Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/quadro-2000-vs-quadro-fx-1800%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/quadro-2000-vs-quadro-fx-1800%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3070
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i3
12100F
EPYC
7h22
Compare NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
versus
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Newer video card, release date difference 1 year(s) 8 month(s)
- 14% faster texturing speed: 20 GTexel / s vs 17.
6 GTexel / s - 3x more shader processor(s): 192 vs 64
- 2.7 times better floating point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 176 gflops
- Newer manufacturing process for the graphics card to make it more powerful but with lower power consumption: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Maximum size about 33% more memory: 1 GB vs 768 MB
- 63% more memory frequency: 2600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.3 times more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 944 vs 403
- PassMark — G2D Mark 4.1x better performance: 300 vs 74
MHz vs 550 MHz
| Release Date | 24 December 2010 vs 30 March 2009 |
| Core frequency | 625 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 20 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel/s |
| Number of shaders | 192 vs 64 |
| Floating point performance | 480. 0 gflops vs 176 gflops |
| Process | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 768 MB |
| Memory frequency | 2600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 944 vs 403 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 300 vs 74 |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- About 5% less power consumption: 59 Watt vs 62 Watt
- About 9% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames9) benchmark: 9019 2917 Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 9% higher: 2917 vs 2668
| Power consumption (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 62 Watt |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
2917 vs 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2917 vs 2668 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 944 | 403 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 300 | 74 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 3240 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
10.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
1682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 | 2917 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 1682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 | 2917 |
Feature comparison
| NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Codename | GF106 | G94 |
| Production date | 24 December 2010 | March 30, 2009 |
| Price at first issue date | $599 | $489 |
| Place in the ranking | 1213 | 1317 |
| Price now | $87. 99 |
$186.29 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 17.65 | 4.05 |
| Core frequency | 625MHz | 550MHz |
| Floating point performance | 480.0 gflops | 176 gflops |
| Process | 40 nm | 65nm |
| Number of shaders | 192 | 64 |
| Texturing speed | 20 GTexel/s | 17. 6 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 59 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 505 million |
| Video connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178mm | 198mm |
| Additional power connectors | None | None |
| DirectX | 12. 0 (11_0) |
10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Maximum memory size | 1GB | 768MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 2600MHz | 1600MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430.
Comparative specifications and benchmarks of video cards
VS
General information winner between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430. Please note that the comparison takes place across all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that determine different criteria in games and work applications.
671
Position in the performance rating
815
10.74
Price and quality ratio
3.93
Fermi
Fermi
GF103
° C 9000 000 0002
Desktop
24 December 2010 (10 years ago)
Release date
11 October 2010 (11 years ago)
$599
Starting price
$ 79
$ 89 (0.1x MSRP)
Actual price
$ 114 (1.4x msrp)
0.69
0.22
GF106 9000
Market Segment
Desktop
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the ranking video cards.
480.0 GFLOPS
Operations with a swimming of
268.8 GFLOPS
No data
Maximum temperature
98 ° C
No data
Cuda Cores Per GPU
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
96
1.170 million
Number of transistors
585 million
62 Watt
Rated thermal power
49 Watt
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 video cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
length
5.7 «(14.5 CM)
None
Additional power
None
No data
Support Suns
PCI-E 2.0 X 16
No data
9,000
Height
2.713″ (6.9 cm)
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
Video card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications.
The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430:
GDDR5
0002 MAXIMUM RAM AMOUNT
1 GB
128 BIT
DISTRUCTION OF Memory bus
128 BIT
2600 MHZ
800 800 MHZ (1600 — 1800 Data Rate)
41.6 GB/S
Memory Bandwidth
25.6 — 28.8 GB/s
Port and Display Support
Let’s find out the difference in ports that NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 graphics cards are equipped with. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
3D Vision
+
n.a. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.
2
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 benchmark comparison
Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards
| 1. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
| 2. | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
3.
|
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs. NVIDIA Quadro P520 | |
| 4. | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs. AMD FirePro W2100 | |
| 5. |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs. AMD Radeon HD 7650A
|
|
| 6. | AMD Bonaire vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
| 7. | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs. NVIDIA QuadroFX 1500 | |
| 8. |
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
|
|
| 9. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
| 10. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
| eleven. |
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs. NVIDIA Quadro 2000
|
|
| 12. | AMD Cayman vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
| 13. | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
| 14. |
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs.
|