Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT what is better?
Home / Graphics Card / NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
58%
DeviceList score
vs
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
59%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO benefits
|
Price-quality ratio |
|
56.1 % 18.8 % (50.4%) better
vs
37.3 %
|
|
Start price |
|
49.99 USD -110.01 USD (-68.8%) better
vs
160 USD
|
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT benefits
Winner in comparison
|
Number of shader processors |
|
112 16 (16.
vs
96
|
|
Core Frequency |
|
1500 MGz 125 MGz (9.1%) better
vs
1375 MGz
|
|
Number of CUDA cores |
|
112 16 (16.7%) better
vs
96
|
|
Maximum RAM amount |
|
1 0.616 (160.4%) better
vs
0.384
|
|
Memory bus width |
|
256 bit 64 bit (33.3%) better
vs
192 bit
|
|
Memory clock speed |
|
900 MGz 100 MGz (12.
vs
800 MGz
|
|
Memory Bandwidth |
|
57.6 19.2 (50%) better
vs
38.4
|
5%) better| General information | |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| 56.1 %
18.8 % (50.4%) better
|
37.3 % |
|
Architecture |
|
| Tesla | Tesla |
|
Code name |
|
| G92 | G92 |
|
Type |
|
|
Start price |
|
49. 99 USD
-110.01 USD (-68.8%) better
|
160 USD |
|
Number of shader processors |
|
| 96 | 112
16 (16.7%) better
|
|
Core Frequency |
|
| 1375 MGz | 1500 MGz
125 MGz (9.1%) better
|
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 754 | 754 |
|
Technological process |
|
| 65 nm | 65 nm |
|
Interface |
|
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
|
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
|
|
| 105 Wt | 105 Wt |
|
Length |
|
| 22.9 | 22.9 |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
|
SLI support |
|
| 2-way | + |
|
3D Vision |
|
| no data | + |
|
CUDA The presence of the CUDA architecture allows you to use applications that are optimized for
|
|
|
maximum temperature |
|
| 105 °C | 105 °C |
|
Multi-monitor support |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
Bus |
|
PCI-E 2. 0 |
no data |
|
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores increase performance in graphics computing,
|
|
| 96 | 112
16 (16.7%) better
|
|
Height |
|
| 11.1 | no data |
|
Maximum resolution via VGA |
|
| 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
|
Audio input for HDMI |
|
| S/PDIF | S/PDIF |
|
HDMI |
|
|
Video connectors |
|
| Dual Link DVIHDTV | HDTVDual Link DVI |
|
DirectX |
|
11. 1 (10_0) |
11.1 (10_0) |
|
Floating-point performance |
|
| 264 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks |
| Memory | |
|
Memory type |
|
| GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
|
Maximum RAM amount Large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures,
|
|
| 0.384 | 1
0.616 (160.4%) better
|
|
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games. |
|
| 192 bit | 256 bit
64 bit (33.
|
|
Memory clock speed A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
| 800 MGz | 900 MGz
100 MGz (12.5%) better
|
|
Memory Bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM your PC can use. |
|
| 38.4 | 57.6
19.2 (50%) better
|
3%) betterNVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.
0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps).
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 98 vs 82
| Launch date | 23 October 2008 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 98 vs 82 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.
2x more texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 15.6 billion / sec - 2.3x more pipelines: 112 vs 48
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 480 vs 364
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 2239
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 2239
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 15.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 112 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 156 gflops |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 480 vs 364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 2239 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
3304 vs 2239 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 364 | 480 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 98 | 82 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2239 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2239 | 3304 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
2845 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G94 | G92 |
| Launch date | 23 October 2008 | 21 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1274 | 1006 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Price now | $103. 99 |
|
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 156 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 48 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 15. 6 billion / sec |
33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 754 million |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Height | 4. 376″ (11.1 cm) |
|
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9″ (22.9 cm) | 9″ (22.9 cm) |
| SLI options | 2-way | 2-way |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 57. 6 GB / s |
57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| CUDA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| SLI |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 with others
NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
NVIDIA
GeForce 8300
NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
NVIDIA
GeForce 9700M GTS
NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
AMD
Radeon HD 6620G
NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
AMD
Radeon HD 7650A
NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
NVIDIA
Quadro K600
NVIDIA
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
vs
AMD
Radeon HD 8370D IGP
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT vs 9800
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
▲
52758
▼
Release date ≤ Q2 2014.
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
▲
52522
▼
Release date ≤ Q2 2014.
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 39,093 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
18,811 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 6% Gigabyte(1458 34AE) 512MB
Worst Bench: 5% POV(1ACC 913C) 1GB
Poor: 5%
Great: 6%
SPEED RANK: 369th / 688
20,282 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 5% Nvidia(10DE 0545) 512MB
Worst Bench: 3% Asus(1043 82AD) 512MB
Poor: 3%
Great: 5%
SPEED RANK: 418th / 688
| Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
5. 55 % |
Much faster effective speed. +41% |
3.94 % |
| Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
7.47 fps | Much better lighting effects. +46% |
5.12 fps | |||
| Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
9.44 fps | 9.78 fps | +4% | |||
| MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
6.41 fps | 7.71 fps | Faster multi rendering. +20% |
|||
| Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
6.17 fps | Much faster NBody calculation. +52% |
4.05 fps |
| Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
8.7 fps | Much better peak lighting effects. +45% |
5.98 fps | |||
| Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
12.3 fps | 12.7 fps | +3% | |||
| MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
7.53 fps | 9.3 fps | Faster peak multi rendering. +24% |
|||
| Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
7.1 fps | Much faster peak NBody calculation. +45% |
4. 9 fps |
Market Share
Based on 55,644,158 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.03 % | 0.03 % | ||||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
52 % | 52 % |
| Age Newest |
102+ Months | 102+ Months | ||||
| Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
3.2 fps | Much better peak texture detail. +39% |
2.3 fps | |||
| Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
4.1 fps | 4.5 fps | Slightly faster peak complex splatting. +10% |
|||
| Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
2.64 fps | Much better texture detail. +43% |
1.85 fps | |||
| Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
3.48 fps | 3.81 fps | Slightly faster complex splatting. +9% |
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- bin bin (220)
- Asus P5G41T-M LX (64)
- Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2L (52)
- To Be Filled By O.E.M. (48)
- Asus P5Q (36)
- Asus P5KPL-AM SE (36)
- Gigabyte GA-G41M-Combo (34)
- bin bin (168)
- Asus P5Q (59)
- Gigabyte GA-G31M-ES2L (46)
- Asus P5KPL-SE (41)
- Medionpc MS-7502 (39)
- Gigabyte GA-G41M-Combo (37)
- Asus P5K (37)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
-
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) ).
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
versus
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Advantages
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
- The VEALLY DIFFERENCE 3 MONTH (S)
- Nucleus frequency is about 8% more: 1625 MHZ VS VS VS VS VS VS VS VS VS VS MHz
- About 17% less power consumption: 90 Watt vs 105 Watt
- PassMark — G2D Mark performance about 20% more: 98 vs 82
| Release date | 23 October 2008 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Core frequency | 1625 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 98 vs 82 |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.
2x faster texturing speed: 33.6 billion / sec vs 15.6 billion / sec - 2.3x faster shader processors: 110 9018 48 2.2x better floating point performance: 336.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
- About 32% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 480 vs 364
- About 48% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3304 vs 2239
- About 48% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 3304 vs 2239
0 — T-Rex (Frames) Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 364 | 480 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 98 | 82 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
2239 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2239 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Codename | G94 | G92 |
| Issue date | October 23, 2008 | July 21, 2008 |
| Place in the ranking | 1274 | 1006 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price at first issue date | $160 | |
| Price now | $103. 99 |
|
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 8.86 | |
| Core frequency | 1625MHz | 1500MHz |
| Number of CUDA conveyors | 48 | 112 |
| Floating point performance | 156 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Process | 65nm | 65nm |
| Maximum temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of shaders | 48 | 112 |
| Texturing speed | 15. 6 billion/sec |
33.6 billion/sec |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 754 million |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | S/PDIF |
| Video connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum resolution VGA | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
| Multi-monitor support | ||
| Height | 4. 376″ (11.1 cm) |
|
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9″ (22.9cm) | 9″ (22.9cm) |
| SLI support | 2-way | 2-way |
| Additional power connectors | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Maximum memory size | 512MB | 512MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 57. 6 GB/s |
57.6 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 900MHz | 900MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| CUDA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| SLI |
NVIDIA GeForce 9 graphics card800 GTX
Features
Drivers
Price
| Name: | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
| Series: | GeForce 9 |
| GPU model: | G92-420 (G92) |
| CUDA Core: | 128 |
| Base clock : | 675 MHz |
| Memory speed: | 2. 2Gbps |
| Memory: | 512 Mb GDDR3 (256-bit) |
The NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX video card is based on a 65 nm process technology and is based on the G92-420 (G92) graphics processor.
The card supports Directx 10. NVIDIA placed 512 megabytes of GDDR3 RAM, which is connected using a 256-bit interface.
The graphics processor operates at 675 MHz. The number of CUDA cores is 128, with a speed of 2200 Mbps.
The power consumption of the video card is 140W, and the recommended power supply is 450W.
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX supports Microsoft DirectX 10 and OpenGL 2.1.
Specifications for NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
| GPU specifications: | |
|---|---|
| Model: | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
| Series: | GeForce 9, Desktop |
| GPU model: | G92-420 (G92) |
| Process: | 65nm |
| CUDA Core: | 128 |
| Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs): | 16 |
| Texture units (TMUs): | 64 |
| Base clock: | 675MHz |
| Number of transistors: | 754 million |
| Memory specifications: | |
|---|---|
| Memory capacity: | 512 Mb |
| Memory type: | GDDR3 |
| Memory bus: | 256-bit |
| Memory speed: | 2200 Mbps (2.  2Gbps) |
| Memory clock: | 1100MHz |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 43.2 GTexel/s |
| Display support: | |
|---|---|
| Maximum digital resolution: | 2560×1600 |
| Maximum VGA resolution: | 2048×1536 |
| Standard connectors: | Two DVI-I DualLink, HDMI |
| Multi-monitor support: | Yes |
| HDMI: | Yes, Via adapter |
| Audio input for HDMI: | SPDIF |
| Thermal characteristics: | |
|---|---|
| Max GPU temperature: | 105℃ |
| Energy Consumption (TDP): | 140 W |
| Recommended Nutritional Requirements: | 450 W |
| Additional power connectors: | Two 6-pin |
| Video card dimensions: | |
|---|---|
| Height: | 11. 1 cm |
| Length: | 26.7 cm |
| Width: | 2 slots |
| Technologies and capabilities: | |
|---|---|
| CUDA: | Yes |
| SLI: | Yes, 2-way, 3-way |
| PhysX: | Yes |
| 3D Vision: | Yes |
| 3D games: | Yes |
| DirectX: | 10 |
| OpenGL: | 2.1 |
| Tire: | PCI Express 2.0 x16 |
| Support OS: | Microsoft Windows 7-10, Linux, FreeBSDx86 |
Please note: the table shows the reference characteristics of the video card, they may vary by different manufacturers.
New drivers for NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Download drivers for video card NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Operating system:
Windows 10 64-bit
Release date:
14 December 2016
Version:
342.
01 WHQL
Status: Out of date
MD5
Operating system:
Windows 10 32-bit
Release date:
December 14, 2016
Version: 9000.01 WHQL 9000
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000.000 Mb Obsolete
MD5
Operating system:
Windows 8 32-bit, 8.1 32-bit, 7 32-bit, VISTA 32-bit
Release date:
December 14, 2016
version:
342.0966 WhQL 9000 9000
238.97 MB)
Status: Obsolete
MD5
Operating system:
Windows 8 64-bit, 8.1 64-bit, 7 64-bit, Vista 64-bit0116
342.01 WHQL
Status: Out of date
MD5
Operating system:
Windows XP 32 -by
Release date:
29 July 2014
version:
340.
52 WHQL 9000
MD5
|
Release Notes (PDF)
Operating system:
Price in Russia
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Frequently Asked Questions and Answers
What series is this video card?
Video card series: GeForce 9
What is the power consumption and power requirements?
Maximum power consumption is: 140 W.
Recommended power supply: 450W.
Auxiliary power connectors: Two 6-pin .
Where can I download the GeForce 9800 GTX driver?
Video cards with 512 Mb memory:
Video cards with GDDR3 memory type:
Video cards with 256-bit bus:
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 – review. Benchmarks and Specs
The NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 graphics card (GPU) is ranked 770 in our performance rating. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 runs at a minimum clock speed of 650 MHz.
The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. RAM size — 512 MB GB with a clock speed of 900 MHz and a bandwidth of 57.6 GB/s.
The power consumption of the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is 90 Watt and the process technology is only 65 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512. To get an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
5.0
From 1
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
Yandex Market
SberMegaMarket
AliExpress
General information
A basic set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 video card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost.
This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Performance Rating Position: | 940 | |||
| Architecture: | Tesla | |||
| Code name: | G94 | |||
| Type: | Desktop | |||
| Release date: | October 23, 2008 (13 years ago) | |||
| Current price: | $99 | |||
| Value for money: | 0.09 | |||
| GPU code name: | G94 | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the performance characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce 9 graphics card600 GSO 512.
The smaller the chip manufacturing process, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
| Conveyors: | 48 | |||
| Core Clock: | 650 MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 505 million | |||
| Process: | 65nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 90 Watt | |||
| Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 15.6 billion/sec | |||
| Floating point: | 156 gflops | |||
| Maximum temperature: | 105 °C | |||
| CUDA Cores: | 48 | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 48 | |||
| Number of transistors: | 505 million | |||
| Estimated heat output: | 90 Watt | |||
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
There are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes today, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop versions).
This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
| Interface: | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |||
| Length: | 9″ (22.9cm) | |||
| Additional power: | 6-pin | |||
| SLI options: | 2-way | |||
| Height: | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |||
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 + turbo overclocking option.
| Memory type: | GDDR3 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 512MB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 256 Bit | |||
| Memory frequency: | 900MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 57. 6 GB/s |
|||
Port and display support
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
| Display connections: | Two Dual Link DVIHDTV | |||
| Multi monitor support: | + | |||
| Maximum VGA resolution: | 2048×1536 | |||
| Audio input for HDMI: | S/PDIF | |||
| HDMI: | + | |||
Technologies
Each graphics card manufacturer complements its products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow. Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.
| CUDA: | + | |||
API Support
All NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 supported APIs are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: | 11.1 (10_0) | |||
| OpenGL: | 2.1 | |||
General gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s see how the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 ranks in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the recommendations of the game developer for system requirements; it may differ from real situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.
0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2MEDLE-Evil Within : Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed Un ityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty : Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 35 fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more |
May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates. |
|
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
AMD equivalent
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 in benchmark results
Benchmarks help you determine the performance of the standard NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 benchmarks.