Pentium G3258 vs Core i3-4130
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 274 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 3% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-4130 — 238 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 — 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 18% cheaper than Pentium G3258 — $56.0 vs $68.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Apex Legends than Pentium G3258 — $0.24 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 — 4 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0. 29/FPS
79%
Price, $
$68
82%
FPS Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
232
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4130 3.4 3 FCLGA 1150 Processor BX80646I34130
Buy for $56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
893
FPS
874
FPS
League of Legends
221
FPS
216
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
238
FPS
233
FPS
Fortnite
1196
FPS
1171
FPS
Minecraft
386
FPS
378
FPS
VALORANT
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
810
100%
Multi-Core
1493
93%
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
740
91%
Multi-Core
1604
100%
Intel Pentium G3258 |
vs |
Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads |
4 |
3. 2 GHz | Base Clock Speed |
3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W |
TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier |
34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes |
Overclockable | No |
Intel Pentium G3258 vs Intel Core i3-4350
|
|
|
Intel Pentium G3258 vs Intel Core i3-4350
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Pentium G3258 on one side and the Intel Core i3-4350 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | Intel Pentium G3258 | Intel Core i3-4350 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Haswell | Haswell | ||||||
Core name | Haswell-DT | Haswell-DT | ||||||
Family | Pentium 3000 | Core i3-4000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80646G3258, |
BX80646I34350, |
||||||
Release date | Q2 2014 | Q1 2015 | ||||||
Lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 | 1.400.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Threads | 2 | 4 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,2 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | — | — | ||||||
Bus speed | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
Cache memory | 3 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 |
DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 21,3 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 53 W | 54 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
GPU execution units | 10 | 20 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 80 | 160 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 160 GFLOPS | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1150 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 72°C | 66. 8°C | ||||||
Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions |
||||||
Security |
— |
Execute Disable Bit |
||||||
Max display resolution |
— |
3840×2160@60Hz |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 331 | 362 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 653 | 971 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 124 | 138 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 244 | 374 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 317 | 322 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 624 | 872 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 1. 816 | 1.913 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 2.029 | 3.448 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.934 | 4.206 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
6.652 | 8.053 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
833 | 877 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
1.517 | 1.822 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
46,2 GFLOPS | 145,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
126 pts / W | 149 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-4350 is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Pentium G3258 is lower. The Intel Core i3-4350 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
362 971 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
331 653 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 49%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
138 374 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
124 244 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 53%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
322 872 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
317 624 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 40%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
1.913 3.448 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
1.816 2.029 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 70%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
4.206 8.053 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
3.934 6.652 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
4.537 8.807 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
3.207 4.849 |
In single core, the difference is 41%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 82%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
3.888 7.488 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
3.745 6.304 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
877 1.822 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
833 1.517 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
877 1.952 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
836 1.443 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.
On macOS:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
---|---|
Intel Core i3-4350 |
894 1.949 |
Intel Pentium G3258 |
736 1.360 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 43%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Pentium G3258 AMD equivalentIntel Core i3-4350 AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Pentium G3250
Comparison of Intel Pentium G3258 and Intel Core i3-4130
Comparative analysis of the Intel Pentium G3258 and Intel Core i3-4130 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology , Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
nine0003
Intel Pentium G3258
versus
Intel Core i3-4130
Advantages
reasons to choose Intel Pentium G3258
- Reveal processor, The difference in release 9 Month (S)
- is about 2% less energy consumption: 53 WATT VS 54 WATT
- Performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core about 4% better: 795 vs 766
- Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 39% more: 46.787 vs 33.765
- 2.6 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 1.278 vs 0.496
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark approx. 35% more: 3.792 vs 2.802
- About 32% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark: 4218 vs 3185
- About 32% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) benchmark : 4218 vs 3185
Issue date | June 2014 vs September 2013 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 54 Watt |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 795 vs 766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46. 787 vs 33.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.278 vs 0.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.792 vs 2.802 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 4218 vs 3185 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-4130
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- About 6% more clock speed: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
- Performance in PassMark2 benchmark — Single thread mark mark % more: 1890 vs 1860
- About 59% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 3303 vs 2080
- About 12% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 1651 vs 1480
- Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — FaceDetection (mPixels) benchmark /s) about 53% more: 1.973 vs 1.292
- GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 22% more: 820 vs 674
- GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) about 31 % more: 2010 vs 1531
- GFXBench 4.0 performance — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 22% more: 820 vs 674
- GFXBench 4.0 performance — Manhattan (Fps) about 31% more: 2010 vs 1531 9003 Number of threads
- Newer processor, release date difference 0 year(s) 11 month(s)
- approx. 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- About 39% more max core temperature: 100°C vs 72°C
- 3.5 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 53 Watt
nine0043
nine0039 1.973 vs 1.292
nine0043
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G3258
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4130
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
nine0040 | ||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
nine0040 | ||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0043
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
CPU 1 |
CPU 2 |
nine0040
Name | Intel Pentium G3258 | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1860 | 1890 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 3303 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 795 | 766 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1480 | 1651 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.292 | 1.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.787 | 33.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.258 | 0.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.278 | 0.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.802 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 674 | 820 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1531 | 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 4218 | 3185 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 674 | 820 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1531 | 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 4218 | 3185 |
Performance comparison
Intel Pentium G3258 | Intel Core i3-4130 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Haswell | |
Production date | June 2014 | September 2013 |
Price at first issue date | $77 | $120 |
Place in the ranking | 1795 | |
Price now | $178. 28 | $139.99 |
Processor Number | G3258 | i3-4130 |
Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 6.43 | 10.09 |
Applicability | Desktop | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3. 20 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Crystal area | 177mm | 177mm |
Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
Process | 22nm | 22nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 72°C | 72°C |
Maximum frequency | 3. 2 GHz | |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Number of transistors | 1400 million | |
ECC support | ||
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32GB | 32GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1. 5V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Graphics base frequency | 350MHz | 350MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
Maximum GPU clock | 1.1 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Video memory size | 1.7 GB | 2GB |
Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 |
Device ID | 0x41E | |
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
DisplayPort | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
VGA | ||
WiDi support | ||
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via VGA | [email protected] | [email protected] |
DirectX | 11.1/12 | 11.1/12 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
Supported sockets | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 53 Watt | 54 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | PCG 2013C |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Compare Intel Pentium G3258 and Intel Core i3-4100U
Comparative analysis of the Intel Pentium G3258 and Intel Core i3-4100U processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphic interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology , Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
nine0003
Intel Pentium G3258
versus
Intel Core i3-4100U
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Pentium G3258
Release date | |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-4100U
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 72°C |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 53 Watt |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G3258
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4100U
Name | Intel Pentium G3258 | Intel Core i3-4100U |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1860 | |
PassMark — CPU mark | 2080 | |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 795 | |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1480 | nine0043 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.292 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.278 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | ||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 674 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 1531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | ||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 674 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
Performance comparison
Intel Pentium G3258 | Intel Core i3-4100U | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Haswell | Haswell |
Issue date | June 2014 | June 4, 2013 |
Price at first issue date | $77 | |
Place in the ranking | 1795 | not rated |
Price now | $178. 28 | |
Processor Number | G3258 | i3-4100U |
Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 6.43 | |
Applicability | Desktop | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3. 20 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Crystal area | 177mm | 118mm |
Level 1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128KB |
Level 2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
Level 3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 3072KB |
Process | 22nm | 22nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 72°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 3. 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Number of transistors | 1400 million | 1400 million |
ECC support | ||
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 32GB | 16GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1. 5V | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphics base frequency | 350MHz | 200 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.00 GHz |
Maximum GPU clock | 1.1 GHz | 1GHz |
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Video memory size | 1.7GB | 2GB |
Integrated graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | |
Device ID | 0x416 | |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology | ||
DisplayPort | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum number of monitors supported | 3 | 3 |
VGA | ||
WiDi support | ||
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via eDP | [email protected] | |
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 | [email protected] | [email protected] |
Maximum resolution via VGA | [email protected] | N/A |
DirectX | 11.1/12 | 11.2/12 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1. 5mm |
Supported sockets | FCBGA1168 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 53 Watt | 15 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 12 | |
PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | 4×1, 2×4 |
Scalability | ||
Integrated IDE | ||
Integrated LAN | ||
Maximum number of SATA 6 Gb/s ports | nine0039 4 | |
Number of USB ports | 4 | |
PCI | ||
Total number of SATA ports | 4 | |
UART | ||
USB revision | 3. 0 | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Anti-Theft Technology | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
General Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
HD Audio | ||
Intel® Active Management Technology (AMT) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.
|