Intel Core i5-8250U 8th Gen Quad-Core Processor for Laptops (Review) – Laptop Processors
The 8th Generation Intel Core i5-8250U is one of the first quad-core processors in the mainstream Core U lineup. It’s an important chip on the market since upgrade from the previous dual-core U-series processors to quad-core is a big leap. That’s visible in the i5-8250U benchmark results.
Intel Core i5-8250U CPU Benchmark
Extra performance over its 7th Gen i5-7200U dual-core counterpart while retaining low (15-Watt) power consumption and low heat is a great achievement. The Intel Core i5-8250U will be therefore a great choice for those who want fast laptop computing without sacrificing portability or battery life. The User Benchmark CPU test also shows the i5-8250U is close performance-wise to the power-hungry 45-Watt quad-core i5 and i7 HQ series. However, it’s worth noting that software applications running on a single computing thread won’t benefit from the chip’s four-core (and eight-thread) design.
Our Everyday-Use Test of the i5-8250U
In our real-world tests, the i5-8250U proved its amazing performance for day-to-day use. We tested the i5-8250U in an HP 470 G5 laptop with 16GB of dual-channel RAM and a solid state drive. We put the CPU through some common everyday-use application tests, like web browsing, work in Microsoft Office applications, and multimedia playback. The i5-8250U had no problems with crunching these tasks and the CPU utilization was quite low. These aren’t too demanding tasks. They can be easily handled by the previous dual-core i5-7200U, too. So, the difference between the two chips wasn’t noticeable during these activities. However, when we stressed the CPUs a bit heavier, the i5-8250U showed its greater potential. For instance, a minute and a half long video was exported from Microsoft’s Movie Maker to a 1080p video file in 42 seconds on the laptop with the i5-8250U. The same tasks took 55 seconds on the i5-7200U-equipped notebook. The advantage of the 8th Gen chip was also somewhat visible when applying filters on large jpeg picture files.
As for 4K video playback on the i5-8250U, it’s completely smooth. Playing various 4K Ultra HD video samples including 60fps ones in popular video apps consumed only up to 3% of the processor capacity. Playing random 4K YouTube videos in Chrome browser consumed up to 5% of the CPU power. Of course, playing 1080p Full HD and lower-resolution videos was a piece of cake.
The processor’s operating temperatures on the tested laptop were quite low. Under normal workload with a couple of browser tabs, MS Word, and MP3 player running at the same time, average CPU temperature was around 40 degrees Celsius. The laptop was only mildly warm on the bottom of the chassis. Under full 100% CPU load while exporting a video from Movie Maker, the average temperature rose to around 70 C. The laptop got warmer on the bottom, which is normal, but still it wasn’t hot. Please keep in mind that CPU temperatures greatly depend on CPU cooling of each laptop model, so temps on them may be different than those presented here.
Gaming on the i5-8250U
What hasn’t been upgraded on the 8th Generation of the i5 U-series chips is integrated graphics. The CPU still uses the basic Intel 620 series from the previous 7th Gen Core CPUs, with a very minor clock speed speed boost and new “UHD 620” name. However, greater power of the processor itself can help in certain CPU-intensive gaming scenarios. Take a look at our Intel UHD 620 review or this gameplay video playlist:
Note: The benchmark scores of the listed processors are averages measured across various devices with these processors. The scores and real-world performance of the Intel Core i5-8250U and compared CPUs may vary depending on the notebooks’ other components, settings, cooling, and other factors. However, the benchmark results are good indicators of the processors’ performance.
Below you can read and submit user reviews, questions, and answers about the processor. Thank you for your contribution.
Current rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
×
Email address *
Please CLICK HERE to provide e-mail for receiving notifications when there are new replies
(The e-mail won’t be used for any other purposes.)
Leave a Review
Ask a Question
Leave a Review
Please select stars to rate this itemPerfect Good Average Mediocre Poor
Title (optional)
Attach a photo or videoPhoto Video
Enter a URL (optional)
Choose a file
Name *
Email *
Ask a Question
Attach a photo or videoPhoto Video
Enter a URL (optional)
Choose a file
Name *
Email *
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U vs Intel Core i5-10210U: What is the difference?
62points
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
55points
Intel Core i5-10210U
Comparison winner
vs
66 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Intel Core i5-10210U
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 3700U better than Intel Core i5-10210U?
- 43.
75% faster CPU speed?
4 x 2.3GHzvs4 x 1.6GHz - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm - 1MB bigger L2 cache?
2MBvs1MB - 13.66% higher PassMark result?
7347vs6464 - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
384KBvs256KB - 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core - 706.01seconds faster Blender (classroom) result?
1568.83secondsvs2274.84seconds - 283.86seconds faster Blender (bmw27) result?
506.7secondsvs790.56seconds
Why is Intel Core i5-10210U better than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U?
- 266MHz higher ram speed?
2666MHzvs2400MHz - 2MB bigger L3 cache?
6MBvs4MB - 5.9GB/s more memory bandwidth?
41.66GB/svs35.76GB/s - 11.65% higher PassMark result (single)?
2252vs2017 - 32GB larger maximum memory amount?
64GBvs32GB - 13.
78% higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?
2956vs2598 - 18.61% higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
1797vs1515 - 16.08% higher Cinebench R20 (single) result?
426vs367
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
Intel Core i7-8550U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i3-10110U
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
Intel Core i3-10110U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
Intel Core i5-1035G1
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-1035G1
Intel Core i5-10210U
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
7 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
8. 4/10
7 User reviews
Intel Core i5-10210U
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-10210U
7.0/10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.0/10
7 votes
6.7/10
3 votes
Gaming
8.1/10
7 votes
5.7/10
3 votes
Performance
8.3/10
7 votes
6.3/10
3 votes
Reliability
8.3/10
7 votes
8.0/10
3 votes
Energy efficiency
8.3/10
7 votes
8.0/10
3 votes
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 2.3GHz
4 x 1.6GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.2GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✖AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✖Intel Core i5-10210U
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
0. 5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
1MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender (bmw27) result
506.7seconds
790.56seconds
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
1568.83seconds
2274.84seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
300MHz
300MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
1400MHz
1100MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2400MHz
2666MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
35.76GB/s
41.66GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✖Intel Core i5-10210U
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✔Intel Core i5-10210U
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✔Intel Core i5-10210U
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✔Intel Core i5-10210U
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✔Intel Core i5-10210U
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✔Intel Core i5-10210U
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
✖Intel Core i5-10210U
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 3700U)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-10210U)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5 vs Core i7: which processor should you buy?
Whether you’re building your next PC or buying a new PC online, one question that comes up from time to time is whether an Intel Core i5 or Core i7 is the best deal. The short answer «It depends» isn’t all that helpful, so we’ve broken down the data in more detail for both mobile and desktop processors.
Desktop Core i5 vs. Core i7
Intel’s October 2017 update for Core i5 (see Amazon) and Core i7 (see Amazon) was the first major shift in key metrics counts since Sandy Bridge in 2011. Over the past six years, the Intel Core i5 family has offered four cores without Hyper-Threading and the Core i7 family has offered four cores with Hyper-Threading. Hyper-Threading allows you to use two simultaneous «virtual» cores for each physical core and distribute the load between them.
The 8th generation processors that Intel introduced in October 2017 increased the number of cores and threads in each of these families by 50 percent, and in the case of the Core i7-8700K, increased the core clock speed. Core i5 and Core i7 processors with model numbers starting with 8 (such as the Core i7-8700K) now have six cores or six cores + Hyper-Threading. nine0003 New line of Intel 8th generation processors
Intel 8th generation processors tend to be more expensive than the processors they replace, although this varies somewhat. The overall price of processors in these segments continues to come down on a per-core basis, and the performance boost from additional cores is often worth it. If you don’t know which generation of Intel processors you have, the first digit of the four-digit model code is the model number. If you have a Core i7-2600K then «2» means that this processor is a second generation Core i7 processor known as Sandy Bridge. nine0003
Intel’s decision to increase the number of processors in all three CPU segments — Core i3 also gets two cores and loses Hyper-Threading for 4C/4T configuration — this is an attractive time to buy. How much you benefit from an upgrade depends to some extent on how many threads your typical games or applications use and how old your current chip is. Although there are other single or dual core applications, Windows is designed to distribute multiple single threaded workloads across multiple cores. A dual-core and quad-core application running at the same time will greatly improve on the new Core i5, as opposed to older options. nine0003
While Microsoft DirectX 11 doesn’t take advantage of multiple processor cores very well, games can still use a mostly single-threaded approach for rendering while direct audio, AI, and/or data loading into their threads. Gamers who simultaneously lose and play games from the same system can also find the six-core Core i5, which is much better suited for this task than 7th generation processors and earlier.
The Core i5-6500 is a 3.2GHz base processor that starts around $200. It also uses the latest Intel motherboards. The
Core i5-4430 is an entry-level quad-core i5 for roughly $185, but be aware that using this Haswell chip means also using a slightly older motherboard.
The
Core i7-4790K is still the highest performing Intel processor released by Intel. Again, this is a fourth generation product, so the motherboards are somewhat older. nine0003
Core i7-5820K is Intel’s cheapest six-core processor and based on its old Haswell-E architecture. It usually starts around $400.
The
Core i7-6900K is an eight-core chip with a four-figure price tag.
If you’re on a tight budget with a particular PC build, the Core i3-6100 is Intel’s entry-level Core i3 and currently sells for around $119.
If all you care about is gaming and you don’t run any other workloads outside of the game, the eighth generation Core i5 won’t bring many short-term benefits over recent quad-core chips. Games don’t usually scale very much past the last four cores (4C/4T, as opposed to 2C/4T), though the new DirectX 12 API may make games more multi-core in the long run. If you’re playing on a 6th or 7th gen Core i5, an 8th gen chip probably won’t improve your game performance at the moment. If you’re going to upgrade no matter what, we recommend the new six-core i5 over the older quad-core option. While I generally don’t recommend trying to «future proof» a system, it’s often not worth what you pay. The processors have now lasted long enough to make buying a future-proof core a smart decision. nine0003 New Intel boxed packaging for Core i3, i5 and i7 processors. The 8th Gen
Core i5 is a strong option for anyone who needs to balance multi-threaded performance, clock speed and price. It won’t match the Core i7 in 3D rendering tests, video editing, or video encoding, but it will be as fast as the Core i7 with the same clock speed in games or lightly threaded apps like Photoshop. Having six cores gives you legroom if newer games start to make better use of multithreading. Alternatively, this should also make it easier to stream and play on the same system, although I would suggest consulting a separate guide that tests this use case before deciding on an i-gen i5 over an i7. nine0003
Core i7 8 cores and 12 threads are great for buyers who can use them. While Intel has been selling six-core processors for years, previous six-core chips were more expensive than the $359 MSRP Core i7-8700K, requiring generally more expensive motherboards and requiring end users to trade clock speed for core counts. However, it’s important that your applications can take advantage of all six cores and 12 threads before hitting the trigger on the 8700K. nine0003
What about HEDT six-core clients?
Intel’s High End DeskTop market segment is, as the name suggests, Intel’s high end desktop segment. These chips typically don’t support as much RAM as their Xeon counterparts and may lack other features such as ECC RAM compatibility, but they have historically offered more cores and threads than Intel’s mainstream Core i7 processors. For the sake of simplicity, we are only comparing six-core HEDT processors against the Core i7-8700K. While Intel has previously sold HEDT processors with 8-10 processor cores, we can’t make a simple rule of thumb when an older higher core ratio HEDT processor will outperform the narrower, faster Core i7-8700K. nine0003
If you’re running an early HEDT model like the Core i7-3930K or Core i7-4930K, the 8700K is definitely a step up. Both of these processors had all-around turbo clocks that were well below the Core i7-8700K’s 4.3GHz base clock and used older, less efficient architectures. Between the 8th gen Core i7 with higher clock speeds and higher efficiency, you can reasonably expect 1.2x to 1.4x performance improvements depending on workload, how high your previous processor was upgraded to full load, and use whether your applications benefit SIMD kits such as AVX2. Bandwidth-aware applications should also greatly increase the level of transition from DDR3-1600 to DDR4-2666. The age of your current HEDT system will be important; customers with the 7800X or 6800K probably won’t see the benefit, while those with systems from the Ivy Bridge or earlier will see significant, though not amazing, improvements. nine0003
If you’re one of the few customers running Intel’s first generation six-core architecture, codenamed Westmere, you should definitely see a significant performance boost from upgrading to the 8700K. Most of Intel’s Westmere processors from Intel had full blown boosts below 3.7 GHz in all cases, and the old Nehalem architecture was significantly less efficient than Intel’s second generation Sandy Bridge architecture. Westmere also lacked support for features such as AVX and AVX2. Core i7-8700K clocked 1.3 times higher than the old Core i7-980 and should offer at least 1.15x better performance from architectural improvements alone. The 1.45x to 1.6x performance improvement from Westmere to Coffee Lake won’t surprise us.
All Together
Intel’s decision to implement higher core numbers across its entire product stack means there are some theoretical benefits to upgrade even if you already have a 7th generation processor. For practical purposes, however, we assume that most customers with a 6th generation or 7th generation processor are not interested in buying a new motherboard and processor right after their last upgrade. nine0003
This chart shows the wide differences between the new 8th Generation Intel processors and its previous products. Frequency comparisons always differ between families, but the i5 and i7 desktop stacks match these basic counts.
This chart predicts how much improvement you can expect, assuming you stay in your current processor family (i5 vs i5, i7 vs i7). For every two generations between your current processor and Coffee Lake, we would appreciate a modestly higher (4-8%) performance based solely on the architecture. A 1% increase in frequency will increase performance by 1% or less. 3D rendering, video editing and video encoding will tend to scale well with frequency and core count, game scaling varies by title and ranges from 1:1 to zero. Our projections are conservative and assume a 4th generation core. The predictions are also weighted to take into account the difficulty of keeping more CPU processors. A dedicated application that scales up to 12 cores will rate «High» improvement rather than «Moderate». Similarly, a customer with a first generation Core i5 can expect more FPS wins in games than a sixth generation Core i5 owner. nine0003
This chart compares base and maximum single-core turbo frequencies for six-core Intel processors as of July 2010 Westmere. The Core i7-8700K has higher clocks, cheaper motherboards, and a lower price.
This HEDT chart shows the full-blown turbo sciences for Intel’s six-core chips that date back to Westmere in 2010. While there’s also a six-core Core i7-7800X, very few people bought the 7800X when it went on sale in mid-2017 with plans to upgrade to the Core i7-8700K. nine0003
We’ve jotted down a lot of numbers and numbers in this article, but don’t worry if your head is spinning a bit trying to keep things straight. The slideshow above includes a series of charts designed to make it easier to understand the improvements and upgrade costs depending on your current situation and product family.
Mobile Processors (8th Generation)
Prior to August 2017, Intel mobile products were mostly dual cores across the entire Core i3/i5/i7 product stack. There were a few quad-core processors in the Core i7 family, but most of Intel’s mobile chips were 2C/4T configurations, with quad-core chips reserved for 45W TDP and above. Intel currently offers several quad-core Core i7 and Core i5 processors. One of the main differences between these Core i5 chips and Intel’s entire previous line of Core i5 processors is that the Core i5-8250U and Core i5-8350U support Hyper-Threading. The Core i7 8650U and Core i7-8550U also have quad-core/eight-thread designs. nine0003 click to enlarge
Unfortunately, reviews of laptops that actually use these chips are still quite few and far between, and Intel is giving laptop manufacturers more options to define their desired operating temperatures and temperature limits in ways that can make a significant difference. changes between different machines that supposedly use the same processor. Early data on these chips suggests they are faster than the older dual-core variants despite having much lower base clock speeds to offset the increase in cores and threads, but no one has yet written a serious review of any 8- mobile generation system. To date, none of the mobile processors offering EDRAM cache significantly improves Intel’s integrated graphics performance, although there are a few 7th generation SKUs. nine0003
Mobile Core i5 vs. Mobile Core i7 (7th generation and previous)
Mobile users have three different options that slightly reduce the problem. There are previous generation Core M chips as well as Core i7 and i5 processors. Core M chips are limited to the m3 family. Intel has taken what used to be a great brand and shifted it to the Core i7 and Core i5 families instead. This creates situations like the ones below.
These two chips look the same, with the same cache, almost the same clock speed, and similar GPUs, but they have different operating TDPs and therefore offer different user experiences. Just as different is not something we can talk to without test equipment, but past systems have shown a marked change depending on OEM design and temperature limits. Core M, launched in 2014 but never sold particularly well, OEMs often settle for processors with aggressive high resolution displays and extremely thin chassis resulting in average battery life. nine0003
Core i5 is in a similar situation:
If you’re looking for a Core i-Core Core i5, we highly recommend doing your homework and checking reviews of specific systems. Core M systems may offer better battery life than their i5/i7 counterparts, but this will vary by manufacturer. Remember that high-resolution screens and ultra-thin systems with limited battery life will cost you as much power savings as you can get with a lower TDP processor, perhaps more these days as higher-end chips cut down on the amount of power consumed. nine0003
Another important difference we want to discuss is the gap between Core i7 and i5 cores on mobile devices. Prior to Skylake (6th gen), almost all Intel chips in mobile devices were dual-core below the Core i7 level. There are several 6th and 7th generation Core i5 mobile devices that offer quad-core cores without Hyper-Threading support, as shown below:
The difference between these three cores is that one of them supports Intel Iris Pro Graphics , and the other two are for Intel HD Graphics only. The Iris Pro 580 is the only Intel Core i5 processor in its class with EDRAM support from Intel. If you want a mobile processor with top graphics and a quad-core processor, this is the Core i5 you want to get. nine0003
Beyond these three cores, the general rule still continues. Most mobile Core i5 processors and all Core i3 processors are dual-core with Hyper-Threading. Here are the features that separate Core i5 and Core i7 mobile processors from 7th generation processors and below:
More cores: Many of the Intel Core i7 processors are quad-core chips with Hyper-Threading support. However, this is not universal and the company offers several dual-core + Hyper-Threading SKUs. nine0003
Higher Clock: Intel’s dual-core Core i7 chips from Intel typically have higher clock speeds than their Core i5 processors, even at the same TDP.
More Cache: Core i7 chips have either 6MB or 4MB cache. It uses Core i5 chips. Older chips (pre-Broadwell) often carry 3MB, while Skylake and Kaby Lake chips are sometimes 4-6MB. The extra cache has little effect on performance.
More Addressable Memory: Many older Core i7 and i5 mobile processors are limited to 16 GB of memory, but there are Skylake (6th gen) chips that support 32 GB and even 64 GB on some late Core i5/i7 models. 16GB of RAM is great for the vast majority of users. But if you think you might need more, check what your processor is capable of in the Intel database. nine0003
How much performance you get out of a mobile Core i5 and Core i7 will greatly depend on your laptop cooling solution and whether the chip can handle its own thermal output. We previously discussed how Intel gave OEMs more freedom to set their TDP and skin temperature targets. But this creates scenarios where buying a faster Core M can actually result in worse performance as the chip hits its thermal trip point and buck chokes to keep it cool. nine0003 Intel’s high end Iris Pro graphics card is available in both mobile iUs and Core i7s at least a small «pause» between the two main families. Generally speaking, if you really want to emphasize low power, choose a processor with lower base and turbo clocks. Intel has traditionally defined TDP as «The average power consumption of a processor while running typical workloads over a specified period of time. » A chip with more headroom is a chip that will hit the throttle point faster. nine0003
Which processor should I buy?
If you are looking at the mobile market, we would recommend the new quad-core quad-core processor over the dual-core processor. On the other hand, if you’re in the desktop chip market, the solution is pretty simple. Gamers and enthusiasts who want to balance high core and frequency performance with a sub-$300 price tag should find the new Core i5 chips in their lane. The Core i7-8700K will only benefit those looking for workstation performance or similar demanding applications, but those workloads will be faster on Intel’s 8th Gen coffee lake than any previous installment. HEDT customers with older Westmere-era machines should benefit greatly from these improvements. nine0003
Check out our wfoojjaec Explains series for more in-depth coverage of today’s hot topics.
Read more
PS5, Xbox Series X, thin on the ground, along with CPUs, GPUs
Microsoft and Sony are supplying all sorts of hardware, but it doesn’t seem to be very many consoles. But don’t worry — everything else is hard to find too.
wfoojjaec
Mobile Intel Core i5-8265U
nine0120
Categories: laptops, processors
Intel has released a mobile, energy-efficient 8th generation Core i5-8265U quad-core processor built on the Intel Whiskey Lake-U architecture with a consumption of 15W and using integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620. Which replaced the popular Intel Core i5-8250U processor (Intel Kaby Lake Refresh. nine0129 Manufacturing process: 14nm++, the chipset for Whiskey Lake-U is also available in 14nm technology (instead of 22nm as before), 16 lanes PCI Express 3.0, support for gigabit Wi-Fi 802.11ac wireless interface (XMM 7360 M. 2) and Bluetooth 5.0, 6x USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports, support for discrete controllers (Titan Ridge or Alpine Ridge), to implement the Thunderbolt 3.0 interface, built-in 4-core digital signal processor for working with sound, support for DDR4-2400 memory, support for Intel Hyper-Threading technology, TDP level = 15W. nine0129 Wi-Fi 802.11ac: When using 2×2 scheme and 160 MHz channel, the maximum data transfer rate reaches 1.73 Gbps.
Performance example: The new quad-core Core i5-8265U is twice as fast as the old dual-core Core i5-4200U. The Whiskey Lake U-series with up to 15W TDP delivers up to 10% more performance than existing Kaby Lake Refresh models (due to higher clock speeds).
Specifications Intel Core i5-8265U:
Supported connectors: FCBGA1528.
Four cores and eight logical threads (through support for Hyper-Threading Technology).
Processor clock speed: 1.6GHz. Due to the support of Turbo Boost technology, the processor can operate at a clock frequency of 3.9GHz (for a single core).
Intel Smart Cache Technology — 6 MB (L3 Cache). The processor cache is an area of high-speed memory located in the processor. Intel Smart Cache specifies an architecture that allows all cores to dynamically share access to the last level cache. nine0129 Core to bus ratio: 16.
OPI bus runs at 4 GT/s. A bus is a subsystem that transfers data between computer components or between computers. An example is the system bus (FSB), through which data is exchanged between the processor and the memory controller unit; DMI interface, which is a point-to-point connection between the onboard Intel memory controller and the Intel I/O controller box on the system board; and a Quick Path Interconnect (QPI) interface connecting the processor and the integrated memory controller. nine0129 Instruction set: 64-bit.
Instruction Set Extensions: SSE 4.1/4.2, AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) 2.0.
Support for the Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (SSSE3) instruction set, which is an extension of the SSE3 instruction set. This is part of the SIMD technology integrated into Intel microprocessors. This technology is designed to improve the ability to process multimedia data. It is designed to speed up the tasks of encoding and decoding information and to speed up various calculations. Using the SSSE3 instruction set, we can process multiple data streams with one instruction per clock cycle. This allows you to significantly improve the efficiency of applications. In particular, SSSE3 commands are applicable to matrix calculations. nine0129 Technology support: Turbo Boost, vPro, Virtualization (VT-x), Intel Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d), Intel Trusted Execution, Intel Anti-Theft, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access.
New AES commands, Intel 64 architecture, Intel VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT).
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology.
Idle states, thermal control technologies.
Function Execute Disable Bit.
Lithograph: 14nm.
TDP configurable (up): 1.8GHz, TDP configurable (up): 25W. Design power (TDP) = 15W. Adjustable TDP value (downward, when operating at a frequency of 800MHz): 10W. nine0129 Maximum memory size (depends on memory type): 32 GB.
Memory types: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133.
Built-in dual channel memory controller.
Maximum memory bandwidth: 38.1 GB/s (DDR4-2400).
Gen 9.5 processor integrated graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 620 (GT2).