Pentium j1800: Intel Celeron J1800 Desktop Processor

Intel Celeron J1800 vs Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1800 and Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.

Intel Celeron J1800

Buy on Amazon

Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1800

CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 17% higher clock speed: 2. 58 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Around 43% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 73.3°C
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 65 nm
6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt

Launch date	1 November 2013 vs December 2007
Maximum frequency	2.58 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Maximum core temperature	105°C vs 73.3°C
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
Around 22% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 813 vs 664
Around 24% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 725 vs 585

L1 cache	64 KB (per core) vs 112 KB
PassMark — Single thread mark	813 vs 664
PassMark — CPU mark	725 vs 585

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1800
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200

PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

Name	Intel Celeron J1800	Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
PassMark — Single thread mark	664	813
PassMark — CPU mark	585	725
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	1.151
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.078
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.007
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	1389
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	1389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7.14
Geekbench 4 — Single Core		258
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core		438

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Celeron J1800	Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Architecture codename	Bay Trail	Conroe
Launch date	1 November 2013	December 2007
Launch price (MSRP)	$72
Place in performance rating	2460	2333
Processor Number	J1800	E2200
Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series	Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Status	Launched	Discontinued
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
64 bit support
Base frequency	2. 41 GHz	2.20 GHz
L1 cache	112 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	1024 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	65 nm
Maximum core temperature	105°C	73.3°C
Maximum frequency	2.58 GHz	2.2 GHz
Number of cores	2	2
Number of threads	2
Bus Speed		800 MHz FSB
Die size		77 mm2
Transistor count		105 million
VID voltage range		0. 8500V-1.5V
Max memory channels	2
Maximum memory size	8 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3L 1333	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Graphics base frequency	688 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	792 MHz
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics	Intel HD Graphics
Number of displays supported	2
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	25mm X 27mm	37. 5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported	FCBGA1170	LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	65 Watt
Max number of PCIe lanes	4
PCI Express revision	2.0
PCIe configurations	X4, X2, X1
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)	36-bit
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Intel Celeron J1800 vs Intel Pentium III 1400

Intel Celeron J1800 vs Intel Pentium III 1400

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron J1800 on one side and the Intel Pentium III 1400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the mini desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,6GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 1 cores, 1 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor	Intel Celeron J1800	Intel Pentium III 1400
Market (main)	Mini desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Silvermont	P6
Core name	Bay Trail-D	Tualatin
Family	Celeron 1000	Pentium III
Part number(s), S-Spec	FH8065301615103, FH8065301615104, QG9C, SR1SD, SR1UU	RK80530PZ017256, RK80530PZ01725E, QIC5, QLL1, SL64W, SL6C2, SL6HR
Release date	Q4 2013	Q4 2001
Lithography	22 nm	130 nm
Transistors	—	44. 000.000
Cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Base frequency	2,4 GHz	1,4 GHz
Turbo frequency	2,6 GHz	—
Cache memory	1 MB	512 KB
Max memory capacity	8 GB	4 GB
Memory types	DDR3L 1333	PC133 MHz ECC SDRAM
Max PCIe lanes	4	—
TDP	10 W	31 W
Suggested PSU	—	550W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	None
GPU execution units	4	—
GPU shading units	32	—
GPU base clock	688 MHz	—
GPU boost clock	792 MHz	—
GPU FP32 floating point	42,69 GFLOPS	—
Socket	BGA1170	PPGA370
Compatible motherboard	Socket BGA 1170 Motherboard	Socket PPGA 370 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	105°C	69°C
PassMark single thread	663	262
PassMark CPU Mark	577	183
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Intel Celeron J1800 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron J1800 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Celeron J1800 is lower. The Intel Celeron J1800 was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Celeron J1800	663 577
Intel Pentium III 1400	262 183

In single core, the difference is 153%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 215%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

Equivalence:

Intel Celeron J1800 AMD equivalentIntel Pentium III 1400 AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

0003

Benefits of Intel Celeron J1800

Release price

$72

-103 $ (-58.9%) better than

175 $

Power Demand (TDP)

10 W

-44 W (-81. 5%) better than

54 W

Benefits of Intel Pentium G3450

Comparison winner

Maximum frequency

3.4 GHz

At 0.82 GHz (31.8%) better than

2.58 GHz

Value for money

32.4%

8% (32.8%) better than

24.4%

Maximum core temperature

72°C

-33°C (-31.4%) better than

105 °C

Passmark

2426

1798 (286.3%) better than

628

Permissible memory size

32 GB

24 GB (300%) better than

8 GB

General
Type
Notebook	Desktop
Architecture code name
Bay Trail-D	Haswell
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.
2	2
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
2	2
Base frequency
no data	3.3 GHz
Process
22 nm	22 nm
Crystal size
n/a	177 mm2
Number of transistors
n/a	1 million
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
2. 58GHz	3.4 GHz Better than at 0.82 GHz (31.8%)
Support 64 bit

Max. number of processors in configuration
1	1
Socket
FCBGA1170	FCLGA1150
Series
Intel Celeron	no data
Release price
$72 -103 $ (-58.9%) better than	$175
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
24.4%	32.4% 8% (32.8%) better than
Maximum core temperature
105 °C	72°C -33 °C (-31. 4%) better than
vPro

TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.

PCI Express revision
2.0	to 3.0
Number of PCI-Express lanes
4	16
PAE
36bit	no data
Secure Key

Quick Sync
+	+
eDP
n/a	+
HDMI
n/a	+
Maximum resolution via VGA
n/a	1920×1200@60Hz
FDI
—	no data
Anti-Theft
—	no data
VGA
n/a	+
RST
—	no data
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
112 Kb	64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache
1 Mb	256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache
n/a	3 MB (total)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)
n/a	72 °C
Power consumption (TDP) Calculated heat output shows the average heat output during load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
10W -44 W (-81.5%) better than	54 W
EDB
+	+
Video memory size
n/a	1.7 GB
InTru 3D
—	no data
DisplayPort
n/a	+
DVI
n/a	+

2426

1798 (286. 3%) better than

Technologies and additional instructions
Extended instructions
n/a	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Turbo Boost
—	—
Idle States

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle.

Thermal Monitoring

Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.

RAM options
		DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
8 GB	32 GB 24 GB (300%) better than
Number of memory channels
2	2
ECC memory support EEC memory is designed specifically for systems with high requirements for data processing reliability. This type of memory automatically recognizes errors that occur. Commonly used in server computers.

Virtualization Technologies
VT-x

EPT

VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

Integrated graphics
		1.10 GHz
Maximum number of monitors
2	3
Clear Video HD

Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4
n/a	1920×1080@60Hz
Maximum resolution via eDP
n/a	2560×1600@60Hz
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort
n/a	2560×1600@60Hz
DirectX
n/a	11. 1/12
OpenGL
n/a	4.3

Comparison Intel Celeron J1800 vs Intel Pentium 2117U which is better?

Main / Processor / Intel Celeron J1800 vs Intel Pentium 2117U

Intel Celeron J1800

DeviceList score

Intel Pentium 2117U

12%

DeviceList Score

We compared the specifications of Intel Celeron J1800 and Intel Pentium 2117U and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Benefits of Intel Celeron J1800

Maximum frequency

2.58 GHz

0.78 GHz (43.3%) better than

1.8 GHz

Release price

$72

-62$ (-46.3%) better than

134 $

Power Demand (TDP)

10 W

-7 W (-41. 2%) better than

17 W

Benefits of Intel Pentium 2117U