Pentium m 370: Celeron M 370 vs Pentium M 735

■

Power Requirement Input Current Board Dimension Operation Temperature COM port & Printer Port Cable x 1 PS/2 keyboard & mouse cable x 1 1 to 3 power output cable 3.5” Embedded Miniboard with Intel Pentium M socket479, VGA, Audio, LAN, 2 x USB2.0, CF, Mini-PCI, 2 x COM PCI riser card supports right side one slot PCI riser card supports left side two slots Mini-PCI IEEE1394a add-on card For further product information please visit the website at http://www.commell.com.tw COMMELL IPC Division, Taiwan Commate Computer Inc. 8F, NO. 94, Sec. 1, Shin Tai Wu Rd., Hsi Chih, Taipei Shien, Taiwan….

All BVM catalogs and technical brochures

1. LV-67D — Intel Atom N270 Mini-ITX SBC

   2 Pages

2. LV-674 — Pentium D/Core 2 Duo LGA775 SBC

   2 Pages

3. LV-671 — LV-671NSMA, LV-671NSMP Pentium M/Celeron M SBC

   1 Pages

4. LV-673 — Pentium M/Celeron M 915GM/910GMLE SBC

   2 Pages

5. LV-675 — Pentium M Low Cost SBC

   2 Pages

6. LV-681 — Mini-ITX AMD Mobile Turion 64×2/Sempron SBC

   2 Pages

7. WEB-6682 — 5. 25″ VIA Eden/C3 Embedded Board Computer

   1 Pages

8. ADE-6020 — ATX Pentium 4/Celeron D 915GV LGA775 Motherboard

   1 Pages

9. PMCA — µATX Core Duo/Core Solo 945GME Motherboard

   1 Pages

10. WAFER-6612 — 3.5” Socket 479 Intel® Pentium M® 533MHz FSB SBC

    2 Pages

11. LE-564 — 5.25″ Embedded VIA Eden Miniboard with Quad LAN

    1 Pages

12. LE-375 — 3.5″ Embedded Intel Atom Z510P US15WP Miniboard Computer

    2 Pages

13. LE-363 — 3.5″ Fanless AMD GX533 Miniboard Computer

    2 Pages

14. LE-362 — 3. 5″ Embedded VIA Eden Miniboard Computer

    1 Pages

15. LE-575 — 5.25″ Embedded Intel Atom N270 945GSE Miniboard

    2 Pages

16. IEM-DB-7S-RS-R30 — ETX Baseboard with VGA/LVDS/TTL, Audio, CF Type II and Digital I/O

    1 Pages

17. MP-2501 WiFi — Mini-PCI 802.11b/g Wireless

    1 Pages

18. LV-668 — AMD Geode NX Processor SBC

    2 Pages

19. WPC-762 — Fanless Pentium M MicroPC

    2 Pages

20. LE-364

    2 Pages

21. HE-B71

    2 Pages

22. IMBA-Q670

    1 Pages

23. MS-C73

    1 Pages

24. LE-366

    1 Pages

25. PPC-F15A-HÔ1 Haswell — 15″ Intelligent Industrial Panel PC

    4 Pages

26. AFL-057A-LX/R/512

    8 Pages

27. AFOLUX ATOM — 5. 7″ to 19″ Intel Atom Range

    8 Pages

28. AFL-15i-HM55

    4 Pages

29. AFOLUX F08A — 8″ Flat-Bezel Intel Atom Panel PC

    6 Pages

30. AFL-W07A-N26/R/2G

    3 Pages

31. AFL2-W07A-N26

    3 Pages

32. AFL3-W10A-BT-J1/PC/2G

    3 Pages

33. AFL3-W07A-BT-N1/PC/2G

    3 Pages

34. HS-B70

    2 Pages

35. MS-C75

    2 Pages

36. LE-37D

    2 Pages

37. SBC-211

    1 Pages

38. LE-37E

    1 Pages

39. IVS-100-BT

    1 Pages

40. ECN-780-Q67

    2 Pages

41. IRS-100-QM87

    1 Pages

42. JBC390F541WXA

    1 Pages

43. BVME 6000

    2 Pages

44. WLP-7A20

    2 Pages

45. WTP-8B66

    2 Pages

46. PPC-F H81

    4 Pages

47. WTP-9A66-15

    2 Pages

48. AFOLUX Light Industrial Panel PC

    6 Pages

49. IMB-170

    4 Pages

50. IMB-180

    2 Pages

51. IMB-182

    2 Pages

52. P4BWA

    2 Pages

53. LE-376

    2 Pages

54. LS-373

    1 Pages

55. EBC-9653

    1 Pages

56. LV-667

    2 Pages

57. LV-66A

    2 Pages

58. LV-670

    1 Pages

59. lv-678

    1 Pages

60. lv-677

    2 Pages

61. LV-676

    2 Pages

62. lv-679

    2 Pages

63. LV-67B

    1 Pages

64. LV-67F

    1 Pages

65. LV-67G

    1 Pages

66. LV-67H

    1 Pages

67. Industrial Long Life Motherboards Micro ATX Core 2 Quad/Duo Q35 LGA775 Motherboard

    1 Pages

68. Industrial Long Life Motherboards ATX Core 2 Quad/Core 2 Duo Q965 LGA775 Motherboard

    2 Pages

69. Mini-ITX Motherboards Pentium M/Celeron M 915GM/910GMLE SBC

    2 Pages

70. Core 2 Duo Mobile GME965 Mini-ITX SBC

    2 Pages

71. Half-size PISA Embedded Core 2 Quad/Duo Q35 SBC

    2 Pages

72. 3. 5” ULV Intel® Celeron® SBC with Onboard CPU

    2 Pages

73. 5.25″ Embedded Intel Core 2 Quad/Duo Q35 LGA775 Miniboard

    1 Pages

74. 3.5″ Embedded AMD Geode LX 800 Miniboard Computer

    1 Pages

75. FS-A70 — PICMG 1.3 SBC Core 2 Quad/Duo/Pentium 4/D SBC

    1 Pages

76. FS-A71 — PICMG 1.3 SBC Core 2 Duo Mobile GME965 SBC

    1 Pages

Archived catalogs

1. EPC-910 Intel® ULV Celeron® M Processor Fanless PCherif

   1 Pages

2. 15” LCD Touch POS System

   1 Pages

3. Industrial Single Board Computer

   2 Pages

Compare

Remove all

Compare up to 10 products

COMMELL LE-370

|| Home | News | Product | ODM/OEM | Support | About | Distributor | Contact  ||

- Single Board Computer NEW

- Computer on Module

- Industrial PC Platform

- DSP & ARM Platform

- Transportation

- Capture & Surveillance

- Network Computers

- POS & Panel PC

- Industrial Peripheral

- Solid State Disk

- ODM/OEM Service

Intel Pentium / Celeron M processor, Intel 852GME & ICh5 Chipset. 

24-bit LVDS Interface, fast LAN , Compact Flash socket interface.

USB 2.0, RS232 ports , Mini-PCI  interface  

view larger image

-

Overview

-

Feature

-

Specification

-

Product Image

-

Ordering Guide

-

Datasheet (PDF Format)

-

Technical Document

  Overview

  Key Feature

  Specification

  Ordering Guide

3.5" Intel Pentium M / Celeron M processor with Intel 852GME & ICh5 Chipset

24-bit LVDS Interface, Audio, LAN, Mini-PCI and CFC Interfaces

Comparison of Intel Celeron M 370 vs Intel Pentium M 753

Brand Created on the basis mobile segment

9000 9000 CPU Nm Nm Nm

family

Differences

Intel Celeron M 370	Intel Pentium M 753
Celeron M 370 belongs to the Celeron 9 processor family0017	Pentium M 753 belongs to the Pentium
Celeron M 370 seriously wins in terms of turbo frequency, 1500 MHz versus 1200 MHz of the opponent compared to 1500 MHz
The Celeron M 370 processor will need more powerful cooling since its heat dissipation is 21 watts	Pentium M 753 wins significantly in terms of heat dissipation, its TDP is slightly lower than that of the competitor and is 5. 5 W

Comparison of instructions and technologies

Safety Technologies

Technology or instruction name	Intel Celeron M 370	Intel Pentium M 753	Short description
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology)		—	Trusted Execution Technology.
EDB (Execute Disable Bit)		—	Execute trip bit.

Other technologies and instructions

Technology or instruction name	Intel Celeron M 370	Intel Pentium M 753	Short description
Hyper-Threading		—	Hyperthreading technology.
Dynamic FSB frequency switching		—	Dynamic FSB switching.
DBS (Demand Based Switching)		—	Switching on request.
PAE (Physical Address Extension)	32 bit	—	Physical address extension.

Benchmarks

Overall performance rating

The overall rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account all the data: test results of all benchmarks, instructions, temperature conditions, structure, year of manufacture, auto-overclocking technologies, socket, frequency, number of cores and streams, and more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Celeron M 370 processor is not much superior to its rival Pentium M 753. The Pentium M 753 processor itself managed to score 1226.64 points, slightly losing to the competitor. nine0084

PassMark CPU Mark

All of our CPUs have been PassMark tested. The benchmark includes a wide range of tools for evaluating the performance of computers, including the CPU. Among which are encryption, integer calculations, extended instruction checking, floating point calculations, compression, game physics calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. In this case, it is possible to compare the received data with other configurations in the database. Perhaps the most popular benchmark in Runet. nine0084

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

The main speed test mode is working with light, simulating global illumination, spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, as well as procedural shaders. This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is already obsolete in our time. The ray tracing method is used. Single-Core version — uses only one rendering thread and one core in its test. It is possible to test multi-processor systems. Released by MAXON, it was based on the Cinema 4D 3D editor. The test is carried out in operating systems Windows, Mac OS X.

Cinebench 10 (32-bit) Multi-thread test

Multi-Core version is another test variant in Cinebench R10 that uses multi-thread and multi-core testing method. It is important to note that the possible number of threads in this version of the program is limited to 16.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi-threaded version of CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark, it can fully load the processor, including all threads and cores. Unlike older versions, 64 threads will be used here. nine0084

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Excellent multifunctional Cinebench version 11.5 from the Maxon team. His tests to this day have not lost their relevance. In this Single-Core variant, tests occur through the use of one thread and one core. In checks, ray tracing technology is still used, a high-polygonal three-dimensional room is rendered with many glass and translucent and crystalline spheres. The benchmark’s value is «frames per second». nine0084

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-core test

Multi Core Cinebench 15 — will test your system to the fullest, showing everything that it is capable of. It is ideal for testing new multithreaded CPUs from AMD and Intel. can use 256 computation threads. Diagnostics will use all CPU cores and threads when rendering highly detailed 3D models.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Cinebench Release R15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from Finns from Maxon. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of highly detailed objects, light sources and reflections. In this version of Single Core, only one thread is used for rendering. It checks the entire system: both video cards and processors. For the CPU, the result of the calculation will be the number of PTS points, and for graphics adapters, the value of frames per second. FPS. nine0084

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

This is a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 test. It has wide cross-platform support for various operating systems and devices, making Geekbench tests the most common today.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single Thread

Geekbench 4’s latest single thread for laptop and desktop testing. For the first time in this version, smartphones on iOS and Android operating systems are also supported. Single-Core check uses 1 thread. The program, like its earlier versions, can still be run on operating systems: Mac OS, Windows, Linux. nine0084

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi Core version of Geekbench 3 — will allow you to make a big test of the «strength» of your assembly and demonstrate how productive your OS is.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded benchmark

Cross-platform Geekbench is usually used for Mac system evaluation, but it will run on both Linux and Windows. The basic purpose is to test CPU performance. The 32-bit version of the benchmark uses no more than one thread and one CPU core. nine0084

Geekbench 2

To date, there are newer options: the fifth and fourth. On our site you can find about two hundred processor models that have test data in this benchmark. An almost completely outdated version of the Geekbench 2 benchmark.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

In fact, this is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD video files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This is the most appropriate test for multi-core and multi-thread processors. The number of frames processed per second is the result of the check. This test is faster than Pass 2 because encoding is done at a constant speed. nine0084

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2

This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. As a result, we get a better quality video file. You need to be aware that a very real task is being simulated, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of encoders. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the encoding is at a variable rate. The result obtained is also determined by frames per second. Therefore, the test results realistically reflect the performance of the platform. nine0084

3DMark06 CPU

This benchmark is often used by gamers and fans of overclocking processors and overclockers. Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the video system, and CPU. Based on DirectX 9.0 by Futuremark. The CPUs are tested in 2 ways: the game AI calculates the pathfinding and the second test simulates the game physics engine using PhysX.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

We can say that approximately 200 processors on our site have 3DMark Fire Strike Physics data. It presents an accurate benchmark that calculates in-game physics. nine0084

WinRAR 4.0

A well-known archiver. The tests were carried out under Windows OS. The speed of compression into the RAR format was checked, for these purposes large amounts of random data were used. The resulting speed in the process of processing «kilobytes per second» — this is the result of the test.

TrueCrypt AES

Not exactly a benchmark, but the results of its work will help to evaluate the performance of the system. Our site shows the results of encryption speed in Gb / s using the AES algorithm. It can fully function in OS: Linux, Windows and Mac OS X. Unfortunately, support for this project was stopped on May 28, 2014. It includes the ability to quickly encrypt disk partitions. nine0084

Comparison Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Intel Celeron M 370 which is better?

Home / Intel Pentium 4 630 VS Intel Celeron M 370

Intel Pentium 4 630

2%

Devicelist

VS

Intel Celeron M 370

9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% specifications of the Intel Pentium 4 630 and Intel Celeron M 370 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023. nine0084

Benefits of Intel Pentium 4 630

Comparison winner

Benefits of Intel Celeron M 370

nine0013

nine0013

nine0102 +

nine0102 no data

nine0102