Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-mx130-vs-uhd-graphics-620%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-mx130-vs-uhd-graphics-620%23benchmarks
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
versus
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 2 month(s)
- more than 12. 7 MHz core frequency(12.7 MHz) MHz
- 8% more core clock in Boost mode: 1242 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Number of shader processors 16 times more: 384 vs 24
- About 81% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 1875 vs 1035
- About 48% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 7176 vs 4848
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — FaceDetection (mPixelsDetection) benchmark ) about 17% more: 31.613 vs 27.116
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 44% more: 406.203 vs 282.684
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) /s) about 14% more: 2.034 vs 1.777
- About 56% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 19.406
- 3.3x more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 32.297
- 2x greater performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 2796 vs 1397
- 4.2x greater performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 3686 vs 878
- About 51% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 3357 vs 2227
- 2x more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 2796 vs 1397
- About 51% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 3686 vs 878
- About 51% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark: 3357 vs 2227
- Performance in 3DMark benchmark Fire Strike — Graphics Score about 74% higher: 632 vs 364
Issue date | 17 November 2017 vs 1 September 2017 |
Core frequency | 1122 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost core clock | 1242 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Number of shader processors | 384 vs 24 |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 1875 vs 1035 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 7176 vs 4848 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 vs 27.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 vs 282.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 vs 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 vs 19.406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 32.297 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 632 vs 364 |
Reasons to choose Intel UHD Graphics 620
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size(s): 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Approximately 24% more PassMark — G2D Mark performance: 245 vs 197
Process | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 245 vs 197 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|||||
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 1875 | 1035 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 197 | 245 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 7176 | 4848 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 27.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 282.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 19.406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 32.297 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 632 | 364 |
Performance comparison
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9. 5 |
Codename | GM108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Production date | 17 November 2017 | September 1, 2017 |
Place in the ranking | 937 | 1284 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Boost core clock | 1242MHz | 1150MHz |
Core frequency | 1122MHz | 300MHz |
Floating point performance | 953. 9 gflops | |
Process | 28 nm | 14nm |
Number of shaders | 384 | 24 |
Texturing speed | 29.81 GTexel/s | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Number of transistors | 189 million | |
Video connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Interface | PCIe 3.
|