second

Resolution
1080p

400.9 FPS

1080p

408.1 FPS

1440p

310.8 FPS

1440p

316.7 FPS

2160p

191.6 FPS

2160p

195.6 FPS

w1440p

267.7 FPS

w1440p

272.9 FPS

i5-9400F
  • i5-9400F The i5-9400F is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
i7-8700K
  • The i7-8700K has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads. nine0354
  • The i7-8700K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
  • In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
  • The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable. nine0354

Compare i5-9400F vs i7-8700K specifications

i5-9400F vs i7-8700K Architecture
i5-9400F i7-8700K
Codename Coffee Lake Coffee Lake
Generation Core i5
(Coffee Lake Refresh) 		Core i7
(Coffee Lake)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# SRF6M SR3QR
Production Status Active Active
Released Jan 2019 Oct 2017
i5-9400F vs i7-8700K Cache
i5-9400F i7-8700K
Cache L1 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
Cache L2 256K (per core) 256K (per core)
Cache L3 9MB (shared) 12MB (shared)
i5-9400F vs i7-8700K Cores
i5-9400F i7-8700K
# of Cores 6 6
# of Threads 6 12
Integrated Graphics N/A UHD Graphics 630
SMP# CPUs 1 1
i5-9400F vs i7-8700K Features
i5-9400F i7-8700K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0 		MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
i5-9400F vs i7-8700K Notes
i5-9400F i7-8700K
This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
i5-9400F vs i7-8700K Performance

nine0047

i5-9400F i7-8700K
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 2.9 GHz 3.7 GHz
Multiplier 29.0x 37.0x
Multiplier Unlocked No Yes
TDP 65W 95W
Turbo Clock up to 4. 1 GHz up to 4.7 GHz
Voltage variable variable
i5-9400F vs i7-8700K Physical
i5-9400F i7-8700K
Die Size unknown unknown
Foundry Intel Intel
Package FC-LGA1151 FC-LGA1151
Process Size 14nm 14nm
Socket Intel Socket 1151 Intel Socket 1151
Transistors unknown unknown
tCaseMax 72°C 72°C

Share your comments 0

Compare i5-9400F vs i7-8700K in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need for Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need for Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed ​​

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Intel Core i5-9400 vs Intel Core i7-8700K

  • Home

    • &nbsp/&nbsp

  • CPU Comparison

    • &nbsp/&nbsp

Overall rating

Issued
Q2/2019

Issued
Q4/2017

Overall score

What is better to choose Intel Core i5-9400 or Intel Core i7-8700K?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best processor. Compare their characteristics and benchmark results.

Intel Core i5-9400 has a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. 6 cores. Power consumption 65 W. Released Q2/2019.

The

Intel Core i7-8700K has a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. 6 cores. Power consumption 95 W. Released Q4/2017.

Differences
Characteristics
Benchmarks (tests)
Reviews

Differences

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i5-9400

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core i5-9400 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

    225 place

  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

    319 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    358 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    407 place

  • iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

    806 place

  • Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

    92 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

    30 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    164 place

  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

    308 place

Reasons to choose
Intel Core i7-8700K

Report a bug

Positions in benchmark results

General positions of Intel Core i7-8700K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models. nine0007

  • Cinebench R23 (Single Core)

    200 place

  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

    179 place

  • Cinebench R20 (Single Core)

    157 place

  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

    172 place

  • Cinebench R15 (Single Core)

    99 place

  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

    219 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    207 place

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    269 place

  • iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

    598 place

  • Blender 2. 81 (bmw27)

    130 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

    12 place

  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    126 place

  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

    15 place

  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

    114 place

  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

    9 place

  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

    210 place

Characteristics

Technical data

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

CPU group and family

Reference information on compared processors, series, generation and market segment.

  • Segment

    Desktop / Server Desktop / Server

  • Series

    Intel Core i5 Intel Core i7

  • Generation

    9 8

  • CPU group

    Intel Core i 9000 Intel Core i 8000

  • Previous model

    Intel Core i5-8400 Intel Core i7-7700K

  • Successor

    Intel Core i5-10400 Intel Core i7-9700KF

    nine0354

CPU specifications

Basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base and turbo frequency, cache size. These parameters indirectly speak about the speed of the processor, the higher they are, the better.

  • Frequency

    2.90 GHz 3.70 GHz

  • CPU cores

    6 6

  • Turbo (1 Core)

    4.10 GHz 4.70GHz

  • Threads

    6 12

  • Turbo (6 Cores)

    3.90 GHz 4.30 GHz

  • Hypertrading

    No Yes

  • Acceleration

    No Yes

  • Kernel architecture

    normal normal

IGPU

Internal graphics does not affect CPU performance, performs the work of a graphics card in its absence or on mobile devices.

  • Graphic processor

    Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • GPU frequency

    0.35 GHz 0.35 GHz

  • GPU (Turbo)

    1.05 GHz 1.20 GHz

  • Processing units

    24 24

  • Shaders

    192 192

  • Max. GPU Memory

    64 GB 64 GB

  • Max. displays

    3 3

  • Generation

    9. 5 9.5

    nine0354

  • DirectX Version

    12 12

  • Tech. process

    14 nm 14 nm

  • Issue

    Q4/2017 Q4/2017

Hardware codec support

Built-in codecs used to encode and decode content. Significantly speed up the work with the required operations.

  • h365 / HEVC (8 bit)

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • h365 / HEVC (10 bit)

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • h364

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • VP9

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • VP8

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • AV1

    No No

  • AVC

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

  • VC-1

    Decode Decode

  • JPEG

    Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

RAM & PCI specifications

RAM types, channels supported by Intel Core i7-8700K and Intel Core i5-9400. Higher or lower memory frequencies may be supported depending on motherboards.

  • Memory type

    DDR4-2666 DDR4-2666

  • Maximum memory

    128 GB 128 GB

  • ECC

    No No

  • Memory channels

    2 2

    • nine0353

    PCIe version

    3.0 3.0

  • PCIe channels

    16 16

Encryption

  • AES-NI

    Yes Yes

Power Consumption

Compare the TDP requirements of Intel Core i5-9400 and Intel Core i7-8700K for cooling system selection. The TDP value refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts. nine0007

Technologies and extensions

Architecture, interfaces, instruction sets supported by the Intel Core i5-9400 and Intel Core i5-9400, virtualization technology and process technology.

  • Instruction set (ISA)

    x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)

  • Virtualization

    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

  • ISA Extensions

    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2

  • Cash L3

    9.00MB 12.00MB

  • Architecture

    Coffee Lake S Refresh Coffee Lake S

  • Tech. process

    14 nm 14 nm

  • Socket

    LGA 1151-2 LGA 1151-2

    • nine0353

    Issue

    Q2/2019 Q4/2017

Benchmarks (tests)

CPUs performance tests

Based on the results of several benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance difference between Intel Core i5-9400 and Intel Core i7-8700K.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best processor!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 SC pushes desktop or laptop compute modules to the limit and accurately captures key hardware performance parameters. nine0007

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 MC maximizes desktop or laptop compute modules and accurately detects hardware performance in multi-core mode.

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors that is memory intensive. nine0007

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform benchmark for desktop or mobile processors, is memory intensive and multi-threaded.

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU — Internal GPU performance in games. GFLOPS indicates the number of billions of operations per second that the iGPU is capable of performing. nine0007

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is an open source software that creates predefined 3D scenes and measures their execution time.

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core) Mac, Linux, Android, iOS

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 MC using multi-core and hyper-trading, includes stress tests that simulate real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac , Linux, Ansroid, iOS

Intel Core i5-9400

Intel Core i7-8700K

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

and performing tasks related to physics.