Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-mx130-vs-uhd-graphics-620%23gaming
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
1115G4
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 3.
7x more core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 300 MHz - Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 1876 vs 1035
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 7176 vs 4678
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 27.116
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 vs 282.684
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 vs 1.777
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 19.406
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 32.297
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 878
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.
0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2227 - 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 878
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2227
- Around 74% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 632 vs 364
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1876 vs 1035 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 7176 vs 4678 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
31.613 vs 27.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 vs 282.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 vs 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 vs 19.406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 32.297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
3357 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 632 vs 364 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 245 vs 197
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 245 vs 197 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 1876 | 1035 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 197 | 245 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 7176 | 4678 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
31.613 | 27.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 282.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 19.406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 32.297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3686 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 632 | 364 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9. 5 |
| Code name | GM108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 938 | 1288 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 953. 9 gflops |
|
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Interface | PCIe 3.
|