Quadro 2000 vs Quadro P400 Graphics cards Comparison
In this comparison between Quadro 2000 and Quadro P400 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P400 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000
Check Price
Quadro P400
Check Price
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000 | Quadro P400 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2. |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
|
Check Price |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000 has 106% more power consumption, than Quadro P400.
- Quadro 2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P400 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro P400 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro P400 — with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P400 is 603 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.
- Quadro 2000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P400 — by 14 nm process technology.
- Quadro 2000 is 33 mm longer, than Quadro P400.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P400 is 1408 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.
Game benchmarks
| Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro 2000. |
||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro P400. |
||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro P400. |
||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 2000. |
||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Quadro 2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Quadro 2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Quadro 2000. |
||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro 2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro 2000. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000 | Quadro P400 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
| Code name | GF106 | GP107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 December 2010 | 7 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1228 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1252 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20. 00 |
20.03 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | 145 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 32.06 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 6.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
|
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 6740G2
- Quadro 2000 vs GeForce 920A
- Quadro P400 vs Radeon HD 6740G2
- Quadro P400 vs GeForce 920A
- Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Quadro 2000 vs GeForce GTX 760M
- Quadro P400 vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Quadro P400 vs GeForce GTX 760M
Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P400 Graphics cards Comparison
When comparing Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests.
But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2000
Check Price
Quadro P400
Check Price
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000 | Quadro P400 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2. 0 x16 |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
|
Check Price |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2000 has 70% more power consumption, than Quadro P400.
- Quadro K2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P400 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P400 — with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P400 is 274 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.
- Quadro K2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P400 — by 14 nm process technology.
- Quadro K2000 is 57 mm longer, than Quadro P400.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P400 is 8 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.
Game benchmarks
| Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Quadro K2000. |
||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Quadro K2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. |
||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. |
||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Quadro K2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than Quadro K2000. |
||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Quadro K2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than Quadro K2000. |
||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. |
||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Minecraft is 1% more, than Quadro K2000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Quadro K2000. |
||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Quadro K2000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. |
||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Quadro K2000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000 | Quadro P400 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | GK107 | GP107 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2013 | 7 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1228 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1252 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.
|