Intel graphics technology 830m: NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs Intel HD Graphics P630

GeForce 830M vs UHD Graphics 620 Graphics cards Comparison

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 830M stacks up against UHD Graphics 620, check out specs charts below.

GeForce 830M

Check Price

UHD Graphics 620

Check Price

GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 830M or UHD Graphics 620 here:

GeForce 830M Laptops

UHD Graphics 620 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 830M	UHD Graphics 620
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	DDR3	LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 830M has 120% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
GeForce 830M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
UHD Graphics 620 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce 830M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 830M is build with Maxwell architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 — with Gen. 9.5.
Core clock speed of GeForce 830M is 729 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
GeForce 830M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 — by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	2−3	2−3
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	3−4	3−4
GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	16−18
medium / 1080p	6−7	6−7
GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	120−130	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	80−85
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
QHD / 1440p	21−24	21−24
4K / 2160p	16−18	16−18
high / 768p	65−70	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce 830M.
low / 768p	75−80	80−85
medium / 768p	45−50	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce 830M.
high / 1080p	2−3	2−3
ultra / 1080p	2−3	2−3
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	12−14
medium / 1080p	3−4	3−4
GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−11
ultra / 1080p	5−6	5−6
QHD / 1440p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−11	12−14
GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	5−6	5−6
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	16−18	16−18
medium / 1080p	8−9	8−9
GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	45−50	40−45
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	4−5	5−6
ultra / 1080p	2−3	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
high / 1080p	1−2	1−2
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	4−5	5−6
medium / 1080p	3−4	3−4
GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
high / 1080p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Minecraft is 6% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
GeForce 830M and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	9−10	12−14
medium / 768p	8−9	9−10
high / 1080p	4−5	4−5
ultra / 1080p	3−4	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce 830M.
low / 768p	70−75	65−70
medium / 768p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
high / 768p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than UHD Graphics 620.

Full Specs

	GeForce 830M	UHD Graphics 620
Architecture	Maxwell	Gen. 9.5
Code name	N15?	Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	12 March 2014	1 September 2017
Pipelines	256	24
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1150 MHz
Transistor count		189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	18. 40	27.60
Floating-point performance	588.8 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	—	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	+
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3. 0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	67 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Quick Sync		+
GPU Boost	2.0
GameWorks	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

GeForce 830M vs Quadro 2000D
GeForce 830M vs Quadro FX 4800
UHD Graphics 620 vs Quadro 2000D
UHD Graphics 620 vs Quadro FX 4800
GeForce 830M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce 830M vs Radeon HD 4850
UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 4850

Nvidia GeForce 830M vs Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU) Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Nvidia GeForce 830M vs Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU)

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce 830M on one side and Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU) on the other side.

The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, it has 256 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,2 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the laptop segment, with 64 execution units, it includes 512 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,4 GHz, its lithography is 10 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card	Nvidia GeForce 830M	Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU)
Market (main)	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	Q1 2014	Q1 2022
Model number	GeForce 830M	—
GPU name	GM108	Alder Lake GT1
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 12. 2
Generation	GeForce 800M	HD Graphics-M Alder Lake
Lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Bus interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	Ring Bus
GPU base clock	1.082 MHz	300 MHz
GPU boost clock	1.150 MHz	1.400 MHz
TDP	33 W	45 W
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)	2	—
Execution units	—	64
Shading units (cuda cores)	256	512
TMUs	16	32
ROPs	8	16
Cache memory	1 MB	—
Pixel fillrate	9,2 GP/s	22,4 GP/s
Texture fillrate	18,4 GT/s	44,8 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)	588,8 GFLOPS	1,4 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)	18,4 GFLOPS	358,4 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU)	1.434
Nvidia GeForce 830M	588,8

The difference is 144%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Processors with the graphics card Intel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU):

Intel Core i3-1210UIntel Core i3-1215UIntel Core i3-1215UEIntel Core i3-1220PIntel Core i3-1305UIntel Core i3-1315UIntel Core i3-1315UEIntel Core i7-12650HIntel Core i7-12800HEIntel Core i7-13620H

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce 830M AMD equivalentIntel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU) Nvidia equivalentIntel UHD Graphics (Alder Lake 64EU) AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

NVIDIA GeForce 830M — Overview. Benchmarks and Specifications

The NVIDIA GeForce 830M graphics card (GPU) is ranked #568 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. Runs NVIDIA GeForce 830M with a minimum clock speed of 1029 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or when overclocked at a frequency of 1150 MHz. The RAM size is 2 GB GB with a clock speed of 1800 MHz and a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s.

The NVIDIA GeForce 830M has a power consumption of 33 Watt and a process technology of only 28 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.

Let’s take a closer look at the most important features of the NVIDIA GeForce 830M. To have an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.

4.1
From 11
Hitesti Grade

General information

A basic set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA GeForce 830M graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost. This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.

Performance Rating Position:		649
Architecture:		Maxwell
Code name:		GM108
Type:		Laptop
Release date:		March 12, 2014 (7 years ago)
Current price:		$160
Value for money:		0.75
GPU code name:		N15?
Market segment:		Laptop

Specifications

This is important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce 830M graphics card. The smaller the technological process of manufacturing a chip, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).

Conveyors:		256
Core Clock:		1029MHz
Acceleration:		1150MHz
Process:		28nm
Power consumption (TDP):		33 Watt
Number of texels processed in 1 second:		18.40
Floating point:		588.8 gflops
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		256
Acceleration speed:		1150MHz
Estimated heat output:		33 Watt

Dimensions, Connectors and Compatibility

There are so many form factors for PC cases and laptop sizes that it’s important to know the length of your graphics card and how it’s connected (except for laptop versions). This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.

Interface:		PCIe 3.0 x8
Tire support:		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0

Memory (frequency and overclocking)

Internal memory is used to store data during calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce 830M + turbo overclocking option.

Memory type:		DDR3
Maximum RAM amount:		2GB
Memory bus width:		64 Bit
Memory frequency:		1800MHz
Memory bandwidth:		14. 4 GB/s
Shared memory:		—

Support for ports and displays

As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.

Display connections:

No outputs

Technologies

Each graphics card manufacturer complements their products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow. Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.

GPU Boost:		2.0
CUDA:		+
GeForce Experience:		+
Optimus:		+
GameWorks:		+

API Support

All NVIDIA GeForce 830M supported APIs are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.

DirectX:		12 (11_0)
OpenGL:		4.5
Vulkan:		1.1.126
Shader Model:		5.1
OpenCL:		1.2

General gaming performance

All tests are based on FPS. Let’s see how NVIDIA GeForce 830M ranks in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).

Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2 Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror ‘s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineTh iefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2 Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Description
5	Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
	May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates.
30	Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more
40	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60	Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more
	May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
?	Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene.
	Uncertain — The performance of this graphics card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value.

AMD equivalent

AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce 830M in benchmark results

Benchmarks help determine performance in standard NVIDIA GeForce 830M benchmarks. We have compiled a list of the most famous benchmarks in the world so that you can get accurate results for each of them (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.

Overall performance in benchmarks

AMD Radeon HD 7690M

AMD FirePro W4170M

NVIDIA GeForce 830M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Intel UHD Graphics 617

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU GPU test results at hitesti.com

AMD Radeon HD 8670D

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

NVIDIA GeForce 830M

AMD Radeon HD 8730M

AMD Radeon HD 8690M

3DMark Fire Strike Score Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Fire Strike Score for GPUs at hitesti.com

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

AMD Radeon 520

NVIDIA GeForce 830M

AMD Radeon R7 M265

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics GPU test results at hitesti.com

AMD Radeon R7 M260X

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

3DMark 11 Performance GPU Benchmark: Graphics card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU GPU test results at hitesti.com

AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

AMD FirePro M4000

NVIDIA GeForce 830M

AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

AMD Radeon HD 8770M

3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check out the 3DMark Vantage Performance GPU results at hitesti.com

Intel HD Graphics 6000

AMD Radeon R7 M265

NVIDIA GeForce 830M

AMD Radeon HD 6770M

NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Passmark benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check Passmark GPU test results at hitesti. com

Intel HD Graphics 530

AMD FirePro W4170M

NVIDIA GeForce 830M

AMD Radeon HD 8690M

AMD Radeon R9 M375

4.1
From 11
Hitesti Grade

Share on social networks:

You need to log in to leave a review
NVIDIA GeForce 830A

AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Bonaire

AMD Baffin

AMD Caicos

AMD Radeon R7 M465

AMD Cedar

AMD Cayman

GeForce 800M Notebook GPUs | PC World

Nvidia promises to release chips that have higher performance and at the same time consume less power.

Michael Brown. Nvidia announces its all-new GeForce 800M line of notebook GPUs. PCWorld .

Nvidia has announced a complete overhaul of its mobile GPU family, promising to release chips that offer more processing power while consuming less power. Upgrades are underway for a range of laptops co-created with well-known gaming laptop makers Alienware and Razer, as well as mass-market vendor Lenovo.

In general, the PC market continues to fall, but sales of gaming computers (especially gaming laptops), on the contrary, are growing. The DFC/PC Gaming Alliance report says that in 2013, the PC games industry generated a combined turnover of $25 billion. Sales are expected to increase another 8% this year.

Sales of gaming equipment and PC games have brought their creators $ 25 billion, and the industry is currently growing at an annual rate of 8%

Nvidia believes that with gaming laptops becoming thinner, lighter and more powerful, sales of new systems will continue to grow. Three years ago, a laptop equipped with Nvidia’s flagship GPU, which provided acceptable clock speeds in AAA games at a resolution of 1920×1080 pixels, was about 5 cm thick. Now, a laptop with an Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M processor is only 2 cm thick, and games at the same resolution, they run 30% faster.

The most powerful of Nvidia’s new GPUs, the GeForce GTX 880M and GeForce GTX 870M, are based on the Kepler microarchitecture and manufactured using 28nm technology. Nvidia’s most powerful desktop GPUs are based on the Kepler architecture, including the GeForce GTX Titan Black. The GeForce GTX 850M model is based on the newer Nvidia Maxwell microarchitecture and is also manufactured using 28nm technology.

ShadowPlay technology allows you to organize automatic broadcasting of game sessions on the Twitch video platform.

The third processor — GeForce GTX 860M — will be available in Kepler or Maxwell versions, depending on the needs of equipment manufacturers (both options show the same performance, but have different power consumption and power dissipation characteristics). Nvidia also announced three GPUs that are positioned a class lower: the GeForce 840M and GeForce 830M models are based on the Maxwell architecture, and the GeForce 820M is based on the old Fermi microarchitecture (the same 28nm).

Three years ago, a typical gaming PC was about 5 cm thick, but now they meet the requirements for ultrabooks

The GeForce GTX 880M and 870M processors are designed to play high-end games (Metro: Last Light, Assassin Creed IV: Black Flag, Batman: Arkham Origins, and Call of Duty: Ghosts) at 1080p, «highest» picture quality, and at least 30 frame/s The GeForce GTX 860M and 850M play the same games at the same resolution in «high» quality at 30 fps or higher.

All new GPUs share the same set of features, which include Battery Boost power management technology, ShadowPlay video capture, GameStream (for streaming PC games to a GameStream compatible device such as the Nvidia Shield), and Optimus (providing automatic switching between the graphics processor integrated in the central processing unit of a laptop computer and a discrete graphics processor depending on the workload). Some of these features are supported by previous Nvidia laptop GPUs, while others are completely new technologies. The only exception was the lack of support for combining the resources of two Nvidia SLI graphics chips in processors earlier than the GeForce GTX 850M.

Battery Boost technology provides the best balance between performance and battery life

Nvidia Battery Boost automatically adjusts performance when the laptop is unplugged from AC power. Battery Boost takes control of the CPU, GPU, and RAM by automatically lowering screen brightness, resolution, image quality, and frame rate (up to 30 fps) to reduce battery drain and extend computer life. Nvidia claims that when powered by battery, Battery Boost technology can increase the duration of continuous operation of the PC by 2 times. Users have the ability to customize key settings, including frame rate, and disable the Battery Boost feature if they don’t want to use it.

Nvidia claims that the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4400 processors do not provide the required quality for 85% of games.

ShadowPlay video capture technology is already available on Nvidia desktop GPUs and is now supported on laptop GPUs. ShadowPlay lets you record your gaming sessions in real time at resolutions up to 1080p. The software automatically saves the last 20 minutes of the game. If something interesting happens and you have something to brag about, press a special key, and the computer will record what is happening with the H.264 hardware video codec on the Kepler architecture and with the H.265 codec on the Maxwell architecture. Manual mode is also supported, allowing you to record a game without a time limit.

To demonstrate your gaming skills, save everything that is displayed on the screen and share the resulting recordings with others

ShadowPlay technology allows you to automatically broadcast game sessions to viewers on the Twitch video platform. Promised backwards compatibility with GeForce 700M and GeForce 600M GPUs. But that will have to wait until Nvidia releases a new version of the GeForce Experience software that ShadowPlay is part of. According to Nvidia, more than 3 million gaming sessions have already been recorded using this technology.

Nvidia GameStream technology allows you to wirelessly stream a game from a PC equipped with a GeForce GPU to a GameStream compatible device (such as the Nvidia Shield compact gaming device). In this case, the game is controlled using the joystick and Shield buttons, and the image can be viewed on the Shield display or on an HD TV connected via an HDMI cable.

Almost all laptops these days come with integrated graphics processors to conserve battery power. Nvidia Optimus technology is designed to switch between discrete and integrated GPU. When running applications that do not require a lot of graphics resources, Optimus turns off the discrete GPU and shifts the entire load to the CPU. When you start a game or graphics application, the discrete GPU turns on again and starts rendering. There is no need to restart the computer. Optimus is already supported on all Nvidia laptop GPUs.

While the quality of Intel’s integrated graphics has improved significantly over the years, even Haswell microarchitecture processors are not capable of playing AAA-class games at high resolution and good quality. Nvidia claims that the Intel HD Graphics 4400 integrated into the 4th generation Core processors for the mainstream consumer does not provide acceptable quality for 85% of games. And the integrated Intel Iris 5100 graphics processor, installed in the most expensive Core processors, is not suitable for 75% of games (Nvidia considers the playback mode with a resolution of 1366 × 768 pixels and a frequency of 30 fps without significant visual distortion to be the minimum acceptable).

If Nvidia’s claims are true, it becomes clear why there are so few computers in the world with Intel Iris Pro 5200 integrated graphics

Nvidia is reporting even greater benefits in terms of power consumption, a critical feature for a battery-powered laptop. If you run the Elder Scrolls role-playing game at 1080p screen resolution, medium image quality, and 10 fps on a laptop equipped with an Intel Core i5-4210U processor, the CPU and integrated GPU will consume 15 watts. When running the same game at the same resolution and image quality on a laptop with the same CPU and Nvidia GeForce GTX 840M GPU, the frame rate can be increased to 30fps while power consumption only rises to 17W. Thus, the frame rate will triple, and the power consumption will increase by only 2 watts.

The efficiency gains are even more impressive when compared to the best-in-class Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 integrated GPU. According to Nvidia, the Intel Core i7-4750HQ laptop processor will consume 43W at 19fps in Skyrim at 1080p. We were unable to verify this claim because the PCWorld lab does not have tools to measure the isolated power consumption of the two components, but we reached out to Intel for comment and will be sure to return to this story when we get a response.