Quadro P5000 Mobile [in 24 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
Quadro P5000 Mobile
Buy
- Interface MXM-B (3.0)
- Core clock speed 1164
- Max video memory 16GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 6006
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started Quadro P5000 Mobile sales 11 January 2017 at a recommended price of $1,885. This is Pascal architecture notebook card based on 16 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 16 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 6.01 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 192 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 100 Watt.
It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at
32. 46%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Quadro P5000
Mobile
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General info
Of Quadro P5000 Mobile’s architecture, market segment and release date.
Place in performance rating | 120 | |
Value for money | 7.70 | |
Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | |
GPU code name | N17E-Q5 | |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
Release date | 11 January 2017 (5 years ago) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,885 | |
Current price | $2137 (1. 1x MSRP) | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Quadro P5000 Mobile’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro P5000 Mobile’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | of 18432 (AD102) |
Core clock speed | 1164 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Boost clock speed | 1506 MHz | of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600) |
Number of transistors | 7,200 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
Texture fill rate | 202. 5 | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Floating-point performance | 6,197 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro P5000 Mobile’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it’s notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro P5000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 6006 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Shared memory | — |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro P5000 Mobile. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 |
Technologies
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro P5000 Mobile. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Optimus | + |
API support
APIs supported by Quadro P5000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 12 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 6.1 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of Quadro P5000 Mobile. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
P5000 Mobile
32.46
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
- SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
- SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
P5000 Mobile
11561
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280×1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
P5000 Mobile
44689
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
P5000 Mobile
20096
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280×720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
P5000 Mobile
86679
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
P5000 Mobile
12363
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
P5000 Mobile
14666
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
P5000 Mobile
401246
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 Mobile
99
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 Mobile
159
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 Mobile
168
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 Mobile
65
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 Mobile
150
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 Mobile
126
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
67
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
14. 5
SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
99
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
67
SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
150
SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
159
SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
168
SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
126
SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
65
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 Mobile
14. 5
SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max
This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.
Benchmark coverage: 1%
P5000 Mobile
125
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good Quadro P5000 Mobile is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Relative perfomance
Overall Quadro P5000 Mobile performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
116.42
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
110.6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
109. 18
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
100
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
87.15
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
85.3
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
81.58
AMD equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro P5000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 21% and lower by 41 positions in our rating.
Radeon Pro
5600M
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P5000 Mobile:
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
100
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
79.33
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
68. 76
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
58.96
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
52.43
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
51.42
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
44.36
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Quadro RTX
4000 Mobile
Compare
Quadro
P5200
Compare
Quadro
P4200
Compare
Quadro RTX
3000 Mobile
Compare
Quadro RTX
4000 Max-Q
Compare
Quadro P4000
Mobile
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Quadro P5000 Mobile according to our statistics.
EPYC
7402P
5.4%
Ryzen Threadripper
3960X
4.3%
Ryzen Threadripper
3970X
4.3%
Core i9
10980XE
3.2%
Core i7
6820HQ
3.2%
Core i5
7200U
2.2%
Ryzen Threadripper
3990X
2.2%
Core i7
6920HQ
2. 2%
Core i7
8750H
2.2%
Xeon E3
1245 v2
1.1%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Quadro P5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
GeForce RTX 3080 vs Quadro P5000 mobile Graphics cards Comparison
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce RTX 3080 stacks up against Quadro P5000 mobile, check out specs charts below.
GeForce RTX 3080
Check Price
Quadro P5000 mobile
Check Price
Quadro P5000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P5000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P5000 mobile here:
Quadro P5000 mobile Laptops
Main Specs
GeForce RTX 3080 | Quadro P5000 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce RTX 3080 has 220% more power consumption, than Quadro P5000 mobile.
- GeForce RTX 3080 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x16, and Quadro P5000 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro P5000 mobile has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce RTX 3080.
- GeForce RTX 3080 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P5000 mobile — in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce RTX 3080 is build with Ampere architecture, and Quadro P5000 mobile — with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce RTX 3080 is 286 MHz higher, than Quadro P5000 mobile.
- GeForce RTX 3080 is manufactured by 8 nm process technology, and Quadro P5000 mobile — by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce RTX 3080 is 12994 MHz higher, than Quadro P5000 mobile.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Battlefield 5 is 62% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
GeForce RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 mobile have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GeForce RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
GeForce RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 mobile have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Far Cry 5 is 76% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 150−160 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 280−290 | 230−240 |
medium / 1080p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Fortnite is 53% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Metro Exodus is 104% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce RTX 3080 and Quadro P5000 mobile have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 350−400 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 290−300 | 140−150 |
high / 1080p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 105% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 900−950 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 400−450 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce RTX 3080 in World of Tanks is 525% more, than Quadro P5000 mobile. |
Full Specs
GeForce RTX 3080 | Quadro P5000 mobile | |
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA102 | N17E-Q5 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2020 | 11 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 8704 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1164 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Transistor count | 28,300 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 465. 1 | 202.5 |
Floating-point performance | 6,197 gflops | |
Length | 285 mm | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 19000 MHz | 6006 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 8.5 | 6. 1 |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce RTX 3080 vs GeForce RTX 3090
- GeForce RTX 3080 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Quadro P5000 mobile vs GeForce RTX 3090
- Quadro P5000 mobile vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- GeForce RTX 3080 vs GeForce RTX 3070
- GeForce RTX 3080 vs Quadro RTX 8000
- Quadro P5000 mobile vs GeForce RTX 3070
- Quadro P5000 mobile vs Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro P5000 video card (mobile) [in 24 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
Quadro P5000 (mobile)
- MXM-B interface (3. 0)
- Core frequency 1164
- Video memory size 16GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory frequency 6006
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started Quadro P5000 (mobile) sales on January 11, 2017 at a suggested price of $1,885. This is a notebook video card based on Pascal architecture and 16 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at designers. It has 16 GB of GDDR5 memory at 6.01 GHz, and coupled with a 256-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 192 Gb/s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a card connected via the MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption — 100 W.
It provides good performance in tests and games at the level of
32.46%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Quadro P5000
(mobile)
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General information
Information about the Quadro P5000 (mobile) type (desktop or laptop) and architecture, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
Performance ranking | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value for money |
Number of Stream Processors | 2048 |
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on Quadro P5000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For laptop video cards, this is the estimated size of the laptop, the bus and the connection connector, if the video card is connected through the connector, and not soldered on the motherboard.
Notebook size | Bolshoy | Interface | MXM-B (3.0) |
RAM
Parameters of the memory installed on Quadro P5000 (mobile) — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Memory type 9Memory capacity | 192 GB/s | out of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Demeded memory | — |
Video slopes | No Outputs | Display Port |
Optimus | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Optimus | + |
API support
APIs supported by Quadro P5000 (mobile), including their versions.
Benchmark tests
These are the results of the Quadro P5000 (mobile) rendering performance test in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
P5000 (mobile)
32.46
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
- SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
- SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
- SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
- SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
- SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
- SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
- SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
- SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max
Passmark
This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
P5000 (mobile)
11561
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark. It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one of a girl running away from some military base located in a sea cave, and the other of a space fleet attacking a defenseless planet. Support for 3DMark Vantage was discontinued in April 2017 and it is now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
P5000 (mobile)
44689
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is Futuremark’s legacy DirectX 11 benchmark. He used four tests based on two scenes: one is several submarines exploring a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
P5000 (mobile)
20096
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is a legacy benchmark that uses DirectX 11 feature level 10, used to test home PCs and low-end laptops. It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
P5000 (mobile)
86679
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 14%
P5000 (mobile)
12363
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
P5000 (mobile)
14666
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm has been used to measure the performance of entry-level laptops and Windows-based tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280×720 resolution. Support for Ice Storm ended in January 2020, now the developers recommend using Night Raid instead.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
P5000 (mobile)
401246
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 (mobile)
99
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 (mobile)
159
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 (mobile)
168
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 (mobile)
65
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 (mobile)
150
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
P5000 (mobile)
126
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
67
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
14. 5
SPECviewperf 12 — Maya
This part of the SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses the Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero power plant with over 700,000 polygons in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
99
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
67
SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
150
SPECviewperf 12 — Solidworks
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
159
SPECviewperf 12 — Siemens NX
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
168
SPECviewperf 12 — Creo
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
126
SPECviewperf 12 — Medical
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
65
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy
Benchmark coverage: 2%
P5000 (mobile)
14. 5
SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max
This part of the SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates 3DS Max by running eleven tests in various use cases, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.
Benchmark coverage: 1%
P5000 (mobile)
125
Game tests
FPS in popular games on Quadro P5000 (mobile), as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
Relative capacity
Overall Quadro P5000 (Mobile) performance compared to its closest competitors in mobile workstation graphics cards.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
116.42
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
110.6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
109.18
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
100
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
87. 15
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
85.3
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 (Mobile)
81.58
AMD competitor
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro P5000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 21% and lower by 41 positions in our rating on average.
Radeon Pro
5600M
Compare
Here are some of AMD’s closest Quadro P5000 (mobile) competitors:
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
100
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
79.33
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
68.76
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
58.96
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
52.43
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
51.42
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
44. 36
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Quadro RTX
4000 (mobile)
Compare
Quadro
P5200
Compare
Quadro
P4200
Compare
Quadro RTX
3000 (mobile)
Compare
Quadro RTX
4000 Max-Q
Compare
Quadro P4000
(mobile)
Compare
Recommended processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with Quadro P5000 Mobile.
EPYC
7402P
5.4%
Ryzen Threadripper
3960X
4.3%
Ryzen Threadripper
3970X
4.3%
Core i9
10980XE
3.2%
Core i7
6820HQ
3.2%
Core i5
7200U
2.2%
Ryzen Threadripper
3990X
2.2%
Core i7
6920HQ
2.2%
Core i7
8750H
2.2%
Xeon E3
1245v2
1.