Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/pentium-b950-vs-core-i3-2367m%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
1115G4
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/pentium-b950-vs-core-i3-2367m%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Radeon RX
580
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
1115G4
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Comparison of Intel Pentium B950 and Intel Core i3-380M
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium B950 and Intel Core i3-380M processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Intel Pentium B950
versus
Intel Core i3-380M
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium B950
- Newer processor, release date difference 7 month(s)
- 2 times the maximum memory size: vs 8 GB
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 3.154 vs 0.428
- About 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark more: 0.
683 vs 0.518 - 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.037 vs 0.618
| Release date | 15 May 2011 vs 26 September 2010 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.154 vs 0.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.683 vs 0.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.037 vs 0.618 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-380M
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- About 20% more clock speed: 2.
53 GHz vs 2.1 GHz - About 6% more max core temperature: 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA vs 85C
- About 50% larger L3 cache, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- About 8% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 19% more: 1179 vs 994
- About 6% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 365 vs 344
- About 21% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 788 vs 649
- Benchmark performance CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 1% more: 19.608 vs 19.451
| Thread count | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz vs 2.1 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA vs 85C |
| Level 3 cache | 3072 KB vs 2048 KB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1022 vs 943 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 1179 vs 994 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 365 vs 344 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 788 vs 649 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
19.608 vs 19.451 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium B950
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-380M
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
| Name | Intel Pentium B950 | Intel Core i3-380M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 943 | 1022 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 994 | 1179 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 344 | 365 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 649 | 788 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
3.154 | 0.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.451 | 19.608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.683 | 0.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.037 | 0.618 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Pentium B950 | Intel Core i3-380M | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Sandy Bridge | Arrandale |
| Production date | 15 May 2011 | 26 September 2010 |
| Place in the ranking | 2773 | 2811 |
| Processor Number | B950 | i3-380M |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Application | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price at first issue date | $49 | |
| Price now | $49 | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 12. 59 |
|
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.10 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
| Crystal area | 149mm | 81 mm2 |
| Level 1 cache | 128KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 512KB | 512KB |
| Level 3 cache | 2048KB | 3072KB |
| Process | 32nm | 32nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 85C | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA |
| Maximum frequency | 2. 1 GHz |
2.53 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Number of transistors | 624 Million | 382 million |
| System bus (FSB) | 2500MHz | |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | 17.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16GB | 8GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 800/1066 |
| Graphics base frequency | 650MHz | 500MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 10 GHz |
667MHz |
| Maximum GPU clock | 1.1 GHz | 667MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum number of monitors supported | 2 | 2 |
| SDVO | ||
| WiDi support | ||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. 5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
| Supported sockets | PGA988 | PGA988 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1×16, 2×8, 1×8 2×4 | 1×16 |
| Anti-Theft Technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Comparison Intel Pentium B950 vs Intel Core i3-390M which is better?
Home / Intel Pentium B950 VS Intel Core i3-390m
Intel Pentium B950
1
Devicelist
VS
Intel Core
14% 9000,000
Specifications Intel Pentium B950 and Intel Core i3-390M and compiled a list of benefits and a comparison table for you.
Find out which one to choose in 2023.
Benefits of Intel Pentium B950
|
Number of transistors |
|
504 million 122 million (31.9%) better than vs 382 million |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
85°C -5 °C (-5.6%) better than vs 90 °C |
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core |
|
1333 106 (8.6%) better than vs 1227 |
|
Permissible memory size |
|
16 GB 8 GB (100%) better than vs 8 GB |
Benefits of Intel Core i3-390M
Comparison winner
|
Threads |
|
4 2 (100%) better than vs 2 |
|
Base frequency |
|
2. At 0.567 GHz (27%) better than vs 2.1 GHz |
|
Maximum frequency |
|
2.66 GHz 0.56 GHz (26.7%) better than vs 2.1 GHz |
|
Release price |
|
$39 -95$ (-70.9%) better than vs 134 $ |
|
Value for money |
|
78.8% 10.9% (16.1%) better than vs 67.9% |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
2829 99 (3.6%) better than vs 2730 |
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
6405 1150 (21.9%) better than vs 5255 |
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
2811 666 (31%) better than vs 2145 |
667 GHz
| General information | |
|
Type |
|
| For laptops | For laptops |
|
Architecture code name |
|
| Sandy Bridge | Arrandale |
|
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 2 | 4
2 (100%) better than |
|
Base frequency |
|
| 2.1GHz | 2.667 GHz
Better than at 0.567 GHz (27%) |
|
Process |
|
| 32 nm | 32 nm |
|
Chip size |
|
| 131 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 504 million
122 million (31.9%) better than |
382 million |
|
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 2.1GHz | 2.66 GHz
Better than at 0.56 GHz (26.7%) |
|
Support 64 bit |
|
|
Max. number of processors in configuration |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| PGA988 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
|
Series |
|
| Intel Pentium | Intel Core i3 |
|
Release price |
|
| 134 $ | $39
-95 $ (-70.9%) better than |
|
Value for money The sum of all the benefits of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| 67.9% | 78.8%
10.9% (16.1%) better than |
|
Tire |
|
| n/a | 2500 MHz |
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| 85°C
-5 °C (-5. |
90 °C |
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| 2.0 | 2.0 |
|
Number of PCI-Express lanes |
|
| 16 | 16 |
|
Demand Based Switching |
|
| — | no data |
|
PAE |
|
| n/a | 36 bit |
|
Flex Memory Access |
|
| + | + |
|
eDP |
|
| + | n/a |
|
HDMI |
|
| + | no data |
|
FMA |
|
| + | + |
|
My WiFi |
|
| — | n/a |
|
FDI |
|
| + | + |
|
Anti-Theft |
|
| — | no data |
|
Fast Memory Access |
|
| + | + |
|
CRT |
|
| + | n/a |
|
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. |
|
| 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
|
L2 cache |
|
| 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
|
Level 3 cache |
|
| 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total) |
|
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output indicates the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 35W | 35 W |
|
EDB |
|
| + | + |
|
Clear Video |
|
| — | + |
|
InTru 3D |
|
| — | n/a |
|
DisplayPort |
|
| + | n/a |
|
SDVO |
|
| + | n/a |
| n/a | ||
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
||
| 2730 | 2829
99 (3. |
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
||
| 5255 | 6405
1150 (21.9%) better than |
|
|
x264 encoding pass 1 |
||
| 50 | n/a | |
|
x264 encoding pass 2 |
||
| 9 | n/a | |
|
3DMark06 CPU |
||
| 2145 | 2811
666 (31%) better than |
|
|
Geekbench 2 |
||
| 3922 | n/a | |
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core |
||
| 1333
106 (8.6%) better than |
1227 | |
| Technologies and Supplementary Instructions | |
|
Extended Instructions |
|
| Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4. |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| — | — |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle. |
|
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
|
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. |
|
| RAM options | |
|
RAM types |
|
| DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066 |
|
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| 16 GB
8 GB (100%) better than |
8 GB |
|
Number of memory channels |
|
| 2 | 2 |
| Virtualization technologies | ||
|
EPT |
||
|
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
||
| Integrated graphics | |
|
Maximum GPU clock |
|
| 1.10 GHz | 667 MHz |
|
Maximum number of monitors |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Clear Video HD |
|
|
Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card. | |