371-0751 nVidia Quadro FX 1400 FX1400 Video Card PCI-E 128MB Sun
CALL US : 866-546-7414
Categories |
DESCRIPTION nVidia Quadro FX1400 128MB Video Card
Condition: Refurbished REVIEWS Customers who bought this product also purchased… |
© Copyright © 2022 Compeve Corporation.
Back to Top
Quadro FX 1400 [in 1 benchmark]
NVIDIA
Quadro FX 1400
Buy
- Interface PCIe 1. 0 x16
- Core clock speed 350 MHz
- Max video memory 128 MB
- Memory type DDR
- Memory clock speed 600 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started Quadro FX 1400 sales 9 August 2004 at a recommended price of $799. This is a Curie architecture desktop card based on 130 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 128 MB of DDR memory clocked at 0.6 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 19.2 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 1.0 x16 interface. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 55 Watt.
We have no data on Quadro FX 1400 benchmark results.
General info
Some basic facts about Quadro FX 1400: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | |
Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | |
GPU code name | NV41 | |
Market segment | Workstation | |
Release date | 9 August 2004 (18 years old) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Current price | $559 (0. 7x MSRP) | of 158889 (A100 PCIe) |
Technical specs
Quadro FX 1400’s specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro FX 1400’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 222 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
Texture fill rate | 4.200 | of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
Size and compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro FX 1400 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Width | 1-slot | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro FX 1400: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
Memory type | DDR | |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Memory bandwidth | 19. 2 GB/s | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro FX 1400. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API support
APIs supported by Quadro FX 1400, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | |
Shader Model | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
OpenCL | N/A | |
Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro FX 1400. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
FX 1400
124
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Quadro FX 1400 according to our statistics.
Pentium D
925
36.4%
Ryzen Threadripper
3970X
9.1%
Core i5
10400F
9. 1%
Pentium Dual
Core T4500
9.1%
Core i3
1115G4
9.1%
Core 2
Duo E6600
9.1%
Core i3
2365M
9.1%
Core i5
1135G7
9.1%
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Quadro FX 1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Comparison of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) ), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Arc A750
versus
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Arc A750
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 17 year(s) 7 month(s) 900 20
- The core frequency is 7.5 times (a) more : 2050 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 244363.6 times faster texturing speed: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 6 nm vs 130 nm
- 32 times the maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 3. 4 times the memory frequency: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 590 MHz
- PassMark — G2D Mark performance in 2.7 times greater: 607 vs 223
- 80.4 times greater performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 8200 vs 102
Release date | 12 Oct 2022 vs 25 February 2005 |
Core frequency | 2050 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texturing speed | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel/s |
Process | 6 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory frequency | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 590 MHz |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 607 vs 223 |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 8200 vs 102 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
Name | Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G2D Mark | 607 | 223 |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 8200 | 102 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 12583 | |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 95573 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6335.04 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1973.663 |
Performance comparison
Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA QuadroFX Go1400 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Generation 12. 7 | Curie |
Codename | DG2-512 | NV41 |
Production date | 12 Oct 2022 | 25 February 2005 |
Place in the ranking | 67 | 750 |
Type | Workstation | |
Boost core clock | 2400MHz | |
Core frequency | 2050MHz | 275 MHz |
Process | 6nm | 130nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34. 41TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | |
Number of shaders | 3584 | |
Pixel fill rate | 268.8GPixel/s | |
Texturing speed | 537.6 GTexel/s | 2.2 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Number of transistors | 21700 million | 222 million |
Video connectors | 1x HDMI 2. 1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Form factor | Dual slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-III |
Recommended power supply | 550 Watt | |
Additional power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4. 6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulcan | ||
Maximum memory size | 8GB | 256MB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 18.88 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256bit | 256 Bit |
Memory frequency | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 590MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR |
Comparison of Intel Arc A730M and NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A730M and NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of the performance of video cards by benchmarks: Geekbench — OpenCL, PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark.
Intel Arc A730M
versus
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Arc A730M
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 18 year(s) 3 month(s) 90 020
- The core frequency is 4 times (a) more : 1100 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 178909.1 times faster texturing speed: 393.6 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 6 nm vs 130 nm
- 48 times the maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 256 MB
- 3 times the memory frequency: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 590 MHz
Release date 9 0040 | 2022 vs 25 February 2005 |
Core frequency | 1100 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texturing speed | 393. 6 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel/s |
Process | 6 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory frequency | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 590MHz |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: Intel Arc A730M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Name | Intel Arc A730M | NVIDIA QuadroFX Go1400 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench — OpenCL | 51004 | |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 102 | |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 223 |
Performance comparison
Intel Arc A730M | NVIDIA QuadroFX Go1400 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Generation 12. 7 | Curie |
Codename | DG2-512 | NV41 |
Production date | 2022 | 25 February 2005 |
Place in the ranking | 339 | 750 |
Type | Workstation | |
Boost core clock | 2050 MHz | |
Core frequency | 1100MHz | 275MHz |
Process | 6nm | 130nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 25. 19 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.60TFLOPS | |
Number of shaders | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 196.8 GPixel/s | |
Texturing speed | 393.6 GTexel/s | 2.2 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Number of transistors | 21700 million | 222 million |
Video connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4. 0 x16 | MXM-III |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulcan | ||
Maximum memory size | 12GB | 256MB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 18.
|