Pentium 200mmx: OEM new Intel Pentium 200 MMX CPU FV80503200 SL27J/2.8V 200MHz : Electronics

Pentium 200 MMX Windows XP

Section Description Score Geekbench Score
Geekbench 2.1.2 for Windows x86 (32-bit)
Integer Processor integer performance 82 69
Floating Point Processor floating point performance 76
Memory Memory performance 46
Stream Memory bandwidth performance 46

Result Information

System Information

Integer Performance

Integer 82
Blowfish

single-core scalar
61

2.69 MB/sec

 

Blowfish

multi-core scalar
65

2.69 MB/sec

 

Text Compress

single-core scalar
73

242 KB/sec

 

Text Compress

multi-core scalar
70

238 KB/sec

 

Text Decompress

single-core scalar
89

375 KB/sec

 

Text Decompress

multi-core scalar
87

357 KB/sec

 

Image Compress

single-core scalar
82

685 Kpixels/sec

 

Image Compress

multi-core scalar
81

683 Kpixels/sec

 

Image Decompress

single-core scalar
56

952 Kpixels/sec

 

Image Decompress

multi-core scalar
57

945 Kpixels/sec

 

Lua

single-core scalar
135

52. 2 Knodes/sec

 

Lua

multi-core scalar
134

51.9 Knodes/sec

 

Floating Point Performance

Floating Point 76
Mandelbrot

single-core scalar
88

59.1 Mflops

 

Mandelbrot

multi-core scalar
90

59.0 Mflops

 

Dot Product

single-core scalar
63

30.5 Mflops

 

Dot Product

multi-core scalar
66

30.4 Mflops

 

LU Decomposition

single-core scalar
29

26.7 Mflops

 

LU Decomposition

multi-core scalar
29

25.7 Mflops

 

Primality Test

single-core scalar
55

8.33 Mflops

 

Primality Test

multi-core scalar
45

8. 42 Mflops

 

Sharpen Image

single-core scalar
70

165 Kpixels/sec

 

Sharpen Image

multi-core scalar
71

165 Kpixels/sec

 

Blur Image

single-core scalar
155

123 Kpixels/sec

 

Blur Image

multi-core scalar
156

123 Kpixels/sec

 

Memory Performance

Memory 46
Read Sequential

single-core scalar
54

67.9 MB/sec

 

Write Sequential

single-core scalar
102

72.0 MB/sec

 

Stdlib Allocate

single-core scalar
34

128 Kallocs/sec

 

Stdlib Write

single-core scalar
34

72. 4 MB/sec

 

Stdlib Copy

single-core scalar
6

6.49 MB/sec

 

Stream Performance

Stream 46
Stream Copy

single-core scalar
46

65.8 MB/sec

 

Stream Scale

single-core scalar
49

65.8 MB/sec

 

Stream Add

single-core scalar
45

70.9 MB/sec

 

Stream Triad

single-core scalar
47

67.7 MB/sec

 

Does the Pentium MMX Live up to the Expectations?

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Introduction

15 days after its official release I eventually received my very own Pentium MMX 200. It was actually a kind donation of Erik Wagner from Nutek Systems USA, IL. I installed it on my system and it it ran straight away without any problems even at 208/83, 225/75 and 250/83 MHz. I am currently using it on my ABIT IT5V at 225/75 MHz with 64 MB SDRAM.

Before you start bombarding me with emails, asking why I used 205/68 instead of 200/66, or 166/66 instead of 171/86, I would like to explain the reason for it. I wanted to show most impressingly, that under some conditions the Pentium MMX 166 is even faster than a slightly tuned Pentium Classic 200 at 205/68. Hence I used the slowest Pentium MMX to compete against the fastest official Pentium Classic at turbo frequency.

Windows Applications

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Benchmark(System: ABIT IT5V, 32 MB SDRAM, Diamond Stealth 64 Video VRAM w/2 MB) Pentium MMX205/68 Pentium Classic205/68 Pentium MMX166/66
Business Winstone 97 (@1024x768x256x60) 44. 3 40.1 41.2
High-End Winstone 97 (@1024x768x256x60) 19.5 17.3 17.5
Business Graphics Winmark 97 (@1024x768x65536x75) 55.1 45.1 49.8
High-End Graphics Winmark 97 (@1024x768x65536x75) 28.6 24.2 25.3

The most impressive performance Advantage of the new Pentium MMX CPUs are reached when running normal Windows applications. At the same CPU speed, the Pentium MMX shows a performance advantage of 16% over the Pentium Classic. This is only achieved by the new cache size and design, the branch prediction unit, the enlarged pipeline and all the other enhancements besides MMX. The performance advantage could be much bigger with image processing applications that are using the new MMX instructions.

For people who are using lots of Windows business applications, the Pentium MMX is certainly worth getting. Even the Pentium MMX 166 is already 5% faster than a maxed out Pentium Classic 200 at 205/68 MHz.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Direct3D Tunnel Benchmark RAMP (@640x480x256) [fps] 18.6 18.7 15.0
Direct3D Tunnel Benchmark RGB (@640x480x256) [fps] 9.0 4.1 7.6
Direct3DTest RAMP — Fill Rate [mpps] 5.89 5.41 5.09
Direct3DTest RAMP — Polygon Throughput [kpps] 150.29 142.00 133.25
Direct3DTest RAMP — Intersection Throughput [kpps] 1. 23 1.19 1.04
Direct3DTest RGB — Fill Rate [mpps] 5.41 1.46 4.57
Direct3DTest RGB — Polygon Throughput [kpps] 165.17 172.37 139.18
Direct3DTest RGB — Intersection Throughput [kpps] 1.00 0.32 0.84
Direct3D FlipCube Benchmark — RAMP (@640x480x256) [fps] 76 76 76
Direct3D FlipCube Benchmark — RGB (@640x480x256) [fps] 76 49 76
Direct3D Twist Benchmark — RAM (@640x480x256) [fps] 42.0 42.0 38.5
Direct3D Twist Benchmark — RGB (@640x480x256) [fps] 26. 0 16.0 22.0
Winbench 97 DirectDraw/Animate Screen Size 1280×1024 [pixels drawn] 42.4 35.6 38.3
Winbench 97 DirectDraw/Fill Color Depth 8 Bit Color [pixels drawn] 252 252 252
  • 1

Current page:
Introduction

Next Page DirectX Applications

Get instant access to breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips.

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors

Intel Pentium MMX vs. AMD K6

There are currently several competing products on the Socket-7 processor market. The most popular are Intel Pentium MMX and AMD K6. However, the latter, due to historical reasons, is not bought so well, which does not quite correspond to its capabilities. Differences in the technical characteristics of these two processors are shown in the table.

9000 9000

9000 9000 9000 70003

WinBench 97

To compare the performance of systems running Windows 95, the popular Ziff-Davis WinBench 97 test was used, which simulates the operation of basic applications. Testing was carried out in MS Windows 95 OSR 2 Rus with a patch installed to support the TX chipset and BusMastering drivers from Intel. The set resolution is 1024x768x32bit. In this system, processors were simply changed without changing the configuration and settings.

Based on these data, it is impossible to draw a conclusion about the unconditional superiority of the Pentium, since it surpasses the K6 only in terms of CPU16. In addition, a significant argument in favor of K6 is its price. At the time of this writing, it is $213 for the Intel Pentium 200 MMX processor and $160 for the AMD K6/PR2-200 (dealer prices shown after the November cut). If you build a diagram on the Bench scale by $, that is, dividing the result by the cost, then the superiority of K6 is obvious.

From this we can conclude that this processor is ideal for office use and work under Windows 95.

Xing Media Player

The second test performed on these processors was to evaluate the quality of video playback, measured by the frame rate of Xing Media Player.

Here Pentium showed better results in absolute terms. But the Bench feature is $1 higher for the K6:

So the K6 is a better buy. At the same time, if you need more performance, you will have to pay a little more money.

Quake

This test will be of interest to people who spend their time at the computer playfully. FPS was measured at the beginning of the game (on the spot) with the sound turned off.

Here the Pentium was also ahead in absolute terms, significantly overtaking the K6. This difference in results is explained by the fact that the Intel processor has the ability to perform operations with integers and fractional numbers at the same time, which is used in the game code. In K6, this possibility is not implemented. However, with the release of the next version of K6+, this problem will be solved. However, if you count the frames per second per dollar, then the K6 and Pentium are practically the same in this indicator.

Intel Media Benchmark

This benchmark was developed by Intel to test the performance of the MMX coprocessor. Results:

Intel’s MMX module is faster than the competitor, but the K6 is still a better buy due to its low price.

Memory speed

In conclusion, we measured the speed of various processors with memory and caches of the first and second levels. Traditionally, competitors’ processors have stood out for high memory performance, but this time the results in MB/s are as follows:

AMD K6 Intel Pentium MMX
Clock speeds (MHz) 166, 200, 233 166, 200, 233; mobile: 133, 150, 166
Level one (L1) cache 32K instruction, 32K data 16K instruction, 16K data
Level two (L2) cache Controlled by chip set Controlled by chip set
L2 cache speed Same as bus Same as bus
Type of bus Socket 7 SOCKET 7
BUS Speed ​​(MHZ) 66 60-66
Instructions Per Clock Cycle Pipelined FPU N Y
OUT-OF-Order Execution N
Process Technology 0.35µ CMOS

9000 86

cache l1 (reading/recording) cache L2 (reading/recording) Memory (reading/recording)
IP200MMX
AMD K6/PR2-200 732/755 253/128 127/74

However, do not be upset, since these figures are not very connected with real performance.

Overclocking

Fans and aficionados of Intel processors may claim that the Pentium overclocks better. However, my observations did not confirm this. Both copies (designed for 200 MHz) that I have overclocked to 262. 5 MHz without any problems, but no more. As for the heat dissipation, the K6 processor heats up more than the Pentium, but it also keeps working at a higher temperature.

Compatibility

In conclusion, I would like to note that the problems with the inoperability of a number of applications that were inherent in the AMD K5 processor were not observed in the AMD K6 processor. All basic and office software ran without errors or failures.

Summary

So, from the above, we can conclude that «all products are good, choose according to taste.» The K6 provides users with a better value for money investment, while the Pentium will appeal to people who want more performance and like brand names. So the choice is yours.

Test equipment provided by computer store ORKI

October 1, 1997

News

  • “The deal was cashless” — the structure of Rosatom gained control over the Elbrus processor developer

    February 10, 2023

  • Is this really an enthusiast processor? Xeon W7-2495X loses to Core i9-13900K in Geekbench test

    February 10, 2023

  • One of the most unusual motherboards. The Asus X670 Mini-ITX has one of the chipset chips located on a hidden separate board

    February 9, 2023

News section >

Computer processor Pentium Socket 7 — huge selection at the best prices

533 results.

Pentium Socket 7 Computer Processor

Many original white box machines from the 1990s had Socket 7 motherboards with accommodating processors. The Socket 7 processor socket is the original standard of Intel x86 processors that came out in 1995 and has the benefit of being backward compatible with older Socket 5 processors if desired. Learn more about this piece of equipment to help you choose the right one for you.

Which CPUs are Socket 7 based?

The Socket 7 market was diverse and also contained processors from manufacturers that were not affiliated with Intel. The Socket 7 was the only one at the time that supported a range of different CPUs and operating speeds. The P5 line of Pentium processors was the first provider of the socket, but other brands came along to offer the x86 computing chip. Processors that are compatible also include the AMD K5 and K6 series, Cyrix 6×86 and 6x86MX chips, IDT WinChips, Pentium MMX, Rise Technology mP6, some Geode chips, and legacy Socket 5 products.

What is the Super Socket 7 motherboard used for?

Over time, the platform produced by Intel became outdated and need replacing, so AMD had developed the Super Socket 7 standard to update the technology of the platform. A Super Socket 7 machine gave users the ability to use AGP video cards. The AMD K6-2 and K6-III were the processors that were used on this platform. This platform was released prior to the launch of their Athlon line of chips.

Can you use Socket 7 computers with updated Windows systems?

Although technically possible with some tweaking, these machines will be impacted when paired with operating systems made after Window XP. However, these work well with Windows 95, 98se, Windows 2000, and Windows XP.

Can a Socket 7 processor be overclocked?

The ability to overclock a processor depends on if the options are present in the motherboards firmware. In many cases, custom built computers will have motherboards with overclocking abilities. Overclocking may require the need to increase the voltage, FSB (front side bus) speeds, and RAM frequency. It should be noted that overclocking may significantly increase the operating temperature of the chip and decrease its lifespan.

Can you have multiple Socket 7 CPUs in one machine? Such motherboards were produced to be server and workstation systems rather than gaming or consumer motherboards. Such boards also had limited support for the type of CPU or RAM installed.

Content provided for informational purposes only.