Intel Pentium II (Pentium 2) Slot1 Processor 233 MHz MMX 512kB L2-Cac, € 12,99
Intel Pentium II (Pentium 2) Slot1 Processor 233 MHz MMX 512kB L2-Cache SL264 80522PX233512
Supplied with thermal paste.
If you are not sure whether the CPU offered here is suitable for your PC or mainboard, please ask before purchasing.
| Processor Technical Specifications | |
| Brand | Intel |
| Part # | SL264 |
| Prozessor Type | Desktop |
| Series | Pentium II |
| Processor Code Name | Klamath |
| Core Stepping | C0 |
| Level 2 cache size | 512 kB |
| CPU Socket Type | SECC (Slot 1) |
| Clock Speed | 233 MHz |
| Bus Speed | 66 MHz |
| Clock multiplier | 3,5 |
| VID Voltage Range | 2. |
| Manufacturing Technology | 0.35 micron |
| Cooling Device | No |
| Thermal Power | 34.8 W |
Contact data
No title MsMr
Title — optional
First name
Last name
Company — optional
Phone — optional
Question about item
Your question
Contact data
Compaq Armada 1573D — full specs, details and review
Get the key specs, technical data, ratings and full review of Compaq Armada 1573D all in one place.
Compare your selected model with other alternatives and give your decision on the best laptop a solid base with our comprehensive overview.
design and dimensions
display
processor
memory
storage
audio & video
battery
ac adapter
input
connections & expansions
software
miscellaneous
|
DISPLAY Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Screen Size (Type) | 12.1″ |
|---|---|
| Screen Resolution | 800 x 600 (SVGA) |
| Widescreen | No |
|
PROCESSOR Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| CPU | Intel Pentium MMX 233 MHz |
|---|---|
| Cache | L2 — 512 KB — Write-Back |
| Front Side Bus | 66 MHz |
|
MEMORY Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| RAM | 32 MB (provided memory is soldered) |
|---|---|
| Max RAM Supported | 96 MB |
| RAM Type | EDO RAM — non-ECC |
| Form Factor | SO-DIMM 144-pin |
| Slots Qty | 1 |
|
STORAGE Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Floppy Disk Drive |
3. 5″ 1.44 MB floppy — internal
|
|---|---|
| Main Storage Size (HHD/SSD) | 3.2 GB |
| Optical Drive | 1 x CD-ROM |
| Read Speed | 20x |
| Compliant Standards | Kodak PhotoCD, CD-DA, CD-XA, CDi |
|
AUDIO & VIDEO Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Video Memory | 2 MB VRAM |
|---|---|
| Supported Display Graphics | XGA (1024×768), SVGA (800×600), VESA BIOS VBE 2.0, SXGA (1280×1024) |
| Sound | Microphone |
| Compliant Standards |
Sound Blaster, Sound Blaster 16/Pro, AdLib, Microsoft WSS 1. 0/2.0
|
|
BATTERY Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Technology | Lithium Ion |
|---|---|
| Installed Qty | 1 |
| Max Supported Qty | 2 |
|
AC ADAPTER Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Input | AC 115/220 V ± 10% (50/60 Hz) |
|---|---|
| Compliant Standards | EPA Energy Star |
|
INPUT Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Type | Keyboard, touchpad |
|---|
|
CONNECTIONS & EXPANSIONS Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Expansion Bays | 2 x (0 free) |
|---|---|
| Slots |
1 x PC Card (1 free) 1 x memory (1 free) |
| Interfaces |
1 x parallel — IEEE 1284 (EPP/ECP) — 25 pin D-Sub (DB-25) 1 x serial — RS-232C — 9 pin D-Sub (DB-9) 1 x display / video — VGA — 15 pin HD D-Sub (HD-15) 1 x keyboard / mouse — generic — 6 pin mini-DIN (PS/2 style) 1 x infrared IrDA 1 x audio — line-In — mini-phone stereo 3.  5 mm 1 x microphone — input — mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 1 x headphones — output — mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm 1 x docking / port replicator |
|
SOFTWARE Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Software Included | Drivers & Utilities |
|---|---|
| Operating System (OS) | Microsoft Windows 95 |
|
MISCELLANEOUS Compaq Armada 1573D |
|---|
| Integrated Options | Microphone, stereo speakers, keyboard, touchpad |
|---|---|
| Compliant Standards | Plug and Play |
| Max Operating Temperature | 35 °C |
| Min Operating Temperature | 10 °C |
| Humidity Range Operating | 10 — 90% |
| Max Altitude Operating | 3000 m |
| Manufacturer Warranty | Limited warranty — parts and labour — 1 year — carry-in |
Similar Laptops
IBM ThinkPad 310E (2600)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 310ED (2600)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 380ED (2635)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 380XD (2635)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 560E (2640)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 560X (2640)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 600 (2645)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 770 (9548)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 770E (9548)
Specifications
IBM ThinkPad 770ED (9549)
Specifications
HP OmniBook SOJOURN
Specifications
HP OmniBook 4150
Specifications
Other Compaq Laptops
Compaq Armada 7800
Specifications
Compaq Armada 7790
Specifications
Compaq Armada 7792
Specifications
Compaq Armada 1560
Specifications
Compaq Armada 1570
Specifications
Compaq Armada 1572
Specifications
Compaq Armada 7380
Specifications
Compaq Armada 1700
Specifications
Compaq Armada SB
Specifications
Compaq Armada 7400
Specifications
Compaq Armada 3500
Specifications
Compaq Armada 6500
Specifications
Comparison of Intel Pentium 150 vs Intel Pentium 233 MMX
| Intel Pentium 150 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX |
|---|---|
| Both processor models from intel brand | |
| Both models came out at about the same time | |
| Two CPU models belong to the desktop type | |
| Processors have similarities in terms of the number of cores: 1 core | |
| Two models have 1 thread each | |
| The allowable core temperature for both processor models reaches 70 degrees | |
| Intel Pentium 150 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Pentium processor core architecture 150 is called P54C | The core architecture of the Pentium 233 MMX processor is called P55C | |
| Intel Pentium 150 runs on Socket 5, Socket 7 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX runs on juice no Socket 7 | |
| Intel FSB data Pentium 150 — 60 MHz | System bus data Intel Pentium 233 MMX — 66 MHz | |
| Pentium 150 seriously loses in terms of frequency, 150 MHz versus 233 MHz | Pentium 233 MMX significantly outperforms in terms of base clock frequency, 233 MHz compared to 150 MHz of the opponent | The Pentium 233 MMX is far superior in terms of manufacturability, its manufacturing process is 350 nm, versus 600 nm for the rival Pentium 150 |
| The Pentium 150 model has significantly fewer transistors, 3 million versus 5 million | The Pentium 233 MMX model has a much larger number of transistors, 5 million vs. 3 million |
|
| The Pentium 150 is far ahead in terms of thermal dissipation, its TDP is slightly lower than that of the competitor and reaches 11.6 W | 900 16 For Pentium 233 processor MMX needs more powerful cooling since its thermal design power reaches 17 Watts | |
| 0017 | The level 1 cache of the Pentium 233 MMX processor is significantly larger than that of the Pentium 150 and equals 32 KB |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 150 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | — | Multimedia extensions. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 150 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMM (System Management mode) | System control mode. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The main rating is calculated using a formula that takes into account all indicators, such as test results in benchmarks, instructions, architecture, release year, socket, technology, number of cores and threads, temperature data, clock speed, and much more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Pentium 233 MMX outperforms its rival Pentium 150 in most parameters. The Pentium 150 barely gains 27.02 points in comparison with the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
Perhaps the most popular benchmark on the Internet. The benchmark includes a wide range of tests for evaluating PC data, including the CPU. Among them are compression, game physics calculations, floating point calculations, integer calculations, extended instruction checking, encryption, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. At the same time, it is possible to compare the results with other configurations in the database.
Almost all of our processors have been tested in PassMark. The Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Pentium 233 MMX processor (35 points) over the Pentium 150 (23 points). The Pentium 150 with a score of 23 clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
It is possible to test multiple processor systems. The basic mode of passing performance tests is working with light, global illumination simulation, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, and procedural shaders. Works on Windows, Mac OS X. Ray tracing method is used. MAXON appeared, it was based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. This benchmark for video cards and processors is already obsolete in our time. Single-Core — uses only one rendering thread and one core in its test.
Cinebench 10 (32bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-core version is another way to test in Cinebench R10 benchmark, which already uses multi-thread and multi-core test mode.
It is important to note that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
64-bit version of CINEBENCH 11.5 benchmark, — can test the full CPU, including all threads and cores. Unlike previous versions, 64 threads will be used here. Testing the Pentium 233 MMX in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 0.04 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Pentium 150 gets 0.03 points, it is far behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
An excellent fully functional Cinebench 11.5 from the Maxon team. His tests still have not lost their relevance. In testing, the ray tracing process is also used, a detailed three-dimensional space is calculated with many glass and crystal and translucent spheres. In this case, Single-Core tests happen using one thread and one core. The result of the test is the value «number of frames per second».
The results of the single-thread test for the Pentium 233 MMX in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 0.04 points. But the Pentium 150 itself, scoring 0.03 points in this test, is far behind it.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-core test
Multi Core Cinebench 15 — tests your system completely, showing everything it can. Ideal for new multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel. capable of using 256 threads. All threads and CPU cores are enabled when rendering detailed 3D models. The Pentium 233 MMX, with a score of 3.69 points, unconditionally scores more points in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Pentium 150 lags far behind with a score of 2.4 points in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from Finns from Maxon. The Single Core version uses a single thread for rendering. A system test is being performed: both video cards and processors.
For the CPU, the result of the calculation will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second. FPS. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of light sources, complex objects and reflections. The single-threaded test of the Pentium 233 MMX processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 3.65 points. Compared to it, its Pentium 150 competitor fails this test with a score of 2.4 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is already a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is the support for different devices and OS that makes Geekbench tests the most popular today. In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core, the Pentium 233 MMX received a score of 88.1, which is significantly higher than the Pentium 150. In this test, the Pentium 150 scores a very low score of 57.93 compared to the Pentium 233 MMX.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single thread test
The program, like its earlier versions, can be run on Mac OS, Windows, Linux.
Single-Core check uses 1 thread. The current single-thread version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktops. For the first time ever, Android and iOS smartphones are also supported in this version of the benchmark. The Pentium 233 MMX scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 87.6. But its competitor Pentium 150 is faring much worse — 57.58 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Geekbench 3’s Multi-Core test — will allow you to make a powerful stress test of your build and show how stable your system is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
The Geekbench cross-platform tester is often used to evaluate a Mac system, although it can work on both Windows and Linux. The basic purpose is to check the performance of the CPU. The Single Core version of the benchmark uses one thread and one CPU core.
Geekbench 2
Seriously outdated version of Geekbench 2. Today there are newer versions, 5v and fourth.
We have almost two hundred processor models on our site that have test data in this benchmark.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In fact, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This is the most suitable test for multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs. The number of frames processed per second. is the test result. This test is faster than Pass 2, as the calculation is carried out at the same speed. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Pentium 233 MMX is much higher and amounts to 1.05 FPS. But the Pentium 150 coped poorly with the task, its speed was 0.68 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. It is important to understand that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video encoders. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the rendering occurs at a non-constant rate.
The final result is also measured in frames per second. The result is a better quality video file. Therefore, the results of the tests really evaluate the performance of the platform. When measuring the compression speed of a video file by the Pentium 233 MMX processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 0.23 Frames / s. Its competitor Pentium 150 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 0.15 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
Benchmark to evaluate the performance of the video system, and the CPU. Written on the basis of DirectX by the Finnish company Futuremark. CPUs are tested in 2 ways: the game’s artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and another test simulates the system using PhysX. This test is often used by gamers and fans to overclock processors and overclockers. The Pentium 233 MMX performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, scoring 55.05 points. The Pentium 150 handled this task worse with 36.27 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
We can say that approximately 200 processors on our Internet resource have data on 3DMark Fire Strike Physics tests.
It presents a math test that makes calculations in game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
Everyone knows the file archiver. The speed of compression into the RAR format was tested, for this huge amounts of random data were used. The resulting speed during compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the test indicator. The tests were done under the Windows operating system. Pentium 233 MMX has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the result of file processing was 30.04 Kb/s. It was far behind the Pentium 150, whose speed did not exceed 19.8 Kb/s.
TrueCrypt AES
Not really a tester, but the results of his work will help to get an estimate of the performance of the entire computer. Unfortunately support for this project was stopped in 2014. It includes the ability to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It can fully function in various Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems. Our website demonstrates the results of encryption speed in gigabytes per second using the AES algorithm.
Comparison of Intel Pentium 133 vs Intel Pentium 233 MMX0001
Features and benefits of both
processors
| Intel Pentium 133 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX |
|---|---|
| Two CPU models from intel brand | |
| Two models were released around the same time time | |
| Two CPU models belong to desktop type | |
| Two CPUs have the same 66 MHz bus performance | |
| Processors have 1 core each | |
| Two processor models have 1 thread each | |
| The maximum core temperature of the presented CPUs is 70 degrees | |
| Intel Pentium 133 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX |
|---|---|
| The core architecture of the Pentium 133 processor is called P54C | The core architecture of the Pentium 233 MMX processor is called P55C |
| Intel Pentium 133 runs on Socket 5, Socket 7 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX runs on juice no Socket 7 |
| Pentium 133 is significantly behind in in terms of clock frequency, 133 MHz compared to 233 MHz | The Pentium 233 MMX is clearly superior in terms of base frequency, 233 MHz compared to 133 MHz Pentium 133 |
| Pentium 133 is less technologically advanced, because its technical process is much larger and equals 600 nanometers tium 133 | |
| The Pentium 133 has significantly fewer transistors, 3 million versus 5 million | The Pentium 233 MMX processor has a much higher number of transistors, 5 million versus 3 million |
Pentium 133 outperforms in terms of heat dissipation, its TDP is slightly lower than the competitor and is equal to 11. 2 Watts |
The Pentium 233 MMX model will need more powerful cooling, since its TDP reaches 17 Watts 9001 7 |
| The L1 cache of the Pentium 133 CPU is much smaller compared to the Pentium 233 MMX and is 16 KB | The first level cache of the Pentium 233 MMX CPU is much larger than that of the Pentium 133 and is 32 Kilobytes |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 133 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | — | Multimedia extensions. |
| Technology or instruction name | Intel Pentium 133 | Intel Pentium 233 MMX | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMM (System Management mode) | System control mode. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account indicators such as benchmark test results, release year, number of cores, threads, clock speed, architecture, socket, temperature, automatic overclocking, instructions, and also much more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Pentium 233 MMX outperforms its rival Pentium 133 in most parameters. The Pentium 133 model barely gains 21.76 points in comparison with the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
It includes a large set of tools for large-scale assessment of computer data, in particular the CPU. Among which are encryption, integer calculations, extended instruction checking, compression, floating point calculations, game physics calculations, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. It is also possible to compare the received data with other configurations in a common database. All CPUs presented on our website have passed PassMark tests.
Perhaps the most popular benchmark tester on the Internet. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Pentium 233 MMX processor (35 points) over the Pentium 133 (19points). The Pentium 133 with a score of 19 clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-thread test
Single-Thread — uses only one core and one thread for rendering. The test is carried out under the control of Mac OS X, Windows systems. Released by MAXON, it was based on the Cinema 4D 3D editor. It uses a method of geometric optics — ray tracing. It is possible to check many processor systems. The basic mode of passing tests for speed is multilevel reflections, spatial light sources, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, working with light, simulating global illumination, as well as procedural shaders. This benchmark for testing processors and video cards is now very outdated.
Cinebench 10 (32bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread is another benchmark in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core test.
Keep in mind that the possible number of threads in this version of the program is limited to 16.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark — which has the ability to test the processor at 100%, including all threads and cores. Unlike previous versions of the program, 64 threads are already used here. Testing the Pentium 233 MMX in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 0.04 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Pentium 133 gets 0.02 points, it is far behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench 11.5 from Maxon. His tests are still relevant. In checks, as before, the ray tracing method is used, a high-polygonal 3D room is calculated with a large number of crystalline and translucent and glass balls. In this Single-Core variant, tests occur using one core and one thread. The result of the test is the «frames per second» parameter.
The results of the single-thread test for the Pentium 233 MMX in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, its score was 0.04 points. But the Pentium 133 itself, scoring 0.02 points in this test, is far behind it.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
The Multi-Thread version of Cinebench 15 will load your assembly to the full, showing everything that it is capable of. All CPU cores and threads are turned on in the process of rendering detailed 3D models. Ideal for testing modern multi-threaded processors from AMD and Intel. it can use 256 computational threads. The Pentium 233 MMX, with a score of 3.69, unconditionally scores more in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Pentium 133 is far behind with a score of 1.9 in the test9 points.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release R15 is the latest tester from the Finnish Maxon team today. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many light sources, objects and reflections.
In the Single Core version, 1 thread is involved in rendering. The system is being checked: both video cards and CPU. For processors, the result of the analysis is the value of PTS points, and for graphics processors, the number of frames per second FPS. The single-threaded test of the Pentium 233 MMX processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 3.65 points. Compared to it, its Pentium 133 competitor fails this test with a score of 1.9.9 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is the multi-platform OS and device support that makes Geekbench tests the most common now. In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core, the Pentium 233 MMX received a score of 88.1, which is significantly higher than the Pentium 133. In this test, the Pentium 133 scores a very low score of 47.82 compared to the Pentium 233 MMX.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single thread test
The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing desktop PCs and laptops.
The Single-Core check uses one processor thread. The program, like its earlier versions, can be run on OS: Windows, Mac OS, Linux. For the first time, Android and iOS smartphones are also supported in this version. The Pentium 233 MMX scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 87.6. But its competitor Pentium 133 is doing much worse — 47.51 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-thread version of Geekbench 3 benchmark — can allow you to stress test your PC and show the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
The 32-bit version of the benchmark loads no more than one thread and one CPU core. Cross-platform Geekbench is usually used to evaluate the system under Mac, but it works on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test CPU performance.
Geekbench 2
An outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester. On our site you can find up to 200 CPU models that have test results in this benchmark.
To date, there are newer versions: the fifth and 4v.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
This is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This is the most suitable test for multi-core and multi-thread processors. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it renders at a constant rate. Number of frames processed per second. is the benchmark for the test. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Pentium 233 MMX is much higher and amounts to 1.05 FPS. But the Pentium 133 coped poorly with the task, its speed was 0.57 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. It is important to understand that a completely real task is being simulated, and the x264 codec is used in many video encoders. The final result is also measured in frames per second. The result is a higher quality video file. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing is already happening at a variable rate.
For this reason, the results of the checks really evaluate the performance of the platform. When measuring the compression speed of a video file by the Pentium 233 MMX processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 0.23 Frames / s. Its competitor Pentium 133 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 0.13 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
This benchmark is very often used by overclockers and gamers. Created using the DirectX 9.0 API by the Finnish team Futuremark. Benchmark program for checking the video system and processor. Processors are tested in two ways: the game AI calculates the pathfinding, and the second test emulates the game engine using PhysX. The Pentium 233 MMX performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, scoring 55.05 points. The Pentium 133 processor coped worse with this task, receiving 29.88 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately 200 processors on our website have 3DMark FSP test data.