Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-480-vs-quadro-fx-4800%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
3500U
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-480-vs-quadro-fx-4800%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
5600X
Ryzen 5
3500U
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
nine0003
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
versus
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Newer graphics card, release dates difference 7 year(s) 2 month(s)
- 17.
5x more texturing speed: 42 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s - A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 40 nm vs 130nm
- 12 times the maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 128 MB
- 3.1 times the memory frequency: 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 600 MHz
- 120.2 times more: 4086 vs 34
- Approximately 64% more performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 436 vs 266
core clock(s) more: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Release date | 26 March 2010 vs 21 January 2003 |
| Core frequency | 700 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 42 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Process | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | |
| Memory frequency | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 600 MHz |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 4086 vs 34 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 436 vs 266 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000
| PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
nine0040 | ||
| PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 4086 | 34 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 436 | 266 |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | ||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
34.483 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 | nine0043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 | nine0043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 | nine0043 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 0 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Fermi | |
| Codename | GF100 | NV30 |
| Production date | March 26, 2010 | 21 January 2003 |
| Price at first issue date | $499 | |
| Place in the ranking | 650 | 610 |
| Price now | $71. 99 |
|
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 61.35 | |
| Core frequency | 700MHz | 300MHz |
| Number of CUDA conveyors | 480 | nine0043 |
| Floating point performance | 1,345.0 gflops | |
| Process | 40nm | 130nm |
| Maximum temperature | 105 °C | nine0043 |
| Number of shaders | 480 | |
| Texturing speed | 42 billion / sec | 2. 4 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | nine0043 |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | 125 million |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Video connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum resolution VGA | 2048×1536 | nine0043 |
| Multi-monitor support | ||
| Tire | 16x PCI-E 2. 0 |
|
| Height | 4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 10.5″ (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI support | 2-way, 3-way | |
| Additional power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x Molex |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 4. 2 |
1.5 (2.1) |
| Maximum memory size | 1536MB | 128MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | 9.6 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | 600MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | nine0043 |
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Overview.
Benchmarks and specs
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 graphics card (GPU) is ranked 254 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. Runs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 with a minimum clock speed of 700 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. RAM size — 1536 MB GB with a clock frequency of 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) and a bandwidth of 177.4 GB/s.
The power consumption of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 is 250 Watt and the process technology is only 40 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480. To get an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service. nine0003
4.5
From 19
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
nine0002 Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
Yandex Market
SberMegaMarket
AliExpress
General information
A basic set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost.
This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Performance Rating Position: | 301 | |||
| Value for money: | ||||
| Architecture: | Fermi | |||
| Code name: | GF100 | |||
| Type: | Desktop | |||
| Release date: | December 7, 2010 (10 years ago) | |||
| Starting price: | $499 | |||
| Current price: | $8.99 (0x MSRP) | |||
| Value for money: | 2.72 | |||
| GPU code name: | GF100 | |||
| Market segment: | Desktop | |||
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 video card.
The smaller the chip manufacturing process, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining). nine0003
| Conveyors: | 480 | |||
| Core Clock: | 700MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 3,100 million | |||
| Process: | 40nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 250 Watt | |||
| Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 42 billion/sec | |||
| Floating point: | 1,345.0 gflops | |||
| Maximum temperature: | 105 °C | |||
| CUDA Cores: | 480 | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 480 | |||
| Number of transistors: | 3,100 million | |||
| Estimated heat output: | 250 Watt | |||
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
Today, there are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop options).
This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
| Interface: | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |||
| Length: | 10.5″ (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |||
| Additional power: | 6-pin & 8-pin | |||
| SLI options: | + | |||
| Tire support: | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |||
| Height: | 4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |||
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
The internal memory is used to store data when performing calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 + overclocking in turbo mode.
| Memory type: | GDDR5 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 1536MB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 384 Bit | |||
| Memory frequency: | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 177.4 GB/s | |||
| Shared memory: | — | |||
Support for ports and displays
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
| Display connections: | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | |||
| Multi monitor support: | + | |||
| HDCP: | + | |||
| Maximum VGA resolution: | 2048×1536 | |||
| Audio input for HDMI: | ||||
| HDMI: | + | |||
Technologies
Each graphics card manufacturer complements its products with proprietary technologies that are used both in games and in the workflow.
Below is a list of features that will be useful to you.
| 3D Vision: | + | |||
| CUDA: | + | |||
| DirectX 11: | DirectX 11 | |||
API Support
All NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 supported APIs are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: | 12 (11_0) | |||
| OpenGL: | 4.2 | |||
General gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s take a look at how the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 scores in the gaming performance test (calculated according to the game developer’s recommendations for system requirements; it may differ from actual situations).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.
0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
nine0005 1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. nine0040 |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphics settings, this game is expected to run at 58 fps or more |
| nine0039 May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been sufficiently studied. | |
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. nine0040 |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates.
AMD equivalent
AMD Radeon HD 6930
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 in benchmark results
Benchmarks help determine performance in standard NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 benchmarks.
We’ve compiled a list of the world’s best-known benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each one (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing. nine0003
Overall performance in benchmarks
AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
17.94%
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
17.85%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
17.84%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
17.66%
nine0002
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
17.66%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Benchmark: Graphic card performance test results. Check 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics GPU Test Results at hitesti.com
AMD Radeon R9 M470
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
nine0002
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
AMD Radeon RX 550 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3DMark 11 Performance GPU Benchmark: Graphics card performance test results.