Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-2-quad-q9400-vs-core-2-extreme-qx9650%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
12400F
vs
Core i5
13400F
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/core-2-quad-q9400-vs-core-2-extreme-qx9650%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
12400F
vs
Core i5
13400F
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 or Intel Core2 Quad Q9400
- 003 Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Core2 Quad Q9400
Family
- Core2 Quad Q9500
Compare - Core2 Quad Q9505
Compare - Core2 Quad Q9550
Compare
Family
- Core2 Quad Q9000
Compare - Core2 Quad Q9300
Compare - Core2 Quad Q9450
Compare
Game Speed
Core2 Quad Q9650
37.5 (+11%)
Core2 Quad Q9400
33.8
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core2 Quad Q9650
39.9 (+11%)
Core2 Quad Q9400
36.1
Performance in everyday work, such as browsing and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core2 Quad Q9650
20.6 (+13%)
Core2 Quad Q9400
18.3
loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Price
The data is obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core2 Quad Q9650 33. Core2 Quad Q9400 29.9 |
1 (+11%)
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core2 Quad Q9650 14.4 (+16%) Core2 Quad Q9400 12.4 |
Extreme |
|
Core2 Quad Q9650 2.9 (+16%) Core2 Quad Q9400 2.5 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC.
At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
The budget shopper should ideally aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650
2440 (+17%)
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400
2086
Features
Main
| Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | LGA 775 | LGA 775 |
| Manufacturer Firm | Intel | Intel |
| Presentation datePresentation in mass media, official information. | 2008-08-10 | 2008-08-10 |
Code name of the Microarchitecture family. |
Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
| GenerationCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Core 2 Quad (Yorkfield) |
Core 2 Quad (Yorkfield) |
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | 4 | 4 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
Missing | Missing |
| Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| BCLK System bus frequency. Some motherboards allow you to achieve a good performance boost by slightly raising the bus frequency. Often this has a bad effect on the stability of the system. | 333 | 333 |
CPU multiplier. The final CPU frequency is determined by the simple formula BCLK * CPU multiplier. Modern processors instantly change the multiplier of each of the cores, taking into account the type of load, temperature, consumption and settings in the BIOS. |
9 | 8 |
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 95 W | 95 W |
Cache and RAM
| L1 Cache First level cache. Modern processors use a multi-level cache. The first is the fastest, but the smallest. In the case of an L1 access and a miss, the L2 cache is searched for the next stage. | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache Second level cache. Holds more data, but is slower. | 6MB (per die) | 6MB (shared) |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. |
DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Dual-channel |
DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Dual-channel |
Video core
| Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | N/A | N/A |
PCI
| PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | Gen 2 | Gen 2 |
Details
Model Official name. |
Q9650 | Q9400 |
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
| Chip manufacturer A company that manufactures chips in its own factory. | Intel | Intel |
| Number of transistors | 820 000 000 | 456 000 000 |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. For Ryzen with a chiplet layout, the CCD process is implied. | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Die size Depends on process technology and number of transistors. For chiplet Ryzen, the area of all CCDs is indicated. |
2×107 mm² | 2×81 mm² |
| Socket type | FC-LGA6 | FC-LGA6 |
| Spec Code | SLB8W | SLB6B |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9650 (12M Cache, 3.00 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) | Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q9400 (6M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB) |
| Instructions | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. |
1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Which is better
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650
- On average, gaming performance is 11% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 16%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 16%.
- The base frequency is 0.34 GHz higher.
How are they similar
- The number of physical cores is the same.
- The number of threads is equal.
- TDP is equal.
Your comment can be here
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450
Home / Processors / Intel Core2 Quad Q9450
- Edelmark rating — 3.9 out of 10;
- Release date: January, 2008;
- Number of cores: 4;
- Frequency: 2.66 GHz;
- Power consumption (TDP): 95W;
Characteristics Intel Core2 Quad Q9450
General parameters
| Clock speed | 2. 66 GHz |
|---|---|
| Cores | 4 |
| Socket | LGA 775 |
Functions
| NX-bit (XD-bit) available | Yes |
|---|---|
| Trusted computing support | Yes |
| Virtualization support | Yes |
| Instructions supported | MMX SSE SSE2 SSE4.1 SSE3 Supplemental SSE3 |
| Support for dynamic frequency scaling (CPU Throttling) | Yes |
Power consumption
| Power consumption | 95W |
|---|---|
| Annual cost of electricity (NON-commercial use) | $22.89/year |
| Annual cost of electricity (commercial use) | 83.22 $/year |
| Output per W | 1.33pt/W |
| Average energy consumption | 77. 19W |
Bus
| Architecture | FSB |
|---|---|
| Clock frequency | 1.333MHz |
Details and features
| Architecture | x86-64 |
|---|---|
| Threads | 4 |
| L2 cache | 12MB |
| Second level cache per core (L2) | 3 MB/core |
| Process | 45 nm |
| Number of transistors | 820,000,000 |
| Maximum processors | 1 |
| Processor multiplier | 8 |
| Voltage range | 0.85 — 1.36V |
| Operating temperature | Unknown — 71.4°C |
Overclocking Core2 Quad Q9450
| Overclocking Clock | 3.71 GHz |
|---|---|
| Water-cooled boost clock | 2. 67 GHz |
| Air-cooled boost clock | 3.71 GHz |
Integrated graphics
| Graphics core | No |
|---|---|
| Brand | No |
| Latest DirectX | No |
| Number of displays supported | No |
| Graphics core clock speed | No |
| Maximum clock frequency | No |
| 3DMark06 | No |
Comparison of Core2 Quad Q9450 with similar processors
Performance
Performance using all cores.
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 4.5 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 4.1 out of 10 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 4.3 out of 10 |
Performance per core
Base performance per processor core.
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 3.8 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 3.2 out of 10 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 3.7 out of 10 |
Integrated Graphics
Integrated GPU performance for graphics tasks.
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 0.0 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 0.0 out of 10 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 0.0 out of 10 |
Integrated graphics (OpenCL)
Embedded GPU performance for parallel computing.
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 0.0 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 0. 0 out of 10 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 0.0 out of 10 |
Performance per W
How efficiently the processor uses electricity.
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 4.7 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 4.4 out of 10 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 4.7 out of 10 |
Price-performance ratio
How much you overpay for performance.
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | n/a |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | n/a |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | n/a |
5 Video composition, PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark, Geekbench 3 Multi-Core , PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core, Geekbench 3 AES Single Core, Price. Total Edelmark rating
Total processor rating.
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 3.9 out of 10 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 3.6 out of 10 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 3.9 out of 10 |
Benchmarks Core2 Quad Q9450
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation)
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 30.86 fps |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | n/a |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | n/a |
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex)
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 0. 18 fps |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | n/a |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | n/a |
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 5.261 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 4.490 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 5.123 |
GeekBench 3 (Single Core)
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 1.535 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 1.306 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 1.490 |
GeekBench 3 (AES single core)
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 115,000 MB/s |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 102,800 MB/s |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 114,000 MB/s |
GeekBench (32-bit)
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 4.892 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 4.161 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 4. 796 |
PassMark
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 3.779 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 2.970 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 3.379 |
PassMark (Single Core)
| Core2 Quad Q9450 | 1.133 |
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600 | 924 |
| Core2 Quad Q9400 | 1.130 |
And I still sit on it)))) More than 10 years. True, I will already take 8700k for ng, it’s time for an upgrade. By the way, the build quality is excellent. Due to my youth and stupidity, I did not know what thermal paste was for, and after disassembling the computer for cleaning, I also wiped the thermal paste. And he worked for me without thermal paste for 6-7 years. Only a year ago, when I became interested in hardware, I decided to see what, in fact, was the temperature of my processor. It turned out he was in idle time with a permanent 100 degrees. For 6-7 years. Under the box cooler. Without thermal paste. And all this time he worked! I played a bunch of games, cruises 1,2,3, gta4, fallouts, code and so on. And all this time he was working, and I was playing at high-maximum. Here is the quality. Not what it is now, thermoconcha and textolite … 
After all, even in BF 4 30 fps. So I won’t be surprised if this 2007 stone at the same low-medium settings without anti-aliasing pulls 30 fps. 