Intel Core i7-870 vs Intel Xeon X3470 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-870 vs Intel Xeon X3470
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i7-870 | Intel Xeon X3470 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Server | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Nehalem | Nehalem | ||||||
| Core name | Lynnfield | Lynnfield | ||||||
| Family | Core i7-800 | Xeon X3400 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80605I7870, |
BX80605X3470, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2009 | Q4 2012 | ||||||
| Lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 774. 000.000 |
774.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,9 GHz | 2,9 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,6 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores |
4 Cores 8 Threads @ 2,93 / 3,6 GHz |
4 Cores 8 Threads @ 2,93 / 3,6 GHz |
||||||
| Bus speed | 2,5 GT/s | 2,5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3 1066/1333 |
DDR3 800/1066/1333 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 21 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 95 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1156 | LGA1156 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1156 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 72..jpg) 7°C |
72.7°C | ||||||
| Security |
Trusted Execution Technology, |
Trusted Execution Technology, |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 322 | 365 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.782 | 2.001 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 95 | 96 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 509 | 526 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 210 | 178 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1. 019 |
980 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 502 | 494 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.623 | 2.722 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.387 | 1.404 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3.036 | 3.168 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.983 | 2.383 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
9.139 | 7.448 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 single core |
572 | 537 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
2. 188 |
2.267 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
66,72 GFLOPS | 62,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
96 pts / W | 78 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Xeon X3470 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
365 2.001 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
322 1.782 |
In single core, the difference is 13%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
96 526 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
95 509 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-870 |
210 1.019 |
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
178 980 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
494 2.722 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
502 2.623 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
1.404 3.168 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
1.387 3.036 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
2.722 9.396 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
2.585 8.548 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-870 |
2.983 9.139 |
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
2.  3837.448 |
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
On Mac OS X:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-870 |
2.685 8.616 |
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
2.299 8.584 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
577 2.281 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
557 2.064 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 11%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
537 2.267 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
572 2.188 |
In single core, the difference is 7%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Xeon X3470 |
607 2.223 |
| Intel Core i7-870 |
580 2.092 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-870 AMD equivalentIntel Xeon X3470 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i7-8700Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700KIntel Core i7-8700TIntel Core i7-8705GIntel Core i7-8706GIntel Core i7-8709GIntel Core i7-8750HIntel Core i7-875K
Intel Core i7-870 vs Intel Xeon X3470. Which is the Best?
X
This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator.
Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time.
More info
General Specifications
Brand
Intel
Intel
Model
Core i7-870
Xeon X3470
Origin
Costa Rica
Malaysia
Package Size
Height
5.5 in.
4.5 in.
Width
4.8 in.
3.4 in.
Depth
2.8 in.
1.5 in.
Weight
0.8 lbs.
1.1 lbs.
-
Height
-
Width
-
Depth
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Details
Socket
LGA1156
LGA1156
Lithography
45 nm
45 nm
Type of Processors
Desktop
Server
Code Name
Lynnfield
Lynnfield
What customers say about «Details»
Intel Core i7-870 CPU Processor
- It’s a good buy so if you have an LGA 1156 socket don’t think twice.
- If you are still on an LGA 1156 then look no further, this is a great processor for your motherboard!
- This is the 2nd most powerful I7 processor you can get for the LGA1156 socket.
- I really like this type of socket it’s easy to install.
- There is very little choice of alternative cooling for LGA1156.
Intel Xeon X3470 CPU Processor
- Upgraded from an i3-550.
Easy to install. - Great product and price. Easy installation.
- Excellent upgrade for any LGA1156 system.
- I ordered this CPU to replace the Core i5-650 in my Dell OptiPlex 980 DT. Easy.
- Upgraded to the (used) Xeon X3470 on my old MSI P55 Cd53 motherboard. Installation was easy.
Technical Specifications
CPU Cores
CPU Threads
Clock Speed
2.
93 GHz
2.93 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Max TDP
95 W
95 W
Max Temperature
72.7 °C
72.7 °C
Data Width
64 bits
64 bits
Virtualization Technology
Yes
Yes
-
CPU Cores
-
CPU Threads
-
Max TDP
-
Max Temperature
-
Data Width
-
Virtualization Technology
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
What customers say about «Technical Specifications»
Intel Core i7-870 CPU Processor
- Excellent performance, low heat dissipation, and energy efficiency.
- Maximum heating 47 C with stock cooling.
- It is still relevant, works great with all systems.
- I tried to overclock, it gets very hot during tests.
- Unfortunately, even with slight overclocking, the LGA1156 did not pass stability tests.
Intel Xeon X3470 CPU Processor
- Fast chip for it’s age. I recommend.
- Great deal for a budget gaming rig for my son.
Fast. - It’s still able to play games like Apex, Fortnite and Tomb Raider with frames over 60fps. Good speeds.
- Great product, highly recommended, very fast.
- Puts out a lot of heat. A little slow.
Cache And Memory Specifications
L1 Cache Size
256 kB
256 kB
L2 Cache Size
1024 kB
1000 kB
L3 Cache Size
8000 kB
8000 kB
Max Memory Size
16 GB
32 GB
Memory Types
DDR3
DDR3
Max Memory Channels
Max Memory Bandwidth
21 GB/s
21 GB/s
-
L1 Cache Size
-
Max Memory Channels
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
Intel Core i7-870
Intel Xeon X3470
What customers say about «Cache And Memory Specifications»
Intel Core i7-870 CPU Processor
- Powerful.
Multi-threaded, large cache. - Very large cache, everything works without lags.
- Not bad memory bandwidth! Xeon is good variant for home PC.
- Using 16GB DDR3 1033 and games works great, no lags!
- Supports only 16GB of RAM, modern processors 32GB and more.
Intel Xeon X3470 CPU Processor
- It has a better memory controller for the price.
- This CPU works well. Good memory support.
- It works perfectly. Has good DDR3 memory support.
- This little Xeon is awesome. Supported my DDR3 memory.
- Excellent upgrade with good memory support. Perfect CPU.
Supported Technologies
Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection
Yes
Yes
Turbo Boost / Turbo Core
Yes
Yes
Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!
Yes
Yes
Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport
Yes
Yes
-
Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection
-
Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!
-
Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport
Warranty / Certifications
Manufacturer Warranty
3 year(s)
3 year(s)
Certifications
CE, FCC
CE, FCC
Other Information
Manufacturer
Link
Link
Popular Comparisons
Other reviews
Best CPUs
Best Gaming CPUs
Best Gaming Graphics Cards
Best RGB Fans
Best NVMe SSD
Best CPU Liquid Coolers
Best Gaming Motherboards
Best Raspberry Pi Starter Kits
Best Solid State Drives
Best USB Sound Cards
Best Arduino Starter Kits
Best Motherboards
Compare Intel Core i7-880 vs Intel Xeon X3470
| Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 |
|---|---|
| Two CPU models from intel | |
| Both processors were released at about the same time | |
| Both processors are based on one microarchitecture Lynnfield | |
| Both processors work on LGA1156 socket | |
Both CPUs have the same system bus performance 2. 5 GT/s DMI |
|
| Processors have 4 cores | |
| Two processors with 8 threads each | |
| Process technology of both CPUs is 45nm | |
| These models have the same number of transistors: 774 million | |
| 5 W | |
| The possible core temperature for the presented CPUs reaches 72.7 degrees | |
| 16 The limiting memory bandwidth of the two models is 21 GB / sec | |
| Two CPU models support PCI Express version 2.0 | |
| Comparable processors can use the same number of PCI Express lanes — 16 | |
| Two processor models support 64-bit architecture | |
| CPUs have the same first 160 KB cache | |
| CPUs have the same L2 cache 1024 KB | |
| Processors have the same 3rd cache 8192 KB | |
| Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i7-880 belongs to the Core | Xeon X3470 belongs to the Xeon processor family | |
| 9 0016 Core i7-880 belongs to the Core i7 processor line | Xeon X3470 belongs to to Xeon X processor line | |
| Core i7-880 is a desktop processor | Xeon X3470 is a server processor | |
| Core i7-880 slightly superior in terms of base clock speed, 3060 MHz compared to 2930 MHz of the rival | Xeon X3470 not much inferior in terms of frequency, 2930 MHz vs. 016 Core i7-880 slightly superior in terms of turbo frequency, 3730 MHz compared to 3600 MHz Xeon X3470 |
Xeon X3470 slightly inferior in terms of turbo frequency, 3600 MHz compared to 3730 MHz Core i7-880 |
| Core i7-880 max RAM 16 GB | Xeon X3470 max RAM 32 GB |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Boost | 1.0 | 1.0 | Intel Auto Overclocking Technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) | Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology. |
||
| Idle States | Idle states. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | ||
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. |
||
| EM64T (Extended Memory 64-bit Technology) | 64-bit extended memory technology. | ||
| NX (Execute disable bit) | Execution inhibit bit. | ||
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) | Trusted Execution Technology. | ||
| EDB (Execute Disable Bit) | Execute trip bit. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VT-x (Virtualization technology) | Virtualization technology. | ||
| VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) | Virtualization technology for directed I/O. | ||
| EPT | Extended page tables. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Core i7-880 | Intel Xeon X3470 | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyper-Threading | Hyperthreading technology. |
||
| vPro | Intel Technology Suite, vPro is a marketing term. | ||
| DBS (Demand Based Switching) | Switching on request. | ||
| PAE (Physical Address Extension) | 36 bit | 36 bit | Physical address extension. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all indicators, such as test results in all benchmarks, base frequency, instructions, structure, overclocking technologies, socket, year of manufacture, temperature data, number of cores and flows, and also other characteristics. The results of the overall rating showed that the Core i7-880 processor is not much superior to its rival Xeon X3470. The Xeon X3470 processor itself was able to score 3896.
82 points, slightly behind the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
All of our CPUs passed PassMark tests. This is perhaps the most famous benchmark in Runet. The benchmark has a wide pool of tests to evaluate the performance of a PC, including the CPU. Among them are compression, floating point calculations, game physics calculations, integer calculations, encryption, extended instruction checking, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. At the same time, it is possible to compare the results obtained with other configurations in a common database. Performance Test showed a slightly better performance of the Xeon X3470 processor (3154 points) over the Core i7-880 (2803 points). The Core i7-880 trails marginally in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
This benchmark for testing processors and video cards is very outdated by now. Single-Thread version — in its work it uses only one core and one thread for rendering. MAXON appeared, it was based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D.
The basic speed testing mode is multi-level reflections, working with light, simulating global illumination, spatial light sources, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders. It is possible to check many processor systems. The test is carried out in Windows, Mac OS X. It uses the method of geometric optics — ray tracing.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi Core is another testing option in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core testing method. It should be noted that the number of threads in this version of the program is limited to 16.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
64-bit version of the CINEBENCH 11.5 test — which has the ability to test the processor to the full, including all threads and cores. Differs from older versions, 64 threads are used here. Testing the Xeon X3470 in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 4.04 points, slightly ahead of its competitor.
At this time, the Core i7-880 gets its 3.81 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the ranking.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench 11.5 from the Maxon team. His tests are still up to date. In this Single-Core variant, tests occur using one thread and one core. In checks, the ray tracing method is also used, a complex 3D room is calculated with many glass and translucent and crystalline spheres. The result of the check is the «frames per second» parameter. Testing in single-threaded mode of the Xeon X3470 processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 0.97 points, he is not much ahead of the competitor. But the Core i7-880 itself scored 0.9 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core Cinebench R15 — will load your system to the full, showing everything that it is capable of. It is ideal for testing new multi-threaded processors from Intel and AMD, as it is capable of using 256 computation threads.
The test will use all the threads and cores of the central processor in the process of rendering highly detailed 3D objects. The Xeon X3470, with a score of 370.38, doesn’t win much in the multi-threaded Cinebench r15 benchmark. Slightly behind it is the Core i7-880 model, gaining 351.29score.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench 15 is the most modern tester from the Finns from Maxon to date. In the Single Core version of the program, only 1 thread is used for rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of light sources, complex objects and reflections. The system is being tested: both processors and video cards. For processors, the result of the analysis will be the number of PTS points, and for video adapters, the number of frames per second FPS. The single-threaded test of the Xeon X3470 processor in the Cinebench R15 program showed a result of 85.05 points, slightly ahead of the competitor. Having received 79.76 points in this test, the Core i7-880 is not far behind.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark
Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-threaded benchmark. It’s wide support for a variety of operating systems and devices makes Geekbench benchmarks the most popular at present. It’s already In the Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core-test, both processors showed almost the same results: the Xeon X3470 scored 9361, no different, and the Core i7-880 scored 9325.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing desktop PCs and laptops. The Single-Core version uses one processor thread. For the first time, this version of the benchmark also supports iOS and Android smartphones. The program, like its earlier versions, runs on systems: Mac OS, Linux, Windows. The Xeon X3470 scored higher in Geekbench 4’s single-thread test, with a score of 2667, but not far ahead of the competition. But the Core i7-880 itself also showed a good score of 2633 points, slightly losing its place to the Xeon X3470 model.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread Geekbench 3 — will allow you to make a strong synthetic test of your processor and show the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
The 32-bit version of the program loads no more than one CPU core and one thread. The cross-platform tester Geekbench is often used to test the system under Mac, although it can work on both Windows and Linux. The main purpose is to test the performance of processors.
Geekbench 2
On our site you can find up to two hundred processor models that have test data in this program. Today there are newer versions, actual 5v and 4v. Outdated version of Geekbench 2.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In fact, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This test is faster than Pass 2, since the calculation is performed at the same speed.
Ideal test for multi-threaded CPUs and multi-cores. The number of frames processed per second. — test result. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Xeon X3470 is slightly higher than that of the Core i7-880, and amounted to 100.77 FPS. Core i7-880 was able to score 95.24 FPS, slightly behind the first processor.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the encoding is not constant. The final figure is also determined in frames per second. As a result, we get better video quality. You need to be aware that a completely real task is being simulated, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video encoders. And this means that the results of the checks really evaluate the performance of the system. During the encoding of the video file by the Xeon X3470 processor into the mpeg4 format, a processing speed of 22.36 Frames / s was obtained. While the Core i7-880 is slightly behind with a score of 21.
11 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
Processors are tested in two ways: AI calculates the pathfinding and another test simulates the system using PhysX. Benchmark program for evaluating the performance of the video system, and the processor. This benchmark is very often used by fans to overclock processors and overclockers and gamers. Written on the basis of DirectX by the Finnish company Futuremark. The Xeon X3470 showed itself a little faster in the gaming physics and pathfinding tests, scoring up to 5121.88 points. The Core i7-880 also coped with these tasks, showing a good result of 4800.29points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
We can say that about two hundred processors on our site have data in the 3DMark FSP test. It’s an arithmetic test that does the game’s physics calculations.
WinRAR 4.0
A familiar file archiver. The speed of compression in the RAR archive was tested, for these purposes large amounts of random data were used.
The resulting speed during processing «Kb / s» — this is the result of the test. The tests were run under Windows. The Xeon X3470 is slightly ahead of its competitor in the WinRAR file compression speed, the data encoding result was 2847.08 Kb/s. The Core i7-880 delivered an encoding speed of 2685.41 Kb/s.
TrueCrypt AES
This is not quite a tester, but the results of its use will help evaluate the performance of the entire system. The program has a built-in ability to instantly encrypt disk partitions. It can fully function in the OS: Linux, Windows and Mac OS X. On our website, the results of the encryption speed in gigabytes per second using the AES algorithm are demonstrated. It so happened that support for this project was stopped in 2014.
Specifications for the Intel Xeon X3470 OEM processor on the KNS website
Description
Features
General characteristics
Ruler
Xeon
Socket
LGA 1156
Processor Code
X3470
Core
Lynnfield
Number of Cores
4 cores
Process technology
45 nm
Frequency
CPU frequency
2.
933 GHz
Bus frequency
DMI
Core voltage
0.7V
multiplication factor
22
L1 cache size
64 Kb
L2 cache size
1024 Kb
L3 cache size
8192 Kb
Instructions
Hyper-threading support
yes
3DN support
no
AMD64/EM64T support
yes
SSE2 support
yes
SSE3 support
yes
SSE4 support
yes
NX bit support
yes
Virtualization Technology support
yes
Additionally
Heat dissipation
95 W
Reviews 0
Reviews 0
Warranty
Processor Intel Xeon X3470 OEM — price, availability, specifications, reviews and delivery terms in Moscow and Russia.