Rtx 2070 super vs rx 5700: Please click the green button to continue.

2 мая, 2023

Nvidia Geforce RTX 2070 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia, Technical News / By Mayank Menghani

We revisited the fight between the current-gen $400 GPUs for those of you who skipped it last week: the Radeon RX 5700 XT, and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super. Since we tested them both at the launch almost seven months ago, we saw various engines, new software, and device fixes, and we saw a very similar situation. It could be defined as a slight performance advantage going in the direction of the Radeon GPU, at an average speed of 8 percent faster at 1440p gaming.

Table of Content

  • 1 Nvidia Geforce
    • 1.1 Comparison( 2070 super vs 5700 xt)
    • 1.2 More thrilling games
    • 1.3 Performance
    • 1.4 Going in-depth
  • 2 Conclusion

Nvidia Geforce

When getting out of the analysis two points became clear. An update was demanded by all. Adding on the DLSS tests was also asked for to enhance the performance. We’ll try resolving these issues today.

Before we launch, the RTX 2070 Super is the more powerful GPU priced at about $500, while the 5700 XT drops in at $400. And up, rendering the Radeon at least 25 percent cheaper.

We’ve introduced the original RTX 2070 to the mix in addition to the 2070 Super because several readers were still demanding this. With this reference, we’ve reviewed a total of 35 games. And will give you the DLSS results. It will be for 2060 Mega, 2070, and 2070 Mega in Control and Wolfenstein: Youngblood.

Both tests were carried out using our Core i9-9900 K GPU evaluation computer with a memory of 16 GB DDR4-3400 clocked at 5GHz. We include resolutions 1080p and 1440p but the focus of the review would be on data from 1440p. Let’s dig through the consequences:

Comparison( 2070 super vs 5700 xt)

We’ve got Call to Duty: New Warfare first. This was a straightforward victory over the 2070 Super for the 5700 XT. As it gave 22 percent more frames at 1440p. Surprisingly, even though the 5700 XT is the better performer relative to the RTX 2070 Standard. Even though it’s only by a 5 percent range. This is a genuinely remarkable outcome for AMD considering that the Radeon GPU is significantly cheaper.

Do not miss: Nvidia shield portable

  • For Ghost Recon Breakpoint, the 2070 Super is able to move away rendering it 7 percent quicker than the 1440p 5700 XT. Notably, however, at 16 percent higher, Nvidia GeForce’s 1 percent low performance was quite a bit stronger.
  • The 5700 XT and RTX 2070 Super in Shadow of the Tomb Raider are necks to neck, producing a maximum of 87 fps at 1440p.
  • This is another category under which the Radeon GPU will hit above its weight limit.
  • Going on to Energy, this is one of the DLSS 2.0 funded games and we’ll be checking some tests shortly. For now, Quality 1080p and 1440p are native here. It does not entirely explain the price rise of 25 percent, but maybe allowing DLSS would improve here.

More thrilling games

Next, we got Metro Migration and here the 2060 Super comfortably beats the 5700 XT. So much so that it can suit the Super 2070 too. Technically the Radeon GPU performs stronger for more stable frame time efficiency in this series. For some cause, the 2070 Super has failed to build on the mainstream 2070 and 2060 Super’s 1 percent low score.

  • The 2070 Super will beat out the 5700 XT smashing it in Resident Evil 3 by a margin of 7 percent at 1440p.
  • 2070 Super defeats the 570- RTX by 21 percent in what is so-called a demanding battle.
  • Fortnite is the only. game in which RTX has managed to defeat 2060 The performance of both $400 GPUs is about 90 fps. While the Super 2070 is 17 percent higher, reaching just over 100 fps.
  • PUBG is one heck of a game too. Frame rates are even lower in this game for the 5700 XT compared to the Nvidia GeForce rivalry, here the RTX 2070 Super is 21 percent better.
  • Borderlands 3 has been a rare Ard, just as what Forza Horizon 4 has been in for quite a time. The 5700 XT is a whopping 32 percent faster than the 2060 Super and 13 percent faster than the 2070 Super, but the tests are correct. Whatever optimizations have been produced here, they obviously operate.

 About Battlefield V. This is a perfect presentation of the $400 Radeon GPU and impressive frame rates for a 1440p title which loos so sweet.

Performance

Generally, you might claim that the Nvidia Geforce RTX 2070 Super was quicker much of the time, although despite the price gap it definitely seemed as though the Radeon RX 5700 XT is always keeping its own. The results overview maps below contain the complete list of 35 games we’ve reviewed.

  • According to the results, the 2070 Super is 6 percent faster than the Radeon. It also suffered many defeats in many well-reputed games.
  • It is also worth remembering that the difference was 5 percent or less in 15 of the 35 games checked.
  • The difference is raised by a single percent while running at 1440p and the RTX 2070 is around 7 percent quicker than the 5700 XT. That’s essentially the same gap we found 7 months ago. When we first checked them in a comparative analysis between the two GPUs. Few improvements have been made to the games used for the review. And the differences in a few players have improved. However, we wind up with a consistent outcome at the wind of the day.
  • We see huge improvements in allowing DLSS in Control and please notice that this is the best DLSS mode, as we operate the maximum possible DLSS resolution at 1440p.
  • Picture values have increased by 66 percent for the 2070 Super and 60 percent for the 2060 Super. This means that the 2060 Super is already 48 percent faster than the 5700 XT. While the 2070 Super is 93 percent faster than the ridiculous.

Considering the comparable picture consistency that we speak about utilizing DLSS between the 5700 XT and 2070 Super. This is a catastrophic finding for the Radeon.

Want to build a PC: 4k Gaming PC Build Guide

Going in-depth

We have checked Wolfenstein: Youngblood and here the result has much less effect on DLSS. It could be because, to begin with, frame rates were still quite large. DLSS 2.0 often takes some time to test. It creates a bit of a higher-end GPU barrier. Which includes games that don’t need a lot of energy like Youngblood.

  • That’s not to say we haven’t seen an uplift of results. The 2070 Supersaw a 17 percent leap and we don’t see any visible drop in picture efficiency. We’d say it’s almost the same under close inspection.
  • The 2070 Super is now 37 percent faster as well, allowed by DLSS in a compelling victory for the green squad.
  • Nvidia Geforce RTX 2070 Super is 9 percent faster than 5700 RTX at 1440p.

Obviously, in order for DLSS to cripple AMD to provide a more positive effect for RTX members, Nvidia needs to boost support for games significantly. We’re not sure when and whether it would happen. But this is an interesting system it fits well in the few games. We’ve tried right now.

Conclusion

Nvidia did a fine job reinventing what is DLSS and how it functions. They have certainly gone a fair way from those dreadfully blurry initial deployments, so, please. The reality that AMD powers Sony and Microsoft’s next-gen consoles is not a promising sign either, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

Looking at today’s prices, the Nvidia Geforce is costing 25 percent more for most retail cards ranging at $520 and up. Although we might still see lots of 5700 XT’s available at or just over the $400 MSRP for the better-equipped versions, which we endorse entirely.

As regards performance, the Nvidia Geforce 2070 Super can not hit the Radeon 5700 XT speeds. But if you emphasize efficiency then the best option can be the Nvidia GPU. The 2070 Super is worth paying the additional $100 for all of you who want to play at 4 K in particular. Because the 9 percent improvement it provides on average usually converts into a smoother gameplay experience.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT has the best value for most gamers reaching 1080p or 1440p. So if you’re searching for maximum performance at just beyond 1440p than the 2070 Super might be worth spending a little extra on. Anyway, you can’t go wrong as both GPUs offer outstanding results.

RTX 2060 Super vs RX 5700 XT [With Benchmarks]

If you’re shopping for a new mid-range GPU in 2023, chances are you’re going to find yourself torn between two very attractive options in this price range: the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT.

In this article, we’re going to be comparing these two rival GPUs, taking into account the hardware, the pricing, the performance, and ultimately deciding which one offers better value for your money.

Both of the abovementioned GPUs came out around the same time last year – the RX 5700 XT launched on the 7th of July 2019, with the RTX 2060 Super following only two days later, so they are both relatively new models.

Without further ado, let’s begin!

Table of ContentsShow

    The Specifications

    The AMD RX 5700 XT is based on AMD’s new RDNA architecture and is part of their Navi lineup. Meanwhile, the RTX 2060 Super is based on Nvidia’s Turing architecture that made its debut in 2018, and it is an updated version of the original RTX 2060, made using a 12nm process and constituting a noticeable performance boost compared to its predecessor.

    GPU Fabrication Process Die Size Transistor Count Base Clock VRAM VRAM Clock VRAM Bus TDP
    RX 5700 XT 7nm 251mm2 10.3 billion 1605 MHz 8 GB GDDR6 14000 MHz 256-bit 225W
    RTX 2060 Super 12nm 445mm2 10.8 billion 1470 MHz 8 GB GDDR6 14000 MHz 256-bit 175W

    As you can see from the most important specs, there is no big difference between these two GPUs on paper. Sure, the RX 5700 XT boasts a 7nm architecture, a much smaller die, and has a higher base clock speed, but the RTX 2060 Super is still more power-efficient and has a slightly higher transistor count, all the while both GPUs utilize what is essentially the same VRAM configuration.

    But naturally, on-paper specifications are hardly a good way to assess actual real-life performance. So, how do these two GPUs fare when put to the test?

    Performance

    To put it bluntly, the RX 5700 XT pretty much consistently outperforms the RTX 2060 Super in most of the newer games. Not only that, but it can even go toe-to-toe with the significantly pricier RTX 2070 Super!

    As you can see in the video above, which showcases the performance of both these GPUs, the RX 5700 XT has a slight advantage in Control and Hitman 2, while offering as much as 20-30 more FPS in the less demanding games such as Forza Horizon 4 and Battlefield V.

    Also, for a more thorough comparison, here are the results from a benchmark by TechSpot, which shows the difference in performance between the RTX 2060 Super and the RX 5700 XT with a negative value indicating the Nvidia GPU being slower and positive indicating it being faster.

    So, as you can tell from the test results, the RTX 2060 Super is, on average, 9% slower in 1080p and 8% slower in 1440p compared to AMD’s GPU. There are a couple of games where it is slightly faster and a few more where the performance is almost identical, but the RX 5700 XT has the lead in most titles.

    Of course, the exact performance will vary from game to game, depending on how well-optimized the game in question is, and CPU and RAM will play a factor as well. In any case, the RX 5700 XT definitely offers better bang for your buck overall.

    Pricing, Cooling, and Design

    Then, there is the matter of pricing, which is where the two cards are on even terms: both of them come with an MSRP of $399, which makes them upper mid-range models, both performance-wise and price-wise.

    However, that is only the MSRP, and in reality, the prices will fluctuate from model to model and from manufacturer to manufacturer and are usually in the $410-$450 range. But what differs from model to model, and is it important which manufacturer you choose?

    Well, the main and most noticeable difference is the cooling solution. You will find RX 5700 XT and RTX 2060 Super models in the abovementioned price range that come with either dual or triple-fan open-air cooling, though you might also come across blower-cooled cards. However, blowers are best for smaller cases with limited airflow, and open-air cooling offers better cooling efficiency for most PCs.

    Note that the slightly pricier cards with better cooling will usually be factory overclocked, meaning that the default clock speed will be slightly higher than on a reference card. However, this doesn’t really make much of a performance difference unless the clock is pushed further with liquid cooling, and liquid-cooled models are usually quite pricier.

    Now, while those massive triple-fan coolers might look cool (no pun intended), larger isn’t always better.

    In fact, going with a smaller dual-fan model might be a better choice for a smaller case. A shorter PCB means it will be easier to fit the card inside the case, while a less bulky heatsink will ensure better air intake if the card is close to the bottom of the case, plus there’s a lower chance that it will obstruct some of the extra PCIe slots on the motherboard.

    Finally, there’s also the matter of aesthetics, which is bound to be a major point if you have an open rig or a translucent case. When we say aesthetics, we mean the color and the design of the fans and the shroud, as well as the design of the backplate and whether the card comes with a backplate at all.

    But naturally, as with all things aesthetic, this is a matter of taste. Some might like the simple black shroud of the Gigabyte RX 5700 XT, while others might prefer the flashier MSI Gaming X variant, with its sleek metallic shroud, subtle red highlights, and RGB lighting.

    With all of the above in mind, should you pay up to $50 extra for better cooling and extra overclocking performance? Well, if you’re an enthusiast who likes playing around with the hardware, you just might be inclined to do so or even go with a liquid-cooled model, but for the average gamer, we’d say that it’s usually not worth it.

    Of course, you might still do so if you like the design of a pricier card better, but at the end of the day, what’s really important is that the manufacturer has a good track record and offers adequate warranty coverage.

    Is Ray Tracing Worth It?

    Logically, we can’t compare Turing and Navi GPUs without mentioning Nvidia’s latest and most heavily-marketed new addition to their arsenal – real-time ray tracing. This feature is conspicuously lacking in AMD’s corner.

    So, how important is ray tracing right now, and does it give the RTX 2060 Super any extra points?

    Well, there’s just no denying it – ray tracing is the future of lighting in video games, as it allows for much crisper and more realistic reflections. However, it is still used by relatively few games, and it constitutes a significant performance hit when turned on.

    Here’s a list of all the games that support ray tracing at the time this article was written:

    1. Battlefield V
    2. Control
    3. Deliver Us The Moon
    4. Metro Exodus
    5. Quake II RTX
    6. Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    7. Stay in the Light
    8. Wolfenstein: Youngblood

    Of course, there are many big upcoming titles that will also utilize ray tracing, including Cyberpunk 2077, Doom Eternal, Dying Light 2, and even Minecraft, among others.

    However, keep in mind that while ray tracing always looks great in demos and sections designed to showcase it, it won’t always make that much of a difference during actual gameplay. More importantly, it is very hardware-intensive, which means that it will usually pretty much cut the framerate in half – and this performance hit is bound to be especially noticeable with weaker RTX models such as the RTX 2060 Super.

    Ray tracing is an important technology, and it is an important step forward when it comes to realistic in-game graphics, but at the moment, we feel that it is still more of a marketing gimmick than a useful feature.

    With that said, we’d advise against getting the RTX 2060 Super for the ray tracing alone.

    Conclusion

    So, all in all, we feel that the Radeon RX 5700 XT offers better value for your money in general, so it is obviously the better pick if you want to get the best performance that you can for what you pay.

    Of course, the RTX 2060 Super isn’t entirely without merit either, as its lower power consumption means that the card will be running more quietly and won’t be hitting temperatures as high as the RX 5700 XT.