CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Opteron 8439 SE (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — June 2023
AMD Opteron 8439 SE (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i7-13700K
Intel Core i9-12900KS
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i7-12700KF
Intel Core i7-12700K
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i7-12700
Intel Core i7-12700F
Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Core i7-12700H
Intel Core i5-12500
Intel Core i5-12500H
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Core i5-12490F
Intel Core i5-12400
Intel Core i3-12100
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-11700K
Intel Core i7-11700KF
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i5-11600K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i7-11700F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i9-10850K
Intel Core i7-10700KF
Intel Core i5-11400
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i9-9900KF
Intel Core i5-11400F
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Intel Core i5-11400H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
Intel Core i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i7-10700
Intel Core i5-11300H
Intel Core i7-10700F
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel Core i7-8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Intel Core i5-8600K
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-10750H
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i3-10105F
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-8500
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i3-10100F
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i5-10400F
Intel Core i7-4790K
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-8400
Intel Core i7-9750H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i7-8750H
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i5-9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i5-8300H
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core i7-8565U
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i7-4790
Intel Core i5-1035G1
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i5-8265U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i5-4590
Intel Core i3-1005G1
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i3-10110U
Intel Core i5-2500K
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Pentium G4560
AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Core i7-2600
Intel Core i3-4160
Intel Xeon E5-2689
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3330
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i5-3210M
AMD FX -8350
Intel Core i5-2450M
AMD FX -8320
Intel Core i5-2410M
AMD FX -6300
Intel Core i5-4210U
AMD FX -8300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-7020U
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core i3-6006U
Intel Core i3-4005U
(YOU) AMD Opteron 8439 SE
Hewlett-Packard Company ProLiant DL585 G6 (2.
8 GHz AMD Opteron 8439 SE)
Copyright 2006-2014 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation
Hewlett-Packard Company
ProLiant DL585 G6
(2.8 GHz AMD Opteron 8439 SE)
Environment stack size set to 'unlimited' Max locked memory set to 2457600 The libhugetlbfs libraries were installed using the installation rpms that came with the distribution. Set vm/nr_hugepages=5400 in /etc/sysctl.conf mount -t hugetlbfs nodev /mnt/hugepages PGI_HUGE_PAGES set to 450.
BIOS configuration: Power Regulator set to Static High Performance Mode
Environment variables set by runspec before the start of the run: HUGETLB_MORECORE = "yes" NCPUS = "12"
C benchmarks:
C++ benchmarks:
C benchmarks:
C++ benchmarks:
C benchmarks:
C++ benchmarks:
C benchmarks (except as noted below):
C++ benchmarks (except as noted below):
C benchmarks:
400. perlbench: |
-march=barcelona -fb_create fbdata(pass 1) -fb_opt fbdata(pass 2) -Wl,-T/usr/share/libhugetlbfs/ldscripts/elf_x86_64.xBDT(pass 2) -L/usr/lib64 -lhugetlbfs(pass 2) -Ofast -IPA:plimit=20000 -IPA:field_reorder=on -LNO:opt=0 -WOPT:if_conv=0 -CG:local_sched_alg=1 |
| 401.bzip2: |
-march=barcelona -O3 -OPT:alias=disjoint -OPT:Ofast -OPT:goto=off -INLINE:aggressive=on -CG:local_sched_alg=1 -m3dnow -Wl,-T/usr/share/libhugetlbfs/ldscripts/elf_x86_64.xBDT -L/usr/lib64 -lhugetlbfs |
| 403.gcc: |
-march=barcelona -fb_create fbdata(pass 1) -fb_opt fbdata(pass 2) -Ofast -OPT:malloc_alg=1 -LNO:trip_count=256 -LNO:prefetch_ahead=10 -CG:prefer_lru_reg=off -m32 |
| 429.mcf: |
-march=barcelona -O3 -ipa -INLINE:aggressive=on -CG:gcm=off -GRA:prioritize_by_density=on -m32 -L/usr/lib -lhugetlbfs |
445. gobmk: |
-march=barcelona -fb_create fbdata(pass 1) -fb_opt fbdata(pass 2) -Wl,-T/usr/share/libhugetlbfs/ldscripts/elf_x86_64.xBDT(pass 2) -L/usr/lib64 -lhugetlbfs(pass 2) -O3 -OPT:alias=restrict -LNO:prefetch=1 -LNO:ignore_feedback=off -CG:p2align=on |
| 456.hmmer: |
-Mvect=cachesize:6291456 -fastsse -Mvect=partial -Munroll=n:8 -Msmartalloc=huge -Msafeptr -Mprefetch=t0 -Mfprelaxed -Mipa=const -Mipa=ptr -Mipa=arg -Mipa=inline -tp barcelona-64 -Bstatic_pgi |
| 458.sjeng: |
-march=barcelona -fb_create fbdata(pass 1) -fb_opt fbdata(pass 2) -Wl,-T/usr/share/libhugetlbfs/ldscripts/elf_x86_64.xBDT(pass 2) -L/usr/lib64 -lhugetlbfs(pass 2) -O3 -ipa -LNO:ignore_feedback=off -LNO:full_unroll=10 -LNO:fusion=0 -LNO:fission=2 -IPA:pu_reorder=2 -CG:ptr_load_use=0 -OPT:unroll_times_max=8 -INLINE:aggressive=on |
462. libquantum: |
-Mvect=cachesize:6291456 -fastsse -Munroll=m:8 -Msmartalloc=huge -Mprefetch=distance:8 -Mconcur=innermost -Mconcur=noaltcode -Mfprelaxed -Mipa=fast -Mipa=inline -Mipa=noarg -tp barcelona-64 -Bstatic_pgi |
| 464.h364ref: |
-march=barcelona -fb_create fbdata(pass 1) -fb_opt fbdata(pass 2) -Wl,-T/usr/share/libhugetlbfs/ldscripts/elf_x86_64.xBDT(pass 2) -L/usr/lib64 -lhugetlbfs(pass 2) -O3 -IPA:plimit=20000 -OPT:alias=disjoint -LNO:prefetch=0 -CG:ptr_load_use=0 -CG:push_pop_int_saved_regs=off -CG:prefer_lru_reg=off |
C++ benchmarks:
C benchmarks:
C++ benchmarks (except as noted below):
539847-B21(NEW), 539847-B21 AMD OPTERON 8439 SE 2.80GHZ SIX CORE 105 WATTS DL585 G6 PROCESSOR OPTION KIT
Article: 539847-B21(NEW)
Attention! Server components are spare parts and can be supplied in OEM packaging (blister, plastic, antistatic bag).
For detailed information about the configuration of the product you are interested in, please contact the managers. Tel. +7(351)7000370
1 829 499 ₽
HP 539847-B21 AMD Opteron 8439 SE 2.80GHz Six Core 105 Watts DL585 G6 Processor Option Kit-539847-B21(NEW) is now in your shopping cart
Compare
Add to favorites
Categories:
Processors
Tags:
- Features
- Overview
- Shipping
Features
| Stock | Delivery time 2-3 weeks |
| Condition | The item is new |
| in detail | Processors — AMD Opteron 8439 SE 2.80GHz Six Core 105 Watts DL585 G6 Processor Option Kit |
| Manufacturer | HP |
Review
Processors — 539847-B21 AMD Opteron 8439 SE 2.
80GHz Six Core 105 Watts DL585 G6 Processor Option Kit
delivery in Russia, with delivery in Kazakhstan, at a bargain price, at wholesale prices, by installments, in the store SetiLend, Cisco, HP, Juniper, Dell, Intel, in Moscow, delivery to the Crimea, delivery to Kyrgyzstan
Delivery
Pickup, delivery by courier, delivery to the desired transport company.
Compare AMD Opteron 290 vs AMD Opteron 8439 SE
| AMD Opteron 290 | AMD Opteron 8439 SE |
|---|---|
| Both from amd brand | |
| Both models were released around the same time period | |
| Both processors belong to the server segment equals 2800 MHz | |
| memory for both processors is 2 | |
| AMD Opteron 290 | AMD Opteron 8439 SE | |
|---|---|---|
| The core architecture of the Opteron 290 processor is called Italy | The core architecture of the Opteron 8439 SE processor is called Istanbul | |
| AMD Opteron 290 runs on socket 9 40 | AMD Opteron 8439 SE runs on Socket F | |
FSB Data AMD Opteron 290 — 1000 MHz HT (2. 0 GT/s) |
FSB Data AMD Opteron 8439 SE — 2400 MHz HT | |
| Opteron 290 seriously loses in the number of cores, 2 vs. 6 | Opteron 8439 SE significantly outperforms in terms of the number of cores, 6 vs. 2 | |
| Opteron 290 seriously loses in terms of the number of threads, 2 vs. 6 | Opteron 8439 SE significantly outperforms in terms of the number of threads, 6 vs.0 nanometers | The Opteron 8439 SE is superior in terms of manufacturability, its technical process is 45 nanometers, compared to the 90 nm of the Opteron 290 |
| Opteron 290 has a significant superiority in terms of thermal emission, its TDP is lower than the competitor and equals 95 W | The Opteron 8439 SE processor needs more powerful cooling, since its heat dissipation reaches 137 W | |
Opteron 29 core temperature limit0 goes up to 67 °C. Not far behind the Opteron 8439 SE |
The Opteron 8439 SE has a slightly higher core temperature limit, reaching up to 71 °C | |
| equals 256 kb | The L1 cache size of the Opteron 8439 SE processor is much larger than that of the Opteron 290 and is equal to 768 KB | |
| The L2 cache size of the Opteron 29 processor0 is much smaller than the Opteron 8439 SE and is equal to 2048 Kilobytes | The L2 cache size of the Opteron 8439 SE processor is much larger than that of the Opteron 290 and equals 3072 KB |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 290 | AMD Opteron 8439 SE | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerNow! | PowerNow! idle frequency reduction technology. |
||
| Halt mode | — | Stop mode. | |
| Stop Grant mode | — | Energy saving status. | |
| CoolCore Technology | — | Complements Cool’n’Quiet. Temporarily disable unused processor blocks. | |
| DDPM (Dual Dynamic Power Management) | — | Dual dynamic power management. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 290 | AMD Opteron 8439 SE | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Streaming SIMD processor extension. |
||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | ||
| SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | — | Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension. | |
| AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. | ||
| 3DNow! | Optional MMX extension for AMD processors. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 290 | AMD Opteron 8439 SE | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | Improved virus protection. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Opteron 290 | AMD Opteron 8439 SE | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD-V | — | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all the data: test results for all programs, clock speed, instructions, temperature data, number of cores and threads, auto-overclocking technologies, structure, year of release, socket, and more. The results of the overall rating showed that Opteron 8439The SE outperforms its rival Opteron 290 in most parameters. The Opteron 290 barely scores 1098.58 points compared to its competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
Almost all of our CPUs have been PassMark tested.
This is perhaps the most popular benchmark on the Internet. The benchmark includes a large pool of tools for large-scale evaluation of PC data, including the central processor. Among which are compression, integer calculations, encryption, game physics calculations, extended instruction checking, floating point calculations, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. At the same time, you can compare indicators with other configurations in a common database. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Opteron 8439 processorSE (2479 points) over Opteron 290 (952 points). The Opteron 290, with a score of 952, clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single threaded test
Uses ray tracing method. Single-Core — in its test uses only one thread for rendering and one core. The basic performance testing mode is a photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, multilevel reflections, spatial light sources, working with light, simulating global illumination, and procedural shaders.
MAXON appeared, it was based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. It is possible to check many processor systems. Works in operating systems Mac OS X, Windows. This benchmark for processors and video cards is already obsolete by now.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core is another test option in the Cinebench R10 benchmark, which uses a multi-threaded and multi-core testing method. It should be noted that the number of threads in this version of the program is limited to 16.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
64-bit version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark — which can load the CPU to the full, using all cores and threads. It differs from previous versions, 64 threads will be involved here. Opteron 8439 testingSE scores 2.83 in Cinebench version R11.5, which indicates a higher performance of this model. Whereas the Opteron 290 scores 1.09, far behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench version R11.
5 from Maxon. His tests are still relevant. In this Single-Core variant, tests are performed using one thread and one core. In tests, as before, ray tracing technology is used, a highly detailed three-dimensional room is calculated with many translucent and glass and crystalline spheres. The result of the test is the «frames per second» value. Testing in single-threaded mode of the Opteron 29 processor0 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 0.45 points, it does not lead much ahead of the competitor. But the Opteron 8439 SE itself scored 0.4 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-Thread version of Cinebench 15 — will check your assembly completely, showing everything that it is capable of. Enables all threads and CPU cores when rendering detailed 3D objects. It is ideal for testing modern multi-threaded processors from Intel and AMD. it can use 256 computational threads. Opteron 8439The SE, with a score of 247.23 points, unequivocally scores more in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15.
While its rival Opteron 290 is far behind with a score of 94.58 points in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from the Finnish Maxon development team. The Single Core version uses a single thread for rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many light sources, detailed objects and reflections. It conducts system testing: both CPU and video cards. For processors, the result of the analysis will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second. FPS. Single-threaded test of the Opteron 29 processor0 in the Cinebench R15 program showed a result of 47.71 points, slightly ahead of the competitor. With a score of 41.38 on this test, the Opteron 8439 SE is not far behind.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark
Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-threaded benchmark. It has wide cross-platform support for OS and devices, making Geekbench benchmarks the most widely used at present.
It’s In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core processor Opteron 8439 SE received 5207.64 points, which is significantly higher than the Opteron 290. In this test, the Opteron 290 scores a very low score of 2007.44 compared to the Opteron 8439 SE.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktop PCs. The program, like its earlier versions, can still be run on OS: Windows, Linux, Mac OS. For the first time, Android and iOS smartphones are also supported in this version. The Single-Core version uses 1 thread. Opteron 290 received the most points in single thread testing from Geekbench 4, with a score of 1335.09 points, but not far ahead of its rival. But the Opteron 8439 SE itself also scored a good score of 1162.59, slightly outperformed by the Opteron 290.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) will show how productive your system is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Cross-platform Geekbench is often used to test the system under Mac, but it can be run on both Windows and Linux.
The basic purpose is to test the performance of the CPU. The 32-bit version of the test uses only one CPU core and one thread.
Geekbench 2
Outdated version of Geekbench 2. On our site you can find up to 200 CPU models that have results from this program. To date, there are more recent updates: 5v and 4v.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In fact, this is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. Ideal test for multi-threaded processors and many cores. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it renders at the same rate. The number of frames processed per second is the result of the test. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Opteron 8439 SE is significantly higher and amounts to 66.18 FPS. But Opteron 290 performed poorly on the task, its speed was 25.59 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression.
It is important to be aware that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video programs. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the encoding is already done at a non-constant rate. The resulting value is also measured in frames per second. The result is a better quality video file. That is why the test results really reflect the performance of the system. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Opteron 8439 processorSE in mpeg4 format — the result was 15.62 FPS. Its rival Opteron 290 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 5.94 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the processor and video system. This test is very often used by overclockers and fans of overclocking processors and gamers. Created on the basis of DirectX by the Finnish company Futuremark. The processors are tested in two ways: the AI calculates the pathfinding, and the second test emulates the physics engine using PhysX.
Opteron 8439The SE performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 4054.82. The processor Opteron 290 coped worse with this task with 1550.61 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately two hundred CPUs on our website have 3DMark FSP test data. This is an exact test that makes calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
A familiar data archiver. The speed of RAR compression was checked by the algorithm, for this huge volumes of randomly generated files were used. The resulting speed in the process of processing «kilobytes per second» — this is the result of testing. Tests were done under Windows. Opteron 8439SE has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the result of file processing was 1689.56 Kb/s. The Opteron 290 was far behind it, the speed of which did not exceed 647.99 Kb / s.
TrueCrypt AES
Not exactly a tester, but the results of his work can evaluate the performance of the system.