Intel Core i5-5200U vs M-5Y71
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i5-5200U vs M-5Y71
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 122,127 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
3,034 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 29% Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 29%
Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 867th / 1364
Gaming 46% Yacht |
Desktop 52% Yacht |
Workstation 32% Sail boat |
119,093 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Base clock 2. 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 31%
Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 745th / 1364
Gaming 51% Yacht |
Desktop 57% Gunboat |
Workstation 36% Jet ski |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
45.5 % | 50.8 % | Faster effective speed. +12% |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
66.6 Pts | 71.7 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +8% |
|||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
66.9 Pts | 69.3 Pts | +4% | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
105 Pts | 118 Pts | Faster dual-core speed. +12% |
|||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
145 Pts | 175 Pts | Faster quad-core speed. +21% |
|||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
140 Pts | 180 Pts | Faster octa-core speed. +29% |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
82. 5 Pts | 87.4 Pts | Slightly lower OC memory latency. +6% |
|||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
93.5 Pts | Slightly faster OC single-core speed. +9% |
85.5 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
156 Pts | Slightly faster OC dual-core speed. +5% |
148 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
220 Pts | +5% | 210 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
215 Pts | +2% | 210 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 55,927,650 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.01 % | 0.17 % | Insanely higher market share. +1,600% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
51 % | 53 % | +4% |
Age Newest |
91+ Months | +1% | 92+ Months | |||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
193 Pts | 210 Pts | Slightly faster OC 64-core speed. +9% |
|||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
136 Pts | 180 Pts | Much faster 64-core speed. +32% |
Launch Date Launch Date |
Q4’14 | Q1’15 | ||||
Cache Cache |
4 MB | 3 MB | ||||
Max Turbo Frequency Max Turbo Frequency |
2.9 GHz | 2.7 GHz | ||||
Memory Types Memory Types |
LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 | ||||
Processor Graphics Processor Graphics ‡ |
Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 | ||||
Package Size Package Size |
30mm x 16. 5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.3mm | ||||
Graphics and IMC Lithography Graphics and IMC Lithography |
14 nm | 14nm | ||||
PCI Express Configurations PCI Express Configurations ‡ |
x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | 4×1, 2×4 | ||||
More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i5-11600K
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
-
Intel Core i5-11400
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Intel Core i5-8250U vs M-5Y71
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i5-8250U vs M-5Y71
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 240,628 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
3,034 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 1. 4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 29% Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 29%
Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 867th / 1364
Gaming 46% Yacht |
Desktop 52% Yacht |
Workstation 32% Sail boat |
237,594 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40%
Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 532nd / 1364
Gaming 60% Destroyer |
Desktop 64% Destroyer |
Workstation 47% Yacht |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
45. 5 % | 60.1 % | Much faster effective speed. +32% |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
66.6 Pts | 71.4 Pts | Slightly lower memory latency. +7% |
|||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
66.9 Pts | 84.5 Pts | Faster single-core speed. +26% |
|||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
105 Pts | 161 Pts | Much faster dual-core speed. +53% |
|||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
145 Pts | 269 Pts | Hugely faster quad-core speed. +86% |
|||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
140 Pts | 369 Pts | Hugely faster octa-core speed. +164% |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
82.5 Pts | 87.7 Pts | Slightly lower OC memory latency. +6% |
|||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
93.5 Pts | 104 Pts | Faster OC single-core speed. +11% |
|||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
156 Pts | 206 Pts | Much faster OC dual-core speed. +32% |
|||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
220 Pts | 379 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed. +72% |
|||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
215 Pts | 552 Pts | Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +157% |
Market Share
Based on 55,927,650 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.01 % | 0.62 % | Insanely higher market share. +6,100% |
|||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
51 % | 56 % | Slightly more popular. +10% |
Age Newest |
91+ Months | 61+ Months | Much more recent. +33% |
|||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
193 Pts | 552 Pts | Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +186% |
|||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
136 Pts | 361 Pts | Hugely faster 64-core speed. +165% |
Launch Date Launch Date |
Q4’14 | Q3’17 | ||||
Cache Cache |
4 MB | 6 MB SmartCache | ||||
Instruction Set Extensions Instruction Set Extensions |
SSE4.1/4. 2, AVX 2.0 | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX2 | ||||
Recommended Price Recommended Customer Price |
$281.00 | $297.00 | ||||
Max Turbo Frequency Max Turbo Frequency |
2.9 GHz | 3.40 GHz | ||||
Max Memory Size Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) |
16 GB | 32 GB | ||||
Memory Types Memory Types |
LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | ||||
Memory Bandwidth Max Memory Bandwidth |
25.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | ||||
Processor Graphics Processor Graphics ‡ |
Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 | ||||
Graphics Output Graphics Output |
eDP/DP/HDMI | eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI | ||||
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency |
900 MHz | 1. 10 GHz | ||||
Graphics Video Max Memory Graphics Video Max Memory |
16 GB | 32 GB | ||||
Package Size Package Size |
30mm x 16.5mm | 42mm X 24mm | ||||
TSX-NI Intel® TSX-NI |
Yes | No | ||||
vPro Tech Intel® vPro™ Technology ‡ |
Yes | No | ||||
Trusted Execution Tech Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡ |
Yes | No | ||||
PCI Express Revision PCI Express Revision |
2.0 | 3. 0 | ||||
PCI Express Configurations PCI Express Configurations ‡ |
x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | 1×4, 2×2, 1×2+2×1 and 4×1 | ||||
More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
Its not the best processor but so far it has done well on my laptop [Jun ’19 ExecutableFiles]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
- Lenovo 80HE (76)
- Dell Venue 11 Pro 7140 (33)
- Dell Latitude 7350 (32)
- Toshiba PORTEGE Z20t-B (28)
- Asus UX305FA (16)
- Asus T300CHI (8)
- Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet 7202 (7)
- Dell Inspiron 5570 (1,065)
- HP Laptop 15-da0xxx (847)
- Lenovo 81DE (844)
- HP Laptop 15-bs1xx (706)
- Acer Aspire A515-51G (675)
- HP ProBook 450 G5 (539)
- Microsoft Surface Pro 6 (493)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i5-11600K
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
-
Intel Core i5-9600K
-
Intel Core i5-11400
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Intel Core i5-5200U vs.
Intel Core M-5Y71
Intel Core i5-5200U
The Intel Core i5-5200U operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.70 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1168 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Broadwell U Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2015
Intel Core M-5Y71
The Intel Core M-5Y71 operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.90 GHz base 2.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 4.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1234 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Broadwell Y Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2014
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core M-5Y71
Compare Detail
2.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.20 GHz |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2.70 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 2.90 GHz |
2.50 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.20 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 5300 |
0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
11.2 | DirectX Version | 11.2 |
3 | Max. displays | 3 |
DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
3. 00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
2.0 | PCIe version | 2.0 |
12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
BGA 1168 | Socket | BGA 1234 |
15 W | TDP | 4.5 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q1/2015 | Release date | Q4/2014 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Intel Core i5-5200U | Intel Core M-5Y71 | |
15 W | Max TDP | 4. 5 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Comparison of Intel Core i5-8265UC and Intel Core M-5Y71
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-8265UC and Intel Core M-5Y71 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Compatibility, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i5-8265UC
versus
Intel Core M-5Y71
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-8265UC
- 2 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 49 vs 2
- more threads: 40 018
- About 34% more clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 2.90 GHz
- About 72% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2200 vs 1279
- PassMark — CPU mark 3 times more performance: 5988 vs 2019
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3. 9 GHz vs 2.90 GHz |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2200 vs 1279 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5988 vs 2019 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8265UC
CPU 2: Intel Core M-5Y71
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
Name | Intel Core i5-8265UC | Intel Core M-5Y71 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2200 | 1279 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5988 | 2019 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 31.246 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.212 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 810 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 1786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1786 |
Performance comparison
Intel Core i5-8265UC | Intel Core M-5Y71 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Whiskey Lake | Broadwell |
Ranking | 626 | 1871 |
Processor Number | i5-8265UC | 5Y71 |
Applicability | Laptop | Mobile |
Production date | December 1, 2014 | |
Price at first issue date | $281 | |
Price now | $281 | |
Series | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors | |
Status | Launched | |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 3. 15 | |
Base frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
Support 64 bit | ||
Crystal area | 82mm | |
Level 1 cache | 128KB | |
Level 2 cache | 512KB | |
Level 3 cache | 4MB | |
Process | 14nm | |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | |
Number of transistors | 1300 Million | |
Supported sockets | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1234 |
Configurable TDP-down | 3. 5W | |
Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600MHz | |
Configurable TDP-up | 6W | |
Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.40 GHz | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 30mm x 16.5mm | |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3. 5W | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16GB | |
Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 | |
Device ID | 0x161E | |
Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 900MHz | |
Maximum GPU clock | 900MHz | |
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Video memory size | 16GB | |
Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | |
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | |
WiDi support | ||
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 | [email protected] | |
DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 12 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Smart Response Technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Intel Core M-5Y71 vs Intel Core i5-3330 — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors
VS
Intel Core M-5Y71
Intel Core i5-3330
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in Intel Core M-5Y71 vs Intel Core i5-3330 comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of Intel Core M-5Y71 and Intel Core i5-3330. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
1.20 GHz
Clock frequency
3.00 GHZ
2
The number of nuclei
4
2.90 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
3.20 GHZ
4
Number
No Data
YES
Hypertureuding
NO
NO
Acceleration
NO
No Data
Turbo (4 Cores)
No. 0015
Internal Graphics
It’s hard to compare Intel Core M-5Y71 vs. Intel Core i5-3330 when graphics card function and specs matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU name
Intel HD Graphics 2500
0.30 GHz
GPU frequency
0.65 GHz
0.90 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
1.05 GHZ
8
Generation
7
11.2
version DirectX
11.0
24
Executive blocks
6
9000 9000
16 GB
Maximum memory
—
3
Number of monitors
3
14 nm
Technology
23 nm
0002 Q3/2014
Release date
Q2/2012
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
Decode / Encode
h364
Decode / Encode
Decode
JPEG0002 No
No
h365 10bit
No
Decode
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
RAM and PCIe
These are the memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Maximum memory
32 GB
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No.
2.0
version PCIE
9000 3.0
9000 9000 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 PCIE 9000 16
Encryption
Support for data encryption
Yes
AES-NI
Yes
Memory & PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between Intel Core M-5Y71 and Intel Core i5-3330, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
4.5 W
TDP
77 W
—
Maximum Temperature
—
— 9Ol000
Broadwell-Y
Architecture
IVY BRIDGE
VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D
Virtualization
VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D
BGA 1234 9000
Jack (connector)
LGA 1155
Q4/2014
Release date
Q3/2012
Price
ca. 184 $
Devices compatible with this processor
You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Popular CPU comparisons
one. |
Intel Core i3-2100 vs. Intel Core i5-3330 |
|
2. |
Intel Core M-5Y71 vs. Intel Core i5-3330 |
|
3. |
Intel Core i5-3330 vs. Intel Core i5-9400 |
|
four. |
Intel Core M-5Y71 vs. Intel Celeron N3050 |
|
5. |
Intel Core M-5Y71 vs. Intel Core i3-2375M |
|
6. |
Intel Core M-5Y31 vs. Intel Core M-5Y71 |
|
7. |
Intel Core i5-3330 vs. Intel Core i5-6198DU |
|
eight. |
Intel Core i5-10400H vs. Intel Core M-5Y71 |
|
9. |
AMD A10-5750M vs. Intel Core M-5Y71 |
|
ten. |
AMD A10-5745M vs. Intel Core M-5Y71 |
|
eleven. |
AMD A6-9220C vs. Intel Core i5-3330 |
|
12. |
AMD A10-4655M vs. Intel Core M-5Y71 |
|
13. |
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 vs. Intel Core M-5Y71 |
|
fourteen. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Core M-5Y71 |
|
fifteen. |
Intel Core i5-3330 vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7 |