GeForce 930MX vs Radeon R7 M350 Graphics cards Comparison
In this comparison between GeForce 930MX and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 930MX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 930MX
Check Price
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce 930MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930MX here:
GeForce 930MX Laptops
Main Specs
GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M350 has 105% more power consumption, than GeForce 930MX.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 930MX.
- GeForce 930MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 — in Desktops.
- GeForce 930MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 — with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 227 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce 930MX and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 930MX is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 930MX and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce 930MX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930MX in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
GeForce 930MX | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16S-GMR | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 March 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1020 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24. 48 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3. 0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GT 750M
- GeForce 930MX vs FireStream 9270
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce GT 750M
- Radeon R7 M350 vs FireStream 9270
- GeForce 930MX vs GeForce 920MX
- GeForce 930MX vs HD Graphics 5300
- Radeon R7 M350 vs GeForce 920MX
- Radeon R7 M350 vs HD Graphics 5300
GeForce 930MX [in 10 benchmarks]
Description
NVIDIA started GeForce 930MX sales on March 10, 2016. This is Maxwell architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. It has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, GDDR5 at 2 GHz, and coupled with a 64-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 14.40 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a PCIe 3.0 x8 card. Power consumption — 17 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
3.33%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 003
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of GeForce 930MX, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Performance ranking | 652 | |||
Value for money | ||||
Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | |||
GPU | N16S-GMR | |||
Type | 90 022 For laptops | |||
Release date | March 10, 2016 (7 years ago) 5
Price now |
1808$ |
of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) |
|
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher the better.
Features
GeForce 930MX’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly talk about GeForce 9 performance30MX, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of benchmarks and gaming tests.
Number of stream processors | 384 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
952 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) | |
Boost frequency | 1020 MHz | out of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
Process | 28 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4090) |
Power Consumption (TDP) | 17 W | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
Texturing Speed | 24. 48 | of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
Floating point performance | 783.4gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility & Dimensions
Information on GeForce 930MX compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For laptop video cards, this is the estimated size of the laptop, the bus and the connection connector, if the video card is connected through the connector, and not soldered on the motherboard.
Bus | PCI Express 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interface | no 0114
RAMParameters of memory installed on GeForce 930MX — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Video outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 930MX. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model. 9No outputs 004
API Support 90 003APIs supported by GeForce 930MX, including their versions.
Benchmark testsThese are the results of GeForce 930MX rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment. Overall benchmark performanceThis is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce 930MX PassmarkThis is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation by running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the latter is done in 4K resolution if possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute. Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce 930MX 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark. It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one of which shows a girl running away from some kind of military base located in a sea cave, and the other of a space fleet attacking defenseless planet. Support for 3DMark Vantage was discontinued in April 2017 and it is now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead. Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce 930MX 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is Futuremark’s legacy DirectX 11 benchmark. He used four tests based on two scenes: one is several submarines exploring a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce 930MX 3DMark Fire Strike ScoreBenchmark coverage: 13%
GeForce 930MX 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 13%
GeForce 930MX 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is a legacy benchmark that uses DirectX 11 feature level 10, used to test home PCs and low-end laptops. It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead. Benchmark coverage: 13%
GeForce 930MX GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Khronos Group’s OpenCL API. Benchmark coverage: 9%
GeForce 930MX 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm has been used to measure the performance of entry-level laptops and Windows-based tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9 to render a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet at 1280×720 resolution. Support for Ice Storm ended in January 2020, now the developers recommend using Night Raid instead. Benchmark coverage: 8%
GeForce 930MX GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses the Vulkan API from AMD and the Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5%
GeForce 930MX GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widely used benchmark for graphics cards that combines 11 different test scenarios. All of these scenarios are based on the direct use of the processing power of the GPU, without the use of 3D rendering. This option uses NVIDIA’s CUDA API. Benchmark coverage: 4%
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX in gamesFPS in popular games on the GeForce 930MX, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests. Average FPSHere are the average FPS values for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions:
Popular gamesRelative performanceOverall GeForce 930MX performance compared to its closest competitors in notebook graphics cards.
Intel Iris Graphics 550
AMD Radeon HD 8790M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
AMD Radeon 630 Competitor from AMDWe believe that the closest competitor to the GeForce 930MX from AMD is the Radeon HD 8790M, which is approximately equal in speed and 4 positions higher in our rating. Radeon HD 8790M Compare Here are some of AMD’s nearest GeForce 930MX competitors:
AMD Radeon HD 6950M
AMD Radeon HD 7770M
AMD Radeon HD 8790M
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
AMD Radeon 630
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 Other video cardsHere we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. GeForce GT 750M 027 Compare Radeon R7 M370 Compare Compare Recommended processorsAccording to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the GeForce 930MX. 17.7% 17.4% 8.3% 6.5% 6. |