NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 96 vs 64
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 311.
04 gflops vs 208 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 96 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 900 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 775 vs 504
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 238 vs 57
- 13.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.139 vs 0.465
- 16.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 127
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 3161
- 16.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 127
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 3161
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 vs 21 February 2008 |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 311. 04 gflops vs 208 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 96 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 900 MHz |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 775 vs 504 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 238 vs 57 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 vs 0.465 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2053 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 3161 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 13.0 billion / sec
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 775 | 504 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 238 | 57 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 2380 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.139 | 0.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2053 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 | 3161 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G94 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 21 February 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $179 |
| Place in performance rating | 1224 | 1453 |
| Price now | $69. 99 |
$39.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | 23.72 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | 208 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 96 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 13. 0 billion / sec |
20.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 96 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2. 0 x 16 |
16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) | 9″ (22.9 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4. 2 |
2.1 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 96 vs 64
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 311.
04 gflops vs 192 gflops - A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 532 MHz
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 vs 22 December 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 532 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 19.
2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 13.0 billion / sec |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 775 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 238 | |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 2380 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G94 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 22 December 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1224 | not rated |
| Price now | $69. 99 |
|
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 13. 0 billion / sec |
19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | 2x DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2. 0 x 16 |
|
| Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) | 229 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28. 8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
17.02 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 532 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550.
GPU Comparison Specs & Benchmark
VS
General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550.
1755
Place in performance rating
not rated
0.34
Value for money (0-100)
0.48
Fermi
Architecture
Curie
GF108
Code name
NV43 A2
Desktop
Type
Workstation
9 February 2011
Release date
20 April 2006 (15 years ago)
$81
Price now
$189
no data
GPU code name
NV43 A2
no data
Market segment
Workstation
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
96
Pipelines
no data
810 MHz
Core clock speed
360 MHz
585 million
Transistor count
146 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
110 nm
65 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
12.96
Texture fill rate
2.880
311.04 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
no data
Number of transistors
146 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
30 Watt
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
145 mm
Length
198 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type.
What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550.
DDR3
Memory type
GDDR3
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1334 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
21.34 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What’s the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 performance benchmarks comparison
Popular comparisons containing this graphics cards
| 1. | NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 vs. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
| 2. | NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 vs. AMD FirePro D500 | |
3.
|
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT vs. NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 | |
| 4. | NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 vs. NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
| 5. |
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS vs. NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
|
|
| 6. | NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 vs. NVIDIA Quadro M520 | |
| 7. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs. AMD Radeon R5 M240 | |
8.
|
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition vs. AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| 9. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition | |
| 10. |
AMD Caicos vs. NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
|
|
| 11. | AMD Baffin vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition | |
| 12. | AMD Cypress vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition | |
13.
|
AMD Cayman vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition | |
| 14. | AMD Caicos vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition | |
| 15. |
AMD Cayman vs. NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
|
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.
0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
versus
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Newer graphics card, approx. 1620 MHz vs 1375 MHz
- 18% better floating point performance: 311.04 gflops vs 264 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process for the graphics card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Approximately 62% less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 2.7 times more memory maximum: 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 384 MB
- 2 times more memory frequency: 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 800 MHz
- 2.2 times greater performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 775 vs 349
- 2.2 times greater performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 238 vs 106
- Performance in GFXBench 4.
0 — T-Rex (Frames) about 52% better: 3275 vs 2160 - GFXBench 4.0 performance — T-Rex (Fps) approximately 52% higher: 3275 vs 2160
| Release date | 1 February 2011 vs 28 April 2008 |
| Core clock | 1620 MHz vs 1375 MHz |
| Floating point performance | 311.04 gflops vs 264 gflops |
| Process | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB vs 384 MB |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) vs 800 MHz |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 775 vs 349 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 238 vs 106 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
3275 vs 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 2160 |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- 2x faster texture speed: 26.4 billion / sec vs 13.0 billion / sec
| 26.4 billion/sec vs 13.0 billion/sec |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 775 | 349 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 238 | 106 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 2380 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.139 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.646 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 | 2160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 | 2160 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Codename | GF108 | G92 |
| Production date | February 1, 2011 | April 28, 2008 |
| Price at first issue date | $79 | $49. 99 |
| Place in the ranking | 1224 | 1262 |
| Price now | $69.99 | $49.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 14.03 | 13.43 |
| Core clock | 1620 MHz | 1375MHz |
| Number of CUDA conveyors | 96 | 96 |
| Floating point performance | 311. 04 gflops |
264 gflops |
| Process | 40nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum temperature | 98 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of shaders | 96 | 96 |
| Texturing speed | 13.0 billion/sec | 26.4 billion/sec |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 585 million | 754 million |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S/PDIF |
| Video connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum resolution VGA | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
| Multi-monitor support | ||
| Tire | PCI-E 2. 0x16 |
PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7″ (14.5cm) | 9″ (22.9cm) |
| Additional power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| SLI support | 2-way | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4. 2 |
2.1 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | 384MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) — 51.2 (GDDR5) | 38.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | 800MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Standard memory per graphics card | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA |
Comparison of GeForce GTX 9600 and GeForce GT 440.
Which graphics card to choose?
Home / Video Card Comparison / Which is better GeForce GTX 9600 or GeForce GT 440?
|
GeForce GTX 9600 |
GeForce GT 440 |
|
May, 2009 | 580MHz | 512MB GDDR3 |
February, 2011 | 810MHz | 1GB DDR3 |
|
Edelmark rated |
Edelmark rated |
Benefits
Why is the GeForce GTX 9600 better?
| Slightly higher memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | More than 55% more memory bandwidth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| More texture units | 48 | vs | 16 | Three times as many texture units |
| More raster operation blocks | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more raster operation blocks |
| Wider memory bus | 256bit | vs | 128bit | 2x wider memory bus |
| Slightly faster texture processing speed | 27. 84 GTexel/s |
vs | 12.96 GTexel/s | Approximately 2.2x faster texture rendering speed |
Why is the GeForce GT 440 better?
| Overclocked | 810MHz | vs | 580MHz | Approximately 40% higher clock speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 1.800 MHz | vs | 1.400 MHz | Approximately 30% higher effective memory clock speed |
| Higher memory clock speed | 900MHz | vs | 700MHz | Approximately 30% higher memory clock speed |
| Lower power consumption | 65W | vs | 140W | 2.2x lower power consumption |
Key test
Memory bandwidth
The speed at which data can be read from or stored in the built-in memory
| GeForce GTX 9600 | 44.8 GB/s |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 440 | 28. 8 GB/s |
Pixel fill rate
The number of pixels that the graphics card can display on the screen every second
| GeForce GTX 9600 | 9.28 GPixel/s |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 440 | 3.24GPixel/s |
Texture Fill Rate
Rate at which the graphics card renders textures
| GeForce GTX 9600 | 27.84 GTexel/s |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 440 | 12.96 GTexel/s |
Number of floating point operations (FLOPS)
Video card calculation speed
| GeForce GTX 9600 | 278.4GFLOPS |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 440 | 311.04 GFLOPS |
Number of shader units
Shaders — GPU subcomponents that work with three-dimensional graphics
| GeForce GTX 9600 | 96 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 440 | 96 |
Number of texture units (TMUs)
Texture units (TMUs) affect the texture fill rate of a graphics scene
| GeForce GTX 9600 | 48 |
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 440 | 16 |
Technical data (specification)
| Parameter | GeForce GTX 9600 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
Graphic processor |
||
| GPU manufacturer | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| GPU name | G92 | GF108 |
| Platform | Desktop | Desktop |
| Clock frequency | 580MHz | 810MHz |
| Two processors | No | No |
| Reference card | No | No |
Rated speed |
||
| Number of shader units | 96 | 96 |
| Number of texture units (TMU) | 48 | 16 |
| Number of ROPs | 16 | 4 |
| Pixel fill rate | 9. 28 GPixel/s |
3.24GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 27.84 GTexel/s | 12.96 GTexel/s |
| Number of floating point operations (FLOPS) | 278.4GFLOPS | 311.04 GFLOPS |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock | 700MHz | 900MHz |
| Effective memory frequency | 1.400 MHz | 1.800 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 256bit | 128bit |
| Video memory size | 512MB | 1.024MB |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Noise and power |
||
| Power consumption | 140W | 65W |
Tags:compare, GeForce GT 440, GeForce GTX 9600
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 — 31 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.
Top specifications and features
- Passmark score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
- GPU base clock
- RAM
- Memory Bandwidth
Passmark test score
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440:
759
Best score:
29325
Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440:
1514
Best score:
Memory
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440:
174
Best score:
General Information
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440:
559
Best score:
Features
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440:
146
Best score:
Description
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 graphics card based on Fermi architecture has 585 million transistors, tech. 40 nm process. The frequency of the graphics core is 810 MHz.
In terms of memory, 1 GB is installed here. DDR3, 900 MHz frequency and with a maximum bandwidth of 28.8 Gb / s. The texture size is 13 GTexels/s. FLOPS is 0.3.
In tests, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 graphics card proved to be as follows — according to the Passmark benchmark, the model scored 759 points. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points. According to the 3DMark benchmark, the video card scored 833 points out of 49575 possible.
Directx version — 11. OpenGL version — 4.3. Regarding cooling, here the heat dissipation requirement is 65 watts.
In our tests, the video card scores 76276 points.
Why NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 is better than others
No merits
- Passmark score 759 . This setting is lower than 50%
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics 833 test score. This setting is lower than 45%
- GPU base clock speed 810 MHz. This parameter is lower than 54%
- RAM 1 GB.
This parameter is lower than 66% - Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s. This parameter is lower than 63%
- Effective memory speed 1800 MHz. This parameter is lower than that of 51%
- GPU memory frequency 900 MHz. This parameter is lower than 60%
- Test score Octane Render OctaneBench 8 . This parameter is lower than that of 14%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Review
Performance
Memory
general information
Functions
Ports
Tests in benchmarks
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Review: Highlights
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
810MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
2457MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
900MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.
6 MHz
16000MHz
FLOPS
A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
0.3TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
1142.32TFLOPS
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
13 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
756.8 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Fermi
GPU Name
GF108
Memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
28.8GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.
3 GB/s
2656GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
1800MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
19500MHz
RAM
1GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
128GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
3
Average: 4.5
6
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle.
This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
128bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
8192bit
Release date
2011-02-01 00:00:00
Mean value:
Heat Dissipation (TDP)
The Heat Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
65W
Average: 140.4 W
2W
Manufacturing process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
40 nm
Average: 47.
5 nm
4 nm
Number of transistors
585 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
80000 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided for an expansion card used to connect a computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
2
Mean: 2.8
5
Width
144mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
421.7 mm
Height
109mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
180 mm
Purpose
Desktop
DirectX
Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics
eleven
max 12.
2
Average: 11.1
12.2
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
1.1
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
4.6
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.3
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.6
Shader model version
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.6
CUDA Version
Yes
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini-HDMI ports.
They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show all
Yes
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
one
Mean: 1.4
3
VGA
Yes
HDMI
Yes
Passmark test score
759
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
29325
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics 9 test score0132
833
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
49575
Test score Octane Render OctaneBench
eight
max 125
Average: 47.