Intel Pentium N4200 vs Pentium N3710: performance comparison
VS
Intel Pentium N4200
Intel Pentium N3710
We compared two 4-core laptop CPUs: the 1.1 GHz Intel Pentium N4200 against the 1.6 GHz Pentium N3710. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Pentium N4200
18
Pentium N3710
13
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Pentium N4200
6
Pentium N3710
4
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Pentium N4200
58
Pentium N3710
58
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Pentium N4200
20
Pentium N3710
17
Key Differences
What are the key differences between N3710 and N4200
Advantages of Intel Pentium N4200
- Around 12. 8 GB/s (50%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 44% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 337 vs 234 points
- More than 15° C higher critical temperature
- Newer — released 8-months later
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Pentium N4200
+56%
306
Pentium N3710
196
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Pentium N4200
+54%
967
Pentium N3710
626
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Pentium N4200
+19%
852
Pentium N3710
713
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Pentium N4200
+45%
2123
Pentium N3710
1464
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Pentium N4200
+44%
335
Pentium N3710
232
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Pentium N4200
+49%
1145
Pentium N3710
768
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710
General
Vendor | Intel | Intel |
Released | August 30, 2016 | January 10, 2016 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Apollo Lake | Braswell |
Model number | N4200 | N3710 |
Socket | BGA-1296 | BGA-1170 |
Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 505 | HD Graphics 405 |
Performance
Cores | 4 | 4 |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base Frequency | 1. 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
TDP | 6 W | 6 W |
Max. temperature | 105°C | 90°C |
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 505 | HD Graphics 405 |
GPU Base Clock | 250 MHz | — |
GPU Boost Clock | 750 MHz | 700 MHz |
Shading Units | 144 | — |
TMUs | 18 | — |
ROPs | 3 | — |
Execution Units | 18 | — |
TGP | 10 W | — |
Max. Resolution | 3840×2160 — 30 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Pentium N4200
0.23 TFLOPS
Pentium N3710
n/a
Memory support
Memory types | DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 | DDR3L-1600 |
Memory Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
ECC Support | No | No |
Official site | Intel Pentium N4200 official page | Intel Pentium N3710 official page |
PCI Express Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 6 | 4 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Pentium N4200
8 (80%)
Pentium N3710
2 (20%)
Total votes: 10
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i5 5200U and Intel Pentium N4200
2.
Intel Core i3 6006U and Intel Pentium N4200
3.
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U and Intel Pentium N3710
So which CPU will you choose: Intel Pentium N3710 or Pentium N4200?
Name
Message
Promotion
Intel Pentium N4200 Vs Intel Pentium N3710 Comparison in India: Benchmark, Specs and Performance
Discuss
Should you use Intel Pentium N4200 or Intel Pentium N3710? Well, your search ends here. Find out which Laptop chipset would work best for you. Compare the two models on the basis of their Performance, memory, IGPU and benchmark scores. Intel Pentium N4200 is manufactured by Intel in India whereas Intel Pentium N3710 is manufactured by Intel in India. Base frequency and memory size are the primary matrices to judge the overall speed and performance of the chipset. Intel Pentium N4200 has a Base frequency of 1.1 GHz and 8 GB memory size whereas Intel Pentium N3710 has a base frequency of 1.6 GHz and 8 GB memory.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don’t forget to check out expert opinion as well.
+ Read More
Laptop Chipsets
Hide Common features
Power |
||
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
TDP | 6 W | 6 W |
Max. temperature | 105°C | 90°C |
Laptops Chipsets
General |
||
Vendor | Intel | Intel |
Released | August 30, 2016 | January 10, 2016 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Apollo Lake | Braswell |
Model number | N4200 | N3710 |
Socket | BGA-1296 | BGA-1170 |
Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 505 | HD Graphics 405 |
Performance |
||
Cores | 4 | 4 |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base Frequency | 1. 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
IGPU |
||
Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 505 | HD Graphics 405 |
GPU Base Clock | 250 MHz | |
GPU Boost Clock | 750 MHz | 700 MHz |
Shading Units | 144 | |
TMUs | 18 | |
ROPs | 3 | |
Execution Units | 18 | |
TGP | 10 W | |
Max. Resolution | 3840×2160 — 30 Hz |
Memory |
||
Memory types | DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 | DDR3L-1600 |
Memory Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
ECC Support | No | No |
Misc |
||
PCI Express Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 6 | 4 |
Official page | https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/95592/intel-pentium-processor-n4200-2m-cache-up-to-2-5-ghz.html | https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/91830/intel-pentium-processor-n3710-2m-cache-up-to-2-56-ghz.html |
Benchmarks |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) | 303 | 197 |
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) | 968 | 626 |
Passmark CPU (Single-Core) | 855 | 706 |
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) | 2133 | 1443 |
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) | 334 | 233 |
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) | 1121 | 792 |
iGPU FLOPS | 0. 23 TFLOPS |
Browse Chipsets By
Similar Comparison
Popular Laptops
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ301T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win 10 Home)
₹ 29,890
-
Lenovo Ideapad 330 (81D2008WIN) Lpatop (Ryzen 5 Quad Core/ 8GB/ 1TB/ freeDOS)
₹ 27,877
-
Lenovo IdeaPad D330 Laptop (Intel Celeron N4100/ 4GB/ 128GB SSD/ Win10)
₹ 29,990
-
HP 245 G7 Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 256GB SSD/ FreeDos)
₹ 28,990
-
HP 245 G7 (1S3P0PA) Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 1TB HDD/ FreeDos)
₹ 26,990
-
Dell E7440 Laptop (4th Gen Pentium Dual Core/ 16GB/ 500GB/ Win 8)
₹ 24,000
-
HP 250 G6 (4QG14PA) Laptop (7th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
₹ 29,189
-
HP 15-db1069AU (9VJ83PA) Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
₹ 26,590
-
Lenovo V110 (80TCA00PIH) Laptop (7th Gen AMD A6/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
₹ 23,999
-
HP 14q-cs0009TU (5DZ92PA) Laptop (7th Gen Ci3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
₹ 25,777
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK302TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
₹ 34,990
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 256GB SSD/ Windows 10)
₹ 37,490
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (11th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10)
₹ 39,490
-
Dell Latitude 3410 Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
₹ 34,100
-
Dell Inspiron 3501 Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10 Home)
₹ 37,498
-
Lenovo Ideapad Slim 3i (81WD00JYIN) Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1 TB/ Win10)
₹ 39,990
-
HP 15s-GR0012AU Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3 3250U/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10 Home)
₹ 37,990
-
Dell Latitude 3400 Laptop (8th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Ubuntu)
₹ 33,390
-
HP 250 G7 (2A9A5PA) Laptop (Celeron Dual Core/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
₹ 34,899
-
HP 250 G7 (1S5F6PA) Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
₹ 33,990
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ501T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win 10)
₹ 41,460
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ521T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 4GB/ 256GB SSD/ Win 10)
₹ 41,500
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ511T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 512GB SSD/ Win 10)
₹ 44,444
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK092TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB 128GB SSD/ Win10)
₹ 40,990
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) M415DA-EK512TS Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 512GB SSD/ Win 10)
₹ 45,990
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK094TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i5/ 8GB/ 512GB SSD/ Win10)
₹ 49,794
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) M415DA-EK502TS Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 1TB HHD/ Win 10)
₹ 41,580
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK312TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 256GB SSD/ Win10)
₹ 47,699
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (11th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win11)
₹ 44,150
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (11th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win11)
₹ 42,460
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 16GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10 Pro)
₹ 81,500
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 8GB/ 1TB 512GB SSD/ Win10 Pro)
₹ 88,270
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10 Pro)
₹ 80,750
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 4GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win10 Pro)
₹ 77,499
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5)
₹ 78,900
-
Dell Latitude 3410 Laptop (10th Gen Core i7/ 8GB/ 1TB/ Ubuntu)
₹ 77,730
-
Dell Latitude 3410 Laptop (10th Gen Core i7/ 8GB/ 1TB/ Win10 Pro)
₹ 86,240
-
Lenovo Thinkpad E14 (20YES00900) Laptop
₹ 79,999
-
Dell Inspiron 5518 Laptop (11th Gen Core i7/ 16GB/ 1TB SSD/ Win10/ 2GB Graph)
₹ 97,990
-
Dell Alienware M15 Laptop (8th Gen Ci5/ 8GB/ 1TB/ Win10/ 6GB Graph)
₹ 99,999
User Reviews
NA out of 5
0 Ratings & 0 Review
Detailed Comparison of Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium N3710
Intel Pentium N4200 has been announced on August 2016 whereas Intel Pentium N3710 has been announced on January 2016. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Passmark Score: Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium N3710
Passmark Score consists of 4 parameters: CPU, GPU, MEM, and UX. The Passmark score measures the performance of the CPU. Passmark score is that measures a processor’s single core performance and evaluates multi core performance. The Passmark score value of Intel Pentium N4200 is 2133 whereas Passmark score value of Intel Pentium N3710 is 1443.
Memory Comparison: Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium N3710
Coming to the Memory, Intel Pentium N4200 has a memory size of 8 GB while Intel Pentium N3710 comes up with 8 GB. Max. Memory Channels used in the first compared laptop chipset is 2 and Max. Memory Channels used in the other laptop chipset 2.
Performance Comparison: Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium N3710
Intel Pentium N4200 has 4 cores with 4 threads whereas Intel Pentium N3710 has 4 cores with 4 threads. Intel Pentium N4200 has base frequency of 1. 1 GHz whereas Intel Pentium N3710has base frequency of 1.6 GHz.
FAQs
Q. Which model has higher Geekbench 5 (multi-core) score — Intel Pentium N4200 or Intel Pentium N3710?
Intel Pentium N3710 has higher Geekbench 5 score with total score of 792 compare to Intel Pentium N4200 with a score of 1121.
Q. Which model has higher Passmark CPU (multi-core) score — Intel Pentium N4200 or Intel Pentium N3710?
Intel Pentium N4200 has higher Passmark CPU score with total score of 2133 compare to Intel Pentium N3710 with a score of 1443.
Q. Which model has higher base frequency among Intel Pentium N4200 and Intel Pentium N3710?
Intel Pentium N3710 has a higher base frequency of 1.6 GHz compared to Intel Pentium N4200 with 1.1 GHz base frequency.
Q. Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium N3710, which model has higher bandwidth?
Intel Pentium N4200 with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth is better than Intel Pentium N3710 with 25.6 GB/s bandwidth.
Q.
Which model has higher number of cores — Intel Pentium N4200 or Intel Pentium N3710?
Both Intel Pentium N3710 and Intel Pentium N4200 have same cores value of 4 cores.
Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium N3710
|
|
|
Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Pentium N3710
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium N4200 on one side and the Intel Pentium N3710 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the entry-level notebook sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,5GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel Pentium N3710 | ||||||
Market (main) | Entry-level notebook | Entry-level notebook | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Goldmont | Airmont | ||||||
Core name | Apollo Lake | Braswell | ||||||
Family | Pentium 4000 | Pentium 3000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | FH8066802979703, SR2Y9, SR2Z5 |
FH8066501715927, QK0G, SR2KL |
||||||
Release date | Q3 2016 | Q1 2016 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Base frequency | 1,1 GHz | 1,6 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 2,5 GHz | 2,6 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 2 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 | DDR3L-1600 | ||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 38,4 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 6 | 4 | ||||||
TDP | 6 W | 6 W | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 505 | Intel HD Graphics 405 | ||||||
GPU execution units | 18 | 16 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 144 | 128 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 200 MHz | 400 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 230,4 GFLOPS | 153,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | BGA1296 | BGA1170 | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 105°C | 90°C | ||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 171 | 84 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 713 | 364 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 50 | 41 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 160 | 141 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 110 | 70 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 370 | 243 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 840 | 681 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 2. 133 | 1.347 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
1.498 | 1.086 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
4.160 | 2.954 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
327 | 226 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
1.034 | 722 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
32,8 GFLOPS | 29,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
693 pts / W | 492 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Pentium N3710 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
171 713 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
84 364 |
In single core, the difference is 104%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 96%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
50 160 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
41 141 |
In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
110 370 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
70 243 |
In single core, the difference is 57%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 52%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
840 2.133 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
681 1.347 |
In single core, the difference is 23%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 58%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
1.498 4.160 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
1.086 2.954 |
In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 41%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
1. 505 3.880 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
1.138 3.042 |
In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 28%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
327 1. 034 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
226 722 |
In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 43%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
359 1.051 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
246 741 |
In single core, the difference is 46%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 42%.
On Android:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android | |
---|---|
Intel Pentium N4200 |
357 1.246 |
Intel Pentium N3710 |
246 810 |
In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 54%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Pentium N4200 AMD equivalentIntel Pentium N3710 AMD equivalent
Intel Pentium N4200 vs Pentium N3710:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Pentium N4200
Intel Pentium N3710
Which is better: Intel Pentium N4200 at 1.1 GHz or Pentium N3710 at 1. 6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 4-core laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one core
Pentium N4200
18
Pentium N3710
13
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmars, where all nucleus 9000
Pentium n4200 are involved0002 Reasons to choose Intel Pentium N4200
- 12.8 GB/s (50%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
- 44% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 337 and 234 points
- More than 15° C higher than maximum working temperature
- Appeared 8 months later than rival
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Pentium N4200
+56%
306
Pentium N3710
196
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Pentium N4200
+54%
967
Pentium N3710
626
Passmark CPU (single core)
Pentium N4200
+19%
852
Pentium N3710
713
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Pentium N4200
+45%
2123
Pentium N3710
1464
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Pentium N4200
+44%
335
Pentium N3710
232
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Pentium N4200
+49%
1145
Pentium N3710
768
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of the Intel Pentium N4200 and Pentium N3710
General Information
Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
Release date | August 30, 2016 | January 10, 2016 |
Type | For laptop | For laptop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Apollo Lake | Braswell |
Model number | N4200 | N3710 |
Socket | BGA-1296 | BGA-1170 |
Integrated graphics | HD Graphics 505 | HD Graphics 405 |
Performance
Cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
Frequency | 1. 1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 2MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Power consumption
Process technology | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6W | 6W |
Critical temperature | 105°C | 90°C |
Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 505 | HD Graphics 405 |
GPU frequency | 250 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz |
Shader blocks | 144 | — |
TMUs | 18 | — |
ROPs | 3 | — |
Computer units | 18 | — |
TGP | 10W | — |
Max. resolution | 3840×2160 — 30Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Pentium N4200
0.23 Teraflops
Pentium N3710
N/D
Support for memory
9000 9000 9000
Other
Official site | Site Intel Pentium N4200 | Site Intel Pentium N3710 |
PCI Express version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 6 | 4 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Pentium N4200
8 (80%)
Pentium N3710
2 (20%)
Total votes: 10
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i5 5200U vs Intel Pentium N4200
2.
Intel Core i3 6006U vs Intel Pentium N4200
3.
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U vs. Intel Pentium N3710
What will you choose: Intel Pentium N3710 or Pentium N4200?
Name
Message
Compare
Game speed
Pentium N4200
29.6 (+14.5%)
Pentium N3710
25.3
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests and similar applications.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Pentium N4200
31.4 (+18.2%)
Pentium N3710
25.7
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Pentium N4200
16.4 (+19.5%)
Pentium N3710
13.2
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading up to 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Pentium N4200 28. 9 (+21.8%) Pentium N3710 22.6 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Pentium N4200 14.6 (+32.9%) Pentium N3710 9.8 |
Extreme |
Pentium N4200 2.8 (+32.1%) Pentium N3710 1.9 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Pentium N4200
371 (+35.6%)
Intel Pentium N3710
239
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU, OpenGL
Intel Pentium N4200
27 (+46.3%)
Intel Pentium N3710
14.5
Passmark
Intel Pentium N4200
2146 (+37.1%)
Intel Pentium N3710
1349 9000 missing existing features.
Basic
Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Pentium® Processor N4200 (2M Cache, up to 2.5 GHz) | Intel® Pentium® Processor N3710 (2M Cache, up to 2.56 GHz) |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Apollo Lake | Braswell |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Release dateMonth and year of the processor being available for purchase. | 10-2019 | 10-2018 |
Model Official name. | N4200 | N3710 |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 4 | 4 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 1.1 GHz | 1.6GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 2.4 GHz | 2.55 GHz |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Instructions | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | ||
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | Yes | Yes |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | ||
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 6W | 6W |
Cooling system specifications |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 405 |
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | 200 MHz | 400 MHz |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | No data | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | No data | No data |
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 | 3 |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR3L-1600 |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | 2 |
RAM bandwidth | ||
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 2 | 2 |
PCI configuration options | 1×4 + 1×2 or 4×1 or 2×1+1×2 + 1×2 | 1×4 + 1×2 or 4×1 or 2×1+1×2 + 1×2 |
Number of PCI lanes | 6 | 1×4 + 1×2 or 4×1 or 2×1+1×2 + 1×2 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Pentium N4200
- On average, gaming performance is 4% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 6%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and 1% better.
Intel Pentium N3710
- The base clock is 0.5 GHz higher.
How similar they are
- Prices for new processors are about the same.
- The number of physical cores is equal.
- The number of threads is equal.
AMD A10-5757M vs Intel Pentium N4200 — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors
VS
AMD A10-5757M
Intel Pentium N4200
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in AMD A10-5757M vs Intel Pentium N4200 comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of AMD A10-5757M and Intel Pentium N4200. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
2.50 GHz
Clock frequency
1.10 GHZ
4
Nuclei
4
3.50 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
2.50 GHZ
4
Number No
Acceleration
No.
3.50 GHZ
Turbo (4 Cores)
2.50 GHZ
Family and generation of the processor
Internal graphics
It is difficult to compare AMD A10-5757M against INTEL PENTIM N4200 the characteristics of the video card matter exclusively in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
Maximum memory
8 GB
2
Monitors
3
32 32 NM
Technology
14 NM
Q2/2013
Exit date
9000 9000 9000 9000
Support for the appliance
24
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
Decode
h364
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode
No
h365 8bit
Decode / Encode
No
h365 10bit
Decode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode
AVC
Decode / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE0003
RAM and PCIe
These are the memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR3-1600
Memorial type
DDR3-18666DDR4-2400
Maximum memory
8 GB
Memory channels
2
NO
ECC
No. 9000 No.
003
version of PCIE
2.0
PCIE Lines
6
Cryning
Support for data encryption
YES
AES-Ni
YES
Memory & amp; PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that, as a result, unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD A10-5757M and Intel Pentium N4200, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
35 W
TDP
6 W
—
Maximum temperature
—
—
Maximum TDP
—
TDP Download
—
Technical details
4.00 MB
L3-CACHE
2.00 MB
32 32 NM
Technology
140002 Richland
Architecture
APOLLO LAKE
AMD-V
003
Virtualization
VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D
FP2
SOCK (connector)
BGA 1296
Q2/2013
Exit date
Q3/2016
devices compatible with this processor
You probably already know which devices use processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses various test scenarios
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
88 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
59 (67%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD 9 processor0003
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
219 (97%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1. 10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
224 (100%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a popular software for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the processor’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
270 (100%)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite 9 software0003
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
73 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
50 (68%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2. 50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
210 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
182 (86%)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. This is software used to create 3D shapes. The benchmark runs in single-core mode without considering the possibility of hyper-threading.
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
113 (100%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
This is a new version of the benchmark based on Cinebench R15 (both versions are based on Cinema 4, the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for benchmark tests of multi-core processor performance and hyper-threading capabilities.
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
371 (100%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
1732 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1. 10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
1263 (72%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the processor
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
4525 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
4233 (93%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
374 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
321 (85%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 software package shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
917 (91%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1. 10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
1003 (100%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
3278 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
2612 (79%)
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32
AMD A10-5757M
4x 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz)
553 (100%)
Intel Pentium N4200
4x 1.10 GHz (2.50 GHz)
216 (39%)
Popular processor comparisons
one. |
Intel Pentium N4200 Intel Core i5-10400F |
|
2. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. Intel Core i9-10900K |
|
3. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. Intel Pentium N3710 |
|
four. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|
5. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. AMD E-240 |
|
6. |
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 vs. Intel Pentium N4200 |
|
7. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. Intel Core i3-9100F |
|
eight. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. AMD A4-1350 |
|
9. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. AMD FX-8320E |
|
ten. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|
eleven. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. Intel Core i3-7020U |
|
12. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. Intel Core M-5Y10a |
|
13. |
AMD A10-5757M vs. Intel Pentium N3700 |
|
fourteen. |
AMD A10-5757M vs.
|