Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.
3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 911 vs 860
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.387 vs 0.264
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.639 vs 1.59
| Launch date | 10 January 2009 vs 8 May 2007 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 911 vs 860 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0. 387 vs 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 vs 1.59 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 829 vs 811
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 301 vs 272
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 507 vs 474
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.235 vs 0.226
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.316 vs 7.743
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.072 vs 0.058
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 829 vs 811 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 301 vs 272 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 507 vs 474 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.235 vs 0.226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.316 vs 7.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.072 vs 0.058 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
|||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 911 | 860 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 811 | 829 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 272 | 301 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 474 | 507 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
0.226 | 0.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.743 | 15.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 | 0.072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 | 0.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 | 1.59 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 10 January 2009 | 8 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 2925 | 2916 |
| Processor Number | T4500 | T7500 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $234 | |
| Price now | $42. 99 |
|
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.72 | |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 3 GHz |
2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V — 1.250V | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Sockets supported | PGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |
Comparison Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 what is better?
Home / CPU / Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390
5%
DeviceList score
vs
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
8%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you.
Find out which one to choose in 2023 year.
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 benefits
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 benefits
Winner in comparison
|
Maximum frequency |
|
2.2 GGz 0.34 GGz (18.3%) better
vs
1.86 GGz
|
|
Passmark |
|
849 249 (41.5%) better
vs
600
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
2308 537 (30.3%) better
vs
1771
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
4273 942 (28.3%) better
vs
3331
|
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
1906 436 (29.
vs
1470
|
7%) better| General information | |
|
Type |
|
|
Architecture codename |
|
| Merom | Merom |
|
Number of cores A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications.
|
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Number of threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Manufacturing process technology |
|
| 65 nm | 65 nm |
|
Crystal size |
|
| 143 2 | 143 2 |
|
Transistor count |
|
| 291 million | 291 million |
|
Maximum frequency Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 1.86 GGz | 2.2 GGz
0.34 GGz (18.3%) better
|
|
64 bit support |
|
|
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
|
| no data | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| PPGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
|
Series |
|
| Intel Pentium Dual Core | Intel Core 2 Duo |
|
Start price |
|
| no data | 234 USD |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| no data | 34. 1 % |
|
Bus |
|
| 533 | 800 |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| no data | 100 °C |
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
Demand Based Switching |
|
| no data | — |
|
FSB |
|
| no data | — |
|
L1 Cache More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| no data | 128 |
|
L2 Cache |
|
| 1 | 4 |
|
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
|
|
| 35 Wt | 35 Wt |
|
EDB |
|
| no data | + |
|
Permissible core voltage |
|
| no data | 1.075V — 1.25V |
| Benchmarks | |
|
Passmark |
|
| 600 | 849
249 (41.5%) better
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
| 1771 | 2308
537 (30.3%) better
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
| 3331 | 4273
942 (28.3%) better
|
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
| 1470 | 1906
436 (29.
|
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core |
|
| no data | 1 |
7%) better| Technologies and extensions | |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| no data | — |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
|
Hyper-Threading More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| RAM parameters |
| Virtualization technologies | |
|
VT-x |
|
| Graphics specifications |
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 Processor Review: Specifications, Benchmark Tests
The Core 2 Duo T7500 processor was released by Intel, release date: May 8, 2007.
At the time of release, the processor cost $234. The processor is designed for mobile computers and is based on the Merom architecture.
Processor locked for overclocking. The total number of cores — 2, threads — 2. The maximum clock frequency of the processor — 2.2 GHz. The maximum temperature is 100°C. Technological process — 65 nm. Cache size: L1 — 128 KB, L2 — 4096 KB.
Supported socket type: PPGA478, PBGA479. The maximum number of processors in the configuration is 1. Power consumption (TDP): 35 Watt.
Benchmarks
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
237 Frames/s 
590 mHash/s | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 860 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 829 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 301 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection | 0.235 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation | 15.316 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex | 0. 072 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition | 0.264 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining | 1.590 mHash/s |
Features
| Architecture name | Merom |
| Production date | May 8, 2007 |
| Price at first issue date | $234 |
| Place in the ranking | 2916 |
| Price now | $42.99 |
| Processor Number | T7500 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 8. 72 |
| Applicability | Mobile |
| Support 64 bit | |
| Base frequency | 2.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB |
| Crystal area | 143 mm2 |
| System bus (FSB) | 800 MHz |
| Level 1 cache | 128KB |
| Level 2 cache | 4096KB |
| Process | 65nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 |
| Number of transistors | 291 million |
| Permissible core voltage | 1.075V — 1.250V |
| Low Halogen Options Available | |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm |
| Supported sockets | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | |
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | |
| Parity FSB | |
| Idle States | |
| Intel 64 | |
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | |
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | |
Navigation
Select Processor
Comparison of processors
Comparison of Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 with other processors
Intel
Core 2 Duo T7500
versus
Intel
Core 2 Duo T7600
Intel
Core 2 Duo T7500
versus
Intel
Pentium Dual Core T4500
Intel
Core 2 Duo T7500
versus
Intel
Celeron M U3400
%d0%9f%d0%a0%d0%9e%d0%a6%d0%95%d0%a1%d0%a1%d0%9e%d0%a0+intel+core+2+duo+t7500+%28socket+ %d0%a0%29+%d0%b4%d0%bb%d1%8f+%d0%9d%d0%9e%d0%a3%d0%a2%d0%91%d0%a3%d0%9a%d0% 90
Sort:
New listings Price ascending Price descending Old New
found: 0 listings
throughout Ukraine
See similar ads:
Hood deflector (fly swatter) Audi A1/A2/A3/4/6/8
30+ days ago
The hood deflector — protects the car from the fire with small fireplaces and other other things that fly on the great speed of the wheel of cars that go ahead.
Tse attaches to the looking plates made of polymeric materials (made of lightweight acryl) victorious over the impersonal functions. Zavdyaki one of them — relieved coma, the plate took away the name of a car fly swatter.
Appointment of the deflector on the hood:
Under the hour of the car’s wreckage, the sharp jets of the wind are poured into the new one, which bring the dzherel of the damaged surface of the car. The configuration of the deflectors on the hood allows you to create aerodynamic wings. Zavdyaks to whom, again, rise above the flat, take away the grassy hills, passing the frontal slope.
Tsya constructive singularity gives the possibility of virishuvati dekіlka zavdan:
protect the front part of the car from the wind with small fireplaces;
avoid the appearance of redundant lumps, brud on the front slope;
stir up a safe ruckus. Komakha, who drank on the frontal slope, respects the water, which creates a threat to the safety of all participants in the movement. Plastic fly swatters on cars allow you to solve this problem;
give the serial design of the car new risi.
All positive qualities of fly swatters for cars are shown every hour at a speed of a car at a speed of over 70 km / year.
How to get a firm Deflector for hoods?
The autoas-shop.com.ua store encourages you to buy a hood deflector in Ukraine from leading picks of these auto products. The catalog store has spare parts and other car accessories that allow tuning all cars.
Viber 38 0
Trunk mat AUDI/Audі A3/A1/A2/A4/A5/A6/A7/A8
764 UAH
Chernihiv
30+ days ago
Online store https://autoas-shop.com.ua/ua/
Polyurethane trunk mat
Audi A1 automatic transmission 2010-
Audi A2 1999-2005
Audi A3 automatic transmission 1996-2006
Audi A3 HB 5dv. 2003-2012
Audi A3 HB 3d. 2003-2012
Audi A3 automatic transmission Limusine 2012-
Audi A4 B5 199*******1994-2001
Audi A4 (B-6 B-7) Manual SD 2000-2008
Audi A4 B-8 (automatic transmission) 2008-
Audi A4 B-9SD 2015-
Audi A5 Sportback 2009-
Audi A5 Coupé 2007-
Audi A6 C5 (SD) 2.
5TDI 1997-2004
Audi A6 C5 allroad (SW) 1997-2004
Audi A6 C6 2.0D 2006-2011
Audi A6 C6 2.7D;3.0D; 2.4І 2004-2006
Audi A6 C7 NEW automatic transmission SD 2011-
Audi A7 Sportback automatic transmission 5d coupe 3.0 2010-
Audi A8 6.0 1997-2003
Audi A8 D3 4E (automatic transmission) 2002-2009
Audi A8 D3 4E (automatic transmission) long 2002-2009
Audi A8 (automatic) D4 Long 2010-
Polyurethane car mats with a high side for Audi
Kilimki are made with gum and added polyurethane. The stench is more elastic and softer, more comfortable, may have better performance characteristics, may have high sides of 2.5 cm.
Our kilimki are model, so they clearly repeat all the trunk lines of your car. The stench ideally kick and fit behind the rozmіrom, not allowing rozrіziv and great unprotected parts. Polyurethane, which is to enter the warehouse of our kilimkiv, ensures softness, suppleness, as well as flexibility and elasticity itself.
Car kilimki in the trunk are securely fixed on the seats, not allowing ruhiv.