Processor comparison site: Intel Core i5-8250U @ 1.60GHz vs Intel Core i5-7200U @ 2.50GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Intel Core i9 13900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X: performance comparison

Intel Core i9 13900K

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.0 GHz Intel Core i9 13900K with 24-cores against the 4.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7950X with 16-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments (8)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i9 13900K

100

Ryzen 9 7950X

100

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i9 13900K

100

Ryzen 9 7950X

100

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i9 13900K

Ryzen 9 7950X

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i9 13900K

Ryzen 9 7950X

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 7950X and 13900K

Advantages of Intel Core i9 13900K

Has 8 more physical cores
Consumes up to 26% less energy than the Ryzen 9 7950X – 125 vs 170 Watt
Around 16. 5 GB/s (23%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

More modern manufacturing process – 5 versus 10 nanometers
Has 28 MB larger L3 cache size
6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.7 GHz vs 5.4 GHz)

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i9 13900K
+10%

2267

Ryzen 9 7950X

2056

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 13900K
+2%

38852

Ryzen 9 7950X

37997

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i9 13900K
+3%

2267

Ryzen 9 7950X

2203

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i9 13900K
+3%

24117

Ryzen 9 7950X

23384

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 13900K and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

General

Vendor	Intel	AMD
Released	September 27, 2022	August 29, 2022
Type	Desktop	Desktop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	Raptor Lake-S	Raphael
Model number	i9-13900K	—
Socket	LGA-1700	AM5
Integrated GPU	UHD Graphics 770	Radeon Graphics

Performance

Cores	24	16
Threads	32	32
Base Frequency	3. 0 GHz	4.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency	5.4 GHz	5.7 GHz
Bus frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	30x	45x
L1 Cache	80K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 Cache	2MB (per core)	1MB (per core)
L3 Cache	36MB (shared)	64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	Yes	Yes

Transistors	—	6.57 billions
Fabrication process	10 nm	5 nm
TDP	125 W	170 W
Max. temperature	100°C	95°C

Integrated Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 770	AMD Radeon Graphics
GPU Base Clock	300 MHz	—
GPU Boost Clock	1650 MHz	2200 MHz
Shading Units	256	—
TMUs	16	—
ROPs	8	—
Execution Units	32	—
TGP	15 W	—

iGPU FLOPS

Core i9 13900K

0. 78 TFLOPS

Ryzen 9 7950X

n/a

Memory support

Memory types	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200
Memory Size	128 GB	128 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	89.6 GB/s	73.1 GB/s
ECC Support	Yes	Yes

Official site	Intel Core i9 13900K official page	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X official page
PCI Express Version	5.0	5.0
PCI Express Lanes	20	28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i9 13900K

523 (27. 9%)

Ryzen 9 7950X

1350 (72.1%)

Total votes: 1873

ompetitors

1.
Core i9 13900K or Ryzen 9 5950X

2.
Core i9 13900K or Core i9 10900K

3.
Core i9 13900K or Core i5 13600K

4.
Core i9 13900K or Ryzen 9 7900X

5.
Ryzen 9 7950X or Core i9 12900K

6.
Ryzen 9 7950X or Ryzen 7 5700X

7.
Ryzen 9 7950X or Core i7 13700K

8.
Ryzen 9 7950X or Core i9 13900KF

Compare Mobile Processors | Chipset Comparison

Mobiles›
Compare Mobile Processors

Mobile Processors Comparison

Compare smartphone and other devices Processor by technical specifications
(performance, graphics, memory, multimedia, connectivity), benchmark
scores and gaming performances.

Popular Mobile Processor Comparisons

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

MediaTek Helio G95

MediaTek Helio G80

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G

MediaTek Helio G95

MediaTek Dimensity 1200

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

MediaTek Helio P35

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

MediaTek Helio G85

MediaTek Helio G80

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

MediaTek Dimensity 1200

MediaTek Dimensity 700

Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G

Samsung Exynos 850

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

MediaTek Dimensity 1200

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

MediaTek Helio G90T

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

MediaTek Dimensity 700

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

MediaTek Helio G80

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

MediaTek Dimensity 800U

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

MediaTek Dimensity 700

MediaTek Helio G95

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Samsung Exynos 990

MediaTek Helio G90T

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G

MediaTek Dimensity 800U

Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Samsung Exynos 9825

MediaTek Helio G80

Qualcomm Snapdragon 710

MediaTek Helio P22

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

MediaTek Helio G35

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 860

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

MediaTek Dimensity 800U

MediaTek Dimensity 700

MediaTek Helio G80

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 712

MediaTek Helio G90T

MediaTek Helio P95

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G

MediaTek Dimensity 800U

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

MediaTek Helio G95

Apple A14 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

MediaTek Helio G85

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730

MediaTek Helio G95

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Samsung Exynos 850

MediaTek Helio G90T

MediaTek Helio G95

Qualcomm Snapdragon 860

MediaTek Dimensity 1200

View All

Performance comparison of two processors.

How to choose the best

Let’s see how you can quickly compare two processors in terms of their speed and choose the best one.

Earlier, ten years ago, there was no such problem. It was necessary to look at the frequency of the processor and it immediately became clear which processor was more powerful. Now the frequency of the processor practically does not say anything. Processors need to be compared according to test results, according to their final performance.

So, there is a task — to purchase an inexpensive laptop, while with maximum performance.

On one of the sites we found two laptops suitable for our financial possibilities. The Lenovo laptop has a 2-core AMD E1 6010 processor with a frequency of 2 * 1350 MHz. The DEXP laptop also has a 2-core Intel Celeron N2840 processor with a frequency of 2/2160 MHz.

As we have already noted, if this had happened ten years ago, there would have been no questions. The second laptop in terms of performance should be twice as powerful.

But, in today’s situation, we will test.

For a quick comparison of CPU performance, check out cpuboss.com.

There are two fields on the main page of the site. They are designed to enter the name of the laptop processor. Below these fields is the COMPARE button. After entering the names of the processors, press this button.

The site will compare processors and display the result.

As you can see in the image above, the Intel Celeron N2840 processor has a slight advantage in overall performance — about 2%.

We go down the page of the site below. On the left side there will be a more detailed description of the results of the processors shown in individual tests. These data are more specific and, with a general equality of indicators, you can rely on them when choosing a laptop.

We go even lower on the site page. We find a brief description of the characteristics of these processors.

Here you can see such indicators as overclocking frequency, chip manufacturing technology, energy consumption, 3DMark06 (performance comparison program), release date of processors.

Almost in all respects, except for energy consumption (here, AMD’s advantage is more than twofold), Intel Celeron has the advantage.

You can get acquainted with the specifications of the processors by going even further down the page.

So you can roughly determine the performance of the processor.

Please note that this comparison method is not 100% accurate! A small error is allowed.

When you decide on specific laptop models, it is better to familiarize yourself with the «live» results of processor testing. The same processors on different laptops give different performance. The processor depends on the accompanying laptop components, layout, circuitry, chipset, on the basis of which the motherboard is made.

Video instruction link:

< Back
Next >

Comparison of processor performance in benchmarks.

Comparison of computer processors

On this page you can compare processors for laptops or desktop computers (AMD and Intel). Check out the main specification differences and comprehensive benchmarks of selected processors.

Processors

Popular CPU comparisons

Compare processor specifications and choose the best: Xeon E7-8870 v2

AMD A10-4600M VS Intel Xeon E7-4870 v2

AMD A10-4600M VS Intel Xeon E7-4830 v2

Most popular

TOP 10 from AMD and Intel

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE

4x 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT

Intel Core i5-10400F

6x 2.90 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT

Intel Celeron 2957U

2x 1.40 GHz (No turbo)

Intel Atom Z3770

4x 1.46 GHz (2.39 GHz)

AMD FX-8320E

8x 3.20 GHz (4.00 GHz)

Intel Celeron G5920

2x 3.50 GHz (No turbo)

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

8x 3.60 GHz (4.40 GHz) HT

Intel Core i9-9900K

8x 3.60 GHz (5.00 GHz) HT

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

8x 3.90 GHz (4.50 GHz) HT

AMD Epyc 7F72

24x 3.20 GHz (3.70 GHz) HT

CPU Rating

All CPUs are rated in real time!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Intel Core i9-12900KF

100%

Intel Core i7-12700KF

97%

AMD Ryzen 9 5950x

9000 9000

Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE 93%

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

91%

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

100%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

71%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

70%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960x

56%

Intel Xeon W-3175x

52%

Cinebench R20 (SINGLE-Core)

Intel Core I9-12900KS

9000)0002 99%

Intel Core i9-12900KF

9000 95%

Intel Core i7-12700K

Intel Core i7-12700KF

9000%

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) AMD 3990X

100%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX

98%

AMD Epyc 7742

83%

AMD Epyc 7702P

76%

AMD Epyc 7702

76%

Geekbench 5, 64bit ( Single Core)

Intel Core i9-12900KS

100%

Intel Core i9-12900KF

9000 94%

Intel Core i9-11900KF

89%

Intel Core i9-11900kb

89% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 11700b

89%

IgPU — FP32 Performance (Single -PRECISION GFLOPS)

Apple M1 Max

100%

Apple M1 Pro (10 Core)

9000% 50% 9000% 9000%

Apple M1x 9000.