Dual Intel Xeon X5675 vs Intel Core i7-4770K
|
|
|
|
|
Dual Intel Xeon X5675 vs Intel Core i7-4770K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Dual Intel Xeon X5675 on one side and the Intel Core i7-4770K on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Dual Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-4770K | ||||||
| Market (main) | Server | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Westmere | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Westmere-EP | Haswell-DT | ||||||
| Family | Xeon X5600 | Core i7-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80614X5675, AT80614006696AA, Q4SF, SLBYL |
BX80646I74770K, BXC80646I74770K, BXF80646I74770K, CM8064601464206, QEH6 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2011 | Q2 2013 | ||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 2. 340.000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 12 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 24 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,1 GHz | 3,5 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,5 GHz | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 12,8 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 24 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 576 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR3 800/1066/1333 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 6 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 72 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 190 W | 84 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 700W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1250 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1366 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 81. 3°C |
105°C | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | — | 127.282 DMIPS | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 277 | 482 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 4.151 | 2.483 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 111 | 156 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.472 | 791 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 200 | 375 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 2.889 | 1.939 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 523 | 934 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 7. 636 |
4.757 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.472 | 2.144 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 11.551 | 7.081 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.513 | 4.393 | ||||||
| (Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
21.271 | 14.891 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 single core |
604 | 1.052 | ||||||
| (Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
5.664 | 4.093 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
196,9 GFLOPS | 261,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
112 pts / W | 177 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Dual Intel Xeon X5675 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-4770K is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i7-4770K is less. The Intel Core i7-4770K was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
277 4.151 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
482 2.483 |
In single core, the difference is -43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 67%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
111 1.  472 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
156 791 |
In single core, the difference is -29%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 86%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
200 2.  889 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
375 1.939 |
In single core, the difference is -47%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 49%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
523 7.  636 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
934 4.757 |
In single core, the difference is -44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 61%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
1.  47211.551 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
2.144 7.081 |
In single core, the difference is -31%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 63%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
2.538 20.  010 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
4.589 15.120 |
In single core, the difference is -45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
2.513 21.271 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
4.393 14.891 |
In single core, the difference is -43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 43%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
2.749 22.556 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
4.  73815.083 |
In single core, the difference is -42%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 50%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
584 5.  562 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
1.073 4.150 |
In single core, the difference is -46%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 34%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
604 5.664 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
1.052 4.093 |
In single core, the difference is -43%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Dual Intel Xeon X5675 |
594 5.598 |
| Intel Core i7-4770K |
1.078 3.  723 |
In single core, the difference is -45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 50%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Dual Intel Xeon X5675 AMD equivalentIntel Core i7-4770K AMD equivalent
See also:
Dual Intel Xeon X5670Intel Xeon X5670Intel Xeon X5675
Intel Core i7-4770Intel Core i7-4770HQIntel Core i7-4770S
Intel Xeon X5675 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
- Home
- CPU Benchmarks
- Intel Xeon X5675 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
Summary
Reasons to consider Intel Xeon X5675 |
| None |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-4790K |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
| Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the Intel Xeon X5675. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture. |
| Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on specifications plus core architecture. |
| Higher overall performance, based on specifications plus core architecture. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-4790K
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-4790K
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 |
||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| Hyper-Threading | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| XD-Bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| 6.4GT/s QPI | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| HTT | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
| Boost 2.0 | ||||
Architecture
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel_Westmere | vs | Intel_Haswell | |
| Market | Server | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Westmere-EP | vs | Haswell | |
| Release Date | Feb 2011 | vs | May 2014 |
Cores
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 12 | vs | 8 | |
| SMPs | 2 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | Intel HD 4600 |
Cache
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 12288 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1366 | vs | Intel Socket 1150 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | FC-LGA10 | vs | ||
| Die Size | 239mm² | vs | 177mm² | |
| Process | 32 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-4790K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3066 MHz | vs | 4000 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 3466 MHz | vs | 4400 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 133 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | 1. |
vs | unknown | |
| TDP | 95 W | vs | 88 W |
-
Intel Xeon X5675
2772 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
4928 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Xeon X5675
14716 points
-
Intel Core i7-4790K
21504 points
Points — higher is better
| VS | ||
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Pentium Gold G6600 |
| VS | ||
| Intel Xeon X5675 | Intel Core i7-1068G7 |
| VS | ||
| Intel Core i7-4790K | AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE |
| VS | ||
| Intel Core i7-4790K | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
| VS | ||
| AMD Ryzen 3 5300G | Intel Core i5-11400 |
| VS | ||
| Intel Core i5-11400 | Intel Core i5-11500 |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.