Core i3-10100F vs Pentium P6100
Availability
No items available
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100F outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100F
- Performs up to 37% better in League of Legends than Pentium P6100 — 1006 vs 732 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 — 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100F — 35 vs 65 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-10100F
FPS
1006
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Pentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
FPS
732
63%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-10100FPentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
1006
FPS
732
FPS
League of Legends
273
FPS
188
FPS
Apex Legends
616
FPS
440
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
251
FPS
178
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
1343
FPS
986
FPS
Minecraft
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10100F
Single-Core
1093
100%
Multi-Core
4054
100%
Pentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Single-Core
295
-171%
Multi-Core
528
-568%
|
Intel Core i3-10100F |
vs |
Intel Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Sep 26th, 2010 |
| Not Available | Collection | Pentium |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Arrandale |
| Not Available | Socket | Intel Socket G1 |
| Segment |
Mobile |
|
|
4 |
Cores | 2 |
|
8 |
Threads | 2 |
|
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP |
35 W |
| Not Available | Process Size | 32 nm |
| Not Available | Multiplier | 15.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i3-10100F or Pentium P6100
League of Legends, 1080p, High
SkyTech Chronos Mini Gaming Computer PC
324
FPS
$
1.97
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
4 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$639
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
SkyTech Blaze 3.
0 Gaming Computer PC
324
FPS
$
2.31
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$749.99
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze II Gaming PC
324
FPS
$
2.67
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$863.99
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Skytech Legacy Mini Gaming PC
324
FPS
$
2.
44
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$791.99
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
SkyTech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC
377
FPS
$
2.12
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Core i3-10100F
8 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$799.99
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
HAJAAN Breeze Gaming Desktop PC
324
FPS
$
2.47
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i3-10100F
16 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$799.99
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC
434
FPS
$
2
/FPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Core i3-10100F
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$869.
99
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Pentium P6100
N/A Stock
Core i7-1165G7
N/A Stock
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Core i9-10910
N/A Stock
Pentium P6100
N/A Stock
Core i9-10910
N/A Stock
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Xeon E-2288G
N/A Stock
Pentium P6100
N/A Stock
Xeon E-2288G
N/A Stock
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Core i7-1068NG7
N/A Stock
Pentium P6100
N/A Stock
Core i7-1068NG7
N/A Stock
Core i3-10100F
N/A Stock
Core i7-10875H
N/A Stock
Intel Pentium P6100 vs Intel Core i3-11100B Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Pentium P6100 vs Intel Core i3-11100B
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium P6100 on one side and the Intel Core i3-11100B on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the entry-level laptop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,0GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Pentium P6100 | Intel Core i3-11100B | ||||||
| Market (main) | Entry-level laptop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Westmere | Tiger Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Arrandale | Tiger Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Pentium 6000 | Core i3-11000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
CP80617004125AL, |
BX8070111100B |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2010 | Q2 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm SuperFin | ||||||
| Transistors | 382. 000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 2 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,0 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 4,4 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores |
— |
4 Cores 8 Threads @ 3,6 / 4,4 GHz |
||||||
| Bus speed | 2,5 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 3 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR3 800/1066 |
DDR4-3200 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 17,1 GB/s | 51,2 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 6 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 35 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | — | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere Mobile) | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16EU) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 12 | 16 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 500 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 667 MHz | 1400 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 96 GFLOPS | 345,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1200 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 100°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator |
— |
Deep Learning Boost |
||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
| Security |
Execute Disable Bit |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2304@60Hz (HDMI), |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 66 | 262 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 111 | 997 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 131 | 654 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 220 | 2. 430 |
||||||
| PassMark single thread | 820 | 2.923 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 859 | 11.366 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
325 | 1.282 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
606 | 4.598 | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive.
We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i3-11100B has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-11100B is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Pentium P6100 is lower. The Intel Core i3-11100B was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-11100B |
262 997 |
| Intel Pentium P6100 |
66 111 |
In single core, the difference is 297%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 798%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-11100B |
654 2.430 |
| Intel Pentium P6100 |
131 220 |
In single core, the difference is 399%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1005%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-11100B |
2.923 11.366 |
| Intel Pentium P6100 |
820 859 |
In single core, the difference is 256%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1223%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-11100B |
1.282 4.598 |
| Intel Pentium P6100 |
325 606 |
In single core, the difference is 294%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 659%.