Intel Pentium G870 vs Intel Core i3-3220
Summary
-
Intel Pentium G870
100%
-
Intel Core i3-3220
127%
Relative performance
-
Intel Pentium G870
100%
-
Intel Core i3-3220
114%
Relative performance
-
Intel Pentium G870
100%
-
Intel Core i3-3220
140%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Pentium G870 |
| None |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-3220 |
| 14% higher single threaded performance. |
| Much higher multi threaded performance (around 40% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| Around 27% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-3220
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-3220
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| Hyper-Threading | ||||
| TXT | ||||
Architecture
| Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel_SandyBridge | vs | Intel_IvyBridge | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Sandy Bridge | vs | Ivy Bridge | |
| Release Date | Jun 2012 | vs | Sep 2012 |
Cores
| Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 2 | |
| Threads | 2 | vs | 4 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | vs | Intel HD 2500 |
Cache
| Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 3072 KB (shared) | vs | 3072 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1155 | vs | Intel Socket 1155 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 65°C | |
| Package | FC-LGA10 | vs | FC-LGA12C | |
| Die Size | 131mm² | vs | 94mm² | |
| Process | 32 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3100 MHz | vs | 3300 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | none | vs | none | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 55 W |
-
Intel Pentium G870
3100 points
-
Intel Core i3-3220
3399 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Pentium G870
6200 points
-
Intel Core i3-3220
8157 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Pentium G870
3816
-
Intel Core i3-3220
5325
points — higher is better
-
Intel Pentium G870
2177
-
Intel Core i3-3220
2466
points — higher is better
-
Intel Pentium G870 (simulated)
102.
22 -
Intel Core i3-3220 (simulated)
117.62
points — higher is better
-
Intel Pentium G870 (simulated)
220.76
-
Intel Core i3-3220 (simulated)
314.44
points — higher is better
Intel Pentium G870 vs Intel Core i3-2100
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G870 and Intel Core i3-2100 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Pentium G870
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i3-2100
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G870
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1460 vs 1421
| Launch date | June 2012 vs February 2011 |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1460 vs 1421 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-2100
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 1836 vs 1503
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 544 vs 538
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1208 vs 977
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1836 vs 1503 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 544 vs 538 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1208 vs 977 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G870
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-2100
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-2100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1460 | 1421 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1503 | 1836 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 538 | 544 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 977 | 1208 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
2.043 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 34.598 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.227 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.938 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G870 | Intel Core i3-2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | June 2012 | February 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $97 | $73 |
| Place in performance rating | 1993 | 2565 |
| Price now | $97 | $59. 99 |
| Processor Number | G870 | i3-2100 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.58 | 18.10 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 10 GHz |
3.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 131 mm | 131 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 69. 1°C |
69.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 504 million | 504 million |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 21 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
| Graphics base frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 10 GHz |
1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 |
| Device ID | 0x102 | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.
|